Thoughts?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
It’s implied by the box of fruit below the sign, and the somewhat pointer shape of the “Help yourself”.
Interestingly they specify below, in smaller writing, one piece per child as I guess they had many taking too much but haven’t yet considered people interpreting it as any fruit in the store.
The scheme is a nice idea to keep children occupied while in store, that they aren’t wanting for a snack and irritable because of it.
However, I’d have thought most parents would ensure they had snacks for their kids and this does fly in the face of a generation of warnings of “don’t accept gifts from strangers, especially food/sweets”.
Also, sad to say the state of the public in this day and age, as they’re not covered, I’d generally be worried for how hygienic the fruit is, no idea how many have touched it, what else they’ve touched, say what you like about the Pandemic but people should have better understanding of cross contamination now.
The cynic in me thinks that they’re just virtue signalling with fruit they would be throwing out soon anyway.
I'm pretty sure they are referring to what's in the box.
Thus does bring up an interesting question though. If the child completely consumes the watermelon, except for the rinds, before you get to the checkout counter, do you have to pay for it? After all, who buys used watermelon rinds?
I think in the interest of etiquette, yes you are. But if that's beyond you, I guess you can go further to prove otherwise.
I tink it’s supposed to be limited to the fruit in the box
Supermarket free fruit schemes are typically designed for children to enjoy a healthy snack while shopping. The fruit is generally simple, portable options like apples or bananas. While it's amusing to imagine a child being offered a watermelon, these schemes are intended for smaller, manageable pieces from the designated selection. Taking a whole watermelon or pineapple would likely go against the spirit of the program. 🍏🍌
Opinion
11Opinion
Jewish star, black kid, poisoned fruits...
... In supermarket free fruit schemes, are you limited to the fruit in front of the sign? Or can you pick any fruit? Because the sign said free fruit. But I took a banana once. And the security guy followed me all the way to the parking lot. His shoes sounded like teeth on the pavement, and he said, "Come here, banana boy.”
They cover what's in the box, I have a friend who has a son who loves blueberries so she'll give him a punnet and pays for them at the end of the shop
You’ll never know until you try.
If it were my store, it would be exclusively watermelons. The kid would have to finish at least half of it before checkout and be wearing the rind like a helmet to get the freebie.
Ell oh ell!
Of course it is or it would have said so, the sign is clearly just a suggestion.
It's free for kids only I thought rather than anyone. I think it's a great idea as it gets rid of excess waste and gives people some benefit to their diets.
It's for kids for free here yet it varies - I ignore it, I'm an adult and thankfully no offspring
I’ve never seen one. I’m curious how they prevent people from getting more than one per day if they come back after checking out.
They usually have that for candy and cookies at the store I just help myself to free samples never seen it for fruit in America
i think it is law in California because of all the temptations of candy in supermarkets
@DreamCrescent oh ok
You can only take from the box I believe.
I think its the fruit that is showing.
Yes, I think there is a limit.
Yes.
You can also add your opinion below!