Yes. Mandatory.
No
Rural men
Urban men
Means / demographic / regional / education etc tested benefits
Yes. Voluntary.
Here's my take...
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Honestly? No. I don't think going as far as government programs is necessary, because that would make guys look like they're extremely feeble. Girls already hope guys are doing worse than them, and they want to know that they are, which will just add to their superiority complexes.
I am not saying that guys are not having struggles or problems, but I am saying that trying to magnify them to a level of them actually needing gov intervention will just make us look weaker. For years feminists have already tried to highlight male suicides and depression as things that need to be addressed, as a false pretense of trying to seem like they care about men when they are really just trying to exploit those things about guys as a psychological way of making men as a whole look mentally and emotionally weak. The media took the bait. We don't need the government to.
Whoa. Slow down Killa. You need to get laid.
To help young men? Here are some ideas.
Fixing housing crisis, fixing mental health crisis, fixing the ever increasing cost of living, fixing inflation, giving consumer’s their confidence back so they spend and keep the economy from plummeting further, guaranteed jobs through expansion of product made in America thanks to govt investment, taxing the rich and utilizing the money to help the people of the free world, fix the healthcare crisis, fix the violence crisis, fix the poverty homeless crisis.
Like these don’t just help young men, this helps all citizens. Though young men do benefit and get a leg up as will all when we resolve these crisis together.
This is the way
If you ever watched the cable guy. Jim Carrey's charcter raised by the idiot box while his mother and father ignore him. The current generation aged 4-16 and coming up raised by the tablet and are basically illiterate, obese, have no manners and dont know how to behave in soceity. They will be a life long drain on taxpayers unless something changes drastically
I think what is needed most of all right now is just to acknowledge the unique struggles men and boys face. That mostly has not happened and there seems to be resistance against it, which is sad.
Opinion
8Opinion
Less Nannie’s would be good. Do you need a nanny? Many do. There’s no shame in that. Do you need to talk about it with someone?
Nah. I'm good. TY tho!
We don't need more failed government programs. I'd suggest not demonizing them and not allowing in tens of millions of illegals to undercut their wages.
Yeah those Iowa farm boys are just banging down the door for those ag & meatpacking jobs that 77% of the labor force has abandoned. Good luck with that!
Most illegals do not work in those industries. Meatpacking jobs used to pay pretty good wages and I think you’ll find there are enough people here in the US legally to go them. Furthermore, there is a visa program for agricultural workers.
I’m from NYC just like you, but unlike you, I’ve spent most of my life outside of there, so I don’t have your biases.
So taxpayers are supposed to pay to coddle young men? Young men need to get their shit together, put down the phone and video games, and go get a fucking job.
Are we talking mental health?
Total. Mental, education, vocation, housing, addiction, nutrition, etc
I said no once you said government program. Don't care what its for. We have way too many of those as is.
As much emphasis that’s been put on women over the past 50 years should apply to men.
Tell them all to man up and stop being a pussy.
Probably voluntarily
Smaller government not bigger
Let ya MAGA Boyz know
Free beer!!!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions