
The Lindsay Clancy case involves a Massachusetts mother on trial for first-degree murder after strangling her three young children in January 2023.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
The Lindsay Clancy case involves a Massachusetts mother on trial for first-degree murder after strangling her three young children in January 2023.
Well, she admitted to it, so execute the bitch!
100% you can see it yourself man
I agree man
She should be executed!
Thanks for the mho
Opinion
17Opinion
What she did is wrong. That much is clear.
Legally though, I don't think the prosecution proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she was fully aware of what she was doing when she killed her young children and aware that it was wrong, which is what the Commonwealth of Massachusetts law requires, the reverse of what most other states requiring the defense to prove she had mental issues.
I personally think the jury will not reach a decision, a hung jury will be declared, and the Commonwealth will not retry the case. This will have Lindsay Clancy left in a mental institution for a long time, essentially maintaining the status quo.
Justice period. This is no different than any other such cases. This was premeditated regardless. You excuse her, you set a dangerous precedent. Cases like Charles Mansion, Jeffrey Dahmer all become questioned. Where is the line drawn?
The defenses job is to instill doubt. They have used the media coverage to do just that.
If she doesn't get life in prison, she should never be allowed near or around child again. Her nursing license will likely be taken.
Personally, i think she should get life in prison just due to the planning she did to kill those kids. This wasn't a random act.
I think she should face justice. It's not the ex husband's fault and she did it. The only thing here is: should she receive leniency because she was looking for help and had post partum depression. The only thing I think we as a society have to think about: 1. She did show premeditation. 2. If we dub her as insane, what will become of other similar cases? What about ones with men? This is the actual problem we are facing - not whether she did it or not. I do empathize with her on some level. I have sisters who had children, who lost children. It's very sad to see. However, she did show premeditation. I think her being insane would make more sense if she did it on a whim.
Funny because you'd never show an ounce of sympathy of it were a man.
My argument is that are women really capable of self control or do they let their emotional impulses control them. If the latter is true, should they be trusted with the same political power that men gave them because we decided to trust that women can be held fully responsible for their actions.
If she is guilty give her the chair or inject her. Why waste money keeping her on this planet.
Agreed
This individual shouldn't run free. Lifelong enclosed psychiatry with daily medication cocktail that turns her in a vegetable.
That's a waste of taxes. I think public execution performed by Trump himself but our leaders are too cowardly to take the Lionheart pill
🧕🪓🦁
It’s sickening that people are even debating over this.
Sure the court has to follow due process.
But as far as any sensible human being goes, she should never see sunlight again.
I think she was suffering psychosis from post partum depression. It seems that she wasn't getting enough help or attention from her spouse, friends or family. When someone is severely depressed, it's usually obvious.
The loss of her children, divorce from her husband and being paralyzed seem to be punishment enough for a lifetime. Maybe require that she is sentenced to psychiatric treatment and community service for a reasonable period of time.
@Screenwriter
She admitted to killing her kids.
@MysteriousDarkness Also admitted to hearing voices telling her she was inadequate, couldn't care for them, saw hallucinations. Nothing about those events is normal.
Okay so when men rape it's just our hormones so we should just get psychiatric care and community service. Sounds like a good idea 💡
Or just admit you don't think women have agency over their actions.
@Taranis_Thunor I"ve never heard of men raping women because they were hearing voices telling them to rape or having hallucinations that the women were succubi asking them to rape them. 99% of women have agency over their actions. But there is a serious connection of loss of the hormonal state of pregnancy causing such a hormone loss that could lead to severe depression that leads to psychosis.
It did not happen to me after my son was born or to anyone I know. Doesn't mean it does not happen in some RARE cases. Who kills all their children? You can be annoyed by them, but only in rare cases does this happen. Men and women do it. I think you have to be crazed to do so. I don't know what justice in such a case looks like. Some kind of incarceration and psychiatric care.
The same should be true for rapists. Who aren't hearing voices or hallucinating. And some of them may have some kind of psychosis too. We've not heard of it though...
People who kill people who've done them little to no wrong, esp. children, or who kill exes, are consumed by unreasonable emotions. Could be psychosis, anger. I'm no psychiatrist. But I suspect this might be the rare case.
"99% of women have agency over their actions. " But apparently because she's a woman in that 1% once again there's certain crimes only a woman could get away with and not a man. Even though one of the people who knew her pointed out that she hated one of her children the most.
Who kills children, jumps out only a 2 story building then tries to fight her case at court? I wouldn't even want to live if I committed such an act.
And yes men, especially teenagers, absolutely can have a voice in their head if they had schizophrenia but there's never just a 1 time voice. "Doesn't mean it does not happen in some RARE cases" so yes you can also make this argument with hormonal men that hear voices in their heads except this voice only appeared in her head once, she didn't know better but to treat the voice telling her to kill her children is bad.
When men commit crimes they never getaway with it using hormonal arguments so it really does prove you think men have agency and women don't and look I'm not even saying I disagree with that as it explains why women have always voted to destroy their own civilisations.
No woman would be sticking up for this baby killer if we publically humiliated her.
Why is it that women get lighter sentences then men for the same crimes in general overall? A provable statistic feminism never had an issue with fixing.
If the genders were reversed I know for a fact you bitches sympathising with her (because you see yourselves in her) would never have defended such a man under any excuses. So you get a choice, keep your vote or we should adjust the the legal system so you're held just as morally responsible as men.
I was bullied when I was at school and had constant images and nightmares of murdering these people out of revenge. If I had access to a gun would that have made a school shooting okay because I can justify it and my hormones were going through the roof. If a young man has his ego insulted by a woman should he react to the embarrassment with violence because his inner monologue tells him?
Also her murder was premeditated as she researched on how to kill her children and get away with it.
I'm not the only one talking about taking rights away over this. Even some women, including my own mother, are starting to question if women should've had the right to vote if women's overly emotional state causes them to murder babies & flood their countries with hostile Islamic cultures that would have them raped.
@Taranis_Thunor We are talking about a very particular, limited case. The same would be true for school shooters and people taking revenge for wrongs enacted on them. I think violent criminals have something wrong with their brains/emotions to enact heinous crimes against people who've done nothing to them.
She might've looked up how to kill her children quickly and painlessly. That was what the defense stated. In a psychotic state, someone could do so, thinking they're performing something that needed to be done.
It's a weird case. But it is ONE case. All women cannot be judged by this one person. Just as all men are not judged by the majority of serial killers and rapists who are males, and the majority of serial shooters. Should we take away men's rights because of them? That's absurd.
"I think violent criminals have something wrong with their brains/emotions to enact heinous crimes against people who've done nothing to them."
Isn't it interesting how it was never an issue for punishing men who commit these crimes. It is a complete double standard that you women suddenly find yourselves defending a child killer once one of your own commited a heinous & unforgivable crime. Yeah these people have something wrong with them which is why our ancestors filtered them out the genepool via execution and why 3rd worlders are still full of evil people like this (as their ancestors did not filter these people out the genepool).
"She might've looked up how to kill her children quickly and painlessly. " 1 you said might've which means it's not even known to be true and 2 this actually tells us just how calculated and rational her mind was when she made the choice. She didn't just get mad and kill someone spur of the moment. Imagine if I used a similar excuse to walk through an Islamic neighbourhood in England, I get spooked and end up stabbing a bunch of Muslims because they pose a threat to me. Is that also justifiable? What argument isn't justifiable if you're just going to appeal to mental illness which, yes, people who suddenly commit murders are generally mentally ill.
"It's a weird case. But it is ONE case. All women cannot be judged by this one person" I'm judging you women by how much many of you are deciding to defend a child killer and it's making me and many others question if they're really as capable of being held responsible as men. If the answers no, then say goodbye to your "equal" political rights (which were never equal to begin with, we just gave you all the benefits men have without any of the drawbacks. They're mote privileges if anything).
"Just as all men are not judged by the majority of serial killers and rapists who are males, and the majority of serial shooters. Should we take away men's rights because of them? That's absurd."
Yeah and men take responsibility by condemning these men. You never find crowds of men & pro-male movements wearing blue fundraising millions towards serial killers, rapists and mass shooters.
Generally men condemn these men & start fantasising about what violent things they would do to these people. When women do it, suddenly all you foids leap to each others defence. If women have this pro-female tribalistic instinct and we give them political rights then we'll effectively be living under a female supremacists matriarchy.
That's exactly what we're living through I'm glad people are starting to wake up to what we Chuds have already known for years.
She killed her kids. A lot of people are mentally ill and no better. I find her guilty. I don’t wanna hear about she’s mentally ill. She’s going to prison where she belongs
As a mother of 4 it is impossible to feel she could be so sick to have done this and should face justice.
she needs to do some serious jail time. She is evil.
I'm not entertained by the murder of children... so I just don't... follow that
She killed little kids.
Justice. Those kids deserve justice for being killed by their mom.
Her defense is complete bullshit. MANY mothers deal with depression and mental health issues and NEVER hurt their children.
She should've chosen to become an abortion clinic in Israel or Palestine. Entirely her choice. Instead she murdered her own babies which is antithetical to our survival oriented nature.
Simple...
Dude was fucking around, she found out, lost her shit, tried to kill herself, really lost her shit, killed her kids to get even with him.
As to your update... the psychos who support her didn't vote.
She should be in jail. Simple as.
If you kill 3 innocent people you should face consequences
Precedent says she should be found not guilty Andrea Yates and Dimone Fleming are examples of this.
I don't know any details or specifics. But anyone that's harms children needs to face justice
Death penalty, now.
Prison. Why support a child murderer? 🤷♂️
There is no justice anywhere in the world.
Burn the witch
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions