4.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It’s not right for anyone to be attacked.
Even though I don’t understand why women would support Trump when he’s had a long history of being an adulterous womanizer who bribes his way through his own bullshit, doesn’t mean the deserve to be attacked. They’re allowed to be as ignorant and naive as they want without violence.00 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
Because it doesn’t happen often as women being attacked/harassed for the way they dress, and the victim in the article you’re talking about is a boy not a girl?
I don’t think it was ok that happened to the teen but consider the fact that the stuff trump has done has actively hurt many people from various backgrounds it makes sense for the guys anger at the maga hat. And the fact that the teenager wanted to “debate”
Many people have been effected and hurt and even killed by the shit that trumps done. Yet this kid wants to debate, they can debate cause they aren’t personally effected by anything that happened during trumps presidency.337 Reply- Asker+1 y
Minorities are in the situations they are in because of themselves. I’m guessing a shit load of minorities where wealthy whenever Obama was president… oh wait they weren’t. Obama must hate minorities. That is how dumb your argument is. Stop blaming one person for millions of people’s failures.
- Asker+1 y
Lol because I don’t like a person who points guns at pregnant women?
- Asker+1 y
And u support someone who is a drug addict and doesn’t give a shit about pregnant women.
- Asker+1 y
Since when did I mention new nazis and white suprematists in this thread?
- Asker+1 y
Last time I checked Trump created a shit ton of jobs for black people when he was president and he calls black Americans Americans where as leftists call them African Americans.
- +1 y
This arguments weak at best. Trump did sign legislation to establish opportunity zones however statistically speaking Obama had contributed a lot and that can be linked to bettering economic conditions for the black community.
Not to mention this doesn’t excuse the fact that trump refused to explicitly condemn white supremacists from Charlottesville, not to mention the fact that his xenophobic and racist rhetorics have been consistently praised by white nationalists and far right extremists - Asker+1 y
Your favourite thing to do is to talk about people who represent less than 1 percent of the population and to call people racist and sexist
- Asker+1 y
I am not taking about me specifically.
- Asker+1 y
Meanwhile you out all trump supports into one bubble
- Asker+1 y
*you put
- Asker+1 y
So a few is enough to judge 50 million plus?
- +1 y
" when you guys have no good argument to make you just choose to change the subject "
indeed it is a common tactic these trumptards do. it's called 'pivoting' and they hope you won't notice when they do it. :P - +1 y
@doopayo: Locker room talk about prostitutes isn't proof that someone is a rapist. It just means that he has a jock athlete stereotype crass attitude about certain women. Spit out the Tide Pods, and use your head a little.
You were told he was a rapist by a network full of men who blackmail each other's children into sex, then try to force them to have abortions they don't want in order to cover it up, then deny paternity until DNA tests make that impossible, then tell their wives too bad when the scandal goes public.
Let's not forget how many Hollywood screeching Trump haters were shown to have ties to Epstein. Big Adrenochrome was most affected by his presidency. And global pedos pulled out all the stops to bring him down in retaliation.
But don't worry, I don't want Trump back. I want someone who will be horrorcore on draining the swamp, rather than simply talk about it. Someone who will go full Duterte on Soros and his endless flying monkeys. Who will send Reptillary on a one-way trip to the surface of Venus, and #LaunchObamaDirectlyIntoTheSun. Who will go RoboCop-Terminator on Common Core publishers, and reduce all of them to wearing pink pants on the chain gang. Who will declare GLSEN a terrorist organization, and make Melissa Klein the Secretary of Commerce. Who will hunt down socialist activist judges like animals, and utter Rorschach's line regarding their fate. Someone who will give Jefferson's Tree something to drink, rather than simply talk about imaginary walls of concrete that never happen. - +1 y
@obsecuredbeyond boy, no. There’s proof, always been proof.
The dudes talked about his literally daughter on television innapropriatly
https://youtu.be/-5oYfc5CXZA
https://youtu.be/DP7yf8-Lk80
He’s rich, so he pays off his victims to stay quiet, and when that fails. He pays off media companies to stay quiet and not elevate the victims voices.
And I’m pretty sure everybody knows about the modeling incident where trump would literally abuse his power to look at naked beauty contestants.
https://youtu.be/tyhXSDeU_Oc
Oh, and you can also check Wikipedia for a master class list of sexual assaults and rapes committed by trump.
The reason why they’re only allegations is because he’s rich, and I’m pretty sure everyone in the us knows the justice systems fucked and bias. So the idea that Trump gets to pay his way out of jail is very possible.
en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
And now onto how Hollywood trump haters had ties to Epstein, trump himself had ties to Epstein as well. So what’s you’re point?
In fact, trump even referred to him Once being a terrific guy. He spent a lot of time with ghislane macwell and Jeffery Epstein, considering the fact that on average you can’t expect the best from rich douchbags the fact he might’ve had larger more criminal ties to Epstein isn’t a bad one. Especially taking into account for the creepy ways he used to talk about his own daughter.
This guys pathetic. That also explains why at a debate trump was such a pathetic loser, he decided to defend his penis size. In my opinion, that’s a pathetic middle schooler move for the president of the USA at the time to be making.
It’s absolutely embarrassing.
www.google.com/.../trump-penis-republican-debate-fox - +1 y
Yeah these trumptards keep conveniently leaving out the fact that he was buddy buddy with epstein
- +1 y
@Still-alive : Which is why he banned Epstein from Trump Tower for life, while the likes of Oprah continued to mollycoddle him.
- +1 y
@ObscuredBeyond citation needed
- +1 y
Because they are hypocrits obviously. Have you ever heard these people speak? They are children who don't want any accountability for themselves or their actions, that is why they can flip their opinions and views so quickly to suit their needs because the belief wasn't what mattered the outcome was what mattered to them (namely them being able to do what ever they want without consequence).
20 Reply
670 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because feminism is a closed door cult.
They might claim that they want rights for all women but what they really want are unearned privileges for themselves and their direct supporters.
You can't count on a "feminist" to side with justice unless that justice plays into her narrative.00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
35Opinion
Either way it is a woman being attacked which is still wrong. I personally don't understand why a single woman would ever get behind that sex offender but it is their poor choice to make. They should not physically be assaulted for it though.
988 Reply- Asker+1 y
What about sniffy Biden?
- Asker+1 y
Don’t understand why women would get behind a sex offender even though Biden is a sex offender
- Asker+1 y
Who do u think is the best USA president of all time?
- Asker+1 y
- s+1 y
I'm going to love playing with you because I am really good at research.
Your story took place in Austin TX where a second video came out showing the interaction between her and police taken by a 3rd party. Haley there got with a political strategist and posted her account of events. The ACTUAL story was no assault even occurred until Haley started filming the guy and getting in his face which at a later point he finally hit her for her invading his privacy.
Police are also shown on the second video saying it is ok she wore a maga hat and that the guy shouldn't have said anything but she should not have been making things worse by following him around with a camera in his face. - Asker+1 y
But if it was a black person you would believe it was a racist attack?
- s+1 y
Are we playing whataboutisms? This is my favorite game to play when people like yourself run out of steam with their initial post.
No. I wouldn't believe that at all. You could replace maga hat with BLM, defund police, a UT vs a Texas A&M hat that point is still the same. Somebody didn't like and said something. Wearer of hat made it worse by busting out her phone and recording that person in their face while yelling and screaming at them. - Asker+1 y
Well the majority of people who get attacked for wearing maga hats are men. So much for male privilege
- Asker+1 y
Ok so we went from all men are sexual predators to not all black men are dangerous
- s+1 y
... what?
Oh honey, did you forget to take your medicine again? Do we need to guide you back to trained medical staff so they can take you back to your padded room?
Nobody said any of those things here except you and that was just now. You are like exceptionally bad at this, aren't you? - Asker+1 y
Leftist women say it all the time
- Asker+1 y
Let’s put all men in one bubble but cancel anyone who puts a particular race in one bubble. (Other than white people of course)
- s+1 y
All the time? Like literally? Someone asks them what they want for dinner and they just parrot that line over and over?
I think you are prone to exaggeration and I think you have completely lost your narrative after having it systematically erased before it began. It is ok if you want to stop now. There is no shame in it. Well.. a little shame, but nobody has to know but you and I. It can be our little secret.
Or... you can go on and deny you are losing, after all, conservatives think that all the time too. 😁 - Asker+1 y
If u aren’t a democrat or a conservative then what are you?
- s+1 y
I am a centrist who likes ideas from both sides and think both sides have also become too radicalized.
Also for @bones0271 apparently male privilege not existing must only be when in reference to a dictionary. - s+1 y
Well, you came on this thread to say incredibly dumb things that offered no real substance to the conversation and clearly you can't spell, so excuse me if we all don't take any credence in what you think I sound like when you sound like you flunked out of middle school and would struggle finding your way out of a blanket tossed over your head.
- s+1 y
Omg!
You got it right this time! Look at you. There is hope for you yet. I won't throw too much at you tonight, but you have shown marked improvement in your learning abilities.
Also, you haven't really argued any point about male privilege other than just saying those words. Can you provide any examples or am I supposed to just take you at face value because of your male privilege? - s+1 y
Outpacing you, yes. Embarrassing you, yes. Trolling, not yet. You haven't even seen me to begin to troll.
If you are going to enter a space of debate and try to be a hype guy for one side, don't be surprised when you get pulled into that debate. You came into this post, tried to be insulting and have been absolutely made a fool of for your efforts.
At least the other guy tried to provide examples. You just simply exist as the leftovers of a conversation that should have ended about 15 posts ago, but instead you keep posting and coming back for more.
I promise you that I can completely emasculate you further, but I am extending an olive branch to you as well. Just end this topic and let's call it a day. - +1 y
I agree with you, down with murdoch media. No he doesn't get captol letters. He's as bad as the current owner of 8chan.
- +1 y
It doesn't exist, maybe at some point it did. That is like saying whites are privileged, the idea why someone would be promoted over someone else as being white or male... Is the aspect if they are considered more reliable or knowledgeable. I had a female friend that was promoted and given an opportunity to excel I gave her support, even though I was more experienced and knowledgeable about the work. I was there temporarily, I didn't want a promotion there. I did not set her up for failure, I wanted her to succeed. I tried to impart wisdom on her, when she did things her way it was a complete mess, I had to constantly clean up after her. I also had other work I was assign to do a massive overhaul on a facility. I tried real hard to teach her, when I was about 50% done I moved to a different state. Her behaviour towards me as her friend was way too much, I felt her friendship was a way for her to say whatever she wanted. She ultimately was terminated, I spent a lot of money for her to get her life together. I can't not stop my life to go back and help do it all over again. I understand you are angry, in many ways you should.
This only perpetuates, anger amongst the people you are trying to educate. Good luck - +1 y
So apparrently, when you are unsuccessful arguing one point to support your idiology you shift to another point hoping something will stick. I probably agree with you guys on something but for different reasons. I think the radical left and radical right have a fleeting relationship with reality.
If you want to argue a point successfully, I recommend the following: Do your research. Use only peer reviewed, verified sources. Learn what the most common logical falicies are and avoid them. Most important, don't start a battle of words with a lawyer. ;)
by the way Ez, I'm terrible at typing on my phone and spelling in general. So, I appologize in advance for misspellings and typos. - s+1 y
Lmao forgiven.
I will say this though, I am not a lawyer even if I really wanted to be one when I was younger.
In reality I am just a former waitress, call center rep and online gambler who found a career in technology and used hard work to get where she is now. I watched several guys get job positions that I had already been doing and my only response was to keep working harder until they had no choice except to give me the job or lose the only person who knew the systems inside and out to another department.
Now I work for a new group getting to work with software engineers. I get to learn by watching them and see how they work. One day in the next few years, I may be there myself. If not, I'll just keep working harder until they have no choice.
Not bad for a girl with only a semester of college behind her, don't you think? 🙂 - +1 y
@bones0271 typing and driving
- +1 y
That is a great acheivement, we all have been there with people getting promoted that don't deserve it. While I was doing the actual work he was brown nosing the new manager, I helped the old one get promoted by my work. I didn't have time to suck up to the new manager and stroke his ego. The new manager was highly inefficient, was a labor intense guy, was terrible at the database. I walked out of door and I was on overtime, I left, I had too much work to do. Well my coworker and I interviewd for the posistion, even though my work performance put the other guy to shame, he got it. I left, after awhile, too much work not enough time or help, plus many other reasons. The whole place fell apart and I was the same kind of support across the network, I had many coworkers call me to tell me the mess it had become. Now, I make more than I the coworker does, and much less work. Hard work does pay off, because when people know what you can do, they pay a lot of money to do it.
- s+1 y
Thank you. I am sure you can tell just by this thread alone, I am always willing to go above and beyond to find answers to things and not just take things at face value. This is why I am a centrist politically. I am not going to blindly follow someone just because they wear the colors I am used to voting for. With my work, I take even more pride there. I want to know my job and the job of everyone around me. I honestly believe management should be able to cover at least 50 % of all the tasks their team is responsible for. I can't expect it of my superiors if I can't do it myself.
In the end, I just refuse to not be valuable in some way and I want to force them to look at me for those positions that guys tend to get easier, especially in a tech field. - +1 y
That maybe a place where men are privileged at, I have a book called "practical binary analysis." It is assumed that men are more likely to spend the time to dive deep into tech subjects more than women. Not the assumption that men are more capable. It is sad I usually stay off social media, because it is a cesspool. I was looking for answers to questions, for the persuit of knowledge and wisdom. My experience has helped people here, but the hate is crazy. So, everybody just stops listening. I really hope you prove hard work and passion gets you that career you want. Good luck
- +1 y
Never knew Trump got convicted of being a sex offender? Maybe in the court of some peoples public opinions. But the same goes for Biden.
You ask them for proof about Biden well let's see the proof that Trump is a sex offender.
Also you don't understand why women would stand behind a sex offender. Let me help you with that. Trump being a sex offender is your opinion plenty of women don't share. It's not factual. Hope that clears it up for you.😎 - s+1 y
I gave 2 of the first 10 results. Ezpz search. Probably the easiest research I've ever had to do to counter someone on here. Thanks for making my part easy.
Please also assure yourself that I'm not liberal either so I am not saying Biden is a Saint though those weirdos who claim he eats babies or whatever need mental assistance. - s+1 y
Here is a pretty good list i found. Good lord the last one is absolutely true.
If you have a bad day or are in a bad mood, people aren’t going to blame it on your gender.
You can be careless with your money and not have people blame it on your gender.
You can be a careless driver and not have people blame it on your gender.
You can be confident that your coworkers won’t assume you were hired because of your gender.
- s+1 y
If you are never promoted, it isn’t because of your gender.
You can expect to be paid equitably for the work you do and not paid less because of your gender.
If you are unable to succeed in your career, that won’t be seen as evidence against your gender in the workplace.
A decision to hire you won’t be based on whether the employer assumes you will be having children in the near future.
You can generally work comfortably (or walk down a public street) without the fear of sexual harassment.
You can generally walk alone at night without the fear of being raped or otherwise harmed.
You can go on a date with a stranger without the fear of being raped.
You can dress how you want and not worry it will be used as a defense if you are raped.
If you are straight, you are not likely to be abused by your partner nor be told to continue living in an abusive household for your children.
You can decide not to have children and not have your masculinity questioned.
If you choose to have children, you will be praised for caring for your children instead of being expected to be the full-time caretaker.
You can balance a career and a family without being called selfish for not staying at home (or being constantly pressured to stay at home).
If you are straight and decide to have children with your partner, you can assume this will not affect your career.
If you rise to prominence in an organization/role, no one will assume it is because you slept your way to the top.
You can seek political office without having your gender be a part of your platform.
- s+1 y
You can seek political office without fear of your relationship with your children, or whom you hire to take care of them, being scrutinized by the press.
Most political representatives share your gender, particularly the higher-ups.
Your political officials fight for issues that pertain to your gender, or at least don’t dismiss your issues as “special interest.”
You can ask for the “person in charge” and will likely be greeted by a member of your gender.
a child, you were able to find plenty of non-limiting, non-gender-role-stereotyped media to view.
You can disregard your appearance without worrying about being criticized at work or in social situations.
You can spend time on your appearance without being criticized for upholding unhealthy gender norms.
If you’re not conventionally attractive (or in shape), you don’t have to worry as much about it negatively affecting your social or career potential.
You’re not expected to spend excessive amounts of money on grooming, style, and appearance to fit in, while making less money.
You can have promiscuous sex and be viewed positively for it.
You can go to a car dealership or mechanic and assume you’ll get a fair deal and not be taken advantage of.
Colloquial phrases and conventional language reflect your gender (e. g., mailman, “all men are created equal”).
Every major religion in the world is led by individuals of your gender.
You can practice religion without subjugating yourself or thinking of yourself as less because of your gender.
You are unlikely to be interrupted in conversations because of your gender
5.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Why does whataboutism still feel like making a real point to some people when the Republican party openly embraces hypocrisy as something they are proud of getting away with?
427 Reply- Asker+1 y
Lmao u r talking about the Republican Party being hypocrites? How about you go to another peaceful protest and burn and loot businesses dumb lefty.
- Asker+1 y
Are party doesn’t burn and loot a whole state purely because of a thug who points guns at pregnant women’s body’s.
- Asker+1 y
*our
- Asker+1 y
So you wouldn’t want Trump to be murdered by the police? If a man raped you would you not want him to be murdered by the police?
- Asker+1 y
How is that irrelevant? You literally said no one should be murdered for their past actions.
- Asker+1 y
“Ah yes, because of someone’s past actions it justifies them being brutally murdered by the police.”
- +1 y
I was using irony to reply to the fact that you think George Floyd should’ve been shot because of something he’s done in the past despite the fact that many white people have been arrested peacefully despite doing fucked up shit in the present or even past.
But no, that’s not a problem. Black people should be shot, am I right - Asker+1 y
Many white people have been shot for no reason as well. But people like u ignore that and go straight to making black people the victims.
- +1 y
What happened to Zach was sad. And shouldn’t have happened but to try and blame this on black people for not bringing awareness to this is kind of.. illogical?
We aren’t super heroes and we aren’t going to be able to support every single case and issue that comes up, so to claim that his case didn’t get national outcry cause he’s white is a huge lie.
No ones ignoring the issue, people in the black community knows this stuff happens. That’s why we’re fighting for police reform so that people like Zach, and any people for that matter don’t have to loose their lives.
Not to mention, statistically black men face a significantly higher lifetime risk on average of being killed by a police officer by force. That’s the reason why people are talking about it so much recently.
Lastly, the media covers what’s popular. This is a fact, that’s just how they get money. So they cover black cases of police brutality because blm has risen in popularity recently.
None of this is black people as a wholes fault or “people that think like me’s” fault.
I don’t work in the news. Simple as that - +1 y
- Asker+1 y
Black people face higher risk because by ratio they commit more crimes.
- +1 y
@Asker you would be the first republican I've come across in a while that wasn't excited to be called a hypocrite. Most of y'all are downright proud of it. Like you get some sense of "family" out of being able to lie to anyone outside your bubble knowing everyone within the bubble will cover for you.
Also, no whole states have been burned down. There was an insurrection you people tried to do, though. That was wild (as promised). Though it is the case that I believe black lives matter, and so I should denounce illegal activity done in its same. However, it's important to remember that much of the vandalism in black lives matter protests were actually done by white supremacists trying to de-legitimize the protests. On the other hand, your side has an ever-dwindling number of people who pretend to believe the lie that trump won the election. Yet your side still resolutely covers for those who instigated and participated in the attempted insurrection. You'll still vote for them. You still support them. Because you're a hypocrite.
And the far right fake news tells you the left doesn't care when white people are shot by cops but they are lying to you. This is the problem with creating a culture of lies within your bubble: you can no longer tell when you are being lied to. - Asker+1 y
Oh great another person who thinks that everyone is American.
- Asker+1 y
@normalice
- Asker+1 y
You do "you'll still vote for them" eventhough that isn't possible because I am not American
- +1 y
@Asker In the data you provided it shows that white people commit the majority of the crimes, why don’t you talk about that issue? Or you can talk about something more productive, for example. Rather than linking crime to race. Crime has many different factors.. like I pointed out proximity, neighborhood (less well of neighborhoods are linked to having higher crime rates and most black people disproportionately live in neighborhoods that are neglected by the government.)
Horrible infrastructures, alcohol, gun stores. This isn’t coincidental, the government does it on purpose. If you go to new York ever I’d love for you to just do an experiment by going to a predominately white neighborhood and going to a predominantly Hispanic/black neighborhood and seeing how stark the difference is on average.
Research structural racism: www.americanprogress.org/.../
Or how during the war on drugs even though cocaine and crack where made up of the exact same molecules, the minimum sentence at the time the minimum sentence for possession of five grams of crack was five years. But you needed 500 grams of powder cocaine to face a similar sentence.
White people where statistically proven to take as many drugs, if not more drugs, and become more frequent drug addicts than black people but yet black people were stopped and jailed way more times.
Black people were 6% more likely to be stopped and searched for drugs than white people. The justice system was built on racism and classism, not justice.
The same reason they ignore women who are beaten, stabbed and murdered for wearing a hijab. It’s not about female empowerment. Feminism is a movement aimed at giving middle class women something to feel oppressed about and feel they need to liberate themselves from (in this case the patriarchy). This is all a guise, in an effort to achieve the main goal, controlling reproduction and in turn the population 🌈✨the more you know✨🌈
10 Reply10.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Everyone who wears a "maga" hat is basically asking for it regardless of their gender or orientation.
It's like tying shark chump to a fuckwit and throwing them in the ocean, but demanding no sharks be allowed near them.
The whole reasoning behind "maga" is pernicious and 4th Reich -esque00 Reply- +1 y
Because anything related to a left wing ideology, including feminism is a lie. They are not interested in equality. They’re interested in compliance. Not attacking women based on what they wear only applies to those who vote for the prescribed party. This is a common thread in all left wing ideology. They want complete compliance and are total hypocrites and liars.
10 Reply - Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
Look how they attacked Kavanaugh over some bullshit alegation that was 30 years old, but they don't say shit about Anderew Cuomo.
90 Reply - +1 y
Someone mentioned Kavanaugh below but disallowed replies. Coward. If you read the transcript, Kavanaugh lied during his own deposition, and got away with it, thanks to the Republicans. He flat out, fucking lied. Question is - why would a woman blow up her own life, and the life of her kids, to make a false accusation?
00 Reply - +1 y
Why do turkeys who don't want to get eaten for Thanksgiving ignore lobsters who get eaten in seafood restaurants?
33 Reply- Asker+1 y
So u think that people who are wearing MAGA hats are asking to be assaulted?
- +1 y
No, I think that sandwiches are not fruit
- Asker+1 y
Don’t get the point u r trying to make. All I know is that a hat is a piece of clothing and a skirt is a piece of clothing
Feminist never cared about women, they care about subverting cultural norms and demoralizing people. That is their role as communist infiltrators.
30 Reply- Anonymous(25-29)+1 y
For the same reason they won't say shit about JoJO the Pedo. They don't give a fuck.
31 Reply- Asker+1 y
True
Because MAGA hats aren't about gender, they are about ideology. So the attack isn't towards a woman's feminism. Think of it this way, calling someone fat is insensitive but not racist. Calling a woman racist isn't misogynist.
20 ReplyIf they had consistency, morals, integrity, intelligence, decency, or valuable social skills, they wouldn't be feminists. Hypocrisy and projection are every feminists' sword and shield.
00 Reply6.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because they are leftists first and foremost and would like to see their political opponents killed or imprisoned.
20 Reply- +1 y
They mean, no woman who self-ascribes as a feminist should be attacked. Any woman who does not side with the feminist movement, they pretty much feel she should be burned at the stake as a heretic.
21 Reply- +1 y
So they're a cult at this point. Most logical explanation so far.
- Anonymous(18-24)+1 y
Those hats are strongly associated with white supremacy. It’s like if a girl wore a swastika then ya you should call her out on it
27 Reply- Asker+1 y
And blm is strongly associated with black supremacy.
- Opinion Owner+1 y
Proof that BLM people want to round up white people in concentration camps and gas them with Xyklon B? Or are you just a closet racist yourself?
- Asker+1 y
I never said that.
- +1 y
I don't think they are associated with white supremacy at all, I've never heard any official statement from Trump or anyone saying they are for white supremacist's only. I see lots of minority people over the last few years wearing them.
I think someone has a personal opinion that they are, when most people don't think they are.
Heck even the swastika has a very different meaning for actual pagans, if you read up on how the German's took a symbol from them, altered it slightly and came up with the swastikas'.
There is nothing bad about "Make America Great Again." - Opinion Owner+1 y
@Dragonpurple “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”
Also the hat was featured prominently on the white supremacist/racist rally in Charlotte. - +1 y
Still not evidence that that means its white supremacy, just cause a few jerks wear them. I respect your opinion on the matter though, that you think they are and disagree as I do not and never will think they are.
- +1 y
The dude who said black supremacy is pretty correct tbh. I’ve seen so many black people talk about black people being superior to white people and how white people are colonizing genetic mutations that weren’t meant to exist. They say that white cops kill us more because we’re better and they know that so the BLM movement is to make it known. If that isn’t literal racism and black supremacy then I don't know what is.
12.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Ever notice is is always girls or elderly people that get attacked by the people from the left. Anyone that can fight back gets a good leaving alone buy these cowards.
00 ReplyI've never thought of that. It's a great point! I gave your question a "thumbs up!" It will be interesting to read the responses.
00 Reply- +1 y
That is a very good question. I have no idea, but feminists seem to do whatever they think at the time and it is always right.
00 Reply Liberalists with an agenda, and the MAGA hats are "non-people" to them, so they don't matter.
10 Reply- +1 y
I say woman shouldn't be attacked, period. End of discussion.
00 Reply - Show More (26)
Learn more