Questions: Society & Politics

Recent democratic-socialist victories are raising a larger question about the future of the Democratic Party.

RNC Research compiled statements from prominent Democrats responding to the socialist/progressive wing’s growing influence. Raphael Warnock, Chris Murphy, Seth Moulton, and Johnny Olszewski have all defended Democrats as a “big tent” party. Bernie Sanders has celebrated progressive and democratic-socialist victories. AOC called socialism’s momentum a “very good sign for November.” Ro Khanna said the progressive movement is “on the ascendancy,” while Jim Clyburn acknowledged that socialism can play well politically.

The compilation also highlights Cory Booker, Jamie Raskin, Ami Bera, Cori Bush, Alex Bores, and Brad Lander discussing accommodation of or cooperation with the socialist wing.

Zohran Mamdani has gone even further, arguing that recent democratic-socialist victories represent a vision extending “beyond the midterms” and “beyond 2028.”

This matters because the DSA generally does not compete as a separate national third party. Its candidates commonly run through Democratic primaries and seek influence from within the Democratic electoral coalition.

That does not mean every Democrat is a socialist. There are still establishment and moderate Democrats resisting that direction. But DSA-backed candidates are winning races, socialist politicians are gaining influence, and more Democrats appear willing to treat them as part of the party’s governing coalition.

I strongly oppose that direction. The DSA agenda goes far beyond a few popular economic proposals and includes major changes to America’s economic and political institutions.

So is this merely one faction gaining influence—or are we watching the Democratic Party gradually embrace a socialist transformation from within?

Humans nature value rare things more than common things. Gold and platinum are obvious examples. Probably less than 1% of the world's population is a blonde hair, blue eyed females. Compare this with roughly the 95% of the world's population that has dark hair.

The classic narrative promoted by the State of Israel is that Palestinians are late-arriving colonizers to this land. Netanyahu frequently emphasizes this point.

In reality, Palestinians are genetically closer to the ancient Israelite samples that Israelis claim as their ancestors. This is because Jews did not reproduce in isolation to the extent many people assume; over the centuries, they mixed with Latins, Germanic peoples, and to some extent Slavs. As a result, only about half of their ancestry is Levantine. The evidence for this comes from genetics—the science that, in my view, carries more weight than the Torah.

The most ironic part is that, according to traditional Jewish belief, Samaritans are not considered "true Israelites" because they supposedly mixed with foreign peoples settled by the Assyrian Empire. Yet genetic evidence indicates that the Samaritans are among the best-preserved descendants of the ancient Israelites.

There's also a litmus test for figuring out who is indigenous. Here's how it works: spend a lot of time under the sun. If you end up with skin cancer, you'll know you came later. White Australians suffer from this far more than Aboriginal Australians. And then there are Israeli Jews—Palestinians do not develop skin cancer as frequently as they do.

This Fall, Florida Students Will Be Forced to Take “Anti-Communist” Classes - Florida public schools will force students to take a Heritage Foundation-backed class on the “evils of communism.” - https://truthout.org/articles/this-fall-florida-students-will-be-forced-to-take-anti-communist-classes/

Many women may deny it, or argue that the correlation is being interpreted incorrectly.

However, Indian and Turkish men are widely known for giving women a lot of attention. Russian women, on the other hand, are widely perceived as being among the most beautiful in the world, and that perception may give them greater confidence. Meanwhile, dating isn't very common in Japan. As for the UK, I'm not sure why the percentage is so low. Are men there less attentive toward women, or are there simply more gay men?
India — 96%
Turkey — 91%
Russia — 81%
China — 73%
USA — 65%
Korea — 61%
Germany — 53%
France — 41%
Poland — 40%
UK — 29%
Japan — 26%