Do women want an "infidelity clause" in a prenup just so they can falsely accuse the men of cheating when he wants a divorce?

[Taylor22424]

Jeannie mai, Jeezy's ex wife, accused him of cheating after he filed for divorce.

Now comes to find out, she didn't have a bit of evidence or anybody for that matter to say "yes, it was me." And it wasn't even the first accusation either, she claimed coercion, forced, not enough time to consider options, etc...

In the end, she got no money after the divorce.

This gives reason to ask this question, I hear all these women wanting "clauses" in the prenup all the time.

It is because they think the court will automatically take their word for it? Or in the back of their mind, they can just get this prenup reversed by either a lawyer or lying?

[DishLady]

Uuugh. No…


A proper prenup should have an infidelity clause that covers BOTH parties. If either one of you decides to be an idiot and seek sexual favor outside your marriage, the other gets compensated.


It’s supposed to help both of you remember to “color within the lines” and stick to your vows.

[EmmaMary]

I have absolutely zero interest in prenups or anything remotely connected to them.

[EmmaMary]

Thank you for the MHO.

[boggboss]

No I think k a cheating clause should be fine thing to have the same way in some states cheating can be somewhat punished when it comes to divorces

[normalice]

Sounds like literally the one example you gave didn't work out the way you speculate, so probably not.

[Jennz6]

I don’t like prenup