I'm going to start off by saying I'm going to try and make this as unbiased as possible. ok now...
Miss Universe certainly displayed a plethora of beautiful women from all over the world. Obviously people are always going to disagree, we all have different beauty standards, that is natural. Now, Miss Jamaica was stunning. She caught my eye and I kept her in the back of my mind, as I believed she was deserving of making it to the Top 5. But I thought Paulina Vega had some undoubtedly beautiful characterisitcs. In fact I was shocked at her beauty, because although I like to support my country (yes, I am Colombian), I try to remain impartial and not get my hopes up during things like this so I tried to focus on other contestants as well.
As the night went on I was happy to see Miss Colombia and Miss Jamaica make it to the top 5. And I was rather upset when Miss Jamaica was placed at 5th. I do believe she at least deserved to be first runner up. And if she didn't make it further because of her short hair, that is complete crap. I saw pictures of her with long hair, and I actually liked it better short. She worked that Halle Berry-esque pixie cut so damn well. As for her answers, I thought they were one of the better answers. I thought she answered very well, could have been better, but under those conditions she did the best she could. But I did believe that Miss Colombia answered better, just slightly. I just thought it was slightly more developed.
With all that being said, say whatever you want about you thinking that I am being biased. I guess I am offended that people are saying Kaci Fennell was "robbed" of the title by Paulina Vega because i believe Miss Colombia was just as beautiful and just slightly more deserving because of the question-answer portion. That is my reasoning. Not because I am Colombian, her winning just makes me proud. But I would have been just as happy for Miss Jamaica to have won if I believed her answers were better, honestly. Opinions?