What level of proof is required to prove consent? What evidence would I need to provide, to stop any accusation?

[Anonymous]

Just wondering because at this point, the accusation alone is enough to wreck a man’s life (reputation, social standing, opportunities) long before any trial. Public opinion, campus processes, and social consequences do not require the same proof as criminal court, and they favor the accuser by default. A signed consent form can be dismissed as made under duress; a video of you explicitly saying you consent can be dismissed the same way. I see no reliable way for a man to protect himself from a later claim of non-consent when both parties were drunk.

So, ladies, you cast this dye. What standard (burden) of proof do we need?

[Chazmatazz269]

There is nothing that can be done under the current rules, especially in blue zones. Especially if these thoughts are occurring to you as a result of the “Cornell 7” case in the headlines lately. It’s important to look at the entire case. Lucy Craig both consented AND revoked consent multiple times that night, and the boys 100% respected her wishes EVERY SINGLE TIME. She even went on to tell multiple of them how much she enjoyed herself and that she would do it again. She didn’t cry “r*pe” until she was disinvited from the Halloween party at the same frat where she held her own personal gangbang. The state of New York, deeply blue, opted to not prosecute because Craig’s claims of r*pe were wholly unsubstantiated under the law.
The current fiasco is a civil suit, which have a much lower threshold for proof than criminal courts, and the jury is still likely to be more than half Clancy Cult members.

Try becoming Muslim. They seem to be very reluctant to prosecute Muslims even for gang-r*ping children. Or identify as a woman. Despite Craig’s own sworn testimony under penalty of perjury, she actually r*ped Matt Ingalls, one of the boys she’s suing. She molested him while he was out cold, r*ped him when he came to, and there are multiple text exchanges in which he admits that he doesn’t remember events that she does. Textbook r*pe under NY law, but the state didn’t arrest her. She didn’t even apologize to him. She knows fully well what she did because it’s the exact story she’s using to falsely claim she was a victim herself.
But no state wants to be the first to charge a woman with r*pe. We’re not ready for true equality, apparently. So, just identify as a woman.


Otherwise, the only way to win is to not play.

[Testttinnggg]

On the one hand you could carry around a breathalizer. On the other, the vast majority of sloots who have casual sex are drinking regularly, more often than not if a sloot is slooting she is drunk, so your breathalyzer will most of the time work against you. ㅤ

[Agape93]

here's my barometer.

Have they had any alcohol or drugs in the last few hours? Iffy, check to see how intoxicated they are, and get verbal consent.

Are they drunk or high? Dont touch.

Are they asleep, drugged, passed out or loopy? Don't touch.

[LazerBean]

Just do as God intended and don't have sex outside of marriage.

[Chazmatazz269]

Blue states enforce marital rape against men all the time. Never against women though. Go figure.

[LazerBean]

And so what percentage of rape charges are marital rape?

[NaultD]

The rapist aura is what ultimately gets you into trouble. I was a jury member for a defendant molested his girlfriend 3 daughters. He was his own worst enemy and the jury was more considerate of this defendant then my next jury duty where the case was self defense death in red state.

[Anonymous]

There is none. Everytime you engage a woman you're opening yourself up to a false allegation. But this is why you take your time to determine a woman's quality. It's no different than a woman vetting a guy. If she doesn't want to take her time and understand who he is she opens herself up to danger. If you suspect a woman is a danger to you, back off! It's just that simple.

[jshm2]

Lol, don't be so dramatic.

The problem is not the proof or consent. It's media and extent of protecting the trial.

But you've got nothing to worry about. You go on stealing those used knickers from your neighbours...

[FrodoSkywalker007]

@jshm2 do you enjoy being an idiot?

[Dargil]

Stay away from American women in all Democrat controlled regions, pure and simple. They are land mines. The Bible Belt is a little safer or, better, recruit from offshore.

[purplepoppy]

Yet billions of men manage to have sex without dwelling on this.

What makes you different?

[Asker]

My career revolves around risk mitigation

[Kelley1]

A three-hour video starting an hour before sex is sufficient.

[Bianca_Italy]

Walk around with a GoPro mounted on your head and record every second of your life.

[moddy_the_mod]

There is zero levels of consent that hold up in the court of public opinion. Whether a woman was raped changes on an emotional whim.

[Ariesman81Nshiiit]

The burden of proof is on her. If she can't prove she was drunk she can't prove she couldn't consent.

[Chazmatazz269]

That’s not true at all.

[Ariesman81Nshiiit]

@Chazmatazz269

How is it not? If inibriation = non consent, then proof of inibriation is required to prove non consent. Unless we're just gonna believe all women.

[msc545]

The reliable standard of proof is proof that you were out of town and, better yet, out of the country, with stamps in your passport when the woman says it happened.

[Levin]

I get 'em to sign a written contract.

[Anonymous]

Pay a prostitute. Then you're good 👍

[In_Trance]

Ok... Stop
You posted this last week