Yes if they are shitty. They must be fine, ordered and well done. For example this, this look pretty crappy to me, I get her intention, but that looks so not cool. Looks like what you draw in class when you are bored.
TO WHOEVER ASKED, IF YOU HAVE THEM & ARE HAPPY THAT MAKES YOU EVEN MORE BEAUTIFUL. TO ADD TO THE QUESTION & ASKING MAINLY THANKS TO THE "YES" REPLIES BY GUYS... HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE TATTOOS? IF YOU THINK IT LOWERS A FEMALES BEAUTY BUT INCREASES ANYTHING FOR A GUY I ITS NOW A DOUBLE STANDARD. I have many, I paid a lot of money to tell my life story across my flesh. I'm complimented by men, women, old and young more than I get looks of disgust. I've worked in many professions, I worked for the courts, and parole officers as a therapist f for those released from prison. I was never asked to cover them up. But, I also know I don't have the right "look" to pull off face/chest tattoos. Its only personal opinion, and if anyone is answering yes just based on being "anti-tattoo" or they v think it's fine for men & not women, their opinion ← if it's shaped by their personal convictions, they most likey think their speaking fact and not opinion, to me that's worthless than those who answered as c if they were staying a fact, knowing "Beauty" in general is a walking contradiction.
In my opinion, they can. A few small, well placed ones aren't a big deal, but I don't care for the look of someone covered in tattoos. Not that there's anything wrong with it (if you like it, by all means go for it), but it's just not my cup of tea, and I personally hate the way tattoos look when they're faded and have that bluish, smudgy look to them.
I also think certain tattoos can look trashy, like face tattoos, the ones that say something stupid or just gross on them, tramp stamps, etc. I know someone who has a tattoo that I swear looks like a sperm, but I don't have the heart to ask her if that's what it is.
Yes, that pic also looks like a bunch of doodles in a notebook to me. I do wish I had her figure, though!
I believe it depends on what generation a person is from. Older people grew up with society telling them that anyone who has tattoos is either druggies, whores or men in the military. They were ingrained with this belief system and even today if they see someone with tattoos they think this. In this case, they believe it spoils that person's beauty.
There are other people who own businesses that won't hire people with excessive, or noticeable tattoos. Especially in the restaurant business. I guess they get the impression that people with excessive, or noticeable tattoos, give the impression that they are dirty. So these people would believe that it spoils their beauty.
She looks like a bad cartoon. It's ironic... years ago the fashion industry sold women on the idea of "perfect skin" and made billions of dollars on products. Now, women who already HAVE perfect looking skin choose to permanently alter it with ink that will one day fade and look like shit. I think a woman with beautiful skin who DOESN'T get a visible tattoo these days is far more unique and stunning than women who get an armful, or a breast load of tats.
True. But for example this girl, has her arms full of cuts. To be honest ink is better looking than scars. However, I agree with you, I don't like full bodies.
She looks like she gave the kids some markers to draw on her because she didn't have any paper for them. Or her tagger boyfriend was practicing his graffiti on her. I think a female body is beautiful enough and needs no other adornment. I just don't understand what someone was thinking when they got these tattoos below.
Tattoos are one of those things that invoke interest in another person for a second or two, like 'ok, those are tattoos'... but then it's over. Then both people have to interact like normal; but the difference is it's a lifelong commitment for the one with tattoos.
In a relationship, the one w/out tattoos is constantly wondering how the other one with tattoos would look... without_the_tattoos !
That is true for me at least... across the board. Every girl I've dated has openly wondered what I would look like without my tattoos.
I don't think the tattoos on the girl pictured adds to her beauty. There's too many different tattoos. Too much inconsistency. It's better when there is a consistent theme that compliments the shape of the body.
I like tattoos except for two places. The breasts, and the pubic area. Those are gorgeous parts of women’s bodies and it does usually ruin it for me. But the picture looks nice. I like FULL sleeves more than tattoos here and there though. She kinda looks like post Malone’s tattoo artist did hers too
Honesty if someone wants a tattoo let them have one lol. Like I don’t love 100 tattoos on one person but I’m also not gonna shame em for it. It’s their body so let em ink it up if that’s what they want. I personally want a tiny one on my wrist or collarbone. Nothing more
it looks bad if it's big and gaudy on a woman's body. Some women have small tattoos here and there and they are fine, but the gaudy one's do mess up the beauty. An attractive woman's skin is soft, supple, sensual and with the curves. Big tattoos take away from visually lingering on that pure beauty, but instead ink getting in the way of the visual
It depends of your and that persons opinion of beauty. If she loves her tattoos then that's enough. If you don't like it then it's ok. Everyone has their opinions. Just don't go and tell them how they are looking based on your definition of beauty. They have their reasons why they got those tattoos.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
I think there is a secret behind this photo, that may not be obvious at first. The tats are there for a reason. The scars on her arms make me think she has been self abusing.
As it is, I don't like any tats, but if needs must... I'd rather see the scars. At least they are an honest portrayal of unhappiness.
I'm not a huge tattoo fan either. I think there are some people who can pull of that look really well, but I don't think there are very many people who can. I think it also helps if you are in GREAT shape and can stay that way. Not many people do that though.
Tattoo is art. Like any art, they can be good, they can be terrible. The extremely stupid people get tattoos of boyfriend/girlfriend names on their body.
Personally, yes, I do. It's ok if you want to add something small on your arm or forearm of your child's name or parent's name or spouse's name. Or something with meaning about God. But ideally, getting no tattoos is better in my opinion. Once someone ages those tattoos will get wrinkly.
Yes but I prefer to see the raw beauty of the female skin no tattoos. Love the feel and looks of freckles, and other imperfections that make them unique. Tracing around the freckles and beauty spots leading up to the erogonous zones. But it's there body and there choice.
I personally don't care. It's not like she got those tattoos for me she did what she wanted to do with her body. If she is a nice decent person that's what I'm into. Beauty means more to me than what's on the outside.
Any tattoos on a woman looks like crap no matter how small it is, looks nasty and cheap. And I say a woman because I don't look at men. In general tattoos are nasty and definitely a sign of personal issues IE mental illness in women.
Yes, I think tattoos definitely can take away from a person's attractiveness... whether they are well done or not. I don't have any tattoos at all and plan on never getting any.
yes i do agree facial tatts can be horrific unless for tribal reasons. otherwise just no. just looks like they scribbled any old shyte on their face post malone is one i could name and that one who like his dad f**ked a parrot jail narc teck 9?
They all do to me. It doesn't matter what it is, ink in human skin always looks bad and ruins beauty. Even a masterpiece on canvas is ruins beauty when scarred into a human.
Absolutely and they are usually red flags that the girl is damaged. In ths pic for example her tats cover the scars likely self inflicted, also the heart in barbed wire is screams that this chick is in pain.
Absolutely. I'm mostly anti tattoo. Some are tasteful, but most are blah and trendy. And sleeves of tattoos are just pointless. Tattoo over tattoo over tattoo. Behind to just look like clothes.
Sometimes they are a bit much but if your hearts set on it please try to be as tasteful as you can imagine first añd pick out something tasteful and artistic or pleàsing to the eye yours and some one not in the biz of tattoos my best advice
Not at all, sometimes it enhances it, and give you a little look into the persons life, for example my mom has a tattoo in remembrance of a relatives death, and I think it's pretty cool that there's a story behind it and all.
Maybe she was indeed bored in class. I'll tatoo "Don't" on my ass but I won't need to draw the "o" my body will do it for me. It's just in case I happen to be in jail somedays, gotta make sure the road to my heart stay safe.
Eye of the beholder. I find chicks wit ink beautiful. A poorly executed tattoo isn’t her fault unless she did it herself but it doesn’t diminish her look at all.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions