Should all the border states bus their migrants seeking asylum to Washingon DC?

Question

The Government would like the States to foot the bill for Biden's Folly. Some States say screw that! and are starting to bus them to Washington DC and then will bill Washington for the costs. I applaud them for one. Biden wants to let them in, then he can deal with them on his time and his dime.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has loudly and proudly extolled his ongoing migrant bussing initiative, which transports migrants from the Texas border to processing centers to Washington, D. C. to suggest he's pushing the responsibility and cost onto the federal government's plate, Arizona state leadership has followed in his footsteps with less fanfare.
On Wednesday a bus carrying 20 migrants arrived in D. C. from Yuma, Arizona, according to The Dallas Morning News' Todd J. Gillman. The vehicle arrived with little heads up for media, and the program was only mentioned toward the bottom of a Wednesday release from the governor's office that focused primarily on suppressing drug cartel social media campaigns.

"With Arizona community resources under all-time demand, and little action or assistance from the federal government, individuals who entered Arizona seeking asylum have the opportunity to voluntarily be transported to Washington, D. C.," the release stated. "The transportation will include meals, and onboard staffing and support."
The initiative Abbott claimed would "help local official whose communities are being overwhelmed" has failed to stem the flow of migrants across the border, and instead has received praise from federal officials and migrants for providing needed transportation for those who otherwise didn't have a ride to sponsors.

Massageman · Accepted Answer

Fill bus.
Fly bus back to Mexico in cargo jet.
Attach big parachute to bus.
Drop bus back in Mexico.

but seriously, - -
My worry about sending them to bidenville is that his DIME will end up being our DOLLARS!

I still like my plan of a sniper every mile, maybe with an M107-SASR-HSR. With a total range of over 4 MILES, and an effective range of 1.13 MILES, those half-mile shots should be a proverbial piece of cake at less than half the effective range of the M107! Southbound people, no problem. Anyone caught sneaking northbound, it's target time! At under $20,000 per rifle, that's a lot cheaper than a physical wall (since the government ALWAYS wants to save money (yes, it's sarcasm!).

Some will say this is an unjustified step. Poppycock and feldercarb! The Constitution of the United States calls for the country to BE sovereign AND defended. That is one of the very FEW specified duties of "the fed". Yet, the Constitution is under continual, relentless attack as liberal ""progressives" keep expanding the reach of the already overstretched federal teats of the "helicopter mommy fed".

The Tenth Amendment sums it up quite succinctly: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Period. Simple. To the point. My 10 year-old grandson understands this. The fed obviously, does not.

The federal government is not living up to its one real obligation: to maintain the sovereignty and safety of the country. Period. Simple. To the point.

Yup- Walk right in, illegals - you don't need to have a shot- you can bring in your illegal drugs - you can bring in your diseases- work? you won't need to do any of that: we'll give you free this, free that- we'll even throw in some baby formula, never mind LEGAL citizens can't find it over half the time, lately. The fed commits to world-wide "guidelines" and "rules"- and heaven only knows what other life-quality-limiting regulations- with no citizen input. This is Bravo Sierra. Period. Simple. To the point.

The federal failure to keep our country's borders safe is a sad reality. Border safety now falls into the arms of the STATES to maintain the country's sovereignty and safety.

Oigit · Accepted Answer

So Calif has a budget surplus of close to $97 billion. They also have a lot of famous actors and such that always push for amnesty programs and immigration reform. So why not use that budget surplus to set these people up in Beverly Hills and the surrounding ares. Clearly the famous people will be all for it. Due to them always advocating for amnesty programs and immigration reform, right? We can also expand this to setting them up in areas where people who also push for amnesty programs and immigration reform tend to live already. Heck we can also start a program where people that advocate for both who advocate for both "adopt" these individuals. Even if it means taking in a entire family. After all of the above would more or less push people to put their money where their mouth is.

Chiarac2003 · Accepted Answer

Yes ship millions of migrants to the wealthiest part of dc… or Georgetown n see how they respond!😂🎀

goaded · Answer

You do realise that the migrants who are bussed there want to go, and the states are footing the bill, right? They can't take a single migrant who doesn't want to go without breaking the law.

It's like Abbott's stupid border checks that cost the economy billions.

Anonymous · Answer

it's not just border states. I live in Idaho and they're shipping them all the way up here too. And I agree, they should go to Washington DC because they're the ones that "want them"-- allegedly. They should go to liberal states at the very least, since those are the ones who "support them" and vote for the crazy shit that benefits them (free healthcare for illegals paid for by the LEGAL citizen taxpayers).

Static_In_The_Attic · Answer

I think you are awesome but you are out of your mind when it comes to buses & with the price of gas busing migrants seeking asylum to Washington DC would cost billions more & I think it would be cheaper to send the people home.

Dargil · Answer

Illegals? Yes. Send them to DC, Delaware, The Hamptons, Martha's Vineyard and other upscale coastal cities.

jshm2 · Answer

You used a lot of words to say nothing.  Texas hicks would rather try and make fun of Federal government and migrants, than actually do any work.  You need to grow the fuck up.

exitseven · Answer

They need to send a few bus loads to the Hamptons and Marthas Vineyard too but absolutely. Let them set up tents on the White House lawn.

Surely · Answer

If it isn’t a problem for the boarder states. Then Bidenville shouldn’t have a problem with them. Since walls and fences only work around the capital!

DARKCLOUD1945X · Answer

Let them pitch their tents on the Whitehouse lawn and parks in the areas near all the elected officials and on their lawns

Likes2drive · Answer

They should send them all to Delaware where Biden lives

KrakenAttackin · Answer

Yes. Every illegal should be rounded up and shipped to DC.

Jamie05rhs · Answer

I think they should be sent to Portland. Let the Social Justice Warriors put their money where their mouth is.

Anonymous · Answer

Why not bus them to the front of Biden home in Delaware.

driven159 · Answer

If they can bus them that far how about bussing them back deep into Mexico

Anonymous · Answer

If you bus them to one place they can’t use them to turn swing states which is good.

007kingifrit · Answer

hell yea send em right in

joeldalton · Answer

I think we just bus them over the Canadian border.

OddBeMe · Answer

They'd do better putting them to work.

msc545 · Answer

Stupid, childish, and cruel.

Pterodon · Answer

No to Delaware

fireforeffect · Answer

YES!!!

Should all the border states bus their migrants seeking asylum to Washingon DC?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Should all the border states bus their migrants seeking asylum to Washingon DC?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.