If men are better at raising kids and protecting elders, are they better humans?

[Vegasrunner]

[NaultD]

You need to sleep or take a shit at somepoint. From there get old and can't take care of yourself and if you can't ask for help you won't get it.

Even if you are by every measure a better person but don't pass it on to the next generation you are effectively worthless less then nothing without a village of people just getting by.

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd TY for sharing. What does this have to do with the question?

[NaultD]

As an individual person there is a limit of value you gain contributing to being a "better human."

A more village collective approach with whatever meaning of a "better human" is a better future for humility.

[NaultD]

Think of potential dilemmas.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dilemma

Do you hunt more for food or stop before winter to make winter coats to hunt in the long winter? As a man you can't do both. So what do you do?

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd TY for sharing but I think you may be responding to a question never asked

[NaultD]

Why are you as a man a better person?

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd That argument was never made. Plesse read the question asked.

[NaultD]

If men are better at raising kids and protecting elders, are they better humans?

How is it different then men are better humans?

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd If you dont understand that then perhaps this subject is to complicated for you?

[NaultD]

Be as obtuse as you want getting the answer to the question you asked.

You're the one dying alone when your kids don't want to see you. That's how you want your legacy to end your business. Just don't expect anyone to care or even remember you existed after your gone.

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd Ok. I hope you feel heard.

[NaultD]

You're the one asking the question.
Are men better people?

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd You are cherry picking. Read the entire question.

[NaultD]

Let's break down the question then.

[NaultD]

"If men are better at raising kids and protecting elders, are they better humans?"

What part am I missing out?

[Vegasrunner]

@naultd Sounds like all of it. You are ignoring the qualifiers thst led to the question. The question never states men are "better people" it qualifies by asking if A is True than is B true. Because it offends you, you ignored the qualifying and are pretending to answer a question never asked.

[Hiker_011]

I think I was a pretty good parent. I spent a lot of time with my son. I don't protect elders. I also don't think most guys prioritize their children to the extent that I did.

[Vegasrunner]

@Hiker_011 Why do you think that?

[Hiker_011]

Mainly because I was in a position to leave my full-time job, and go work part-time so I could take care of my son more. I became his primary caregiver, and I bonded with him more than my wife did at the time. A lot of men have to work full-time, and because of that, they often bond less with their kids. Some of them will even abandon their families and not care too much about it. You really have to spend time with your kids in order to be close to them.

[Vegasrunner]

@Hiker_011 Well actually statistically speaking children who are raised by single fathers tend to lead more productive lives than those raised by single mothers.

[Spencer10]

What is your source for this observation that men are better? Do you have some data to support this?

[Vegasrunner]

@Spencer10 That is known as an argumentative response. You dont like the info presented to you so you attempt to deflect by asking the author to prove something to you. This provides you with a sense of control while simultaneously distracting the audience.

[Mike_Hum]

And this is known as dodging the question, because you're full of shit.

[Spencer10]

@Mike_Hum Sounds like a lot of deflection going on. Thats the sign of someone who has no facts to back up a position.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Thats kind of true but @Spencer10 didn't dodge it he is reframing in attempt to avoid an answer while having the audience focus on another aspect. This is called question for question.

[Spencer10]

Well here is my answer then... since you clearly have zero facts to support this question I conclude your question is meaningless and totally full of crap. Just some more GAG trolling by an individual with some kind of anti female agenda.

[Vegasrunner]

@Spencer10 TY for sharing. So what you're saying is this question makes you feel bad however deep down you understand it has merit (or why else would you take the time to respond?). Instead of providing an answer, you've decided to attack the author which is another common deflection tactic. However the original question doesn't take your feelings into account it simply asked based on the evidence presented does this make men better humans. Which judging by your answer you obviously believe so.

[Mike_Hum]

@Vegasrunner dipshit you are the one dodging

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum That doesn't make sense. How can I dodge a question I asked?

[Mike_Hum]

You dodged Spencer’s question

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum So he answered a question w/ a question?

[Mike_Hum]

And you bullshitted with no evidence.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum So you're saying its acceptable to ignore the question asked?

[Mike_Hum]

I’m saying you’re full of shit.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Ok, why would I be concerned w/ what a random online profile says? I posed a question if you are unable to answer then why are you spending your time here?

[Mike_Hum]

WHat you did was make a statement of fact within an attempt at a question with zero evidence to support your premise.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Um no, thats why reading is important, what I did is ask a question based on a premise which is actually pretty standard educational technique. Im asking if A is true why is B true. The question triggers you so, you're attempting to attack the author, which is a tactic used by low IQ individuals.

[Mike_Hum]

You provided no evidence for your premise. If I posed the question "Vegasrunner is a mouth breathing retard, should he be banned from this website?" it should happen?

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum I think I understand your confusion, its a statistical fact that men are better at raising kids and protecting the elderly. Just because you are ignorant to this doesn't make it less of a fact. Sounds like you're commenting on a subject which you know nothing about, hence the reason for your frustration?

[Mike_Hum]

If its a statistical fact, prove it. or you're making it up.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Lol, Now you want me to educate you? What do I get out of this?

[Mike_Hum]

Oh we've all learned a lot about you already.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Nice glad I could educate you.

[Mike_Hum]

I wasn't expecting you to be in the top three dumbest posters here, but thanks for the info.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum No worries, if you work really hard, and get some breaks you'll have a chance to be almost as successful as me.

[Mike_Hum]

I'd probably need quite a bit of brain damage to be like you.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Na thats just your emotions talking. Its a common trait of low IQ people. You feel bad about some i fo you heard, so you need to pretend as if there's some deficiency in the messenger. You never stop to examine if the information is true or the success of the person providing it.

[Mike_Hum]

you're projecting emotions. I can prove you're an idiot, can you prove men are better at raising kids?

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Stating a fact is projecting emotions? Elaborate

[Mike_Hum]

You haven’t stated a fact

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Why do you feel like that?

[Mike_Hum]

I know you’re full of shit.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum So now you're providing a statement w/out evidence, why is it acceptable for you to do this when you just whined about it?

[Mike_Hum]

Nah you posted a false premise, so full of shit. Objectively.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Lol, just because something makes you feel better doesn't mean its false.

[Mike_Hum]

Hence the reason people are calling your stupid shit out

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum There's nothing to "call out" outside of you most people have reading comprehension skills.

[Mike_Hum]

uh huh. Smart people take their L and move on, but you're still going.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum I never once claimed you were smart so not suprises you're struggling to accept your L.

[Mike_Hum]

for what? I correctly called out your bullshit.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum You complained about some information that made you feel bad, and are now attempting to use juvenile insults as justification for your ignorance.

[Mike_Hum]

You're projecting feelings again.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum Uh huh. Im just glad you agree that using feelings for an argument is a bad thing.

[Mike_Hum]

you're the only one feeling some kind of way.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum You are correct I feel great.

[Mike_Hum]

Ignorance is bliss as they say.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum No one would know this better than you.

[Mike_Hum]

That's rich from the guy typing stupid ass shit as insightful questions, lol.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum I certainly understand how facts can hurt your feelings, but not sure how your opinion impacts any of this.

[Mike_Hum]

Again, you're the one having big feelings you need to get off your chest.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum You keep saying that however the responses contradict it.

[Mike_Hum]

again, these are characters on a computer screen. you're putting your emotions into them, not mine, if you detect any.

[Vegasrunner]

@Mike_Hum You're simply regugitating what I told you which means, n you're unable to think for yourself and have been emotionally triggered. Remember its you who are responding to my post not the other way around

[Dargil]

Yes they are.