Why did the Lindsey Clancy jury seem so biased in her favor?

[DonFrank]

IRL I don't know anyone who thinks Lindsey Clancy is innocent. Also, recently on a poll someone asked about what they thought about the Lindsey Clancy situation and nearly everyone thought as much too. Like, man haters I know irl thought she was guilty. 🤔

But if most people favor a guilty verdict then why was the jury so obviously lopsided and bias in her favor?

I can think of only a few options:

The Jury selection panel was compromised ⚖️

The population of Massachusetts was uniquely different 👫

Just bad luck 🎲

People who agree with her actions are so distant socially they appear invisible to me and others I know.🫥

A total of 7 votes were cast: 2 girls and 5 guys. See detailed results

[Chazmatazz269]

Massachusetts is deep blue. Don’t forget that the governor just legalized full term abortions there.
The jury was mostly white women, who patently refuse to accept accountability for anything ever.
They most likely don’t really care about Clancy at all. They are simply trying to establish the precedent that women can kill anyone they want, whenever they want, however they want, anywhere they want, and face no repercussions. This is the perfect case. If we refuse to protect even children from women, then feminism has won. People actually accept their nonsense argument about fetuses not being human or alive. But let a woman walk for the cold blooded murder of three innocent children? Now THAT is the biggest win of all time!
Children are just pawns and men are the enemy. Women above all has always been the goal, and we’re there. Lindsay Clancy is 100% going free, and there will be no protests, let alone riots. This country is 100% doomed.

[Chazmatazz269]

Oh, and Michael Desronvil, the “holdout juror”, reported that all of the other jurors were actively using their phones during the trial and deliberations. Eight of the women were set on not guilty from the outset. Almost certainly they either had their minds made up before even being selected for the jury, or they were more influenced by social media than by the facts of the case.

[exitseven]

You really have to understand the people that live in Massachusetts. They are real moonbats. They like to pay a lot of taxes and support illegal aliens. Thr governor recently signed into law that a woman can have an abortion right up until birth and all these women cheered like they won the lottery. It is not lost on me that the lone holdout was from Haiti.

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎

[rgb008]

the jury wasn't sequestered, when it should have been. and they were all probably watching TikTok when they shouldn't have.

[midnightmoon05]

They have been hypnotized by her evil eyes.

[NaultD]

First and foremost the burden of proof is on the prosecution. The benefit of doubt goes to the defense by our constitution.

Ultimately the question is if she is going to an asylum or jail. Now i don't know all the facts because I wasn't a jury member but if the prosecution got over zealous to the point where this happened that is on the prosecution being greedy.

That is a factor with how the state have unlimited power over with our tax dollars has over an individual citizen.

[Chazmatazz269]

Complete nonsense. Massachusetts has a plethora of cases in which they successfully convicted men using the insanity defense. Included one man who was actively living in a mental institution at the time of his crimes. Absolutely NO doubt in ANYONE’S mind that he was out of his mind… GUILTY!
This is 100% about her being a white woman and the jury being mostly white women. This is such an obvious fact that, in order to deflect that fact, Massachusetts overturned the conviction of a black woman who killed her family during Covid, so as to not appear racist.
Of course, the appearance of gender bias is of no concern whatsoever. We’ve been violating the fourteenth amendment to the US Constitution in favor of women for decades. Nobody seems to care.

[Anonymous]

Because of sexism.

Clancy, and the majority of the jurors, were female. That is the bottom line.

[strateguy632]

Clancy, and the majority of the jurors, were women

[Anonymous]

Maybe the people who sat in the courtroom listening to evidence thinking differently than the people who didn't is a clue.

[shish_kebab]

Didn't she admit to doing it?

[Ariesman81Nshiiit]

Yes, but according to her supporters, that is actually evidence she didn't do it. Because women never admit guilt. And therefore, means the husband did it. Make sense?

[shish_kebab]

😭😭😭 yes, by saying she did it is proof she didn't do it. Clear as mud.

[Ariesman81Nshiiit]

Exactly!

[Anonymous]

Feminists on the jury.