@kelleynice how old are you really? You post about things that 13 year old just don't even perceive or comprehend but you seem to have a very adult perspective on just about every thing... hummmm? IKR?
Boys are more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than girls (12.9% compared to 5.6%).
www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/data.html
So let me tell you the deal back in the 1980's if you were a strong willed hyper active kid, you were just an asshole until you grew out of it. So you got older you learned out to control it and more positively manage and funnel that energy in more productive ways.
But in the might to late 90's Bill Clinton passed some type of education bill (I can't remember its name and I am not going to research it now) that provided additional funding to schools based upon the number of specials needs children they had.
Previously under Regan schools got money for academic achievement. But these were schools in areas that could afford special programs... because schools were funded by property taxes, places with higher property taxes in areas with higher cost of living had better funded schools. At the same time you never saw kids in schools with sever learning is abilities or wheel chairs, they had completely different schools and classes for those kids. The were not in the general population of students.
Clinton and the bleeding hearts thought it was really unfair and that every kid should have equal opportunity despite their handicap, even though nature already decided they would not have an equal opportunity by virtue of their handicap. People in my date never wanted their kids to be diagnosed with a condition or handicap because then they would be sent to the specials school... ever see Forest Gump? His mother did what she had to do to keep him in a normal school.
So now under Clinton schools would get money for special needs kids, and these kids would be integrated into normal classes and class rooms. During the same time frame they increased to told number of conditions that would qualify as special needs... so this is when ADHD started to become popular. Schools promoted it because it made it easier to deal with kids when they were being drugged, and they got additional school funding because ADAH qualified as a special needs kids.
More times than not guys were being diagnosed 3 to 1 with ADHD compared to girls. Because more time than not girls have a more passive nature than boys, and young boy are in general more rambunctious and harder to deal with.
So by drugging these kids at a young age to "overcome" their "disability", they were never forced to develop any productive methods to deal with their hyper active nature, other than taking a pill. So as these kids hit adulthood they eventually realized the true effects these drugs were having on their personality and mental state. Throughout their adolescents years they never developed cooping mechanism, and stunted their mental or emotion development. So now they were full grown adults struggling with depression and mental health issues.
Since you believe a person's age determines their ability, obviously the following video is a fake since not one teenager or adult in 25 can do what the 6 year old Cameron does. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sdipnb3llI
@DaveJord I don't believe GAG will make my email public and, otherwise, I have nothing to hide. More than an interest in politics per se, I have an interest in what happens in our country, our world, and even our future. In that regards, I have an interest in the colonization of planets in other star systems. Also, I am interested, in human behavior, evolution, and a bit of science.
Other than the first several questions, my questions have been about the foregoing things that I am interested it; they are not about me. There are plenty of other on GAG that do that.
It may be see by some that at the moment it benefits girls and women, but in the future is may be seen as extremely short-sighted as many of the ADHD diagnosis's will probably be found to be in error because they will have been sought at the behest of women teachers who find themselves unable to cope with boys leaning in a totally different fashion to girls and the teachers being unable to handle it.
And with the precipitous drop of men attending College/University with the exception of those men doing courses in STEM fields,
Women are seeing the dating pools shrink, with few if any marriage prospects for the future as they will be want men with higher degrees than they have,
and men just not interested in dating because they want to get their degrees done in the shortest time possible thus reducing the size of any loans they take out.
and men also seeing College/University as a hostile environment, where they are only tolerated because of the degrees they pay for even then they are second class citizens who have few if any rights while there.
Men have realised that they can attend a Trade/Technical School while doing an apprenticeship and earning a descent wage at the same time and be student loan free and be four years ahead on the corporate ladder of those coming out of College/University, and if they need extra qualifications they can gain them through remote learning, the old model of HAVING to go to College/University to get a decent job is if not dead then dying.
And it is those who have precipitated the war against boys and young men in Public Schools and College/University, who are of a certain mind set who are to blame, but when it comes around to apportion that blame those persons will have disappeared.
No. It started with medicating boys and teachers having an easier time in the classroom. As one teacher explained her stance, "We're just trying to survive." She was referring to getting through her lesson plan each day, uninterrupted and without having to go into explanations or deal with any emotional outbursts (all part of the life of a child especially when you put 18 or 20 of them together in a structured environment for 6 hours a day).
As far as colleges go, more and more women are seeking a formal education. Relying on one person's income is risky because divorce rates are high. It's tough for women to get hired as a roofer, plumber, or mechanic.
Men learn better by doing. Women are better with lectures. Science has proven the school environment of today is more for women then men. They took all the hands on programs out of school like shop.
Furthermore I wanna argue your divorce rates argument. The rate of divorce is 53% and the rate of women filing them is 80%+. Now the behaviors that cause the divorce I canât be positive about but most of them still love their partners according to the reasons given. Many times it has to do with finance or standing in society.
I understand your argument of formal education however women can easily go into the trades if they work hard. Men have to work hard for these jobs as well. Itâs not as easy as ima man and wanna be an electrician. I have to know my shit and put forth the work. I got a steel milll job hiring right now if you are able and willing to work very hard⌠itâs not physically demanding other than in the heat and we have several women very high in the company including our CEO. Whatâs these womenâs excuse?
I believe all people are hired based off if the employer believes they can do the job well. I refuse to believe just for being a woman she canât get a job as a plumber, roofer, mechanic⌠heâll my neighbors a 50 something woman and is a roofer. I just found that out last week lol.
I donât think women know how to work as hard as men. Itâs rude to say but I think you get many things much easier then men. Men get more chances but we also have to prove ourselves in everything we do. Women just are and get.
Weâre not equal. Men are superior and women are treated as superior. If men and women went to war and tried to dominate the other side who would win? This is how I see it through the facts.
@VanillaSalt Seems like you lost the topic of the queston in your rant.
"Furthermore I wanna argue your divorce rates argument. The rate of divorce is 53% ..." I'm not sure what you are arguing. I said divorce rates are high and to me 53% is astronomical.
I disagree with your claim that women can "easily" work in the trades. I also want to point out that a CEO position is not the same as roofer job and companies hiring CEOs tend to want a Master's degree.
I'm not going to get into a back and forth with you regarding the rest of your opinion.
You provided your points and I responded to your points regardless the original topic. My point with most of this is women are taking point in this âwar.â I was pointing out womens role in all this and how it effects marriage. Also yeah I know the CEO isnât the same Iâm just pointing out we have many women in our plant that are women at all levels.
No, not at all.
To my incredible surprise, even in this modern age, women STILL want men who are in a higher financial space, who are strong and confident, and who are educated. Neo-feminism is VERY bad for those of us trying to find a good mate.
When you want men who are better financially but you improve the financial quality of women then your just decreasing your options.
Opinion
48Opinion
No it doesn't benefit girls and women because the elites want to create a society where the strongest people, strong and stoic men, are wiped out, and no one is left to resist them or disobey. And this has been going on since at least the year 2000, if not longer. I won't mince words with you just because you're thirteen years old, OP. You're clearly intelligent enough to handle them.
Do you know what Active Measures is? Yuri Bezmenov? He said it takes a good 15-20 years to brainwash an entire generation into hating their country and becoming weak and useless men. This was accomplished by 2015. All the Safe Space, Hug Box BS going on in universities. And while it wasn't the KGB/Russia trying to destroy America, and by extension, the entire West, it was people far worse than one Communist government, that operate in the shadows. Well, Klaus Schwab USED to operate in the shadows.
But yeah, the real target was men; women weren't needed to be targeted because in war, women are weak and can't do anything. Women (while essential for society) do not built, maintain, or protect society.
And they actually gained more and more targets since then under the bigotry of social justice/"wokeness." First it was men. Then conservative white men. Then all white men. Then white people in general. Then Asians in general. Then they even started attacking blacks and Hispanics who weren't far-left/Progressive. Now, almost everyone is seen as "a Trump supporting Nazi."
Hell, look at modern society. We have a bunch of useless, talentless, foul, uneducated, entitled, awful girls joining OnlyFans as soon as they turn 18, and then thinking society should kiss their behinds and reward them for being useless c*m dumpsters to the world. They call it "female empowerment." All of this, while MOST young men under 40 are single and can't find a partner because every woman thinks she's a 10 out of 10 and deserves a 25 year old Elon Musk to worship her while she e-whores herself on the internet.
And this is nothing new, either. There's a reason sluts are "slut shamed" (I don't even "slut shame;" I just admit they aren't good or useful people to society). It's because they don't contribute to families. And anything that hurts families, hurts the future of a culture. That's the super-simple version of it.
Feminism is one of the most "toxic" destructive, hateful, and nasty ideologies to ever exist (not as bad as Islam, but still almost as hateful). You spend 12 years propping up third and fourth wave feminism, while shaming, harassing, MeToo'ing, and Canceling normal young men for being normal young men (as opposed to being soyboys, cuckolds, and simps), and you beat the masculinity out of a society.
These are men who ALREADY likely grew up without a father or strong role model, me included. And now, you intentionally keep them from higher education, from success, and from forming romantic attachments with decent women because it's now considered "sexual harassment or rape" to ask a woman out or call her pretty?
Meanwhile, you're turning decent young women into useless sluts, whores, and c*m dumpsters under the guise of 'female empowerment." Then these women end up used and unwanted by the time they hit 35, bitching "where have all the good men gone" now that their looks have faded, as if anyone but the biggest simps and losers would want a woman like that, who disrespected them and continues to be a terrible life partner.
But no, society says you're supposed to be a good paypig, simp, loser, and beta male to terrible, disgusting, shameless women with no value to society, anyway. Even simps and cucks on this site are "still alive" when it comes to self-emasculation.
This is a lot to take in, but the TL;DR is: They want to collapse society. The easiest way to collapse something is to destroy its foundation. So they targeted strong men and the nuclear family unit. And propped up angry, bitter women, who are unfit to run society. That is why.
(I ran out of typing room)
The simpler version is this: It's not about raising women up, it's about putting down men. There's no reason why both men and women can't be raised up to be intelligent, contributing members to society. Except the elites don't want that; competition to their monopolies and free-thinkers opposing them. It's just easier to target men first.
But believe me; they're going to start attacking women in higher education too. Hell, the promotion of trashy sex work IS attacking women and discouraging them from being useful members to society and telling them they'll still be respected and valued being a cheap talentless whore on OnlyFans.
The female population might feel better represented in education, specially in colleges and in fields traditionally seen as male-dominated, media and politics. The issue is that this support often comes with a cost, of basically putting the male popularion's minds through a grinder since their youth. Some don't know stuff like this happens while some say that it's a fair price to pay because of "history".
The truth is that it'll be a shit show when this backfires. It's not a question of if anymore. The men making up this generation have been conditioned to reject masculinity and every other value that's built society. Do you think these men can sacrifice themselves for society when hard times come? I'll go further: those who still can aren't willing to, and rightfully so. Women create these men but they're not attracted to them, so making up families will be an even bigger issue in the future. People will only notice the seriousness of this mistake when shit hits the fan.
Young girls also get more attention from teachers than boys. Women have higher rates of college graduation.
Saying college being a hostile environment to men is understatement. I remember my college dorm having nonstop feminist propaganda all over the walls. Many of our ârequiredâ courses were very anti male.
And that was almost 2 decades ago. I canât imagine what itâs like now.
Anyway my fathers generation had this attitude of âoh just ignore it (feminist bs). No one really cares about these people anyway. They will never get anywhere in the real worldâ. But these people ARE getting their way in the âreal worldâ. They are radically influencing corporate culture and politics.
Anyway this isnât to say men âwantâ to hold women down through so called âpatriarchyâ. The vast majority of us have zero problem and are actually proud of women who excel (as long as they didnât abuse special privileges in the process). But feminists canât help but tear into men all they can.
In a true meritocracy, the best contender wins. However meritocracy and affirmative action are fundamentally incompatible, and itâs easier to whine and argue and demand special treatment than it is to actually put effort into something.
@Sixgunsound â itâs easier to whine and argue and demand special treatment than it is to actually put effort into something.â đŻ
But the question is why do the whiners get enabled in the first place? And why do we keep enabling them to get away with it? Itâs because most conservatives are afraid of being labeled sexist, racist, homophobic and now âtransphobicâ even though we often have rational reasons to resist this crap. Liberals are very good at making people second guess themselves
The whiners get away with anything because politicians on the right are selected for their willingness to comply with the dictates of left. They have been selected for their willingness to accept being the second of two parties. The only candidates Republican voters are shown go through a primary process in which there are no restrictions that someone actually be loyal to the party, and as such you get people like Bush the Younger and Romney. This is why trumps political career has been fire! He actually follows through, has the courage to fight, and even more surprisingly wins. The right in the United States is so conditioned to lose that they would vote for a three legged dog that had the courage to fight and the ability to win.
Persecution of men and boys might seem to help women in the short term, however positive masculinity is required for a culture to thrive.
Men are the ones who take on the intense and difficult physical jobs that maintain the infrastructure of society. Electrical workers, construction, bricklayers, all the hot sweaty, painful and uncomfortable jobs that women aren't exactly lining up for. They do them for the love of their family and the good of all.
The inclusion of women into the full time workforce as a norm rather than an option has actually driven down individual wages for both sexes, and resulted in the decline of the middle class.
Women aren't happy as housewives, because their husbands usually can't earn enough by themselves to give a good standard of living, nor are they happy working as an equal along side their men. The drive to marry up remains and now we're seeing an unprecedented number of single women in their thirties rushing to have last minute children, or simply having none at all.
With the diminished economic value of men, we struggle to fulfill the traditional role of provider protector, and so many women choose to be single mothers instead. Their children having no concept of a positive masculine role model further accelerates social degeneration.
When viewed from this perspective it's easy to see why Marxists like this situation. As their stated goal is the destruction of all power structures outside their own, the traditional family included.
It's a sad loveless way to live.
Itâs pertinent to recall that families thrived prior to capitalism. So the communist defiance of the contemporary family unit is neither false no uncalled-for. If you prefer capitalism to anything and everything else, thatâs your privilege. But the insinuation that the communist challenge to the capitalist hierarchy is INHERENTLY destructive is grossly ignorant by any reasonable standard.
First off, you're struggling to for verbosity to seem smarter than you are, to the point where your sentences are losing meaning.
Nobody said communist disdain for the family unit was false or uncalled for. You just sound like a twit padding for word count in a school essay.
I specified no preference for capitalism.
As for being grossly ignorant, you should educate yourself on the human cost of Russian and Chinese communism, both of which have been massively destructive with deaths counted in the millions, due to both mass murder and starvation.
In summary, piss off you posturing idiot.
You didnât have to specify anything, the context of your grossly biased statements was clear. Your immediate, ignorant and disdainful response only solidifies the evidence of your own ignorance. Donât worry, some day the other one will drop and youâll have the opportunity to catch up with the rest of us.
Thanks for the thinly veiled threat there comrade.
I think it's pretty clear who's got the market cornered on ignorance in this conversation. I'm happy to let yourself paint the picture of your own derangement for everyone to see. Please continue.
There is no war on boys.
The statistics you are reporting are about education.
There is a war on education and that is being conducted by the GOP because less informed voters are easier to lie to. And boys, being more naturally animous to authorities they don't like, yet more easily persuaded by authorities they want to believe in are quite often siding with the GOP in their war on education.
The GOP isn't alone in this. Think of other hyperconservative societies such as Muslim countries in which girls are denied education. Look at what the Taliban is once again doing in Afghanistan.
TITLE: Taliban reverses decision, barring Afghan girls from attending school beyond 6th grade
Updated March 23, 20222:27 PM ET
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/23/1088202759/taliban-afghanistan-girls-school
======
You see, when you give people an education, you arm them. You are arming them with information and information = power... power to defend themselves and power to attack... and most importantly, the power to refuse being controlled.
The Taliban knows this.
They want a return to conservative Islamic principles in which girls grow up to become nice obedient subservient Muslim wives just like Islam teaches them.
And what does the GOP want (among other things)?
They want a return to conservative Christian principles in which girls grow up to become nice obedient subservient Christian wives just like the Bible teaches them.
Back to the "War on Boys", unscrupulous men are boys who grew up and understand how to manipulate boys into thinking exactly what they want them to think. And what these men want these boys to think is that education is bad for them. Education is not bad for the boys - it's bad for these men if the boys get the education.
Well you have to understand what's really going on when I was in the third or fourth grade I knew right then and there that women are smarter than men they are going to take over the world and that is because of one thing when you were at that age and you're sitting in your desk and you're daydreaming this is the time where guys start getting their daily hard on they try to control it but they can't at that time and when the teacher asks a question in my school your to raise your hand she calls on you you stand up and you give your answer or she will just call on you and you stand up and you give your answer I don't know how many times did the teacher would call my name and want me to stand up and answer the question whether I knew the answer or not there's no way I could stand up because you would see that I had a hard on it would totally piss me off or embarrassed me because I would know the answer and the next thing I know she would scold me and then she would pick a girl and the girl would stand up answer the question and I would just say why why is this happening to me LOL but that holds so many guys back from doing what they should be doing and connecting with the teacher and the class and becoming smarter but once it starts happening your mind goes a whole different direction because of embarrassment are trying to control your heart on and I believe it's probably still going on to this day the boys are going through this and it sucks
I work at a university, it's starting to look like an all women college. We past 68% women last year and it would be much worse if it wasn't for the fact that the majority of foreign student are men filling in the gap.
Some majors have no men in them but the University has been slow to adopt any programs (like they did for women in engineering etc) to help men enter these fields. Teachers college has 3600 students, I took micro and macroeconomics classes in an auditorium class of nearly 400 and was the only guy. We only have two male nurses, and men are now the minority in chemical engineering.
There are 30,000 students here.
No. Thereâs already some likely unforeseen repercussions. Despite womenâs liberation and feminism, most straight women still insist a man makes more than them. With so many women investing time, energy and money going to college and getting into a high-paying career, when they slow down to meet Mr. Right their dating pool is cut way down. The men who actually do make more than those women have their pick of women, and âtop earningâ is attractive to women, not men. Those men will likely choose someone younger, more attractive and vivacious, and who is more than happy with their earnings potential. Hell, even men who make the same as these older, fussier women will by then have their pick by comparison. Unless a woman can be satisfied with someone who earns the same as her or less, or can be happy with herself, her career and her friends and coworkers, she may eventually lament the forfeiture of her love life.
It does not benefit women or men. Because in a lot of ways it's yet another back and forth issue to add on top of the rest. You can look at many issues on the political and social sphere and you will see that many people on both sides of a given issue have developed a my way or the highway attitude. So bargaining, compromise, finding a middle ground and various other things needed to make any kind of real progress towards a solution are simply no longer options. So the issues will continue to go unsolved and the negative effects of them will simply get worse.
Even in elementary schools they teach them to hate boys/men, not trust them, and they discipline them harsher for the same offenses. I have personally witnessed that multiple times from school staff, fellow teachers, and even a principal too. That was here in California. It may be different elsewhere.
ADHD is mostly false. Most of the students that have behavioral problems that were blamed on that somehow magically can control; themselves without medication when they have a consistent and fair teacher.
ADHD is a cry for help to the medical establishment from voluntarily single mothers who donât understand or know how to raise their boys, and want away for it not to be their fault and to get drugs to sit them down and shut them up until they age out of being their problem anymore. Ask me how I know.
I think that it is sad. I don't think women or men should be put down due to gender. I think girls should have EQUAL opportunities not special ones. Women have proven that they are perfectly capable of doing most of what a man can do.
So there is no reason for special treatment. It simply isn't far to boys and tells girls that they can't do anything on their own.
We should not be at war with each other but all love each other and want what is best for each other. So I encourage you to give strong encouragement to both your male and female peers and help them and support them through what they need to do.
Stand up for what you think is right. I have read your bio and know that you aren't going to public schools but as smart as you are you could seriously help a LOT of people. So talk to people and help them.
God bless and thank you for being a truly amazing person.
It does not benefit women.
What the feminists have done in try to turn little boys into girls and we have created a generation of confused weakling men. No women will be attracted to this and thus we will have to listen to more women complian about how they are disgusted with modern men and there lack of masculinity.
It's terrible for all of us, including women. But unfortunately many (most?) women today are too self-centered, victim-minded and short-sighted to see how it will destroy our society. It's an enormous problem that is coming at us like a freight train but most people are too ignorant to see how it will affect them directly.
Here's a great article by a guy from whom I would not expect something like this. If you want to see some true ignorance, read the comments from females that follow the article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/02/08/andrew-yang-boys-are-not-all-right/
Women tend to want someone that makes more money than they do... that's out the window.
Women that would prefer a masculine mand... most of that is out the window.
Educated... mostly out the window.
Naw, I think females in the younger groups are going to have a slimmer and slimmer chance of finding long term loving relationships.
If this is true, maybe males just don't like is being offered to learn about. I mean, if I were a guy I wouldn't want to get lessons on how to be a drag queen.
They might be going to trade schools instead of college. College is not for everyone and never has been.
Nope.
Just look up the ridiculous articles women are writing about there not being enough eligible men anymore. Meanwhile 39% of all men in the US are single, most women provide no value, have kids, and are sleeping with several men and blaming men for the position they have put themselves into. Women entering the workforce en mass is the worst thing that could have ever happened for women; the moment both men and women started working, the value of labor stagnated meaning that men would no longer be able to provide since the combined household income doubled and devalued the dollar.
Every aspect of feminism has made life worse for women in the long term; and I support women being able to work if they want, vote, and drive. But women weren't happy with equality and seeing what happens when women get equality has made me unhappy with women being equal. Life is not a fucking game, stop acting like it is.
I have not once experienced hostility towards males in both schools and universities and i am having doubts, that these exist on a very large scale.
Are we being taught mostly useless stuff and sometimes propaganda in various educational facilities? Definitely. And some of us pay the tuition fee to be told such nonsense.
But that is how the rulers of our society make us go through these hoops if we want to have that piece of paper, that acts like a pass for a vacancy paying more than McDonald's and the worst part is that most employers are pretty much shallow about requiring a higher education of nonsense and propaganda.
a lot of the actions that screwing over the male students are look small at face value but actually have major repercussions.
An example is how to e for recess has be shrinking and so have the amount physically activities during recess. At face value this might not seem like much but boys generaly have more energy than girls and if they can't release that energy then they become hyper or noncompliant this is just a natural part of being a boy however despite the importance of releasing this energy schools have been striking away their outlets for years I personally got to see it when I was in grade school because they shortened recess 3 times while I was there.
@crossdressingrihno i understand what you mean. Hence its not much of a surprise when boys exhibit parts of ADHD. I had it too, where i wasn't focusing on school and class. However my experience was that i was not marginalized for it.
The things, that bothered me the most is school itself in the first place and then being forced to memorize nonsense and being told propaganda.
Like Rick in rick and morty said in season 1 - school is not a place for intelligent people
The war on boys and men cannot benefit girls and women in any meaningful way. And, in fact, that is not the real reason. The real reason is to turn men into defanged obedient serfs that will not rise up against the leaders when the economy collapses and conditions become almost as harsh as the the conditions in North Korea.
In the short term yes, in the long term no. When women get to the age that they want to have men in there lives, all there will be is boys and impulsive men that won't settle down but instead will use women as flesh holes and more women will die alone.
Iâm so proud of you for reading that. Have you seen the 20th anniversary edition, or Warren Farrelâs boy crisis?
I haven't read it.
This isn't a gender thing, bro. We're neglecting our children and pinning the blame on "because I have a daughter too" like no, mofo, you should have been happy with one kid.
Talking about schools, they've industrial mindset plus all the neglect comes from taking in more than 30 pupils in one class â beyond what a teacher can handle.
It's a societal and educational issue, nothing to do with women.
Nah, because then you have many women who lose out of potential partners.. You have less families, and with the standards many women have today you have angry lonely men and women..
Percentage of Male Physicians: 64%
Percentage of Males in STEM field: 76%
Percentage of male CEOs: 95%
Sorry, but guys don't want to take "How to Be Woke 101"
I think not. I think the current status quo of the west is incapable to give meaning to men and masculinity. I suffer from this my self. Skipped out of high school. I dont wa't to participate in society. Its not for me, I dont see any meaningful place in western mainstream society as a white man.
No. Girls love crushing men into obedient beta males and then are surprised that they arenât attracted to their husbands anymore
I donât think this is right. I think men have give soft and fail to stand up for themselves like a real man would. I also think women want to be a pain in the fucking ass but be put in their place lol. A woman loves a man that holds his ground and stands up for himself and hates men that just say yes dear all the time. Yet they push and poke and prod to get their way every time.
Women thrive on drama. Itâs their emotional side as far as Iâm concerned. And men arenât stoic enough these days to say you will not treat me like this.
No, women end up with misguided and confused men. Men who do not know what their role in the wider world is and even less in relation to women.
colleges and shools benefit people who are agreeable, docile, compliant and who don't like to think for themself. i know that having been through pretty much all levels of the system myself.
What war on boys lol? The war on girls in public and private schools have always been clear with their controlling dress codes and teaching the ways of the Bible which is sexist against women by the way
Yeah itâs not like people have been screeching about âtoxic masculinityâ for the past 15 years.
Oh it isnât as man-made sexism have existed for centuries or anything. .
You are all pretty darn pathetic. You can take a little bashing for 15 years when women have dealt with that, plus your abuse, and controlling natures for centuries. Wow
So you think âa little bashingâ of men for 15 years is okay? You demand men stop mistreating women and then you think itâs okay for women to mistreat men?
Youâd think someone that seems to know so much about being oppressed would be against it no matter who it targets. But thatâs the hypocrisy of human beings. Always out to better themselves always complain when itâs their problem but ever silent when it comes to the problems of others they think are below themâŚ
@VanillaSalt Men demanding, mistreating, etc women will never stop so itâs only fair if it happens to men as well
Hypocrisy? So you think your little manipulation tactic will work against me huh lol? It wonât. See because people like you obviously believe the oppressed should be pushovers to their oppressors to what, continue experiencing systematic sexism as well as appeal to male privileged spoiled boys like you? Who what? Sees the world as a rainbow loving place full of equality for everyone? As if appealing moral to you is more important than a worldwide issue lol
Did it benefit women when Eve ate from the tree of knowledge? Seems women have learned zero since then till now. Rhey, They, all back at it once again in history.
Yes! It unquestionably disadvantages men to the benefit of women.
since most of the professional women decide they'd rather stay home with kids around age 40, this is a disaster for society
i just think the education system has been tailored way more towards women and how they learn to the point where itâs like no wonder guys donât care about this and would rather learn a trade.
Our whole school system is just really outdated. The entire school year revolves around farming system like it's the 17th century.
College is a waste of money. Smart men are learning trades at a fraction of the cost
Where were you when I was getting out of high school?
The debt associated with college attendance probably dissuades more men than anything else.
Exactly!! That's why I didn't go!
Most of those are bullshit and just American doctors trying to make a quick buck and/or get tenure for their half assed theories.
Ofc yeah. Straight white males are especially targeted because they arenât different like everyone else⌠while everyone else cares about everyone elseâs race orientation etc⌠they are left behind
Iâll try not to judge the coverâŚbecause boys do have antagonists: themselves. Toxic masculinity which no one wants to admit. Society forces boys and men to value fighting, never ask for help, dont cry, dont be gay, etcâŚ
War on Boys and young men at school? Where you people get this BS from?
I keep telling y'all YouTube videos isn't a reflection of the real world out here.
It's an actual thing
Modern day school systems are actually more geared towards female students
@crossdressingrihno: In what way? Aren't boys and girls in the same class being taught school subjects at the same time?
Unless you are suggesting a teacher will purposely ignore a boy who needs help in the classroom and help the girl instead because she's a girl.
I will find that extremely hard to believe.
Boys and girls fundamentally different both physically and mentally.
A good example of rules that harmful for male students is the baning of most competitive or physical activities during recess
Recess is actually important for the development of male students. Boys naturally have a lot more energy and need to byrn that all off in order to properly focus yet despite this recess time shrinking dramatically and so are number of physical activities that permitted during that time.
@crossdressingrihno: Please... that's your argument of war on boys? đ... I still think they let boys and girls play basketball, kick ball, soccer and football at school unless they aren't tackling each other because obviously that can hurt kids very bad.
They shortened recess time dramatically.
The time to do such things is dropping dramatically
@crossdressingrihno: Find better arguments that make sense.
How does that not make sense?
There are less activities for boys to do and there was less time to do them. Less time in the less activity means more energy and the more energy boys have the less they can focus and school requires high focus. I don't see how you could be getting confused right now.
You only need to Goggle to find studies showing that elementary teachers give girls higher grades for the same work. However, if you are going to insist that there is no difference between boys and girls than I cannot help you.
@kelleynice: You expect to believe that bs? You mean to tell me a teacher will give a male student a lesser grade even though he got the same exact question correct on school work? Please.
It's illegal to do that. A teacher that does that will be fired immediately..
Well you know what it's also illegal to drive without insurance but guess what happened just a couple days ago. A man driving without insurance crashed into my dad while he was driving and injured him this is only like 3 days ago. People break laws all the time keep in mind this guy was driving in a company vehicle when he did this so people are not afraid to lose their jobs while breaking the law.
People shoot other people and Rob other people all the time despite it being illegal. Laws are more like suggestions that are sort of reinforced every once in a while
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy Since you refuse to Goggle read the studies, and justsay whatever false statement that pops into your head, I can't help you. You can have the last word, but I'm done with you.
@kelleynice: You're the one that's making the BS claim so you post for people can see the proof and please don't post something that's extremely isolated and only happened a few times where boys were targeted just because they were boys.
Post tour claim something that's widespread and is affecting boys throughout the country.
And @crossdressingrihno: Your comparison with the car insurance is bs comparison.
Adults drive and should be responsible, you guys are claiming little boys are targeted by teachers just because they are boys.
Have you done any searching into the subject at all?
@crossdressingrihno: You guys are the ones making the claim, not me.
Show me some hard Significant data that boys are targeted to fail or receive lesser grades by teachers simply because they happened to be more males.
Ok #1
Ok #2
They really like to quote Christina hoff sommers
Looking for one that doesn't
@crossdressingrihno: You wasted 5 minutes of my life with this BS video about boys conduct or misbehaving in school.
The girl claimed boys are getting lesser grades than girls even though their school work is correct because they are boys.
I want to see that data, not a video about boys needing to play outside more or a weird violent kid drawing pictures of men getting their heads chopped off in school.
Good thing I sent 3 links then
Look imma go now it's 5 in the morning, I'm sick, this conversation is no longer worth my time and in all honesty I'm bored
@crossdressingrihno: Quit posting about feelings or boys being emotional etc.
I want to see the data were boys are getting their school work correct yet teachers are screwing them over on their good work because they happened to be boys or boys are purposely being ignored by their teachers and not getting the help they need with school work because teachers would rather help girls get better grades than boys.
I want to see that hard data happening in the U. S.
@crossrdressing: You got bored because you talking ish.
War on boys means encouraging boys to dress like girls, act, walk and talk like a girl, forcing them to listen to drag queens to read to them which some sick parents actually bring their kids to that BS.
If schools aren't forcing or encouraging boys to do what I just wrote then there's no war on boys.
A boy acting like he lost his damn mind and sense in the classroom and the teacher telling him to sit his ass down and shut up isn't war on boys.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy studies in Europe and the US show that female teachers (almost all) grade boys about 40% harder than girls, give girls. much more attention, and are much more likely to request formal discipline against boys. The system is ultra -gynocentric.
@KrakenAttackin: Where are these credible studies that teachers are working against little boys to make sure they don't succeed in the classroom?
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy. It's not that female teachers have a conspiracy, it's more about females teaching in ways females respond to. Girl behavior is seen as the gold standard while boy behavior is to be disciplined and medicated.
@KrakenAttackin: Because boys generally misbehave more than girls.
I was once that little devil of a boy in school that drove my teachers crazy by opening their cabinets and doing all sorts of bs and they had to call my mother in to talk to her about my bad conduct.
The way it should be, boys and girls go to school, respect and listen to the teacher, shut their mouths and learn the educational lesson that are being taught in class.
It's not supposed to be having little devils cause a disturbance and somehow thinking that's normal for boys or girls to act undisciplined like they don't have no damn sense and home training but America acting like a idiot is tolerated and promoted.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy. Do a quick search on YouTube for "war on boys", and you will find amazing videos documenting the collective issues boys are facing.
Kraken do you mind checking your messages?
@KrakenAttackin: Its the same bull that other guy posted earlier. I don't believe in this war on boys bs.
Like I said war on boys means teaching and encouraging them to dress like a girl, act like a girl, humiliating them, speaking hurtful words to tear them down, stuff like that is what a war on a boy would look like.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy. Ok, keep being a part of the problem.
@KrakenAttackin: What problem? Sick and tired of people in this society having strawmen arguments and BS that isn't actually there.
Constantly moaning, constantly whining, constantly complaining, constantly playing the victim.
@crossdressingrihno I gave up on replying to him when I realize, he is not interested in the truth or any facts; he just wants win an argument.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy. Do you think boys and young men are in good shape in this country? Can you think of any positive male role models (nationally)?
@KrakenAttackin: No I don't. Most boys and men today seem to be total soft cotton boy punks.
And what produces that is having too much prosperity and constantly moaning and whining.
A hard difficult life and growing through it with a positive attitude is what makes a person tough and rugged. Not moaning and bitching all the time about life and circumstances.
@kelleynice: You didn't post facts when I asked. You just talking ish to push a narrative that isn't true at all but in your own imagination or BS videos you be watching on YouTube.
As a matter of fact I think you are a male under a fake pink account with a fake age.
No it hurts women. Because then the guys end up all fucked up and disempowered and it messes up society
I wonder who pays off those expensive college courses and whether they are ultimately helpful to them.
Short term benefits, long term consequences.
Yes they have a safe education environment
Soon they'll start killing the men
The wars on boy doesn't benefit me in any way.
The world is becoming soft. More bubble wrap is the answer. 1st place ribbon for everyone.
It definitely does not
Sounds like the source is bs.
no, it makes men angry and women lonely
Not really, as we have seen.
Nope. Just makes them easier targets for players.
its bad for both genders
Yeah
Nope.
You can also add your opinion below!
Holidays 
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions