Guys, rate who is dateable on this chart! Read the Details!

[Anonymous]

Guys, rate who is dateable on this chart!

Let's just say for argument sakes that you found their personality incredibly beautiful! Like this girl is the love of your life.



For body type where do you draw the line on dating her anyway, and would you still be friends with her if you weren't physically attractive and still just hang out with her.

Use this Chart:

link

Example Answer:

If I got to know her and thought she was my soulmate:

1. Dateable

2. Dateable

3. Dateable

4. Dateable

5. Dateable

6. Friends, and we could totally hang out. (Hopefully, she loses the weight so we can date)/

7. Friends, I could never find her attractive after knowing she was once that big.

8. Dateable

9. Dateable

^^^^Please Make Sure You Format Your Question Like That^^^

I really would like to see how you men think. Especially, where the friend line is drawn, why it's drawn (if you love her personality), etc.

[ProTraceurDGDJ]

0. Not datable, but I would befriend her & help her overcome her anorexia via ''shock therapy'' (My def. of Shock Therapy_Simulation - Friend is terrified of violence & doesn't want to defend himself therefore we stop at a family owned restaurant & I tell him to wait near the entrance outside then I push over & knock down all the Bikers Motorcycles & I HIDE while he's in shock & just stands there terrified. Bikers comes out & they gang up on him & kick his ass I then join the fight via a surprise attack the biggest fucker there & see if me & him can live through this experience. = Problem solved!)

1. Datable but she's hitting the gym to gain some muscle, stamina, & to tone that body of hers via me inviting her to join me & if she says no I'll bring it up in conversation some day's later that women are checking me up & hitting on me at the gym then days later I'll as her again, getting a natural tan via frequent dates at the beach, & gaining some meet on her bones via me cooking her high calorie meals.

2. Dateable

3. Dateable

4. Dateable

5. Dateable, but she's losing all that extra weight & she's gonna start eating right too.

6. Not Dateable, but I would befriend her & help her lose all that weight.

7. Not Dateable, but I would befriend her & help her lose all that weight too.

8. Dateable

9. Not Dateable, but I would befriend her & help her learn that men are not attracted to Muscular She-Men. (:

[MrOracle]

0. Anorexic/unhealthy, and therefore not datable.

1. Dateable

2. Dateable

3. Dateable

4. Dateable

5. Dateable

6. Too big to date.

7. Way too big to date.

8. Dateable

9. Too manly/masculine to date

I would date a girl who was up to a 5 or even a 5.5, but anything bigger is a no-go for me. I know I'm fat myself, so I understand that weight can be a struggle, but I don't expect to get every girl either. And, frankly, two fat people just doesn't work.

1-5 I consider the "normal range", and 8 is also in the "normal" range. 0 isn't a girl who is naturally long and thin, but rather a girl who has dieted and exercised herself into sickly, emaciated proportions. That's an eating disorder, and is no better than a girl who is a 6 or 7. And the #9 girl is gross - I've never been at all attracted to muscular/body-builder type women - I don't find them feminine at all, and without femininity, women aren't attractive to me.

[Asker]

What about being friends with 0, 6, 7, & 9? Would you still go to the movies with them, or be seen with them in public?

[MrOracle]

I would have no problem being acquaintances with them, and hanging out with groups of people, but I only keep a handful of close friends, and the few who are women are limited to girls I am dating or those I would date. I have a handful of close guy friends too, but everyone else is just at the acquaintance level.

[MrOracle]

The other issue is that most 0 and 7s, and a lot of 6s, tend to have serious self-esteem or other mental/personality issues, and it's those issues, more than their body size, that makes them unattractive to me. I could be friends with an awesome girl who was a 6.

I can't imagine having much in common with a 9 - I'm not a gym rat and have no desire to be.

[MrOracle]

I tend to avoid close relationships with people with serious mental/emotional issues in general. Most aren't ready to change or don't want to do the work to get past their issues, and I don't need to be dragged down by their negativity. A girl could have the hottest body in the world, but if she is an emotional wreck, I have no desire to be around her.

[Asker]

But in my question I stated that their personality is perfect for you.

[MrOracle]

I know... but in real life, that's nearly impossible for 0's, 7's, and 9's. It could be possible with a 6.

[Asker]

This isn't real life, Silly. :P

[Neiler]

0. Friends but she really needs to put on some weight, she's just way too tiny.

1. Dateable

2. Dateable

3. Dateable

4. Dateable

5. Dateable

6. Friends, I would still hang out with her though.

7. Maybe friends, her personality would have to be overwhelming for me to find her attractive after knowing that she was once that big and she would have to be pretty awesome for me to not want to help her lose some weight all the time if we were friends.

8. Dateable

9. Dateable but she is a little too muscled for me. If she had a great personality then I wouldn't see any problem with her

[Asker]

Aww, this is a really nice answer! You just made me feel that not all men are pigs. I can completely understand this!

[Neiler]

Thanks for that :) and were not all pigs, a lot are though and that's a shame.

[Asker]

Np. It's true :)

[Janson]

i couldn't see myself dating 0, 6 and 7. I don't mind the body builder girl tbh. Ya, she's more beastly than I am, but the only reason I wouldn't date her is because I'd be afraid of being laughed at when seen with her..which when you think about it, is an utterly retarded reason. 0, 6 and 7 look like they don't take care of themselves whatsoever

[Janson]

sorry I forgot to format it the way you wanted, but all the others are dateable to me besides the ones I mentioned. For them, I would be just friends. The thing is, they have issues with their weight that are changeable with effort. A lot of people aren't that fortunate

[sovetskii13]

Dateable vs not dateable relies mostly on a persons personality, attitude, behavior, things like that. Looks is more of an additional or separate feature/part. A personal can look very attractive but be a complete a55. Not dateable. And vise verso.

[Asker]

You didn't read the details did you?

[sovetskii13]

Yes I did.

[Asker]

Then your answer makes no sense because I said if this person was your soulmate personality wise.

[sovetskii13]

Well, if you don't like my answer then give it a down vote and forget about it. You don't have to like it.

[Asker]

It's not about liking your answer. It's about answering it correctly. When you answer it correctly, I'll decide if I like your answer. I don't down vote people.

[sovetskii13]

Okay, I'll give you my opinion on the attractive vs unattractive opinion

1. No

2. No

3. Yes

4. Yes

5. Yes

6. No

7. No

8. No

9. No

[Asker]

But I wanted to know if you'd be friends with the ones that aren't attractive and if they changed their appearance could you see them as more than a friend knowing they were once unattractive. Ya feel me? :p

[sovetskii13]

Why can't you just rate me down and forget about me? Wish I never answered this question.

[Asker]

Lol because I don't believe in that, and I want answers. Sorry I'm so frustrating.