If someone was physically attractive to others, not particularly attractive to you (but not that ugly, either), wealthy, had a lot of social power, had a personality with an average level of attraction from you, and was SUPER into you, like almost in love with you (as you currently are), would you date them?
Or in other words, a 5 in personality, a 5 (or less) in looks, but rich and "hot" to others.Jennifer Aniston: Not my type at all.Sandra Bullock: Not my type.Julie Cash: Not some men's type.Karen Fisher: Not some men's type.
Yes, I'd give them a shot and see what happens.
No, I don't think I could do that.
Unsure / maybe.
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Would you date someone who was conventionally attractive, wealthy, and a decent enough person, but not attractive to you, or your type?
Nope. I have to find them physically attractive to me to want to sleep with them. They have to have a personality that I find interesting to want to stay with them. Accumulated wealth doesn’t add anything at all. How someone deals with the savings, debt, investments, etc. regardless of their size are more important to me. It’s about how their mind works not the flash they have. Social power is also a worthless trait. Social power can actually be detrimental to them depending the nature of it and how it is derived but it is never a positive thing.
I would, the key here is that they would have to love me and desire me, to want me as a partner and be willing to share and compremise. Because we will likely be doing things that we both don't naturally like so we will be sharing what we like to do.
Yes the most important thing to me is that they’re sweet, affectionate, and loving. Before my boyfriend I didn’t like any guys with long hair I always thought that it was gross and when I first started talking to him I told him that he should cut his hair now I just see that as a regular part of him and just a part of the man I fell in love with even though everytime we kiss his hair interrupts us 😂.
Yes I would give the guy a chance and see where is goes. But not because of money and status but because no one is perfect and I am not perfect. So the idea of finding a perfect person is nieve and I never had it. And I wouldn't want a man to expect me to be perfect either.
Don't really care about money so that wouldn't be a factor. I care most about personality followed by looks, if we didn't mesh personality wise it wouldn't work. Look wise, I actually am pretty loose with my preferences when it comes to looks (I thought all the women pictured were attractive (obviously in different ways)), so I don't think that would affect me either. But in general if personality isn't meshing then nothing else matters, its not going to work.
No, because I'm a man who doesn't follow women so it wouldn't make sense for me to let a woman picking me be more important than my own preference/choice. If she wants me she better put in the work to make me see her in a better light.
I'd give them a shot and try and find out the real them, they could be a secret philanthropist, not good, imho, to read a book by it's cover,,,
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
I’m in the unsure maybe type of place. There’s a guy like that right now he’s a good guy I’m not really attractive to him but he has connections and assets. I like his family his family likes me.
Home > Dating > Polls > Would you date someone who was conventionally attractive, wealthy, and a decent enough person, but not attractive to you, or your type?
Most Helpful Opinions