Polls: Society & Politics

They are including Hispanics in this. The only ones excluded are white people. I don’t agree with it but California really seems to be the place to be for a person of color.
Plus, live next to a beach? Sounds nice.

Apparently Minnesota Supreme Court thinks if a woman gets blackout drunk on her own she deserves to get raped.

I do

As an outsider looking in, I think this might be an effective way of reducing gun violence. I don't see it as being unconstitutional because the right to bear arms is still there. Everyone would have the right to apply for a licence and even though licencing authorities could reject applications where there is reasonable concern that an individual is unsuitable to own a firearm due to something like documented violent behaviour just as an example, everyone would still start with a clean slate. What I am suggesting is simply a reinterpretation of the constitution and not an outright violation of it.

Of course, people would find ways around this by obtaining guns illegally but there should be harsh penalties for doing so. The pressure of the threat of incarceration combined with an increased difficulty to obtain firearms should result in reduced fatalities as a result of shooting. Due to the new laws needed to make possession of firearms without a licence illegal, what you could call "gun related crime" could potentially see a temporary increase. This should be expected but it should also be expected to subside to lower levels than before the laws were enforced over time.

I also see economic benefits to this and it fits with American capitalist ideals. Business opportunities and jobs involving training, testing and awarding licences would be created. All jobs which didn't previously exist. Your thoughts?

Biden is really a freaking dumbass Republican who hates freedom. Plus his VP smoked weed before, is Biden going to fire Kamala Harris lol

Also Steve Jobs smoked weed when he was alive and Elon Musk is known to smoke weed on podcasts, two men I have more more respect for than I do with Biden!!

(Keep in mind this is a joke and not an actual belief)

I use to have a big beard but any time the beard got to a certain length people started to shout pedophile at me. Why do pedophiles always have beards and glasses? What is it about that look... that children find so sexy?

I asked this question just to have an idea of how many snowflakes are on here.

Seriously though, can you name a single male politician or celebrity in the world, who's moderately powerful and/or famous (or gay, or trans, since these celebs seem to be exempt- for now), at this point who HASN'T been accused of sexual harassment, solicitation, molestation and/or straight-up rape at this point? Most often, by dozens of women who've accused thousands of other men of the same things, without having ever met or had any form of contact with any of those men? And hasn't this just become a complete farce by this point? These MeToo activists said "Believe All Women"- but haven't they made sure that, eventually, no-one will ever believe any of them, or their fellow women, with these sorts of shock-value, oh-so-conveniently timed, cancel-culture sex allegations ever again?

I know I don't believe any of this bullshit any more; at this stage, I'd look at any sex allegations and think "yawn, just politically-charged shit-tossing yet again, get a life". Because that's just what women are like now- and the fact that no women have or will ever speak out against false sexual abuse allegations, or even acknowledge their existence, means that they all condone and encourage it. And while the true sufferers, who will just be ignored, now have my sympathy and condolences, they'll never have a scrap of my trust or belief in their accusations ever again; and it's all women's fault for politicizing, weaponizing and abusing our sympathies for them, as they always have, do and will with every single thing we care (d) about defending them from. What about you lot? What do you think?

The original article on Psychology Today was deleted back in 2011 due to the backlash it garnered. Here's a copy of it on Tumblr:

• https://tishushu.tumblr.com/post/5548905092/here-is-the-psychology-today-article-by

Here are articles administering said backlash:

• https://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/psychology_today_racist_black_women_attractive/
• https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/psychology-today-asks-why-black-women-arent-pretty-131686/amp/
• https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/351205/
• https://www.theroot.com/black-women-are-less-attractive-oh-really-1790863946
• https://www.huffpost.com/entry/satoshi-kanazawa-black-women-less-attractive_n_863327/amp
• https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2011/05/17/136399684/bloggers-ugly-conclusions-anger-some-in-the-black-community
• https://www.colorlines.com/articles/pseudoscience-black-women-are-less-attractive
• https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/may/18/satoshi-kanazawa-black-women-psychology-today

The claims just seem odd. I can see ancient royal fucks angry at Harry for marrying a POC. But she goes on and says the family was concerned about the baby’s skin tone... My exaggeration bells are going off.

The two are also shilling for jobs in Cali. The land of exaggerated claims.