I will leave the direct answer at the end but only after explaining why. Forgive my errors for i know not what the hell i type at times due to a lack of coloring books for undiagnosed geniuses, i will treat this page as a my own little studying Q&A for mysticism. If anyone wants real direct answers to the asker's question about gender, i suggest you simply google this question to see thousands of dedicated articles. Similarly, do not judge spiritual teachings referenced here just because a self proclaimed retard on GaG made spirituality sound stupid to you.
You may have heard "anima/animus" from alchemists such as Carl Jung. Which is kinda gay to think about without deeper research, like what does it mean a man's soul is female? Gross.
Or even this, you've heard how jews purported Adam to be a tranny, that at some point humans were androgynous (many ancient allegories, including the bible where "god created male and female" was in the first chapter, but Eve was brought up only in the second chapter, as if sexes divided later on.)
Tracing back in time, we definitely were braindead at some point, and anthroposophists believe it was due to all of our soul energy being put into self-breeding. (You might misinterpret it as inline with general direction of darwinian evolution as if amoebas self-fucked their way into humans, but it definitely isn't).
Generally referred to as mesozoic age by anthroposphy, theosophy mentioned the age approximately 18 millions years ago for the division of sexes, preceding the divergence between apes. Which material scientists today estimate to be 8 million years ago. Though it's said the "breeding" was a sporitual act, and humans were being worked on by higher spiritual beings while apes seem to be sort of failed experiments.
I know your thoughts right now. Genetics needn't exist a that stage, if it was closer to the ethereal realm. But let's assume they did.
How about lizzards, most iguanas have XX/XY chromosomes like humans, yet others like komodo dragons (though not xx/xy) can propagate asexually. Iguanas and komodos resemble one another no less than monkeys resemble humans.
If one thinks monkey-to-human evolution is feasible, then there's room for an ancient species of humans reproducing asexually, compare humans to iguanas who are also xx/xy, and compare that ancestor to komodos, similar appearance but self-fucking. Feasible.
(This isn't about denying science, rather questioning overlooked details. Like the scientist who proved that ribosomes do not exist in living tissues, and form geometrically due to the process of preparing cells to be viewable, he points out flaws in popular understandings, so without making up anything new, he's scientist, not a psuedoscientist.)
(I give a fuck ton of trust to clairvoyant researchers because I have first hand verifiable experience with some clairvoyance and divination, and i think of psychics as bros who bench only 1 plate, whereas ascended masters are like benching 3 plates spiritually. You also have the choice to train, we don't evolve spiritually by being lazy.)
Especially since some are still being born intersex. Are people seriously more likely to believe that all humans once were monkeys, than that all humans were intersex at some point? Of one of these, we have real (though dysfunctional) examples today, and no examples of the other outside of fiction.
Furthermore scientists have forced intersex rabbits to multiply asexually, so it could have been a thing in mammals in the past.
It's supposed to serve as an example, if primates diverged to stupid fucks and inventors, then so could modern human fall down into a stupid fuck if he chooses materialism and violence. Hilariously, there's also a lot of herd-mentality in most spirit-deniers, just as primates who couldn't integrate their egos into the astral body (in other words, their soul is tied into the astral body but is unable to unite with the spirit, therefore lack the sense of "I") stayed stuck with a group soul (though unique compared to other archetypal animals) as opposed to having individual souls like humans. Whose connection tolo higher realms through spirit will only keep growing while maintaining individuality.
According to clairvoyant research, humans were divided into sexes due to natural (in) volution upon transitioning to mainly physical life (with purpose to develop individuality), from previously predominantly experiencing reality in the astral/etheric realms (that's where you experience spying on people like a ghost, yes I've done "astral projection" personally as in OBE and am not simply regurgitating.)
This seems to me to explain why remnants of the ancients show that they definitely experienced more "paranormal" (the stuff in astral/etheric realms, thier physical life was really similar to that, if reality was less "dense").
(But importantly, the astral body, although enables desires and emotions, is absolutely distinct from the soul and ego, just a popular misconception among those who accidentally get OBEs.)
Now in the physical gendered life with an ego, the soul which consists of both sexes, only puts half of its energy into the body, only the masculine side, if the physically body is male. Thus the leftover female part of soul can be joined by the male spirit to form a mind with consciousness and thoughts, creativity and morality, ability to love.
As i write it, i think you'd wonder about animals, why do they have physical genders but are dumb fucks. They are, regardless of their sex, ruled by one same inferior soul portion of what once was the shared group soul with primal humans back when we had no spiritual sense of I, which got probably divided in half when apes diverged due to being stupid fucks, (and later the advanced human portion of the soul divided into many individualized souls united with spirit).
It is widely believed among spiritual people that animals have group souls, and without the soul's individuality, there is no capacity to love. Animals have group spirits that organize their behavior, more like a separate external entity. Which also explains Rupert Sheldrake's findings and similar observations (scientific or not, still observations) such as "hundredth monkey effect". (And then, skeptics themselves call it "not falsifiable":
)
Fuck, clairvoyance itself is verifiable, but has never been falsified and only verified. Hear the CIA-employed professor of statistics explain it. Both the credibility of clairvoyance and realness of "morphic fields" aren't questionable anymore:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrwAiU2g5RU(Although i think it's time for the general public to establish a clearer definition of clairvoyance and types of it.)
Logically, or even if you're an education-drone who only follows curriculums - Carl Jung is not considered a quack by mainstream science. And his anima/animus is even worshipped by genderbending libtards because their shallow minds assume it supports the gross sodomistic nature they are imposing on humans.
The rest of my crap above is only understood by critical thinking, and it dispels gayness falsely associated with divine union of gender within. It is clear to me that libtards want to erase gender in order to reverse our spiritual progress. While I am trying to be less sexist with the purpose of progressing further into a more loving jesus.
I think it is good to expose how horrible men and women are. The comments below are doing a damn good job writing garbage aboit one another. I'm even reporting nikki's posts regularly for posting memes with offensive language targeted at men.
Ranting about either gender's BS is good only if you use it to conclude that it's the result of clinging onto ANIMALISTIC treatment gender, to abuse one another for material gain like animals do, what happens if you as a libtard take darwinism to personally. But not that genders are inherently wrong. So back to Jung. I think he advocated balancing the forces within yourself, and that certain addictions, even cock-addictions, are a byproduct of gender imbalance in your being.
---
My answer is that for the most part, it's better for boys and girls to learn together, especially in the earlier years. But because we have a gender which is not a social construct, we obviously require a different intensity of physical exercise, and men don't need to learn how to breast feed.
Crap like math and English can be studied just the same. But I'm sure you can name many subjects that need a more gender specific curriculum, like how fo fuck, or, the preparation for occupations should include two entirely different lists if we want to leverage the gifts each gender naturally possesses.
Opinion
27Opinion
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
