When I say this, I do NOT mean a man wants a woman who needs his help basically all the time. I mean that men like to do things like killing bugs, lifting and moving heavy things, or filling up her car's tank to show he can be her hero in some way.
But what about men who DON'T have the "Protector Instinct?" So many articles say that men need to be needed to be happy in a relationship. But pretty much anyone who's seen many of my questions know I'm basically an Amazon Chaser. In case you don't know what that means, the video below best explains it. I genuinely don't feel a need to be needed. That doesn't mean I won't ever help a woman with something when she need it. It just means I get no satisfaction out of it. I don't have the Protector Instinct, and my tastes in women really reflect that.
To me, a girl kicking a creep's ass or killing her own bugs/snakes/mice/etc, and not needing my help--THAT is the real aphrodisiac. Dainty, delicate, weak? That ain't it, chief!
I don't have the Protector Instinct. What does that say about a man, when he doesn't feel a need to be needed by his partner? What do you think it means when a man doesn't get any satisfaction out of being his girl's hero?
And in more extreme cases, what if he actually LIKES that she's a badass who doesn't need him?
Women nurture, men protect. Women want to have a family, men want to be needed. If a woman doesn't want kids, society just accepts that no problem. But no one says anything about men who don't want to be a knight in shining armor.
So I'm genuinely curious as to what the people have to say.