
Should giving someone HIV knowingly and without consentbe a serious crime or non serious like in california?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
So my guess is that this is more about people consenting to the state to do a blood test and finding out a contamination happened in the first place. The attack happened and that dosen't change how, but now there isn't more punishment so it's better to consent for a blood test rule out any dangerous blood and better odds for the person who got hurt get the proper help they need.
This probably happens more in prison then everyday life. Shank someone and put hiv blood on it then don't consent for blood test. At the same time it's not impossible to get it from someone else either so the blood is pretty irrelevant.
Ultimately I do think the law change is supposed to help with that. Shit happened let's sort this out together. It dosen't change much at all really.
Could be that
As a Californian, I find this new law to be appalling, but also par for the course for the morons and criminals that run this state.
Remember, we are talking about people who KNOWINGLY and intentionally infect other people. The idea that this is "a health issue" and not a criminal issue is just divorced from reality, but doing this is fairly common in the gay community, and lord knows that the folks in charge are going to cater to the community, and who cares what it costs the overall public.
Ty for inviting me to share.
I have to side with the "assault with a deadly weapon" analogy.
But what good does making it a "serious crime" really do? It doesn't stop anyone.
I don't have a magic answer, I wish I did. I know a lot of our old systems are just not working anymore and somehow, someway we are going to have to come up with a better one.
I suppose since HIV is now a chronic, long-term illness instead of a death sentence l like it used to be, the statutes have changed.. But giving someone a chronic illness that will cost them time and loads of medication to maintain their lives, might be prosecutable, still. I could see someone seeking damages.
Opinion
43Opinion
I don't care about California. California is the system of Dr. Tarr and Professor Feather.
In Florida, knowingly transmitting HIV/AIDS once is a third degree felony: up to 5 years in state prison. Doing it more than once is a first degree felony: up to 30 years in state prison. Knowingly transmitting any other STD is a first degree misdemeanor: up to 365 days in jail.
It should be treated as a serious crime similar to rape or an assault that causes permanent injury. Deliberately causing grievous bodily harm with malice of forethought.
I would be okay with chemical castration as a penalty.
Contracting HIV is life changing. It can destroy a person's life.
Deliberately giving them it should be treated as murder,
I think it's far more likely to occur through reckless indifference to the wellbeing of the partner, rather than deliberate intent to harm.
@bddddd if you know you've HIV then yiu know what you are doing by spreading it
Manslaughter vas murder.
It should be Treated equivalent to a Homicide!.. and charged with death Penalty.
HIV Disarms a Person and kills their Immune System, Which is One of the Vital System for Human body. Like circulatory system.
Giving Someone HIV is like stabbing someone's heart, which is Equivalent to Killing a Person!
I believe it's a crime still. It's just that they have better medications for it now so people aren't given a death sentence like they did in the early days of AIDS.
HIV/AIDS was once a death sentence, but still infecting someone with an incurable illness is still and should remain a criminal act
Its not a death sentence anymore but its still plenty bad to have. I mean you can't or at least shouldn't have kids if you have HIV. Then there's the immune problems and the health effects of being on medication permanently long term.
Totally it’s still better not to get infected with HIV/AIDS
Isn't that simply attempted murder? I guess it is now comparatively fine to attempt to murder someone in California, as long as it's done through biological weapons... 😂
Though on the upside, this change might reduce the sleeping around rate, since people will be more wary of HIV spreaders.
Serious. It's even worse than just killing someone, it's giving that person a life of suffering, ostracism, and finally death in the long run.
It's a torture.
assault with a deadly weapon at least, maybe attempted murder.
Knowingly exposing someone to a fatal/and/or chronic disease should be charged as murder or attempted murder.
California decriminalizes everything, but harasses law abiding citizens who complain or dare to protect themselves and their families from the violent criminals California politicians let run amok with impunity.
Damn, as a Californian that's fucking scary! It should be classed as "assault with a deadly weapon".
All the more reason to steer clear of California girls
what is the point of that? that is motive and attempted murder at the least
yes for sure, what the heck is wrong with california.
oh yea...
you know, we really do need Kamala Harris to take over that state... right?
If the punishment is the EXACT same for a needle jab or a erect cock I'm cool with it.
Needless to say I'm NOT cool with this.
It's understandable as likely most of California is HIV positive with the wife swapping that takes place with the ultra elite from Hollywood.
I'm not sure but I think it is a crime here. If it isn't it should be.
It's a crime for sure but without knowing what the old and new penalties are it's difficult to comment on good
On this**
Some of the laws in California make zero sense. This is one of them.
Serious crime. Worse than murder in my opinion.
In California they have so many gays, homeless and drug addicts, that if they wanted to send all of them to prison there would be no place left.
It should be (and is here in Canada) regarded a felony, as an HIV-positive person who infects a partner puts the other person at potentially fatal harm.
Serious crime. I need to remember not to go to California anymore.
Yeah I think so. It is an assault charge in Australia even though the sex was consensual
Someone who knowingly passes on HIV should get the death penalty. Humanity would be better off without narcissists like that.
Only California's government believes it knows better than everyone else. No one should follow California down this path of ruining another’s life.
California is an insane asylum run by sociopaths. YES, if you knowingly transmit a potentially fatal STD, it should be a serious felony.
That's true because then the given would have to answer, why new burns get exposed and injections of it.
Knowingly giving someone HIV under any circumstance should be considered a serious crime worthy of imprisonment.
Why is it still a smart idea to practice unprotected sex?
Serious crime!
Wtf California.
You know what I'm actually not surprised.
Seems to be a real attempt in a lot of places to rather than prevent crime they just decriminalise it.
It should be "Attempted murder."
Should be a death penalty offense.
It should be attempted murder.
This is a very serious crime.
It should be a felony.
It should be serious
you mean to say that's not a crime yet?
Yes, absolutely
That should be a serious crime
Absolutely it should
Should definitely be a crime
It must be sentenced with death penalty
Absolute crime , serious with max jail
Serious Crime
Serious.
Yes but the are shots for it
Attempted murder
Yeah totally a crime
Should be serious
Yes.
Should be serious
You can also add your opinion below!