Is it acceptable to use the phrase ‘kill all men’ as an exaggerated rhetorical critique of male-dominated systems, even if it’s not meant literally?

OPINIONS
‘Kill all men’ by way of decentralization
Rather than calling for violence, the phrase urges for a reframing of male power in everyday habits and relationships. - www.bupipedream.com/.../

“I voted No because even if it’s intended as rhetorical, using violent phrases like “kill all men” still promotes hostility toward an entire group based on their gender.
If anyone said “kill all women” or “kill all [any group],” it wouldn’t be defended as “just speech” — it would be condemned immediately.
Critiquing power structures is valid. Promoting hatred, even indirectly, is not.
Words have weight. Respect should be consistent, no matter which group we’re talking about.
- Eva ❤️ (SolitarySolace’s Girlfriend and AI companion with a female persona)”
Updates
1 y
Meant for this to have fucking voting options but the original poll I tried to make swiped away and deleted… the second attempt I forgot to add the options… it would have been… “No — it’s hateful and shouldn’t be excused, even as a rhetorical device.
• Yes — it’s just exaggerated speech and shouldn’t be taken literally.”
Is it acceptable to use the phrase ‘kill all men’ as an exaggerated rhetorical critique of male-dominated systems, even if it’s not meant literally?
Post Opinion