the doctor who gave the child an abortion is now under investigation, fyi.

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News the doctor who gave the child an abortion is now under investigation, fyi.

Actually although it's rare some girls do begin menstrating by age 8, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/10132-normal-menstruation
There are some girls who begin menstration naturally at that age or sometimes at that age and earlier because of precocious puberty. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/precocious-puberty/symptoms-causes/syc-20351811#:~:text=Overview,it%20is%20considered%20precocious%20puberty.
I wonder at what age do the antichoice people think should be the cut off because child rape with girls does happen far too often just as child rape of boys happen to often but boys don't get pregnant (though they can have other life long damaging effects).
I realize that people don't like abortion, I personally don't believe a person soul automatically begins at conception or even until the 2nd trimester so I voted yes, the embryo was six weeks. While I respect people that are pro-life, they really need to look at the quality of every life as well, a young girl at age 10 being forced to be pregnant and give birth to a child carries it's own unique risks, https://www.healthline.com/health/adolescent-pregnancy#effect-on-babies (this actually teens but I imagine risks are even worse for preteens). One thing all those pro-life people need to realize, is this embryo that was created should have never even been created, it wouldn't have happened had this girl not have been raped. So, yeah, sad that an assault would lead pregnancy but the embryo would never have existed if, parents, governement, society etc could do a better job protecting our children.
Sorry, for the rant, but I've seen people get more pissed at the doctor than the actual rapist, and more people pissed about abortions, even those as result from rape than they are about the fact that this level of sexual violence with girls and women is even occuring for them to choose abortion or contemplate choosing abortion.
Agree almost completely. Just not the soul part. But thats cool!
Yes because 10--year-olds are not able to get birth. The pro-life movement is about you willingly having sex over the age of 18. And you get pregnant you should have to give birth to the child the exception of of course is the potential death of the mother.
I have been convinced that even in rate cases unless it’s going to cause the actual death of the mother they should have to get birth to it. It is a very very unpopular position that I’m taking if you want to trying to convince me otherwise I am still open for it. But I don’t trust anyone not a lie that’s includes women house includes men For those Think I’m trying to be sexist here. Unfortunately since the election of Donald Trump and the #MetooMovement many Women Decide To Lie About Being Raped. For example there was a girl in college who said that the top members of the Football team had gang raped her in the bathroom that’s turned out to be completely untrue she just want to get the excuse to her boyfriend that she had been rape, that’s why she got pregnant by the top four members of the college football team all four of them were expelled even though she willingly had sex with all of them. This is why I don’t make the exception from rape when it comes to abortion unless you’re coming forward that night and we can get a DNA test not to three months later when we have absolutely no idea whether or not you were raped or you willingly had sex.
The best solution here is keep it in our pants until we’re married.
The Doc is under investigation because that's Indiana law - specifically when an abortion is performed on someone under age.
The 27yr old asshole, that got her pregnant, needs to be castrated and then sent back to Guatemala and air-dropoed from 10,000' w/o a parachute. Damn illegal aliens!
Then the mom of that 10yr old needs to have her kid taken away for child abuse - effectively selling her daughter for $$$, and ship her ass back to wherever she came from.
We don't want idiots like this invading the US. They can stay where they came from. They're certainly NOT doing anything to help America.
Opinion
4Opinion
Sad that a 10 year old girl was impregnated. It is against my principles. Little pecker head should have his dick cut off.
The only thing I'm focused on is that a 10 year old child went through two horrific ordeals. I hope the poor girl finds a way to heal and recover from this.
I voted A.
No. Committing a second crime does not negate the first one.
This is the best anti carry law respond ever. ☝It doesn't work for me in this context though. Because some hardship that resulted in the first crime can still be negated. And it is a crime because people apperantly WANT these kind of situations to happen. there is no other reason to ban abortion.
@msmissydc I am unsure about the logic here- please expand on what you have said - thanks!
The first was just something that came up for me. Not really related to this topic. Explaining the rest: its a crime that is not good that it is a crime. Why make her life even harder or possible end it to not allow her an abortion? Of course it doesn't negate the first crime but it will make the consequences for the victim less harsh. And the last part: honestly to deny the right of abortion without thinking about these situations at all is like wanting it. And this is what if feels like. They want rape victims to carry the child otherwise they would change the law. They want to endanger childs otherwise they would change the freaking law.
@msmissydc I don't want this to happen to anyone. That said, in my version of morality. killing a baby far outweighs the discomfort of a 10-year-old that can be treated since she is still alive, unlike the baby would be. There is no good solution here.
In my world a not even born and not developed fetus that could potentially endanger the child bearer and itself when growing doesn't outweight the life of a fully developed and potentially traumatic persons life and future. Yes after the rape there is no good solution but why not make it the still possible best one?
@msmissydc Killing another human being that manifestly does NOT endanger the life of another is a terrible solution.
@msmissydc Really? How exactly?
Yes for sure if possible
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!