Chivalry.
Particularly when it involves women.
According to Ms. Magazine, this is considered a "tool of the Patriarchy" and that it "contributes to a world in which women are not equal to men." They also go through the shady history behind it (as they like to do with everything they want to demonize), even though it has nothing to do with how it's preceived today.
The idea behind chivalry—at least today and imo—is simply to take joy in being courteous. Feminists think men only do it to women, but they forget that men also do it to other men, to the elderly, and to children.
They think men do it because they believe the persons they are being courteous to are weaker and less capable—thus, not equal to them. But they fail to understand that sometimes its just nice to have things done for you, even though you can clearly do them yourself.
Who tf thinks women are incapable of opening a goddamn door?
They also don't understand the natural male desire to want to be "protectors" and "providers." Men don't do it to show superiority... but I don't expect feminists today to be interested in what men feel, since they're too preoccupied with what they THINK men feel.
Most Helpful Opinions
Bingo.
They hate male masculinity and want to replace it with femininity.
But they really just covet it, which is why their ideal of "sTrOnG fEmAlE cHaRaCtErS" are just butch dykes, who outclass all men at everything, acting like pseudo-alpha males, to begin with.
Or in simple language, they want to replace strong men and make them as weak as they see all women as. They think femininity and being a woman is a weakness/flaw.
It depends on the type of feminist.
While I don't consider myself one, I think it's pretty clear that there can be toxic masculinity, and toxic femininity.
Just as there can be healthy masculinity and healthy femininity.
A simple model to consider when understanding the difference is via archetypal psychology.
Some of the four major masculine archetypes are: The King, The Warrior, The Magician and the Lover. Each of these archetypes has its shadow, or toxic, aspects.
For instance, a man who embodies his King archetype is noble, respected, powerful and takes care of his Kingdom. But when this archetype turns toxic, he enters the shadow of the King, which is either The Tyrant or The Weakling. Adolf Hitler was a Tyrant King, for example. I won't go through each archetype, I'm sure you get the idea.
I think that it's important to acknowledge that humans can be toxic. Nobody is immune.
The kind that isn't afraid to cry. The kind that's not threatened by other guyscuz territorial issues. The kind that understands that a woman should have a bigger say in whether she's getting abortion or not. The kind that doesn't slut shame whether he gets laid or not. The kind that doesn't engage in gender wars. The kind that is sexual but not pussy whipped. The kind that blushes. The kind that tries to understand female language rather than calling them difficult and moving on. The kind that's worth risking everything for.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
29Opinion
Any form of "masculinity" that pedestalizes them and allows them to exploit men is not seen as toxic. So basically true masculinity is something they consider toxic, while at the same time ironically crave in a man.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/PlpFMTx4FHs
Other than that. The term toxic masculinity is invented by women nobody wants to fuck, to describe the men they do want to fuck. I had shared the following video of Andrew Tate debunking toxic masculinity under another post, but the snowflake user decided to remove it lmfao. Andrew Tate debunks it perfectly:Neo-Feminism is honestly the most laughable 'movement' on the planet. A group of self-loathing bull-dykes that stand for nothing but the continued deterioration of our first world countries. However, one of the least impactful. Whereas 'politics,' the 'news,' 'entertainment,' and so called 'education' are the most.
I think that most feminists probably would want a man to be manly/masculine. But they just don't want the common "negative" traits associated with it. It's why I think they'd be completely okay with a submissive but masculine guy. Like a guy that's still very manly but he does what she says and acts how she wants him to. You see this stuff all of the time on films directed by or where the plot is heavily influenced by feminists/feminism.
Modern feminists want equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. They want to vote, they don't want to go to war. They want men to treat them with benefits of traditional women (providing and protecting for them) without any of the responsibility.
I disagree, I believe that the issue is the toxicity not the masculinity
There is no such thing as "toxic masculinity" or "toxic femininity", only toxic behavior, and both men and women do it.
Attributing it to one gender or the other is the kind of bullshit divisiveness that we have disgusting feminists and MGTOWs to thank for.Masculinity that don't force other's there will onto other people. You can be macho that's fine but there is no need to tell other's to be so and shame them for not been so.
None it's ridiculous. They want to turn men into chicks. Then complain how their men are pussies.
they just hate all men unless they're wimps... and even then...
None.
Snowflake feminism just needs to get it's act together and stop thinking it's the 60's. The world is moving on faster than themThey just prefer to blame specific terminology for their problems and do nothing about it but propagate misinformation and their half-assed thoughts to those who build their life on them.
It seems like no days off him and his having attitude and they had to prove that they're bigger and better and Boulder I just keep walking
Only masculine males without a penis or testicles in nontoxic.
It's a power game designed to push forward their views over anyone elses. Not personal, they just want to win. And if they do, they'll choose something else. That's what activists do.
The masculinity that is crying, wearing dresses, not being competitive, and always obeying women. Smh. Aka not masculinity at all.
Not being able to recognise and accept that there is toxic masculinity is toxic
Bingo. You are completely correct. They want to be the masculine ones and they dont want to compete with nature. Then they claim that their homosexuality is completely normal
Just reword your question, use narcissism instead of masculinity. Then you got the just of toxicity. Relationships are a 2 way thing. Respect for respects. Media teaches toxic narcissism is healthy, its. not. lifes to short to not enjoy happiness..
None because they want to kill all men, feminism is a branch of the liberal tree, the same liberals who believe in magic money tree
According to feminists, anything traditionally male, is toxic, evil, and must be destroyed.
Learn more