Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
DNA tests are harmful to children, family relationships, and women. If a woman has sex with several men, she should have the right to name the man who would be the best provider for her and her child.
French law limits genetic testing exclusively to medical, scientific, or judicial court-ordered purposes. Should DNA tests also be illegal in the USA?
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
7Opinion
DNA tests are like guns or knives or anything else in society.
They can be used to good or for harm.
DNA testing is a great method for doing geneaology and family history.
As for this:
"If a woman has sex with several men, she should have the right to name the man who would be the best provider for her and her child."
Absolutely not. That's a form of slavery and, worse, no different than rape; it is the taking away of freedom against your will. No man who is not the father should be required to be responsible for another man's child. That's the other man's responsibility, period.
What you suggest would violate probably 3 or 4 constitutional amendments.
In the UK and US, approximately 13% to 14% of married women admit to having cheated on their husbands. However, this number varies by age and culture. For example, in France, studies show that about 32% to 40% of women admit to infidelity during their marriage.
DNA does not lie. It can show true relationships between people. Essential for correct genealogical research. Yes, it can show up cases of infidelity, but my attitude is if you are scared of DNA and the truth, don't be unfaithful!
I have learned much about my ancestry usind DNA tests.
Like I have, every child has the right to know its true origins.
That is not necessary if they believe.
Belief is not the same as knowing. Are you going to ban people ftom knowing their blood group? Just in case it shows an impossible match?
In that case, they don't know unless the mother knows.
It is the father we are concerned about.
@Kelley1 so pregnant women chose a father for their child? Not biological father but money father?
Yes, before DNA, haven't they always
@Kelley1
Yup
that is the most gold digger trapping with a child woman thing that I've ever heard.
It is what we have always done. Only, before DNA testing, the men didn't know.
LOL, you miss the point.
A lot of these test companies are BOGUS to begin with. But overall, the time and cost wasted is tremendous.
Nope. Those tests are what caught the golden state killer.
For what purpose Kelly? Who does it hurt to test? How does it create a victim by testing,
It hurts the husband. Not knowing, he was so happy. If he knows, he blames his wife for cheating.
I thought it was the man having the testing done. The mom knows who the mom is. Daddy don't. And I think every guy wants to know if a child is his.
Oh, and Kelley what's that last Crack there? A woman should have the right to play find the pea with impregnation then scope the most successful one out and hang daddy tag on him. Shame on you!
no I think men should not be liable if they are not the father
It is enough that they might have been.
No, denying the truth changes nothing