What’s wrong with getting Replaced by better or less costly workers?

[DataOrganizer27]

It isn't about 'protecting white people' but if you want good quality work you aren't going to get it for less money. And if you want competent employees you aren't going to get that from someone who's never done the job and has no experience.

That has absolutely zero to do with race and EVERYTHING to do with corporations outsourcing and letting otherwise great products go to shit for the sheer sake of cost. It's also why China has tons of sweatshops and a bunch of kids working twelve or more hours a day for literal nickels. So great, let's just keep the sweatshops up and running.

[Avicenna]

Sounds good, so you'll be the first to give up your sinecure to a better/less costly person?

What you're suggesting was the same thinking throughout history behind the importation of slaves. And not only was slave labor used by Communists, Nazis and other very unsavory regimes, but 'better" is a subjective term. Does that mean unable or less willing to assert their rights under the law? Willing to work off the books? The use of slave or cheap labor also discourages improvements in automation and management methods and besides creating instability and structural unemployment, it adds additional huge social costs in an economy. If a person has to constantly worry about being made redundant, are they going to spend anything but the bare minimum?

[exitseven]

With the development of more and more automation there will be fewer jobs for people. Governments must start planning for this now before there is poverty at never seen before levels. I think the tipping point will be when self driving cars are developed.

[Smoke-n-Growls]

Lmao, no one is replacing white workers. They weren't getting the job in the first place.

Also, immigrants also aren't replacing white workers - robots would be. Automation is the next industrial revolution.

No war but class war.

[MuddyMole]

It depends on the timeframe you're talking about.

In the very long term, this ought to be the goal - a "post-industrial society" or "knowledge economy". All those unpleasant, unskilled, low paid jobs can be outsourced abroad, or better yet, done by robots/computers. Meanwhile, you invest heavily in education (your "human capital"), giving you a highly creative and skilled workforce that generates far more wealth, because it can offer premium services and products that nowhere else in the world can compete with.

The problem is that in the short term, you're taking people out of those low value jobs before you've trained them to do the high value jobs, and before those high value jobs even exist, because there hasn't been sufficient investment in education - least of all in the US, which is bordering on anti-intellectual.

[OldWorldOrder]

Laissez-faire is unsustainable and necessarily sacrifices the interests of the genetic in-group, for whom the nation-state is founded, in favor of profits for a disloyal cosmopolitan elite class.

Markets are supposed to serve nations, not the other way around.

The shootings will in all likelihood continue until the demographic problems are properly rectified by dismantling the American Empire and partitioning it into a new series of proper nation-states.

[Stoner710]

Innocence absolutely nothing, this is why minimum wage in the United States is hurting the United States because we are not allowed to pay our workers a wage that will suit the free market but are we going to become a collective and share everything worked out well for North Korea China Venezuela etc.

[NYCQuestions1976]

So only "white people" can be "expensive" workers? That implies all non-white people are somehow "legally" less expensive to employ, and also supporting that position. That's racist.

The REAL issue is employing illegal immigrants over qualified American citizens. Race is irrelevant.

[Jamie05rhs]

Well, you can't have a society with a K-12 school system that teaches softness and empathy and tolerance and understanding, and then throw those very same kids into a world of extreme darwinism. To me, that is just socially unethical. You're setting up your own children to fail.
If you want them to compete with any and every person in the world as an adult, then you need to raise them in a more savage environment as children. No more coddling.

[lightbulb27]

were all for lower cost cheaper products until it replaces us... and puts us out of work.

[ArtemisSilver]

I'm pretty sure that it's obvious why the death of an entire culture and civilization might be considered a bad thing.

[Sevenpointfive]

there's nothing wrong with it but it hurts the economy

[msc545]

Any workers you hire are eventually going to be sick of your shit and they're going to form a union and you're going to be sorry. Try treating people decently and you won't have trouble with them.

[Anonymous]

As long as these less costly workers are legal citizens who aren’t being used to sway elections, sure.

[notwoke]

its ok as long as there's no welfare for the able bodied. Otherwise the free market doesn't work

[Kingofkings1992]

Nothing, as long as they are a legal citizen. Again you dumb ass liberals fail to understand the difference between legal and illegal immigration.

[zagor]

Um, the white people aren't the only ones who would get replaced by less costly workers. It would affect ALL current residents of a country.

[Juxtapose]

As another user said, raising kids to cooperate and then sending them to a cutthroat work environment is not congruent.

[jshm2]

Because they usually aren't.

[Agagagagaga]

Such a shameless activist race huckster.

[Leibstanrdarte]

ask the chinese peoples liberation party

[Anonymous]

Marxists are behind the great replacement so no.

[888theGreat]

If American , sure , not illegals

[SupremeWarlord]

nothing wrong.