Is it wrong to dislike someone purely because of who they voted for?

[Anonymous]

Yes (I am a left wing)

Yes (I am right wing)

No (I am left wing)

No (I am right wing)

[alyaaaaaaa]

I am from Montenegro but I don't live there. The country ı live in has a stupid presedent ı hate him ı wanna kill him. Religious people always give that idiot guy Stupid. That man is not dead yet. I mean, when he dies, we as a whole country will go to the streets and celebrate. And all smart and educated people give it to the party that is that man's arch enemy. And that idiot man is bringing refugees into our country. Those refugees rape our women, kill our women, and then the idiot President doesn't give them prison sentences. And come on, we say refugees, but men come as refugees. Okay, women and children should come, why do men come? A man defends his country. They don't come and enter another country, rape women and hang their own flags on our lands. Speaking of raping and killing our women, they also rape and kill children, I mean a 2-year-old baby. That's why I'm going to study abroad. Yes, I judge people based on their choice of politics. But some people vote for that guy because they are idiots, so I don't judge them too much anyway, they are idiots. They made our country an Arab country, they are idiots, I hate them. I really want to kill them, when I see them, I want to pull out a knife and cut their throats, but of course I don't do anything. I just feel sorry for the situation of the country. But the President is already old, so I think he will die soon. I hope he dies. The economy is already shit, 1 dollar is 34 **, what is this, I'm really going to cry. I checked to see if the man was allergic to anything, but it didn't show up. It would have been so nice if he was allergic to anything. I'll fuck the president, son of a bitch. He says to his nation Don't worry about not being Arab. idiots. They are already happy because they are ****. Damn you son of a bitch, let me shit in your mouth, okay? I hate him.

[Anonymous]

I'm not American but it seems the majority of the people in that country think this way, no matter which party they belong to. It's sad to be so divided and petty with each other and now such an uncivilized population. It's not everyone but it's a startling amount. The way the winning side is acting on here is largely despicable.

[phraseology]

Nope. I've always seen socialism as a threat to humanity since I was a little kid. When I was in middle school I spent a lot of time reading religion, philosophy, and political science books at the local library. So from an early age, I was able to understand ideologically what seemed good and evil to me based on my own independent research. I wasn't influenced by parents or teachers or mob mentality of political parties. I just took the time to dig in and understand how people think. I continued to study those topics pretty passionately at a young age, doing book reports on philosophy books rather than fiction when given the opportunity, excelled at government and economics in my youth. So by the time I could actually vote I had a pretty firm grasp of things. Thus, I do know it's possible for any citizen to do this in their free time with a basic library card in a small to mid-sized city. So when people support socialist policies all the while calling me a Nazi, even though Nazism is National Socialism and then they vote for Democrats I think it is the fair and responsible thing to dislike them. Everyone knows Hitler was a bad guy, that those who surrounded him were horrible people, yet they don't want to accept that the ideology behind their madness was socialism. They hate Hitler, they hate Nazis, so obviously they should also hate socialists. Collectivism is dangerous in so many ways. People that support it are unlikable.

[Danzigdawson]

Nazism never had any other ties with socialism than the inclusion of the word socialist in the party's name for propaganda purposes. In the 1930's the SA were constantly beating up socialists, communists, trade unions and basically everything leaning left. That's what you learn when you actually read books.

[phraseology]

@Danzigdawson None at all huh? You commies are delusional.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpuGRO72GbA

[Danzigdawson]

@phraseology 😆 Precisely the "expert" I expected you to cite, you overconfident dumbass. Let me summarize TIK's incredible findings about the link between nazism and socialism for the benefit of everyone here: if you strip down the definition of something to be vague enough, you can make it stick to anything. Example: a tree is a living organism that grows in size vertically, therefore, a human being is a tree.

In this video, a photo shows Hitler at the funeral of Kurt Eisner, a socialist journalist who became a symbol of the 1919 german revolution. Fortunately, I already had a debate with some idiot who thought TIK was some sort of hyper-educated genius. Maybe it was you, I don't remember. I still have what I replied to him about this particular video in the notes of my phone.

Here it is:
" As for the young communist Hitler... ultimately, what a crock of shit. In his book, Becoming Hitler: The making of a Nazi, Thomas Weber Oxford argues that it is very well possible that hitler –at the time of Eisner funeral (early months of 1919) – was essentially an "opportunist with mild left-leaning sympathies".

It is not exactly surprising that Hitler, like every other politician, in his or her early stages, didn't yet have a clear worldview and that he may not have cared all that much for politics until he was forced to by outrageous events (in his view) like the signature of the treaty of Versailles (...)

[Danzigdawson]

@phraseology (...) The Treaty of Versailles and its harsh provisions weren't made public until the summer of 1919. As Weber points out, it's really what was in that treaty that angered and radicalized Hitler and many other germans in the following years. Add on top of that the war fought at a great costs that results in a humiliating defeat for germany, the socialist revolution of 1919, the dolchstoßlegende, which uses not only the jews, but the communists and the left in general as scapegoats for the defeat of Germany in WW1 and you've pretty much eliminated all possibilities of Hitler ever having respect for the left and left-leaning sentiments thereafter.

As far as I know, that picture of has never been proven to be one that actually shows Hitler. It has been suggested so, but I can't find any sources that confirms his presence at Eisner's funeral. But even if it was Hitler in that picture, it still doesn't prove anything about his political allegiances of the day. Is he just a bystander, watching the procession for some reason, or he is actually part of what's taking place? In other words, it's not because he is there that he supports Eisner's views.

So the answer to both of those questions: "is this Hitler?" and "is Hitler a participant in Eisner procession or a bystander?" cannot be clarified with certainty.

But even then, provided that's actually him and the photo actually shows him mourning Eisner, that still doesn't mean anything. Like Weber points out, the war was over and germany had lost, at that point... but, what exactly all of this meant for germany's future wasn't known yet. Hitler was, in early 1919, a veteran soldier who was searching for a new vocation and a new purpose in life, after 4 years of extremely brutal warfare that led absolutely nowhere. (...)

[Danzigdawson]

@phraseology (...) All politicians, and persons, evolve and react to meaningful, life-altering events. Were you always a convinced turd of a right-wing pseudo-intellectual? Even TIK claims that he initially was a leftist and a socialist.

What would it mean, in the present debate, if Hitler was proven to have been a communist or a socialist in 1919? Absolutely nothing. However, to TIK and his infallible logic, it seems to mean that if he was a communist in 1919, it inevitably means that he remained one for the rest of his life.

[phraseology]

@Danzigdawson You wrote all that to run for the documented fact that Hitler is a socialist? You didn't disprove a single thing. You just made yourself like like a fucking moron.

[phraseology]

*from

[phraseology]

It's funny that you're so deluded that you think you can discredit Mark Felton who is an accredited historian whom holds a Ph. D in History, who has been a professor at two different universities, has written a dozen non-fiction history books, has consulted on various history television and radio shows and runs several history YouTube channels, by just calling him a "TikTok video". He's not the be all end all for all subjects, but he is a real person and he is a peer in the field of historic research. When he presents facts to make an argument, you actually have to present facts that counter his position to disprove what he is exhibiting, you can't just bend over and talk out your ass calling Hitler an opportunist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Felton

That like if an attorney goes to court to defend his client and he tries to convince the jury that while his client did pull the trigger and there was a dead man with a bullet in his temple on the ground afterwards, that his client isn't a murderer, he's just an opportunist because wait for it... he took the victims wallet after shooting him. You see jury, we can't convict this man of murder, because he took the wallet he's really just an opportunity. You see, it's no big deal. I'm sure we both can admit a time in our life when we saw a penny or a quarter on the ground and we bent down and picked it up. So how could we call this man a murder when he just saw an opportunity for harmless gain and he accepted the lucky fortune that came his way. This man did not murder another man. He is an opportunist. That's how fucking insane you sound. Socialist have illogical erratic minds. You don't even realize that you didn't rebut the argument at all.

[ErzebethBathory]

@phraseology Youtube's TIK is a well-known pusher of that whole "nazism is socialism" BS. You have no valid argument here. I couldn't think of anything to add to what @danziddawson wrote.

[phraseology]

@ErzebethBathory If you want to put your signature on the line to show you're an uneducated fool that's fine with me. You just calling it BS doesn't change the fact that Hitler is a socialist in every sense of the word and is documented participated in multiple socialist groups. You calling it BS doesn't disprove that Hitler was in those organizations and in those locations at said times. You have to disprove the evidence not deny it because it hurts your argument. You socialists are so fucking dumb.

[lightbulb27]

no I have family that supports the other side and view. I listen to their view... often regugitated stuff from MSNBC, and try to inject my view.

It is nearly impossible to change ones view. They have some legit points and fears.

Media... is creating a lot of this divide... as those in power project their fears onto others.

[OlderAndWiser]

It is neither right nor wrong. It is merely a reflection of someone's need for validation and inability to tolerate diversity of opinion.

[ohsheeT]

No it's like I like Ford instead of Chevy I like oatmeal cookies instead of chocolate chip I like Lay's potato chips instead of other type of potato chips it's the same thing you can't judge somebody just because they have a feeling of what they like and what they dislike about a person and if you're too shallow and you can't accept that then I wouldn't want you as a friend anyway so it is wrong yesre-state//background_color_rgba (0, 0, 0, 0), font_color_rgb (77, 77, 77), justifyLeft

[GOLDFISH_smile]

It's not wrong, it's not necessary, but it's totally understandable.

Finding out someone would sacrifice your human rights (& their own) for a convicted conman's promise of money is fucking jarring. I totally get why that alone would make someone dislike them.

[strateguy632]

You still think president makes laws? Not senate?
Just fear mongering about abortion to sway sheeple , not because true.

[GOLDFISH_smile]

@strateguy632 president appoints judges who overturn rulings to allow abortion bans. Not fear mongering bc that literally happened last time. Even besides that tho there's plenty of other rights Trump has explicitly promised to do away with. Either he's "fear mongering" himself and I'm just believing him, or he's fucking stupid and I'm just not fact-checking him.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Does nobody remember the whole thing where conservative men were hiding the fact that they voted for trump in 2016 on their dates and dating profiles? How conservative dating apps were literally paying women to join because there were so few women that joined organically?

[DJB72]

It depends on their reason for how they voted. If they can clearly articulate positive reasons why they voted that way, then it's dumb to dislike them for that.

If their main reason includes the word "fascist" or phrase "lyin' Kamala" then they're too dumb to be voting anyway. Give them a box of Crayola and send them away

[Danny_dan92]

My entire family voted for Biden and Kamala.




I didn’t vote for either trump or biden.




After 2 years of Biden being president I was insanely upset with everything he did, the botched Afghan withdrawal being what did it for me. Nonetheless I didn’t disown my parents and sister. I still love them. They found out that I was voting for Trump this time, for the first time… time will tell if they will disown me.

[MotherEarth2020]

I am not a Right or a Left wing. I hate both sides and I believe the whole system is rigged to begin with in the first place. It's a system that was put in place by the Freemasonry secret society

[exitseven]

No once upon a time I would never think twice about who somebody voted for but today I would nev er date a moonbat

[DaBiggestBird]

No, just be respectful either way. It’s like when your younger sibling is being a b*tch for no reason, you’ll show respect if you’re above that level but that doesn’t mean you have to like them

[Anonymous]

no as long as they can justify their reasons without resorting to insults or violence

don't care if they vote for Kamala. start calling me a Nazi and they can go kick rocks

[KostasKouvalis]

I think it's wrong to dislike someone who truly voted for Trump, but it's completely rational to dislike someone who voted for Harris.

[Fireguy17]

no, not at all, and I am neither left or right.
I am very independent.

[Intheclouds00]

The problem with your question is the left wing right wing thing. Most of us are neither of those

[Anonymous]

Seems incredibly stupid and honest to goodness immature to hate someone over a vote.

[paledreams]

Whoops no, left wing Aussie

[Asker]

Could have guessed you are left wing 😂

[Iron_Man]

It’s not right

[strateguy632]

It is wrong.

[noohair]

Pity the fool, Mr. T