I do, though I also think men and women tend to disagree on what it means exactly.
Men seem to think it's mostly about physical attractiveness, money and status while women value other traits as well - faithfulness, potential to be a good partner and father, resourcefulness, strength (both mental and physical), character and integrity. Some of these traits are unfrotunately lacking in many men who straight out call women gold diggers and try to fool themselves and everyone else into thinking that is the sole reason they've been rejected. Also, when speaking of a single man on a dating scene, a high value man is not too old unless the woman isn't interested in having children. For me a man's value as a potential partner decreases as he turns 35 because every passing year he has less time to father healthy children and ultimately that's what I seek in a man. Yes, being financially stable and capable of supporting a family is required to be considered a high value but unlike what some men think, it's not the only thing that matters and for many women not even a deciding factor. A man who's playing around and using women is not high quality no matter how rich he is. Money is not the thing that defines the value of a person, however their ability to earn it regardless of circumstances is definitely a big factor for men. Good health is also a requirement to be high value.
Like it or not, people are not equal. You're worth the effort you put into yourself and into your life. If you chose to play games and work at McDonalds or Starbucks until you're 30 then your value as a partner is less than a man who has different priorities in his life. That being said, to me the concept of high or low value is strictly used for dating, meaning if a man is say 50 years old and I'm nowhere near that age then I don't view him as high or low value because it simply does not matter to me. Of course, there are also high and low value females though for women the things that make them more or less desirable as partners are different - age and physical attractiveness play a much more significant role.20 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yThe societal definition of "High Value" is different from mine. Having abs, making 6 figures or being 6ft is NOT a high value male. How does it define who he is as a person? He could have a personality worse than filth. I find it cringey whenever someone refers to themselves as a 'high value' person. What do they mean? Does it mean that they are "better" than everyone else? I find them to be pompous and conceited.
Personally, I look for mutual physical attraction, the ability to have scintillating conversations, trustworthiness, authenticity, hard working, kind, good sense of humor, mature and a good listener. I want someone I can count on when I'm feeling down. I want someone I can share my life with. I wouldn't revolve my life around them, and I certainly don't want my partner to do the same. I like travelling, so preferably someone who loves travelling as much as me. You know what's better than staying up until 2am with your partner and talking about the most random shit ever? Nothing. I want passion and comfort.30 Reply
+1 yI am not a man but speaking with something that I do have experience with I'm going to use the term high value women or women who are more how do we put this it's difficult cuz saying sexually attractive isn't the entirety of it cuz there's more to a woman's value than sexual attractiveness although that is a very important part
How about overall relationship value or ORV
A woman's ORV is based off of how attractive they are to other people within their age range as well as how their personality, demeanour, health and a general status is
A woman who is physically ugly but is very kind is still going to have a low ORV and thus will probably be less likely to gain a attractive or high ORV mail not impossible but unlikely
I don't believe people should be confined with dating people within their ORV I believe they should date whoever is willing to date them and who they are willing to date as long as they're not doing anything morally bankrupt like cheating on their wife or trying to slip something the woman's drink or whatever else
I do happen to believe in an ORV or overall relationship value because it is just a thing that exists we are naturally going to value one person as a partner over another person depending on certain qualities those qualities may change over time along with our cultures and science and stuff like that but the basic idea of this person hot and this person not is just going to exist until we stop needing have sex entirely and even then it's still probably going to stick around for a while longer unless we end up like the pandas which I really hope humanity does not end up like the pandas11 Reply- +1 y
I meant I am not a woman
- 2.7K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yWhat is considered high value is based personal preferences, same for 1-10, its too subjective to be a "league".
112 Reply- +1 y
Rich, tall, handsome, intelligent men are not objectively more attractive? Because find me the woman who says I want to date a poor, short, ugly, dumb guy.
- +1 y
@Intothevoid666 Your example falls short of reality.
objective superiority is not what attracts people, relatibility is.
lets say you found some extremely religious woman, she hates money because of her view on it being the source of greed, she thinks being rich means being evil, and she thinks vanity is a sin, and she likes dumb guys who believe the same bullshit she does. So she wouldn't be interested in the guy you described.
Objectivity gets thrown out the window in most relationships.
I like gaming and being creative and having free time, and I have expensive tastes in products, so logically, a rich woman who can fund my dream career and cook for me and clean for me would be perfect right?
Well, no, I want someone I can mentally relate to, someone just like me, not someone who fills my shortcomings or acts as "my other half", or my bank, or does tasks I hate doing, but rather one who shares my sources of enjoyment with me.
Another man might disagree, he might want a maid and bank for a wife despite sharing my hobbies.
Love is definitely subjective, therfor what is or isn't valued is subjective.
- +1 y
I honesly would prefee a woman with a lower income.
- +1 y
prefer*
- +1 y
I’m not saying no one has different preferences but if u think the majority of women don’t want someone tall, attractive, smart, and wealthy ur kinda just delusional. Like that’s what 95%+ of women want. Sure not literally every woman on earth will agree but most def will.
- +1 y
@Intothevoid666 There is no "the majority" people are picky.
- +1 y
Thanks, I try.
- +1 y
The vast majority of women prefer taller men and it would be absolutely delusional to claim otherwise.
- +1 y
@Intothevoid666 seems like you are delusional, most people in general don't even mention height in their requirements list when dating, it's largely deemed unimportant.
- +1 y
So if I make a poll asking that question right now and tag u in it that’s not how women will vote?
- +1 y
@Intothevoid666 a poll on the internet is going to have random results, because you aren't getting answers from everyone, you are getting answers from a random, small group of people, who happened to use the site, see your question, and bothered to answer it.
it's not like a census where it's mandatory for everyone to answer, so the poll results aren't capable of representing the public as a whole.
You could get 10 or 100 people and it could seemingly validate your point, or you could get 10 or 100 people and it could seemingly disprove your point, it matters who decides to answer and how many decide to answer, but most of the public doesn;t even use gag, so good luck getting any useful consensus.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
55Opinion
- 355 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yNo I don't... this isn't some card or video game. People are people. Making more money doesn't make you "high value". Neither does being attractive or whatever else.
32 Reply- +1 y
damn life isn't a video game? :(
- +1 y
@Still-alive video games are, literally, attempts to model configurations of reality at varying levels of realism, but if there's a win/lose dynamic, at the most basic level, life is like a video game
2.3K opinions shared on Dating topic. Some people ARE higher value as a partner than others.
Being a more desired/preferred height, being strong, having an attractive face, being good with kids, being intelligent, being able to come up with successful solutions to problems, self discipline, having an acceptable past, having a respectable/good job, etc. all add value to someone.
The only people that deny those things add value to someone are the low value people that bring very little to a relationship/potential partner.
Examples of low value would be, short weak men, fat women or ones with an unacceptable past, (drug use for men or women, financial irresponsibility and large debt, bad with kids).
Different qualities DOES add to or take away from someone's value as a potential long partner.
People that don't believe it should go get a broken down used car from a junkyard to have for their primary vehicle. It is just as valuable as others right? How about eating food from a dumpster instead of clean food from a store or restaurant? It has the same value right? Only ignorant people, or people in denial due to their own low value try to claim that everyone has the same value.12 Reply- +1 y
@GreedGod Just because you are short does not mean that you're of low value. Don't go around believing cringy stuff. The term is "high value" is demeaning. Just be a good human being. Height is largely genetics. You can't change your height unless you undergo surgery and that's a waste of money.
417 opinions shared on Dating topic. It absolutely exist. In The sense that there are men who have more reasorces or influence, men who are more able than other men. Here's the problem though and it's true for women as well; they're very unlikley to actually do anything for you. Gaining that value and keeping it means they can't just flaunder it and so they usually have very high expectations on people they'd do anything for. Somtimes those expectations even exceed what they're willing to do in turn wich means that for all they've got you become one of their assets rather than the opposite.
So what do they do? Well, they display their wealth, inflate their importance, make people want THEM rather than go for who they want and when they have somone on the hook they'll be like "yeah I can give you a much easier life, you can live in better standards and I can offer it to you for a far less cost than you're currently spending on your living situation". They won't actually use those excact words but once you think that way yourself you're trapped.
So you agree and you let go of your own home, thinking you've made a great deal but you've just lost your independence put yourself under somone else. Sure you live better, sure it's cheaper but at somone elses mercy.
That's why there are certain laws to protect the interests of somone willing to relocate and become dependent, otherwise people just wouldn't do it.10 Reply- 502 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yMore than "High Value Males" or "Females", I believe in "High Value People" - goodhearted, kind, morally strong, and determined.
In my opinion, people can be divided in three groups - tomatoes, apples, and grapes.
Tomatoes are red outside, and red inside - they are good people both within and without.
Apples are red outside, and white inside - they appear as good people and might be, but need counsel, kindness and understanding to stay on the right path and live well.
Grapes, on the other hand, are irrecuperable and sour. You can do nothing with them and if you are not careful, they'll grow and spoil the bunch.25 Reply- +1 y
Put it in a showtune queer bait
- +1 y
@Creampiekarl420 it's actually the basis of the Juche and Byunjiin idea.
- +1 y
@Sun_Kim-Ai I understood that I’m just saying that it was gay
- +1 y
@Creampiekarl420 there's nothing "gay" about it. It's the idea of a just society - one people, one country, one leader.
- +1 y
If you say so bro
2.6K opinions shared on Dating topic. Of course.
I suppose some characteristics a high value male would being masculine, gentlemanly, bright, motivated, hard working, energetic, capable, kind, compassionate, understanding, generous, honest, loyal, protective, authentic (not affected), communicative, fun loving, funny, ... stuff like that.
Notice that I didn't mention height, 6 pack abs or six figure incomes because, although those things might be a bonus, they aren't what it takes to get a high value woman unless one's definition of a high value woman is a materialistic, beauty queen, gold digger.23 Reply- +1 y
I think using the term leagues is valid. It has to do with things like looks, charisma, and wealth.
There are different levels, just like in sports. A lot of guys might play baseball, but very few are going to make it to the minor leagues – Low A, High A, Double A, Triple A – let alone the major leagues. Some guys aren't good at baseball at all. So there are different leagues in one sport but there are also other sports.
The same with life. Some guys are just super handsome. Some have a lot of charisma. And some are born into wealth or are successful at making money. And there are different levels within those categories. Some guys are high level in more than one. But just like in professional sports, people have different opinions on who is the best.
Face it, even the prettiest girl from a small town is never going to marry a prince. And their chances of marrying a business mogul, celebrity, major league athlete, or a guy who was born into wealth are slim. - +1 y
There nothing wrong with aiming high. It shows ambition and healthy self esteem. But some people make themselves miserable whining about their inability to get a partner who is out of their league. They focus on externals like looks and wealth at the exclusion of more important human qualities.
People with wholesome values and modest lifestyles are often happier than those who are driven to achieve wealth and status.
People who want multiple estates, expensive cars, yachts, private planes, expensive planes, jewels, expensive clothes and high status are often rotten on the inside.
I’d rather play sports (life) for fun and have a happy life rather than shooting for fame and fortune. I don’t care about the opinions of critics. It’s not a competition.
2.4K opinions shared on Dating topic. No I bust up laughing avesta clapping wouldn't guys tell me that there are an alpha male I cannot stop laughing when they say that for me I'm just who I am I can tell you all the great things about me and I can tell you all the bad things about me and they both counterbalance each other I would never tell anybody that I was a high-value male never ever you would find out if something drastic happen are natural disaster or something where it was an emergency of some sort or even playing baseball Sports building something I am who I am and I don't want to be anybody else but high value never
10 Reply
+1 yYes because so guys are working harder to prepare for dating or are working harder to reach their dreams than other guys.
Some guys know what they want and they don´t waste their time and life on stuff that seems interesting at first but has no benefit for their lifes.
That doesn´t mean that other people don´t have value because everybody has value in themselves but there are people that have a higher value for something specific like for a relationship or an advanced position in a company.
So I think the whole idea depends on a certain incedent they don´t have high value in general plus it´s nothing that one could say himself.
It´s an attribute others give you.11 Reply- +1 y
No I don't believe in leagues because there are no commonly known attributes what a league consists of.
I consider that to subjective.
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yI don’t think High Value Males Exist.
The fat and ugly ones , the so called “nice guys”. Are unbelievably UNATTRACTIVE.
The hot Brad Pitts , Chads, the Hotties. Are wanted by all the “H03S” and usually have hella STDs, and even have children most of the time. So that’s also a NO-GO!
Then you have the SuperRich guys who either buy women with their riches and buy sex. Or they are Rich and Hot and have it all and don’t need nobody.
there's no winning.
Women on the other hand can get majority of men no matter how ugly or fat they are.10 Reply
+1 yI definitely believe in the concept of a high value male!!!
When you date around and meet new people, there are men who will respect your values, be clear on what they want out of this relationship and treat you with respect. That is a high value male.
There are also men who will never say what they want out of you and stumble when you ask them; they will not respect your boundaries and their actions will not match their words. They are men with no value.
The secret to a healthy relationship is filtering out the rubbish men and dating men with high value. It goes beyond just money and looks. It's the way they carry themselves.10 Reply
+1 yTinder/ok cupid studies both support it. Women view 80% of males as being physically unattractive. Many guys in the 80% have to compensate with status and money (hence why 69% of men still pay for meals with women to get them to continue dating them).
So yes. There are high value men. Some of these men are valued for their physical looks and don't need to compensate on wealth/status.
See for example, Jeremy meeks who was a common criminal when he became media famous and yet had tons of women throwing themselves at him for sex/relationships.
Other men need to bump up their status/money to very high levels (top 20% of males) to be considered high value.
Also whether your value of being high value often depends on geographic location. A man who is 6'2" and fairly good shape in America may not stand out as much in say Germany where the men are 5'10".10 ReplyA popular vs. high quality anything are 2 different things - broccoli is high value, but far less popular than heroin, which isn't high in quality (i. e. provides meaningful benefit to one's life) - people often choose not what's high quality, but most popular (usually emotionally stimulating) - if you're concerned, think of TokTok - far from the most useful use of time, but far less people will be watching lectures online to educate themselves.
I believe in the concept, but don't care, as much of society now turns out obese, addicted to (controlled by) food & technology... I don't envy the misery that I know few but myself who can be content to sit by water for 3 hours with my own thoughts... to me that's a high value male (confident, happy, etc.) - not one who measures value in external gratification.14 Reply- +1 y
Nobody is selling & sacrificing everything they own, lying, cheating to get constant access to broccoli to improve their health, but, when it comes to something that destroys them in every way, but gives them an chemical/emotional high, they're literally ADDICTED (obsessed) with it... what's most worshiped isn't value as quality, only value in ability to satisfy an urge for a cheap (in the fulfillment sense) emotional rush.
+1 yI think high value is up for interpretation, like what's high value to one, isn't always going to be to another.
Personally, I do believe it exists in dating, in the sense that it's to do with desirability, like if you're a guy that most women want to be with, then that makes you high value in the dating sense.20 Reply- 548 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 ylabeling someone as "high value" is just way of dehumanizing and objectifying people. Some people add value to your life others don't, but everyone has the same inherent value. To argue otherwise is to argue that some people are less than human, which is the same argument that was made for slavery and the holocaust.
30 Reply - 430 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yDo I want a highvalue man, if I prefere a tall nice virgin or man with low bodycount who is not a sex worker? I dont understand my obsession with tall and virgin men. I am very jealous of people who dont care about looks. Maybe it is because all my male cousins are tall or majority of men in my surroundings are tall? I swear i dont understand and I really hate my shallowness
10 Reply - 1.3K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yIt's only a foreign "concept" these days due to embracing mediocrity, laziness, and easy sex.
Men have always worked towards bettering themselves and the world around them, scolding those who didn't contribute. Now it's the opposite and the guy trying to read more books for knowledge or being driven seems like a cult member.10 Reply
+1 yPeople who think there is no such are losers who say the prize isn’t all that great because they couldn’t grasp it “yea you got the gold medal but that doesn’t make you the best” it literally fucking does we all are doing the same thing but I have much better results that makes me high value
31 Reply- +1 y
@SweedyPie UPDATE: TRUTH TIME! “All people are not created equally there are winners and losers.” Yes leagues exist
1.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. Just as their are differences in the value of diamonds, horses, and art, obviously there are wide range of differences and abilities and therefore value of men. Girls and women value men that are tall, good looking, smart, and very athletic over men that deformed, short, retarded, blind and crippled. I find it hard to imagine that any intelligent person would claim otherwise.
10 Reply
+1 yYou don't know what a high value man is so why even discuss this topic. You literally said in your update that there is nothing positive about a high value man which is 100% incorrect. Stick to what you know
15 Reply- +1 y
Here, you can read the full thing here. Due to the word count I was unable to finish. Feast your eyes, an amazing phenomenon, someone who disagrees with your point of view... oH mYyyyyyY lol!! The Myth of High Value Males, Leagues and Alphas... Debunked ↗
- +1 y
I know what a high value man is I date them . Not my fault you end up with shitty men
- +1 y
Maybe you're the problem. You attract what you are.
- 1K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yYes. Simple example:
Low value male: has a cruddy minimum wage job, high school diploma, no savings, shitty car, few social skills or future prospects.
High value male: has a good job, promising career path, educated, financially smart, good future prospects.11 Reply- +1 y
correction.
Low value male: Guy under 6'0" with a middle class salary, ok social skills, one good car and house, as well as, any man that falls below this marker.
+1 yDifferent people value different things. There is no universal ranking of priorities, or even anything close to one. This is also why there are no leagues. My wife and I used to watch a reality show called undateables and it was lovely because they took these people with *severe* issues and found someone for them. And not just someone with equally bad issues to settle for them, but like a nice normal person who just wasn't bothered by their flaws and was into them.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yA lot of people interpret it differently. But the concept comes from dating statistics among the wealthy elite in large cities. A “high value man” would not necessarily be the right man for people out of that environment. Since it typically refers to wealth and power and those men are usually not monogamous.
20 ReplyYes, it's a thing in society. However, it's highly subjective. One person could think wealth makes a man "high value," while another could say character, discipline, and integrity, makes a man "high value."
10 ReplyI don't believe in it personally, but I'm sure there's people out there who put themselves on a pedestal and think they would be considered high value, possibly.. sounds like something someone has bound to have done at some point.
10 Reply- 723 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yJust another way of saying Alpha male. Both of which are just used to highlight shallowness and insecurities in people
11 Reply
+1 yNothing but derogatory claptrap, from the same people- or at least the same mindsets- that brought you eugenics.
20 Reply- 995 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI think people have their own definition for what they see as high value. Some see having tons of money as being high value maybe its looks or its personality.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yI don't like these terms. What kind of values are we talking about? A lot of people might think of different things when they hear "high value", so it's pointless in my opinion.
I don't believe or like leagues when it comes to dating at all.10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yHigh value man... pfft. aren't they those big babies, who want a mommy v2 type of girlfriend who is basically nothing more than an obedient housemaid?
there is one thing i learned from most women and its that big money and dick doesn't make a man "high value".
High value means what? is it high net worth? Chains and jewels? Personal values and beliefs? There are gaps in this definition or it has a big enough ambiguity.20 Reply447 opinions shared on Dating topic. There is no such thing as high value anyone, male or female. Anyone that thinks you can put a value on a person's worth is a moron.
11 Reply
+1 yWomen collectively agree that some men are more attractive than others yes this a fact otherwise beauty standards wouldn’t exist. Male models tend to all have certain traits this is a fact. It’s a joke that we’re even discussing it quite frankly
20 Reply
+1 yIt's crap.. just like the concept of a high value woman is crap.
You're better off focusing on figuring out what kind of man/woman you're compatible with and then playing the numbers game from there.118 Reply- +1 y
Everyone is compatible with a high value. Thats the point. Why do some men seem to attract many women and some few? High value in terms of maleness is whats at play. And if you dont think there is a value to a hot young woman vs an old fat one you're in lala land.
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
Looks.. looks is why.
Looks open more doors and give more opportunities to show that you're compatible. - +1 y
Its not just looks... for men money is also a huge part of it. And for women its youth. there's more at play than looks that is part of high value. But it can be summed up as the qualities the general population finds desired.
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
This is ridiculous. There's a sizable amount of women out there who see obvious wealth as a turn off.
Money isn't a door opener.. it's a compatibility factor. Some women will love it, others won't. - +1 y
Lmao have you ever met a woman?
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
Yes. Have you? - +1 y
Never met one that specifically wanted a broke man.
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
Never said anything about broke men. It's "don't want men who flaunt their money to compensate for a micropenis."
The fact that you're arguing with me says more about your penis than it does about my experiences. - +1 y
Actually it says a lot about your extensive experience with micropenises. I haven't seen enough men naked to make an opinion like that. Clearly you're more experience than i am. But im not sure what a gay man would know much about dating women. Or one that doesn't understand English and know there is a difference between flaunting money and being successful, maybe too buys inspecting penises?
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
You're a fucking idiot. Explain to me how the fact that I know that small penises exist means I'm gay and not that I'm more intelligent than you. - +1 y
You are more intelligent than me... in regards to penises for sure. I only have experience with my own. So clearly i can't compete with your vast experience with different penises. Clearly only a gay man would have so much experience with penises unless im mistaken and instead you're bisexual or a urologist. Those are the only options i can think of that would give you all the dick credibility you're claiming.
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
Lol "so much experience with penises." Again, because I know big penises exist? Man you're pathetic. Keep crying me that river. - +1 y
you're the one claiming men who are flashy have small penises. Youve must have seen quite a few flashy men with small penises to make such an assumption. I've not seen enough penises to make such a statement. I dont think most straight men have.
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
Nah. I'm just not enough of a little bitch boi that I need to be flashy under the excuse that most women like to see it.
It's not even most, dumbass. - +1 y
But as i already said, money, success. I never mentioned flashy. For some reason thats all you are concerned with. The vast majority of women prefer men who are successful in their work regardless of if they are flashy or not. Women aren't dating mcdonalds workers over lawyers in droves because too many lawyers are too flashy. Its a made up scenario where yes some woman says some man was too flashy but this isn't a huge factor in dating. Flashy men often have access to more women than say a mcdonalds flipper. So you're really just splitting hairs over nothing just to throw a red herring to the argument that there is in fact men who are generally universally attractive in qualities that are considered male and women that are generally universally attractive in qualities that are considered female. Not sure what there is to argue about there but somehow you have an anal fissure over the fact this happens. And like all supply and demand systems, there is also a value to such and therefore some are high value. This is just a factual statement. But back to your red herring and favorite topic of conversation... PENIS!
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
That was a whole lot of words to say a whole lot of nothing.
Most women right now couldn't care less about what a guy makes. That's it.
Exactly, go to therapy so you can feel better about your inadequacies down there.. you butthurt little bitch. - +1 y
You must be broke asf. Try and work harder. I actually started making extra money by working in the adult industry years ago. So id say a big penis is more helpful for making money. Maybe you can do that too since im assuming yours is huge since you hate little pps so much. Lmao.
- +1 y
@bamesjond0069
Literally dumbass.. all you've done is prove my point that you're obsessed with penis size. I've only mentioned it once or twice.. and you've mentioned it a ton afterwards in your little fragile masculinity tantrum.
Faggot.
High value males exist, High value women exist
Everything from money to personality goes into how much a person is valued to another depending on dating standards.
There are some people who do settle for mediocre partners that have nothing to offer. Those are the people who don't believe in the system.00 Reply- 6.5K opinions shared on Dating topic.
m +1 yonly an idiot would believe these things... as they go about it
21 Reply- +1 y
edit/update: only a dumbass would believe on these league things... as they go about it
1.7K opinions shared on Dating topic. Well yes but it's not set by men but by women and it might differ between women what that is. Same as high value woman isn't defined by what men wants, not what women think. So I can be high value for some but unfit for others.
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yUnless you believe all men are equally attractive to date, then you too believe in the concept of High Value Males.
So, uh. . . yeah.111 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 yLeagues are pretty much the same articulation of High Value. It's a recognition that not everything (or everyone in the dating world) is valued the same. This should be manifestly obvious and is quite easily measured or demonstrated by simple experimentation.
It's good to acknowledge reality--you tend to get better outcomes when you approach the world as it is.
Opinion Owner+1 y@update: what now? Of COURSE some people are better for some things and some aren't worthy. That's REALITY. What do you think is going on when you decide NOT to date the pathetic loser and you DO date the cool attractive guy? Do you think you're just acting randomly? Do you think people randomly swipe right on Twitter? lol!
Reality is a thing, you know?- +1 y
The Myth of High Value Males, Leagues and Alphas... Debunked ↗
The update word count was reached, so what I was typing was unfinished. Read it here if you like
Opinion Owner+1 yThere are a couple of very good points in there and a few points that range from pretty confused to just wrong. Some of the confusion is a function of you straw-manning what is meant by "high value." Another key point of confusion/incorrectness is a failure to recognize that objective/subjective lies on a spectrum. Things that are largely objective with some subjectivity are quite different from thing that are mostly or completely subjective.
What's less clear is whether you don't recognize those logical fallacies and therefore miss the mark on what is truth/reality, or whether you DO recognize them but ignore them because you're more interested in propaganda/narrative than you are in discovering reality. If the former, you need to sharpen your critical thinking; if the latter you need to work on your messaging.- +1 y
Thank you for the honest critique. High value as it is perpetuated in social media is specifically what I was speaking of, not each person's perception of an ideal partner. Many of the responses here were about people believing in high value men in a different sense than the toxicity I have seen perpetuating alongside the term. For example, see the youtube channel fresh and fit. Ooooo myyyyyy. Lol. Quite disturbing and they are disturbingly convincing lots of young men that the way they do is the way to be. Which is very sad to me.
My sticking to the completely subjective side of the spectrum is purposeful because of the exact reason I stated. Even identical twins on this earth with each have thier own view of the world because there is no way humanly possible that they are both experiencing their lives the exact same way. We are all individuals, and so it boils down to each individual having thier own opinion of what is good or not good for seeking a partner, based on the influences we each have. So to think of men grouping women together, all women of various backgrounds, experiences and beliefs and say that they will generally lean towards x type of men... is a fallacy.
- +1 y
I don't believe what I'm saying is propaganda because when you see the slaughterhouse of these umbrella terms and the robot army it's creating with a toxic way of seeing and seeking women, I believe you would be as amazed as I was.
And to answer your original response, yes I do see all men as equally attractive to date, because my opinion of what is attractive has nothing to do with what society tries to brainwash me into thinking it should be. If you think objectively and logically, without prejudice of being on one or the other side, I think you would get my point.
But lemme ask you this, if you had to make an argument to combat my opinion that these are only umbrella terms, the newest fads, the boxes that are set for people to fall into... what would be the main points to show that this concept is worth believing in?
Opinion Owner+1 yOkay, so it seems like your issue is some pretty bad logical fallacies. So let's take the issue of objective versus subjective. You seem to be making the claim that if there is ANY difference--no matter HOW slight--in how people view something, then their views are COMPLETELY different. This is not a very useful concept because it doesn't help you distinguish between things in any useful way. It leads you to the absurd conclusion that nothing can be compared to anything else. But that's CLEARLY not true. You claim that you see all guys as equally attractive to date. That might be true if you're homosexual or asexual (and therefore have no use for ANY man) but if you're into guys, there's simply NO way you see them as all equally attractive to date. If that were true you' would for example swipe right on absolutely everyone and immediately go out with the first available option. I highly doubt that's true.
- +1 y
Lol. Okay, point taken. Concerning whom I find attractive you don't have to believe me. And whether or not you believe me doesn't change who I am. And no I won't ever use dating apps. They can't give me what I need. But think of it in the reverse of the way you are thinking now. Every human has the same equal chance at a relationship.
Opinion Owner+1 yI thought I did make the points you asked for. You're stated belief that you find all guys equally attractive to date is verifyably false due to your behavior unless you literally say "yes" to any dude who asks you out and/or you ask out any dude you see. Value is a thing. Without it you literally couldn't make any choice about anything ever.
+1 yOf course. I don't value drug addicts, abusers or the like
10 Reply- 8.9K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yof course. because otherwise you'd have to give litterally every male on the planet the same chance to date you. same goes for women.
21 Reply- +1 y
of course i don't mean absolute value. but subjective to the individual.
350 opinions shared on Dating topic. Reminds me of "Alpha male", though at least that term is starting to turn into "meathead".
10 Reply
+1 yYea but the right woman can propel a middle performer to great success. Unfortunately having a bad partner can do the opposite.
20 Reply2K opinions shared on Dating topic. What kind of moron wouldn’t believe in it? What even is this? Yes of course a man with a 6 figure income is more valuable than a fking chodestain gamer in his mom’s basement
10 Reply4.3K opinions shared on Dating topic. Ehh, I looked up the traits and they’re meaningless cliches. Success, confident, assertive and masculine; funny, likeable, caring, intelligent, loyal. Could you be more vague?
10 Reply544 opinions shared on Dating topic. I'm not much on one myself, but I believe in the concept.
10 Reply10.9K opinions shared on Dating topic. I don't think it is a specific thing, just a reference to men who are capable of supporting a family.
10 Reply- 6.3K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yThis level of confusion is astounding.
If you don't choose a high-value man for your mate you'll be sorry. I guarantee it.
A woman would have to be insane for choosing a loser, or a girlie-man, a momma's boy.00 Reply
+1 yOf course. One has different levels in life. Different people, different standards. You know. Same goes with women.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yNo. The west is just extremely shallow and ignorant.
10 ReplyNo, I think Value is just a made up word. Tiny Ants on a rock in space. Nothing matters. The end.
10 Reply- 2.2K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI did before. Not now. More labels. Makes me want to throw up.
10 Reply
+1 yIs this a joke. Ok here's a REAL world example. The reason Putin isn't on the front lines is... why? Guess.
10 Reply1.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. Oh very much. You're high value men are the top 20% of men. The rest are in the bottom 80%. Very real
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yWell there's no question there are certain men and women who are more valuable to and sought after by the opposite sex.
10 Reply
+1 yDon’t go to r/FemaleDatingStrategy. Please. Just treat men like you’d treat your other friends.
20 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yOf course but it's not a set rule everybody has different definition of value. We might see a murderer with tattoos and cigarettes low value, but there will be a few women who think that's high value
11 Reply- +1 y
Lol at you think its' a few women. See Jeremy meeks.
- 339 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yHow funny that most women don't. And the one that do don't have the same definition that guys do.
12 Reply- +1 y
@zyxacb and you think that is the norm? Those are the exception my friend.
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yNah, it’s something that the Female Incel group “female dating strategy” on Reddit came up with to justify their sexism and double standards
10 Reply4.5K opinions shared on Dating topic. Yeah but women don't see the difference between them and douchebags 😂
10 Reply
+1 yyes, if you don’t think rich, handsome guys have a better chance with pretty women than your’re either lying or very naive.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yI laugh at the concept of alpha male and QUEEN
both are stupid15 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 y@lofii
GOD is alpha and omega
you are nothing but an ant in a cage
his pet
so shut up idiot
learn your place
Opinion Owner+1 y@lofii
like I said you are in a glass cage
you are beta
and nothing more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMr6Qb0_5kM
8.5K opinions shared on Dating topic. No, I hate this term. Everyone has value.
30 Reply
+1 yMy question on that is “who gets to define it?”
10 Reply- Show More (8)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions