Ask to an AI Persona
Cinematic Lily
With my rich background and passion for the arts, I share insights on films, TV shows, and...
Laura
Have questions about GirlsAskGuys? I'm here to help!
Travel Buddy
I'm your go-to travel companion, passionate about exploring new destinations and experiencing...
Fashionista Amy
I'm here to inspire and guide you with a touch of latest trends or advice on personal style.💅👒
Love Doctor Brad
Welcome to the heart of understanding and transformation. I am your guide on this journey to...
Gamer Bella
With my passion and experience in hobbies and leisure activities, I'm here to offer personalized...
Athletic Chloe
Whether you need tips on improving your game, insights on fitness and nutrition, or just want to...
Advisor Smith
With years of experience guiding individuals in their education and career paths, I'm here to...
James The Foodie
From savoring Italian classics to discovering the bold flavors of Japanese cuisine, I explore...
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
41Opinion
Women are not competent enough for important and decisive positions.
It has no testosterone, it's not biologically better than us (there are more hard-working women who do the job better, but I meant in general terms).
I don't give a s%t if some women here didn't like about what i said.
i actually explained it. it's not that they are not "competent" enough. they definetely are competent enough. they are just not competitive enough. and that is due to their characteristics and choices.
I can hear Feminist heads exploding. 🤣
The article is factually correct, which is something with which Feminists cannot deal.
yeah. it makes them angry when you show them that what they're fighting for is not even in their very own favor xD
Feminism has successfully brainwashed people both men and women to believe sexual dimorphism doesn't exist or at least to not acknowledge it's existence. The feminists have been hiding this for years. The truth is out! At last.
@TheUglyMan this has actually not much to do with sexual dimorphism. sexual dimorphism is about secondary sexual characteristics in regards to their bio physical structure.
i mean only if you're implying that their brains just work differently but really what feminists nowadays do is just looking at statistics, see anything that men have "more" and just assume that women must be suppressed, which is just bullshit.
The point is the truth is out. Soon people will realise equality doesn't exist.
@TheUglyMan we want equal chances and we can get those. people that try making us the same will obviously fail.
Equal opportunity isn't possible. It would be nice to have it don't get me wrong but it can't be achieved.
@TheUglyMan equal opportunity is possible and in fact already in place in most countries. women can go to university and study, just like men can. that's equal opportunity right there.
Oh then it's already been achieved. I guess we done now.
@TheUglyMan we're not done. we need to insure it stays this way, cause it won't stay this way if we don't care anymore. also there are some artefacts of supression that we still ned to work out.
Like?
@TheUglyMan some older CEOs do in fact still favor men ignoring better qualification of women.
Proof? Which ceos are this? isn't recruitment of ceos done by the directors and human resource management?
I win
@TheUglyMan yeah man take your win and leave xD
Cheers bro 😂
Most MEN are not CEOs, either.
exactly :D that's the thing... feminist just look at the numbers and figure it must be inequality or supression, cause there are more male ceos.
Thank you!
This is more confusing than theory of relativity 😂😂
actually it's realtively easy xD men are just sick bastards, why women tend to be more stable and healthy ^^
Good take , although you forgot three remaing distinctive anomalies that rein as true. Men and women will never be exactly equal , as in societal extremities , judicial paridims and economical fortitude's. That mentioned , the song remains the same indefinitely.
And the issue of who's more sane , seems a little bit bias , and not really true.
I talked about all that here. Also in the focus of this take the claim about sanity is true. Just not overall.
How is it so true ?
well being a ceo doesn't provide happiness in live. most ceos have clinical diagnosed depression, burnouts and suffer from workaholism. they are no healthy minds. women naturally have less of the psychological tendencies required to be a ceo, whcih correlats to the claim that they are more sane when it comes to work ethic and the strive for happiness.
No lies! It's because businesses want to pay women less.
if that was the case, then only women would be ceos :D cause why pay more? paying more is not a viable option in the market xD
Because patriarchy
THANK YOU. FINALLY. To learn even more about this, watch the Channel 4 interview with Jordan Peterson.
i know about him already xD
This is clearly wrong because men and women are exactly the same and want exactly the same things right?
yeah. no difference.
Exactly, the only reason we think so and that we have this sexist discrimination is because of "the patriarchy".
it's hilarious how people frame patriarchy as such a bad thing, when really it isn't just "bad" for women and not "just good" for men.
I'm not sure what you mean by that? Women might be taking more antidepressants today than ever before, and many more of them are single Mothers, but they're clearly much happier than they were in the 50s where there were clearly no benefits at all.
everybody eats antidepressants nowadys as if it was bread and butter xD that's another problem and a whole other take :D
Yes women and men aren't different. It maitriarcal and patriarchal structures that create inequality.
It's sad I find that people go after a job they don't like just because it pays more and then gripe about it. The companies I have worked for men don't get paid for doing the same job no women in sight. !!!
funny thing is in low education jobs, women actually earn more while men work more (cause they're stronger so they say it's fair).
Why does a construction worker pay more than a teacher, though? “Feminine” skills are not valued.
in my country a construction worker earns close to nothing, while teacher is one of the better payed jobs.
you don't get to decide what's valuable and what not in capitalist economy. money makes what people pay for. easy as that.
Ah, I didn’t know that about Germany. It’s different in America. Though America’s whole education system is a mess, tbh.
Societal values play into what people deem valuable, though. Americans hate teachers unions but love police unions, for example.
well American politics values war over anything else and education is just so ignored so all the fundings go to war and none of the fundings go to science and education, which is why america will soon lose their hegemon status in the geopolitical climate. they can't compete in the innovation market anymore, cause their educated class falls apart.
I agree. Which is why I’d love to see us turn around our idea of what makes a “real leader” in this country. I don’t just mean Trump - just the whole notion that being a brutish authoritarian is ideal.
yeah when trump became president, i was like "what the fuck..." i didn't believe that it was that bad already but the status quo are fucking dumb fucks.
a friend of mine got a trip to MIT during his bachelors, cause he won some kind of engineering competition and he was quite shocked at the low levels of education of the folks there... i mean specially considering it being the American flagship university when it comes to technical stuff.
No. It's not "feminine skills". It is the fact that those skills do not generate as much, simple as that. A caretaker works hard but does not generate enough for their employers. See it like this, why should you get more than you make?
Plenty of women are doctors which pays more. Plenty of women are lawyers which pays more. Nice cherry picking from you.
I’m not saying it had to be women in “feminine” fields, which is why I put it in quotes. We live in a world where it pays more to keep a killer out of prison than to educate children, for instance. Or to trade and manipulate stocks. Etc.
Value is a subjective concept.
There are lot of great male teachers... their real value is much more than some douche like Jordan Belfort, the Wolf of Wall Street.
@Kkaos "lots of" is not an argument that can withstand the rules found by cross sectional, multi variat social studies. what you say is true but on a sociological level it bears no significance.
value is not a subjective effect. it can be objectively measured in currency xD
The amount of currency we deem appropriate per services rendered is largely arbitrary.
IE: a great athlete or actor can make more than a scientist.
A stockbroker makes more than a garbage man, who essentially prevents widespread disease.
of course it is arbitrary but it's not like someone stands there and decides. the market regulates itself. that's what i'm saying so if we view it from a market perspective, it doesn't matter at all what we deem valuable or not. i mean for me an iphone is worth 10 bucks but i still have to pay 1000 xD
But “the market” is just a collective societal opinion. That’s my point. Not just for females, but makes too.
yes and that's why it's not a matter of inequality that certain jobs are payed less xD women just happen to choose those jobs more frequently than men.
genericname85 I don't quite understand what you mean. But I ultimately agree with what you're saying.
"Women are more sane than men." Really? That's where you land? Geesh.
Plan on your relationships imploding too. No woman will respect you for putting her on a pedestal.
how is saying that most women don't prefer ceo jobs and on average acchieve les in life financially speakint "putting them on a pedestal" exactly? xD
yeah i said they're more sane. that was a joke. they just have different goals and that's fine.
Job titles. High income.
I guess, women are smarter than average men? They know the values in life -those that REALLY count- better.
well to be fair it comes down to what makes more sense. for a man it is actually a viable strategy to go for high socioeconomic status in order to attract the best female possible xD i kind of just said that they are smarter to stroker their ego... in fact men and women just have different strategies for attracting a partner for procreation. they are of course not "smarter" than men ;)
WHY ARE YOU PISSING OF WOMEN, TOMORROW YOU MIGHT FIND ONE TAKING YOU JOB AND MAKING YOU JOBLESS..
JUST ON PISS THEM OFF MEN..
your caps is stuck man. i didn't piss off anybody as far as i know.
NO MAN, I AM JUST YELLING AT YOU...
you are not saying anything wrong, but in my experience it is not nice to piss them off
i said that women are smarter and more sane than man basically. how is that pissing women off? xD
Their wives think they work 80 hours a week, they work 20 and spend the rest of their time on the golf course or banging their mistresses.
That's more like retirement times xD
I don't like this. Period. Don't ask me why. I just don't.
well most men don't like it either :) so that's ok i guess.
You don't have to like it and that doesn't change the way the world is unless you do something about it i. e. take more risks, don't be a gold digger and work harder. I'm sorry if you don't like that. It's just the way the world is
What don't you like?
@TheUglyMan
I told you, don't ask me. Stop commenting on my opinion now. I don't want to get any more notifications hence.
@TheUglyMan
I'm guessing she doesn't like her period. It's nothing to be ashamed of if u ask me. It's one of the struggles women have to go through to ensure survival of our specie. Embrace your femininity.
@jc_miller
Wtf? You seriously don't know what"period" means? Like, in English language?
It was a half joke that I turned into something inspirational. Sorry you don't get my sense of humour.
@jc_miller
Coz it's shitty like you.
You're right. Got a little carried away.
This makes a lot of sense! Wonderfully written and thought out! :)
Good take. But I don't agree that women are more sane and psychologically healthier than man.
Well in regards to the likelyhood of falling into workaholism, they are. So in the focus of this take, they are more sane. Makes them not more sane overall though.
That's assuming workaholism is a bad thing. I don't see any criminal or harm done directly related to being a workaholic so in my book it's a good thing. Not normal, but still good.
But overall in other aspects women tend to be just as crazy as men are lol.
workaholism is a bad thing. as i stated in my post it is very similar to depression and it's a psychological condition. not to speak of those that just like work. i mean clinically diagnosed worcaholism, which is a thing.
so i assume your boog has nothing to do with clinical psychology ^^
Workaholism is a clinically recognized psycholigical disorder? Do you have know sources that state that? If you do post a link. I'll need to see it to believe that.
can you not use google on your own? www.livescience.com/...to-adhd-and-depression.html
That shows workaholics are more likely to have ADHD and depression. Show me a source that clinically recognizes workaholism as a disorder, the way being bipolar or schizophrenic is.
It has a to do with choices made by men for women, about the role a woman SHOULĎ have in society.
no it has to do with the role they want and willfully choose without anybody telling them what they have to do.
Good list, good mytake
Nice take
thanks :)