Infanticide? I thought they viewed abortion as a body decision. So these people will kill their infants? And how will they justify infanticide? Their body their choice? And women will kill themselves because they can't kill their babies? I don't think they will. They love their lives. The idea of suicide should never be suggested.
I think a woman who’s already suffering with mental issues or depression , especially if it’s a young teen, could definitely potentially commit suicide if they have an unwanted pregnancy. And they’re a lot of fucked up unfit parents out there that would definitely kill their baby or abandon them because they don’t want them. I don't know I’d rather someone abort a fetus than kill an actual living baby but that’s just me 🤷♂️
People like you only see abortion as "opting out of responsibilities." When abortion covers way mare than that. Rape victims, miscarriages, fetuses not seperating from the euteral wall, dead fetuses poisoning the body, defects in growth that will make the baby stillborn or suffer a hell of pain their entire life, the person impregnated is a child because of a pedophile, the womans body didn't develop properly during puberty so having a baby will kill her, and for the other services abortion clinics provide such as gynecology, & help with infertility. There is so much you are taking away if abortions get banned because politicians dont pay attention to exact details, especially with male politicians that don't know shite about it
@dragoblack plus dead fetuses and miscarriages are not THE RESULT OF ABORTION. No politician prohinits removing dead fetuses who died NATURALLY. Abortion kills the LIVING fetus
Yes, but at the same time under law description, a miscarriage is considered a removal of a fetus from the womb... law is dumb like that when written by people who don't know how it works. politicians want to ban it all together, instead of specifying the type of abortion, and that is the problem not acknowledged by people & politicians and not what you are understanding. And just like how useless banning guns is, it won't stop people from using them. Same applies to the abortions that you are talking about. Remember what "coat hanger abortions" are? It was the old unsafe way women would get abortions in secret before the protection on abortions were made. There were other unsafe methods too but abortion clinics made it safe for women to do so without harm of the woman. There's many things pro life people don't take into accou t when talking about abortion. You can rant and rave all you want but abortions will always keep happening whether they are illegal or not
It is likely a shift to move power back from the federal government to the states. Is this a bad thing, considering how divided the country is? Perhaps we should allow the states to make their own rules so people can live in communities which share their values.
Perhaps the Left should actually try to pass laws like a democracy instead of pushing things through court and going for tyranny of a minority.
Congress is there to pass laws. If you want gay marriage legal nationwide, write your reps and get them to pass a federal law for it. Stop trying to shove your agenda on people via decree of courts.
The constitution is bullshit, Americans follow it like their Bible, it's outdated and full of crap
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
1 y
Yeah soon the liberals will have push to the social credit system and start seizing assets before they dissolve current and ban all future marriages then they can start running their prison complex/slave plantation in what was formerly known as the USA
Yes, Here are things I see next on the chopping block.
Same Gender Marriage The National Labor Relations Act (The right to form a Union in the workplace) The Civil Rights act of 1964 ... just to name a few.
It is possible and plausible the foundation of that decision is privacy. Saying privacy isn't explicitly in the constitution means a lot of doors thought protected are now open. Not just for lbtq+.
Clarence Thomas already explained they are going after contraception and gay marriage next.
How many times does a person have to tell you what they are going to do, before you believe them?
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
1 y
No. This is nonsense and won't happen. And many guys are responsible. Some of us will wear a condom and make sure we are being safe and not risking pregnancy. The fact is that most other bc is for women. Not men. Biologically that is how they work. Invent a pill that guys take that is as effective as the one women can take.
Why don’t we the people votes get to the voice (by voting) in choosing whether not there a change in the constitution not the government. Roe v wade was created to protect the women NOT men
Technically that "right" was never in the constitution, thus only controlled by the state. The democrats are trying to take away our freedoms and rights guaranteed by the bill of rights, because it is inconvenient for them.
Nope, abortion isn't a right. At least not one inumerated in the constitution. I would say that the recent gun legislation is more of an indication of the government trying to take away our rights than the Supreme Court overturning a bad precedent.
as an onvestor i would like to invest in the whole sale slaughter of Liberal and POC babies, but as a human i just can seem to celebrate it. thats why i was perfectly happy letti g them do it in the shadows.
Sexual views will determine laws, this is why in the future it will be legal to have sex with 6 year olds. Just like Drag Queens, Homosexuality of young school children. And the International Laws allowing Human trafficking and child pornography to strive and prosper as it has always been done.
"Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge."
Remember that legal doesn't always equate to moral. Slavery was legal at some point. If we separate religion from the state, what code of morality are we going to use for ourselves to determine right from wrong?
@Datboi65 Religion is not the basis of morality. There’s nothing immoral or wrong with gay marriage, and people can barely defend why they think it is without using religion as an explanation. Your religion is not my problem and I’m not gonna base my decisions in life on what YOUR god says. And it’s not fair if I have to
You said people, you didn't specify what people. The answer is simple actually. You live in your own bubble, so you are more concerned with individualism. I see the bigger picture and overall effect on society. We think differently. Obesity then shouldn't be a problem as well, should it? If someone else is fat, how is that my problem to worry about? Wrong. If more people are fat, less people are able to carry out labor-intensive jobs, and less people can defend their country from a possible attack, as joining the army requires a certain level of fitness. I think you understand my point. Back to the main problem, the reason why gay marriage is wrong is because a) it reduces the offspring population and b) it increases the amount of sexually transmitted diseases. This is a scientifically proven fact and is not up for debate. It is also an unnatural process, and nobody is "born that way" because scientists have not been able to find a genetic predisposition for homosexuality, rather it is a common finding that a lot of gay people have been molested by a male member in their childhood, and that is how the trauma could manifest itself in their preferences. If you have chosen a lifestyle where you cannot make children of your own, you should not be entitled to adopt children that are the byproduct of heterosexual sex, and force your worldview upon them.
Also, religion is an example of objective morality. It's much easier for people to be on the same page if they follow a code, rather than if everyone creates their own code. Think about it. You go to work, and certain things are expected of you to be done. You don't just do what you feel like is necessary, but you follow your boss's word to the letter. If every employee started to argue over what they think is important, nothing will ever get done. Your idea of morality is subjective, and you get offended over the slightest disagreement. I have already provided you with reasons as to why gay marriage is immoral, so now you should provide me with reasons as to why it is moral in your worldview, other than "it should be everyone's right to get married".
@Datboi65 honestly I’m not reading all that, man. Nobody is offended. If you believe that being gay or having abortions is immoral, then whatever, that’s you. But again, your beliefs, whether it’s religious or not, got NOTHING to do with me or anyone else.
@Datboi65 and yes “everyone has a right to get married” is 100% enough for gay marriage to be legal lol. You not liking gay people doesn’t mean that it should be banned for two consenting adults to get married.
"I'm not reading all of that" *proceeds to write two paragraphs*. You asked for a reason other than scripture, I gave you TWO reasons backed by science. What more do you want? I already told you, objective morality. This is not my "opinion", it's backed by science and it's part of my religious beliefs. How you expect people to respect your orientation if you don't respect their religion? When I asked you to give a reason, I was specific in what criteria I asked. I want scientific evidence that proves otherwise, not some bullshit pseudoscience about how people are "born that way" and "everyone deserves that right". Think objectively and don't get offended, then maybe we can talk.
@Datboi65 you wrote like 4 paragraphs bro spewing bullshit about why you think being gay is immoral. And I genuinely don’t care about your opinion or about your scientific evidence. That’s why I didn’t bother to read all of it, just being honest 🤷♂️
Bro, if you don't care, then don't reply. If you don't care about science, then you are simply delusional. I find it hilarious how folks wanna talk about science when they discuss the pandemic, but want to ignore science when we talk about the lgbtq. By your own logic, incest should also be moral if both parties are consenting adults, right? Do you see how ridiculous this "I was born this way" theory is? I'm not gonna keep arguing with someone who ignores logic. You do you bro. I'm outie ✌🏾
Yeah, I mean how can it be the land of the free when it has vaccine mandates forcing people to inject into their bodies experimental gene therapy? Sick stuff.
I think it’ll more be that religious institutions gain more power and do softer discrimination, rather than banning gay marriage, but both could happen 🤷♂️ wretchedness
yes eventually. the court never had purview to rule in that way on gay marriage and it has clearly been a serious downside that is constantly expanding with the gay parades and child grooming.
Home > Society & Politics > Questions > Do you think Roe V Wade being overturned is going to lead to other rights being taken away, such as gay marriage for example?
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
60Opinion
Infanticide?
I thought they viewed abortion as a body decision. So these people will kill their infants? And how will they justify infanticide? Their body their choice?
And women will kill themselves because they can't kill their babies? I don't think they will. They love their lives. The idea of suicide should never be suggested.
I think a woman who’s already suffering with mental issues or depression , especially if it’s a young teen, could definitely potentially commit suicide if they have an unwanted pregnancy.
And they’re a lot of fucked up unfit parents out there that would definitely kill their baby or abandon them because they don’t want them.
I don't know I’d rather someone abort a fetus than kill an actual living baby but that’s just me 🤷♂️
So if abortion didn't exist what would women do? Kill their babies?
Yeah…parents kill their children all the time. Remember Casey Anthony?
People like you only see abortion as "opting out of responsibilities." When abortion covers way mare than that. Rape victims, miscarriages, fetuses not seperating from the euteral wall, dead fetuses poisoning the body, defects in growth that will make the baby stillborn or suffer a hell of pain their entire life, the person impregnated is a child because of a pedophile, the womans body didn't develop properly during puberty so having a baby will kill her, and for the other services abortion clinics provide such as gynecology, & help with infertility. There is so much you are taking away if abortions get banned because politicians dont pay attention to exact details, especially with male politicians that don't know shite about it
@dragoblack tell me how many % of abortions are done for the cases you listed.
@dragoblack plus dead fetuses and miscarriages are not THE RESULT OF ABORTION.
No politician prohinits removing dead fetuses who died NATURALLY.
Abortion kills the LIVING fetus
Yes, but at the same time under law description, a miscarriage is considered a removal of a fetus from the womb... law is dumb like that when written by people who don't know how it works.
politicians want to ban it all together, instead of specifying the type of abortion, and that is the problem not acknowledged by people & politicians and not what you are understanding. And just like how useless banning guns is, it won't stop people from using them. Same applies to the abortions that you are talking about. Remember what "coat hanger abortions" are? It was the old unsafe way women would get abortions in secret before the protection on abortions were made. There were other unsafe methods too but abortion clinics made it safe for women to do so without harm of the woman. There's many things pro life people don't take into accou t when talking about abortion. You can rant and rave all you want but abortions will always keep happening whether they are illegal or not
@dragoblack no one wants to ban removing dead fetuses.
Just don't kill living fetuses! Period
It is likely a shift to move power back from the federal government to the states. Is this a bad thing, considering how divided the country is? Perhaps we should allow the states to make their own rules so people can live in communities which share their values.
Don’t know but it definitely sets a precedent.
i agree with what you said and it takes the country back 50 years
This is done to destroy women with a real womb
Read it again and think..!
People in deep sleep don’t even know what I mean..
but we’ll back to your qs
no your lgbt friends are Aight they have endless rights cheers
Perhaps the Left should actually try to pass laws like a democracy instead of pushing things through court and going for tyranny of a minority.
Congress is there to pass laws. If you want gay marriage legal nationwide, write your reps and get them to pass a federal law for it. Stop trying to shove your agenda on people via decree of courts.
The constitution is bullshit, Americans follow it like their Bible, it's outdated and full of crap
Yeah soon the liberals will have push to the social credit system and start seizing assets before they dissolve current and ban all future marriages then they can start running their prison complex/slave plantation in what was formerly known as the USA
Yes, Here are things I see next on the chopping block.
Same Gender Marriage
The National Labor Relations Act (The right to form a Union in the workplace)
The Civil Rights act of 1964
... just to name a few.
It is possible and plausible the foundation of that decision is privacy. Saying privacy isn't explicitly in the constitution means a lot of doors thought protected are now open. Not just for lbtq+.
Clarence Thomas already explained they are going after contraception and gay marriage next.
How many times does a person have to tell you what they are going to do, before you believe them?
No. This is nonsense and won't happen. And many guys are responsible. Some of us will wear a condom and make sure we are being safe and not risking pregnancy. The fact is that most other bc is for women. Not men. Biologically that is how they work. Invent a pill that guys take that is as effective as the one women can take.
Why don’t we the people votes get to the voice (by voting) in choosing whether not there a change in the constitution not the government. Roe v wade was created to protect the women NOT men
Technically that "right" was never in the constitution, thus only controlled by the state. The democrats are trying to take away our freedoms and rights guaranteed by the bill of rights, because it is inconvenient for them.
Nope, abortion isn't a right. At least not one inumerated in the constitution. I would say that the recent gun legislation is more of an indication of the government trying to take away our rights than the Supreme Court overturning a bad precedent.
I believe it to be unmanly to not take responsibility for your actions.
as an onvestor i would like to invest in the whole sale slaughter of Liberal and POC babies, but as a human i just can seem to celebrate it. thats why i was perfectly happy letti g them do it in the shadows.
As they should, they are satanic. The bible is correct.
We have religious freedom and we need to remember separation of church and state. Religious views should not determine laws
Sexual views will determine laws, this is why in the future it will be legal to have sex with 6 year olds.
Just like Drag Queens, Homosexuality of young school children. And the International Laws allowing Human trafficking and child pornography to strive and prosper as it has always been done.
"Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge."
Remember that legal doesn't always equate to moral. Slavery was legal at some point. If we separate religion from the state, what code of morality are we going to use for ourselves to determine right from wrong?
@Datboi65 Religion is not the basis of morality. There’s nothing immoral or wrong with gay marriage, and people can barely defend why they think it is without using religion as an explanation.
Your religion is not my problem and I’m not gonna base my decisions in life on what YOUR god says. And it’s not fair if I have to
You said people, you didn't specify what people. The answer is simple actually. You live in your own bubble, so you are more concerned with individualism. I see the bigger picture and overall effect on society. We think differently. Obesity then shouldn't be a problem as well, should it? If someone else is fat, how is that my problem to worry about? Wrong. If more people are fat, less people are able to carry out labor-intensive jobs, and less people can defend their country from a possible attack, as joining the army requires a certain level of fitness. I think you understand my point. Back to the main problem, the reason why gay marriage is wrong is because a) it reduces the offspring population and b) it increases the amount of sexually transmitted diseases. This is a scientifically proven fact and is not up for debate. It is also an unnatural process, and nobody is "born that way" because scientists have not been able to find a genetic predisposition for homosexuality, rather it is a common finding that a lot of gay people have been molested by a male member in their childhood, and that is how the trauma could manifest itself in their preferences. If you have chosen a lifestyle where you cannot make children of your own, you should not be entitled to adopt children that are the byproduct of heterosexual sex, and force your worldview upon them.
Also, religion is an example of objective morality. It's much easier for people to be on the same page if they follow a code, rather than if everyone creates their own code. Think about it. You go to work, and certain things are expected of you to be done. You don't just do what you feel like is necessary, but you follow your boss's word to the letter. If every employee started to argue over what they think is important, nothing will ever get done. Your idea of morality is subjective, and you get offended over the slightest disagreement. I have already provided you with reasons as to why gay marriage is immoral, so now you should provide me with reasons as to why it is moral in your worldview, other than "it should be everyone's right to get married".
@Datboi65 If you give Gay people Ivermectin they become straight because 9 out of 10 times gay people have parasites inside them that makes them gay.
@Datboi65 honestly I’m not reading all that, man. Nobody is offended. If you believe that being gay or having abortions is immoral, then whatever, that’s you. But again, your beliefs, whether it’s religious or not, got NOTHING to do with me or anyone else.
@Datboi65 and yes “everyone has a right to get married” is 100% enough for gay marriage to be legal lol. You not liking gay people doesn’t mean that it should be banned for two consenting adults to get married.
"I'm not reading all of that" *proceeds to write two paragraphs*. You asked for a reason other than scripture, I gave you TWO reasons backed by science. What more do you want? I already told you, objective morality. This is not my "opinion", it's backed by science and it's part of my religious beliefs. How you expect people to respect your orientation if you don't respect their religion? When I asked you to give a reason, I was specific in what criteria I asked. I want scientific evidence that proves otherwise, not some bullshit pseudoscience about how people are "born that way" and "everyone deserves that right". Think objectively and don't get offended, then maybe we can talk.
@Datboi65 you wrote like 4 paragraphs bro spewing bullshit about why you think being gay is immoral. And I genuinely don’t care about your opinion or about your scientific evidence. That’s why I didn’t bother to read all of it, just being honest 🤷♂️
Bro, if you don't care, then don't reply. If you don't care about science, then you are simply delusional. I find it hilarious how folks wanna talk about science when they discuss the pandemic, but want to ignore science when we talk about the lgbtq. By your own logic, incest should also be moral if both parties are consenting adults, right? Do you see how ridiculous this "I was born this way" theory is? I'm not gonna keep arguing with someone who ignores logic. You do you bro. I'm outie ✌🏾
Yeah, I mean how can it be the land of the free when it has vaccine mandates forcing people to inject into their bodies experimental gene therapy? Sick stuff.
I think it’ll more be that religious institutions gain more power and do softer discrimination, rather than banning gay marriage, but both could happen 🤷♂️ wretchedness
I don’t foresee gay marriage being revoked because that would really hurt election candidates.
yes eventually. the court never had purview to rule in that way on gay marriage and it has clearly been a serious downside that is constantly expanding with the gay parades and child grooming.
we can't leave peacefully with them