‘White Knights’ is one of the many labels on the Net. It is one of the few tags that has a modicum of credibility.
It points to the deceptive nature of some men who attempt to entrap women. They act in an overly nice and complimentary manner in the hope of gaining something in return. The key motivation is usually sexual favours. Got to have some nude pics to admire while 'feeding the chooks'. In between watching porn 24/7, the behaviour often cringe-worthy. Any woman with a pulse will have these types lurk. The woman could be an obnoxious nutter, it will not prevent these guys from defending them. As if they are rescuing the damsel.
The behaviour is not new. It was rampant before life was ruled by the Net.
Growing up in the 1980's, we used to ridicule, and taunt these types of guys as ‘tree jumpers.’ They never had the confidence to approach women in a direct and honest manner. They had to behave in an overly sucky manner. Add in a liberal dosing of schmoozing to seal their manipulative mindsets. The hope of getting into a woman's panties was always the driving force.
The irony of the label is its use, or, overuse. This coupled with the type of guys who are hysterical over it.
These guys are easily identifiable. In large, insecure little jocks who are so fragile in their own skins. They desperately need to gain some form of 'cred’ by diminishing others. Any who don’t fit into their very limited cranial capacity over life and women are loaded into the chamber. Add in hysteria as their common theme and one needs to make sure to have an abundance of popcorn and pop to fully enjoy the theatre.
The almost perverse hypocrisy going hand in hand is often their embrace as ‘players.’
On the one hand, they are on the war footing over the ‘white knights’. On the other, they embrace, and liberally indulge in another form of pathetic fake behavior as seen in bragging about ‘playing’ women.
‘Hey nigga, brahs, would you smash this sloot....?’
An atypical exaltation from these bellend types. They need to boast about seemingly ruling women and having them at ‘their mercy’ while desperately needing others to reinforce their delusion.
This is only the tip of the iceberg in regard to their hypocrisy riddled fake demeanour.
They claim to be the ‘real men’ but, are so triggered by genuine behaviour by other men around women.
They are obsessed and driven by the fervent belief that women are the enemy to all men. All women are ‘raging Feminazis' whose main motivation is to bring men to their knees.
If any male dares to have no issue with women or worse, broaches any form of positivity about women, they are instantly labelled a ‘white knight’. In their eyes, these ‘males’ are the betrayer of the 'bro code' due to women always being the ‘enemy.’ Never in a million lifetimes could they accept that they are the enemy to self. In the aftermath, taunts and abuse flows. The hilarious nature is it is so very cliched. As if cut and pasted ad-nausea. To fully seal the fake demeanour. The abuse is usually delivered hiding under the anonymity that the net affords. 'Real men'- but can't eyeball another to extol a bastion of masculinity. Or, in a 'seemingly' cleverer manner by creating a fake account. In the case of the more rabid, many fake accounts.
The fact that some men can, have, and have had many rewarding unions with women can never be fathomed. If this is even approached within a nearby zip code it means having to face up to reality which would be akin to having acid thrown on ones face with its shock and scorn. The poor dears would have to deal with much insecurity over self, and in regards to women along with other men who are defined by being self-assured. Which exposes another raft full of Swiss cheese type holes in their makeup.
The key standout is sincerity, a respect for self, and all others they have contact with it. This works remarkably well in any relationship with women.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cue the keyboard warrior blue anons???????
Most Helpful Opinions