Does the difference between Europeans and Australian Aboriginals look like a Social Construct to you?

[Physics-Man]

Yes

No

Updates

+1 y

I always find a way to fuck up my questions; I should've added more pictures of Australian Aborigines.

[Anonymous]

No, and it's quite strange. I often see people say gender is a social construct, but sex is the biological thing.. yet they say race is a social construct when it reflects biological differences like sex..

To me it just looks like they lost track of the lie.

[SuccessfulHornDog]

Clearly you're filled with hate for questioning the latest liberal idiocy

[DevilsAdvocator]

So, you pick the single ugliest pics of Aboriginal Australians you can find, most likely from native reserves which have the highest rates of drugs abusers in the world; along with the most cherry-picked images of white people you could find to contrast them with? Tell me- does the difference between Europeans:

And Aboriginal Australians:

nice-women-facts.com/.../...-in-Australia-main.jpg

Look like a 'social construct' to you? Hmm?

[DevilsAdvocator]

And surprise surprise, here come the downvotes. Aww, what's the matter? Are your egos, and your illusions of supreme racial attractiveness, really that fragile?

[Physics-Man]

Nice try. I strictly typed 'Northern European people' and 'Southern European People' on Google and those were among the first images to pop up; and the rest were relatively close in attractiveness. I wasn't able to find any of those images. I strictly typed 'Australian Aborigines' on Google and those were among the first images which popped up; and in the rest of the first few pages, they were about as unattractive as the ones on this page I posted. Only quite a few were moderately attractive during the preliminary pages. None of the images you posted came up during the preliminary pages of even typing in 'white people', so it's quite obvious that you were the one doing the cherry picking and probably typed in 'funny white people' or something similar. By the way, even those ugly whites are better looking than the typical ugly phenotypes associated with Abos.

[Physics-Man]

How could they be fragile? Whites are the most desired race of people in the West. They're essentially the accepted definition of beauty.

[DevilsAdvocator]

'In the West'. Which, surprise surprise, is a 'region' defined, not by geography, but by the sociological classification of 'White European Nations'. So tell me, how on earth would they NOT be the most desired race of people in a 'region' defined only by the dominance of their own societal values? They're the accepted definition of beauty in 'The West'- i. e, in their own eyes- because it's exactly the same with any racial group anywhere in the world, and always has been.

[DevilsAdvocator]

"I strictly typed 'Australian Aborigines' on Google and those were among the first images which popped up; and in the rest of the first few pages, they were about as unattractive as the ones on this page I posted." Did you look at any of your sources? At where those images came from? All three of those images of Aboriginal peoples you posted came directly from a racial supremacist rant thread by a proud Australian neo-Nazi on Stormfront. Tell me, do you really believe that's a reliable source, for an unbiased presentation of relative attractiveness?

[Physics-Man]

Oops, sorry about that. I didn't check the source. But still, like I said, the other images there not from Neo-Nazi sites, which are the overwhelming majority, still aren't attractive.

[Physics-Man]

Let's converse in a civil manner please.

My bad. I should've added in the other parts of the world where they're desirable. In most of Asia they're also highly sought after by Asian women as well. Take a look at the my Charisma Man question for further verification. I don't know about the rest of the world like in Africa, but in all of the Americas, Asia, and Europe, and Oceania, they are viewed as the most attractive.

[DevilsAdvocator]

Given that the average Aboriginal Australian community has higher rates of alcoholism, tobacco, cannabis, heroin and other illegal drugs (including petrol sniffing, which has become fairly normal in Aboriginal communities from a young age, and is proven to have a massive detrimental impact on IQ); along with a far lower income rate, higher prevalence of broken families (thanks largely to the 'stolen generation', and the fallout from this in subsequent generations) than you'd get even on the worst Trailer Park in America, or the most ghetto black 'hood in the States? Yeah, no kidding they're gonna look like that.

[DevilsAdvocator]

And you know full well that the sexual attractiveness of men, in the eyes of women (ESPECIALLY Asian women, due to cultural and societal differences) has next to nothing to do with their appearance, or their genetics, and everything to do with their perceived fiscal and/or social value. In most of Asia, White men are highly sought after by Asian women; because they've built up a reputation as easy pickings, feeble emasculated submissive cucks who can be manipulated into providing them with anything and everything they want. You're the ones who facilitated the rise of Feminism, after all- that gives the impression that you, in general, don't have any boundaries or self-respect. And Asian women care about number one first and foremost, loudly and priudly stating facts like "As a man, you should get a good job so you can give money to your girlfriend", "I like him, but he doesn’t own a car", "I dated this guy for over a year and he doesn’t buy me enough gifts so I want to break up", "Why should I buy my boyfriend gifts? I’m a woman", "This man deserve to be cheated on, he lost his job"; why wouldn't that sort of woman see a white man as the most desirable of all? After all, you hold a disproportionate amount of wealth, and you're soft touches who'll never stand up for yourselves no matter what they do, or how much they leech off of you, because "we're the good guys, we're not like all these non-white savage hyper-masculine rapist thugs, we're so much nicer and more civilized and sensitive and caring than they are, we respect you women and support women's rights, because you can do anything we can do and more!"

[Physics-Man]

This is more of your opinion by the way, and I disagree with it. So let's agree that we disagree at the very least.

[Physics-Man]

Here's a video of an Abo female talking about the first time she ran into white people. Notice that she has a very similar appearance to the pictures I posted and to others on Google. There's nothing to suggest that she is on drugs or fell ill to other plagues from the English. In the past film sequences and images in the video you also them appearing very similar to her as well. This was around the time of contact as well.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=69LDbyl4Xjs

[Physics-Man]

Oh shit, my bad! That's the wrong video. I copied the wrong link.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C2nvaI5fhMs

[Physics-Man]

Many apologies. I wanted to post these videos to you prior, but I couldn't remember the titles. Here they are. They were made by a member of the incel community, so I'm not sure if you'll accept them.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gWD9n1cyeQU

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4agyEFFKJTY&t=168s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CaYbJLE5ySA&t=695s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f9uPDkOu5lw&t=9s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MP0CDxhQerM

[Starrk]

Your premise is based on a poor understanding of race, genetics and social construct.

Social Construct doesn't mean groups of people aren't different. Anyone with a functioning eye can tell that certain groups of people look different and similar to one another. When the science community says race is a social construct we're more so referring to how we categorize race and how we determine it.

The concept of Race came from the simple idea of "If they look similar then they must belong to the same genetic family". So Caucasian/White People are their own "genetic race" because they share similar features. Black people are their own "genetic race" because they share similar features. Asians are their own "genetic race" because they share similar features and so on. However, studies into the genes of these populations show that genetic populations are a lot more complex than that and that physical similarities DO NOT tell you what a person's genetic makeup looks like.

Just because two people share similar physical features (we call these phenotypes) doesn't mean they are genetically similar and this is evident when you look at various studies that look into genes. A white guy in Norway can be more genetically similar to the Black guy in Atlanta than he is to the White guy from France. A group of white men from France can be genetically more similar to a group of Japanese men living in Tokyo then they are to the group of white men living in New York.

So the concept of "biological races" fails once you actually look at the biology side of it. Without biology propping it up, the concept of race turns into nothing but a social concept.

[Physics-Man]

I've taken Honors courses in Anthropology and passed them with flying colors. This information is nothing new and doesn't necessarily dismiss the biology of race.

"A white guy in Norway can be more genetically similar to the Black guy in Atlanta than he is to the White guy from France. A group of white men from France can be genetically more similar to a group of Japanese men living in Tokyo then they are to the group of white men living in New York."

How can they be similar? Through genes right? And how do they measure these genes?

[Starrk]

"I've taken Honors courses in Anthropology and passed them with flying colors."

So you should be fully aware that the American Anthropological Association, debunked the concept of biological races.

www.americananthro.org/.../Content.aspx

How can they be similar? Through genes right? And how do they measure these genes?
Genetic similarities. As for how they measure the genes, that is a question better suited for a geneticist. The field of measuring gene expression is not my area of expertise. All I know for certain is that the various scientific fields such as biology and genetics reject the concept of race being a biological reality.

[Sweetnessxoxo]

This is interesso we’re the aboriginals more like indigenous americans or african? I know that they are australlian but Like do they have Asian roots or African roots?

[Sweetnessxoxo]

I hate my autocorrect

[Sweetnessxoxo]

I feel like you chose the worst images of them :/

[Physics-Man]

There were plenty of other ones where they looked pretty bad. I'd say they looked bad in the majority of them.

[Sweetnessxoxo]

Wow google must really think they're all ugly

[Physics-Man]

I think they're generally not so attractive looking people. Most at least, but not all.

[October808]

Probably South America and Asia.

[Testaccount65754]

They have the most Denisovan blood.

[Sweetnessxoxo]

@Testaccount65754 what is denisovan?

[Testaccount65754]

Hominid species that went extinct during the Pleistocene. Similar to Neanderthals.

[Sweetnessxoxo]

@Testaccount65754 I don't want to sound mean but why do they look like that? that kinda sucks

[WhiteShoulder]

@sweetnessxoxo a character in a novel I read was half Aboriginal and she was beautiful.

[DevilsAdvocator]

@sweetnessxoxo Coincidentally, in a move condemned by the UN and Human Rights organizations (but not widely publicized since you know, 1st World Countries can't do any wrong) Australia implemented the use of mass drug administration (MDA) as a method of combating the infectious diseases found commonly among Aboriginal peoples, while also highlighting the importance of "sanitation, access to clean water, good food, integrated vector control and management, childhood immunisations, and personal and family hygiene". The primary drug used by the Australian government, which was forcibly administered to all Aboriginal Australians, often against their will (as opposed to actually introducing proper sanition and infrastructure, because that would have been 'too costly')? Ivermectin. The primary adverse side effects of said drug? Neurotoxicity, and consequent ataxia (often resulting in atrial fibrillation), along with impaired bone marrow growth, and a vastly increased rate of cancer and other diseases, especially liver and kidney disease. But hey, I'm sure that the fact that the Aboriginal Australians have a disproportionately high rate of all these conditions, along with the highest rates of atrial fibrillation, liver and kidney disease, and cancer rates of any ethnic group in the world, is all purely coincidental, has nothing to do with the Australian government's Aboriginal MDA programs, and is all solely because "oh, they're genetically inferior, they've got inferior genes". Right?

[Sweetnessxoxo]

@DevilsAdvocator I don’t think they are inferior to others but that really sucks what you just told me

[October808]

They migrated while Pangaea was a thing. partly Asia and South America. Same places my ancestors probably came from.

[BestUserName100]

What is the difference.. Actually the aboriginals turns out is superior ones.

[Physics-Man]

How come?

[Jamie05rhs]

Does this question not seem racist to you?

[Physics-Man]

Not racist, but race realist. I don't believe the races have equal capabilities, and I believe that some races are better than others. To believe that we're exactly equal is absurd and quite frankly, politically correct. It's not really hateful, but something that needs to be pointed out. I recommend the YouTube channels: American Renaissance, Australian Realist, and the American Renaissance channel on BitChute if you want to learn more.

[Jamie05rhs]

I don't know, dawg. I don't really agree with that. But thanks for sharing your opinion.

[Physics-Man]

Take a look at those channels. They may change your mind. Start with the Amren channel on BitChute.

bitchute. com/channel/amrenaissance/

[Jamie05rhs]

I appreciate the suggestion, but I'm not really interested in that; thanks.

[Physics-Man]

Fair enough. Just please be conscious that there's plenty of evidence that suggests the races aren't equal, and that you're ostracizing yourself to it at the sake of continuing to believe in what you do.

[WhiteShoulder]

They look very different, but mentally and emotionally all races are the same.

[Physics-Man]

Genetically they're different. IQ wise, they're also different due to a majority of it being attributed to genetics.

[Sweetnessxoxo]

Are you saying that aboriginals are stupid lol?

[Testaccount65754]

Behavior is influenced by genes, like everything. There is a reason Chimpanzees act differently from Humans. If humans differ physically, there is a 100% chance of behavioral differences too.

[Jesse0]

The people who disliked this comment believe in evolution

[WhiteShoulder]

@Jesse0 I believe in evolution. But mentally and emotionally all humans are the same. There are cultural differences, but even those aren’t universal.

[Jesse0]

Yeah I agree too but these people think they aren't mentally and emotionally the same.

[WhiteShoulder]

@Physics-Man there are no IQ differences between different races. If there are studies that suggest there are, they are probably either based on flawed data or deliberately rigged.

[WhiteShoulder]

@Jesse0 oh ok

[Jesse0]

The reason why I said they believe in evolution was because back then the aborigines were killed for their skulls to be held in museums.

[Physics-Man]

@WhiteShoulder

There are plenty, and I mean PLENTY of studies which suggest that there are unequal differences among the races in intelligence. I understand that you're a female and as a result, your empathic, loving, and nurturing demeanor shines through here in believing that we're all equal. But it's simply not the. But maybe I'm being too harsh. You just can't help to think with your heart instead of your brain. There's nothing wrong with your nature; that's how women are programmed to act. But you're wrong.

[Physics-Man]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O8sO86jRdOM

[Physics-Man]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YsjCBxiY9z0

[Physics-Man]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6rEjrxCeIe4&t=363s

[Physics-Man]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ecJEYplQzXU

[Physics-Man]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3eV2Sc3pnBA&t=92s

[Jesse0]

@Physics-Man
Aboriginals only have had western education for 2 - 4 generations and their languages doesn't even have writing. The IQ tests were designed by Westerners and they test for concepts that are common in Western environments, thought patterns and lifestyle. It's their culture, pure culture and tradition.

[Physics-Man]

@Jesse0
The need for a system of writing is a fundamental sign of intelligence, as only the lowest IQ races have never had them. The Raven Progressive Matrices IQ test is completely culture neutral. But they still do poorly at that one as well. Repeating memorized strings of numbers forwards and backwards is another type of culture neutral IQ test which Ashkenazi Jews do the best at followed by Asians, Caucasians, Hispanics, Sub-Saharan Africans, then Abos. Furthermore, IQ tests measure intelligence, not educational level. Another thing I find interesting is when people say that the reason blacks and Abos do poorly on IQ tests is because they're biased towards whites and Western culture, yet Asians and Jews do better at them than Whites do. Moreover, why don't blacks come up with a black biased IQ test where whites do poorly on to prove their point of it being biased?

[Jesse0]

@Physics-Man
The average western middle-class child has had 1000 hours of reading practice with their parents by the time they start school. An Australian Aboriginal still living in a traditional society will more than likely have had none. But I bet you they could already survive on their own catching fish and hunting food.

There is an example that I just found where Aboriginal children were tested before and after a special 2 hour test induction, in groups including white children. After the induction many of their scores jumped significantly, even from the bottom half to the top quartile.

Using IQ scores would suggest the average Indigenous Australian is suffering mental retardation. Judging these people’s intelligence based on IQ tests is ridiculous and absurd in the extreme. I'd strongly suggest anyone using these IQ test results to judge their intelligence is the retard. Sorry, but true.

[Physics-Man]

@Jesse0

Can you provide a link to that study? Please know that educational testing isn't the same as IQ testing. One measures knowledge, the other measures the ability to learn, solve problems, and think at a critical level; different areas. IQ cannot be drastically increased within 2 hours by the way; it tends to remain relatively static. And yes, they're technically retarded. Why wouldn't they be? By the time the English had arrived in Australia, they hadn't invented the wheel, domesticated a single beast of burden, hadn't invented a single mechanical device, didn't have a written language, didn't have an account of their history or have a calendar, and had never built a structure taller than 20 feet and older than a century. All of these suggest an extremely low level of intelligence.

[Jesse0]

Look up aboriginal test induction scores.

[DevilsAdvocator]

Genetically, they're different. But those differences between extant human 'races' are so laughably small, and arbitrary, that they're effectively non-existent. If you applied the same genetic standards to define a human 'race' as we did with dog and cat 'breeds', where there's a minimum genetic divergence required to register a new breed, then the last separate 'races' of humanity which existed were Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis and Homo Sapiens Denisova. And the single most genetically divergent extant 'race' of humanity, the Khoi San, who diverged from the rest of humankind since the Toba supereruption 70,000 years ago (the single most ancient, largely unbroken lineage of huamnity, descended from an isolated group of survivors who comprised roughly 1/13th of humanity at the time, with the single greatest genetic diversity known among human populations by a huge margin, greater than the sum total of any and all human populations who ventured out of Africa later on)- still only has just over 1/4th of the required genetic divergence, from the rest of humanity, to qualify as a different 'race'/'breed', if we applied the same scientific standards used for dog and cat breeders. As for the 'white race', well, that's the most laughable of all. Even if you include Arabs, Indo-Aryans, and Slavs, the Human Genome project's confirmed that the Khoi-San alone have more than a hundred times the genetic diversity than all of you lot combined do. Regarding genetic value, there's more genetic variation between a pair of Khoi-san siblings than there is between a pair of random unrelated White Europeans. But hey, I'm sure you're the 'superior race'...

[Physics-Man]

@DevilsAdvocator

This article offers an excellent counter to the genetic diversity argument.

en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin%27s_Fallacy

[Anonymous]

What provoked this question? We’re you reading/watching something related to this?

[mattdzz]

They're genetically different, obviously.

[KatoMagnus]

It looks like an evolutionary construct.

[Jesse0]

They are literally just another race.

[Soteris]

Yes it does. Show me scientific proof if you want.

[Testaccount65754]

Science is a social construct though, say thing with the concept of "proof" since it was made up by humans.

[Soteris]

@Testaccount65754 No. Science is the tool we use to understand the world. The world exist and is correct regardless of our understanding so science simply uncovers things that has always been there.

[Testaccount65754]

Science is a social construct made up by humans, it doesn't actually exist in nature.

"A social construct is something that exists not in objective reality, but as a result of human interaction. It exists because humans agree that it exists."

Yes the world does actually exist, but all of the categories, words, and labels we use are made up. Science and proof are all vernacular and made up.

[Soteris]

@Testaccount65754 Well yeah, tools does not naturally exist either.. That does not make them any less real or useful though and again, Science is the tool which we use to find the truth of the world. A scientific proof is not science itself but a piece of the universe we have found.

[Testaccount65754]

It's the same thing with race, you can see the physical differences. So since race is a social construct then so is science, proof, trees, plants, animals, everything.

Science is also extremely recent, humans for most of history have not used it. How do you know science will remain the tool we use to learn about the universe in the next 10,000 years? We may have moved onto something better or worse.