Would Mark Hamill be the right actor to play Darth Vitiate if he was ever brought to the big screen?

[WestfieldHyperdome]

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Why would Mark Hamill play both Luke Skywalker and some rando sith?

[WestfieldHyperdome]

You have no idea who Vitiate is do you

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Having the same actor for two opposing roles is a bad idea, same as how they’re making RDJ the new Doctor Doom

[WestfieldHyperdome]

Hamill voiced Darth Bane in the Clone Wars. So no it’s not

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

That’s an entirely different medium from live action, that’s semantics

[WestfieldHyperdome]

Blah blah blah

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Here’s a better question for you, since you stopped talking on the other point: why would an American movie made by an American studio for American audiences care what someone in the middle east thinks when you are nowhere near their biggest source of money to be made?

[WestfieldHyperdome]

Don’t change the subject

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

You’re asking about a live action movie owned by Disney, an American company. This is relevant to the conversation.

[WestfieldHyperdome]

No it isn’t

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

It’s incredibly relevant, whether you agree with it or not

[DeeDeeDeVour]

It would be wise to choose another actor especially since MH is already playing LSW.

[AI Opinion]

Mark Hamill, known for his iconic role as Luke Skywalker, has a legacy in the sci-fi world. While he's an exceptional actor with a broad range, casting him as Darth Vitiate might draw too much connection to Star Wars for audiences. However, his voice acting skills, as seen with The Joker in Batman: The Animated Series, could bring depth to a character like Vitiate, potentially in a different, more nuanced role. 🌟

[Anonymous]

No, people consider him as the good guy.