How do you feel about pregnant women getting the vaccine?

[just_a_potato]

This is a question i'll keep my opinion out of.

[razelove]

As long as those women aren't my wife, then their data can shine light on any lingering doubts of long term effects better.

To get the vaccine or not to isn't a big concern here. I don't get why they didn't separate their vaccine list/line voluntarily between those who have already had Covid, and those who have not.

I think if it was for the safety of America/your country/the world, and voluntary, most people would have shared their positive test results so other people could go ahead of them in line. That would have simplified logistics, distribution, and getting this out as a large chunk of the population has had it already, and the biggest chunks are fairly well concentrated, 5 states account for 75% of outbreaks. 10% of the population has caught it already from positive test results.

The anti-bodies can still be tested for if I'm not mistaken, and many people who got sick did not get tested or go to a doc, because it contradicted the point of masks and lockdowns unless they had complications. So figure filter them out, let anyone who doesn't feel they have to take it, or has had it already get tested for anti-bodies.

Use that for help in plasma treatments for current patients, make the targeted vaccine roll-out faster, and try to not administer it to kids (infants, toddlers, k-3) or pregnant women until we know more. We don't know what the herd immunity threshold is, CDC says as much. That measure could be enough to reach it. Could be that age for kids has to keep going down, but they should be last along with pregnant women for the complications reason, and that kids have the lowest mortality rate.

We're doing this whole let people suffer to potentially save one life thing, those lives are the elderly, pre-existing, and the obese. Targeted roll-out. I think most people who are "anti-vax" on this are more skeptical because of how many balls have been dropped, conflicting information from the same information sources, CDC, WHO, Fauci. Along with any doctor or politician who has concerns being silenced.

It doesn't instill a great deal of confidence. I felt optimistic and had little reservations before the flip flopping, besides, what's the worse that happens, gulf war syndrome?

[KneeDragger]

To me it is very scary for anyone to get the "vaccine" for the Wuhan virus. All other vaccines use aborted fetal tissue to generate the given vaccine. Morally I have a problem with that issue alone. In regards to the Wuhan "vaccine," it's actually not a vaccine in the traditional sense. The "vaccine" is actually gene therapy using mRNA from animals. In one animal trial, specifically ferrets, all of the animals died; every single one, but they pushed the therapy forward because everyone was so scared.

In related information, the Wuhan virus (or the Corona-19) has an over ninety-nine percent survival rate. First off let me say that anyone who has died from the Wuhan virus is a true loss and by no means am I taking anything away from that single death, let alone all those who have died. Sure there have been people who have died after becoming infected with Wuhan, but every single person who had the virus and died, they had an underlying health issue. Just as an example, my mother was a long time chain smoker, very overweight and very unhealthy. She stopped smoking last year and she came down with the Wuhan, yet she got better. Sure there are people who have died with the Wuhan but how many of those people just had the virus, yet they still passed away? Was this confirmed with an autopsy?

However, there have been nearly three-thousand people who have died here in the USA, after receiving the Wuhan gene-therapy, and over ten-thousand people in the UK have died after the gene therapy shot.

Should mothers receive the gene-therapy to stop the Wuhan virus? To me, there is ZERO reason to even take the chance in causing the miscarriage of the child, why even take an unneeded risk? There is none.

[Belgie]

"All other vaccines use aborted fetal tissue to generate the given vaccine"

How are you allowed to post such utter shite? Have you no shame? No morals at all when it comes to spreading lies and bullshit? At the end of the day, have you simply no decency?

[KneeDragger]

@Belgie - Where is your proof otherwise to my position?

All vaccines use aborted fetal tissue to generate the dead viruses, which are used by the human body to generate the antibodies against the virus. The "vaccine" used for the corona virus (Corona-19) is literally gene therapy, mRNA that our bodies generate which in turn fight the virus. This technology is new and not a normal action previously used to generate vaccines.

Please though, explain your understanding of the experimental gene therapy.

[Belgie]

I've debated idiots like you before - no, you've exactly zero interest in the facts or in learning why you're wrong.

How about YOU, who made the initial claim, provide some fucking substance to back it up? These replies are filled with bullshitters and when confronted with the facts they just resort to anger.

For anyone who does want to know (Not this asshole, obviously) you can start by reading just about any credible science journal about the vaccines. Here's one for example.

www.nebraskamed.com/.../you-asked-we-answered-do-the-covid-19-vaccines-contain-aborted-fetal-cells

As for your LAUGHABLE claim that 10,000 UK people died.. jesus christ, you fucking idiots have no concept of the world outside your borders. If 10,000 people in the UK died of any one thing, like this vaccine, it would be world wide news and it would bring down the UK government.

You're such a fucking asshole, your lies aren't remotely credible, you give no sources, and you want me to go through the motions of educating your dumbass about gene therapy?

Get the fuck off this planet.

[KneeDragger]

@Belgie - "I've debated idiots. . . . fuck off this planet." Well, my apologies because not all of the gene therapies used aborted fetal tissue, instead they used the tissue from the aborted children for testing. But aborted children are still used! Three things happened; therapies are created from aborted children, then tested with or without aborted babies or they might have created the therapy and then used aborted fetal tissue/cell line for testing. In some way, shape or form there were aborted children used in some portion of production to create the gene therapy. My apologies for not being “clear enough” for everyone to perfectly comprehend my position.

As for you cited article, that is a “credible science journal” the article refutes itself in the first two paragraphs of their paper. Dr. Lawler says “No, the COVID-19 vaccines do not contain any aborted fetal cells” and one paragraph later, he says “Johnson & Johnson uses fetal cell lines in vaccine development, confirmation and production.” By no means do I have a medical doctorate in infectious diseases, but I did graduate from a state university with a pre-veterinarian science degree and the science of everything from biology to diseases, they are the same. Hell, I could argue that a veterinarian understands viruses better than a typical doctor because a vet must do everything with zero communication with the patient, but that isn’t where I want to go.

Looks like this will be a three post response ; )

[KneeDragger]

@Belgie - Then Dr. Lawler goes on to write about how cell lines aren’t the same as fetal tissue. The funny part here is that every doctor who uses aborted fetal tissue for research, here is where they point out the abortions were “elective.” It is pointless if the mother at the time elected to slaughter her child, the child was killed, and their tissue was used to generate the cell lines. Then he justifies the cell line because it is “thousands of generations removed from the original fetal tissue,” the original abortion. That is the same logic of the people who support abortion.

Then Belgie you tell me to provide you with evidence. Well just to let you know, I know if I provide you with any evidence, you will claim that my source isn’t valid. Are you going to tell me that I am wrong?

Dr. Lawler correctly points out the covid-19 is a gene therapy (they are NOT vaccines).

[KneeDragger]

@Belgie - You wanted proof; here is an article talking about how the Pfizer and Moderna gene therapies were created without the aborted cell line, but they were tested with aborted cell line. Here is the key sentence, “while neither vaccine is completely free from any use of abortion-derived cell lines,” and here is the source - I cannot post links.

Found another awesome article where they say “Vaccines currently in use in the United States contain ingredients including “human fetus cells lines” and “African Green Monkey kidney pus cells” harvested from diseased primates, according to a bombshell document published by the CDC. The report also shows that other substances are used in vaccines manufactured for human use, including: porcine circoviruses, Thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, human serum albumin, diploid human cell, human embryonic kidney cells 293, also often referred to as HEK 293, HEK-293, 293 cells, or less precisely as HEK cells, human fetal cells listed as WI-38, MRC-5, HEK293, and more. — Editor.”
,
Sweet, I can have monkey and pig mRNA genes injected into my body, plus they killed all the ferrets in one study but pushed the therapy through because of the health crisis, which has a 99% survival rate. Science rocks and people don't know what they are paying for.

I tried to post links but I'm too new ; )

[Belgie]

Again. I'm not here to teach you science but there's a reason why I said they didn't use aborted fetal tissue and not "tissue from cell lines derived from".

If you have the slightest interest in honesty look up why they're not the same thing and admit you were wrong. Stop your bullshit misinformation campaign.

[KneeDragger]

@Belgie - The "tissue created from aborted fetuses cell line" is the same thing as "aborted fetal tissue" because the babies were aborted previous to 1973. I understand they claim there is a difference because the words are in a different order but that doesn't change the reality that babies were aborted in '73 and are used in research.

You are way too caught up in the fact there is a difference, I'm not sure how I can show you that a dead baby is still a dead baby. Is it because one is genetic cell line before they become tissue, the other is after there is tissue? Yes, I do see that difference. Otherwise I really don't understand what you are trying to write.

[jennifer_bloom]

The science so far, since it’s a new thing, suggests pregnant woman are more likely to jeopardize their pregnancy and their lives with the corona virus affecting them in their vulnerable state, than they are to suffer in themselves or by their child proxy by getting the vaccine. And as far as I know; there is not a single case of reported health problems with pregnant woman who get the vaccine but many pregnant woman with CoVid end up in danger at the icu unit because their pregnancy puts them at higher risk of dying from the virus. I also think it’s a personal decision and outsiders should not judge their choices because having a baby without a pandemic is already very hard.

[Shamalien]

yeah 'as far as you know' --.- this is why we need questiions like this, so we as a community can pool our info together and discover what's being hidden from us for the sake of profit

[Glue-Sniffer]

I was asked several times before getting my corona vaccine if I was pregnant or if there was a chance I could be pregnant. They clearly told me if I were pregnant I could not get the vaccine.
Also my friend who recently got birth wasn't allowed to get the vaccine until after she gave birth, while her husband got it last month.
She will get her shot probably in July since she is nursing the baby and doesn't wanna risk anything.
I think that the rest of the population should definitely get vaccinated exactly for this reason. To protect those who can't get vaccinated.

[wankiam]

from the nhs website
Advice if you're of childbearing age, pregnant or breastfeeding
If you're pregnant, you should be offered the COVID-19 vaccine when you're eligible for it.

It's preferable for you to have the Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna vaccine because they've been more widely used during pregnancy in other countries and have not caused any safety issues.

You can also have the COVID-19 vaccine if you're breastfeeding.

Speak to a healthcare professional before you have the vaccination. They will discuss the benefits and risks with you.

There's no evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine has any effect on your chances of becoming pregnant. There's no need to avoid pregnancy after vaccination.

The vaccine cannot give you or your baby COVID-19.

all i would say is the best thing for any pregnant woman is to check with their doctor

[OlderAndWiser]

I am not a female (obviously) and my girlfriend is post-menopausal. I have no children or grandchildren. I have no younger friends who are pregnant. So, I really have not considered this matter at all.

If I had a pregnant wife, I would probably be more concerned about her getting the vaccination than about getting covid.

[Anonymous]

Idiots. The guidelines in the UK mention that pregnant women shouldn’t have the vaccine.

People have gone insane. There are two extremes: on one hand you have the anti-vaxxers who say that all vaccines are bad no matter what, regardless of the evidence. On the other you have pro-vaxxers who say that all vaccines are good, no matter what, regardless of the evidence. As if there’s absolutely never any risk at all.

I’ve seen a number of posts from those who went against that advice virtue signalling about how they got their vaccine and that they’re fine, and a few days later they post about how they had a miscarriage. Even worse for the “listen to medical professionals” folks, many of these were doctors and nurses.

[FilmGuy93]

Let me put it this way: I wouldn't want any pregnant women in my life taking the vaccine unless they absolutely had to. I think that many people can take the vaccine without immediate incident (those longer term side effects are what concern me). My only real issue with jabbing pregnant women with this stuff is that the women need to understand that they are participating in a science experiment. I doubt that these risks are being explained.

The U. K. Government has documented a 550% increase in miscarriages in women who were pregnant at the time of vaccination. It has not been determined if the pharmaceutically active compounds of the vaccine enter nursing mothers' breast milk. There's a reason these vaccines are insanely and rigorously tested tested for years before we give them to people.

[Belgie]

"The U. K. Government has documented a 550% increase in miscarriages in women who were pregnant at the time of vaccination."

www.reuters.com/.../factcheck-miscarriage-vaccine-idUSL1N2LT21A

You're a liar. A stupid and foolish and gullible person. But mostly a liar. Your are a disgusting blight on humanity.

[FilmGuy93]

@Belgie And you are a coward, a mindless drone, and are only fit to serve society as sniper practice

[Madhatter920]

According to the CDC, there is no evidence that the vaccine has any effect on a fetus, placenta, or anything else, so it's fine to get a vaccine if you're pregnant. Still, that's only a cursory glance from a single source. Were it me, I'd do some independent research from multiple reputable sources in a few different countries and see if everyone is on the same page with that claim. Better safe than sorry.

If multiple reputable sources back up that claim, then I'd agree with the experts. If there is disagreement among them, then I wouldn't.

[loves2learn]

Pregnant women should talk to their doctor about it. Is it more dangerous to get Covid while pregnant or is the vaccine more dangerous? I would go with what the experts tell me.


I always got my flu shot when I was pregnant. I wanted me and my babies to be protected from influenza in the first vulnerable months of their lives.

[Brainsbeforebeauty]

I feel it's their health and that of their unborn child so it's their choice and their decision and not my business...
We have a right to make decisions for our lives and that of our family, our children, not for others... I get prior want to feel safe/be safe but what makes one safe, someone else may see as a risk to their safety...

[Screamsgutter]

It's amazing that when you watch television commercials for new medications, half of it is a list of all the possible side-effects one could experience, yet somehow no side-effects are ever mentioned for this vaccine that had to be rushed to the public. I note the word 'rushed'. Are we to believe that this is the first medication in history that has no side-effects... at all... for anyone regardless of personal situation i. e. pregnant, undergoing cancer treatments, interactions with other medications and on. I don't get how anyone could be so confident in big pharma considering everything that's happened over the last like two years.

And if you're in the US, would you trust anything the current presidency is promoting?

[DiscomfortZone]

We had like 20 pregnant women getting the virus real bad. One of them died with her unborn fetus. So when you're imagining the evil things about the vaccines (those that aren't being recalled by governments due to actual data) - consider the alternative. Pregnant women who refuse the vaccine are putting themselves, their babies and their environments in danger. All you oxygen wasting disease spreading vermine can go kill yourselves for all I care, I won't be responding to your conspiracy theories. Your parents should be punished for failing with your education so miserably.

[call_me_scar]

Well said 👍

[Jjpayne]

Well, first of all. Pregnant woman exist during the pandemic. That's fact.

Now what do we do with that?

Are babies safe while in the mother womb while they are getting it?

There might be not much we know about it yet but I will say that a safe way could simply be waiting until the child is born, then getting the vaccine after that

[Apple1996]

Its ridiculous considering they haven't done full studies on what it could do to the baby. I'm pregnant and they recommend me to get it but I will definitely not be getting it.

[Z1pTD]

If you want to talk about science/data/facts, the fact is that in a recent study of 823 pregnant woman who were predicted to have a successful delivery and took the vaccine, 13.9% of them had “spontaneous abortion”.
I’m not saying 13.9% of pregnant ladies who take the vaccine will miscarry, I’m just saying that’s what the data says.

[Z1pTD]

Oh, and while we’re at it I’d like to point out that although the vaccine is FDA approved it is still in the experimental stage. And while we’re talking about that I want to point out that if billionaires are the problem and it’s because of them poverty is a problem, why are we supporting a vaccine funded by one of the RICHEST billionaires in the world?

Not to mention that the same guy who largely funded the vaccine said in a tedtalk ON VIDEO that he wants to decrease world population.

[DJB72]

Reports show that babies born after the vaccine was administered to their mother during the third trimester have been born producing covid antibodies by themselves.

Generally I'd say that's a good thing. It contributes to creating herd immunity and building a stronger community in general.

[RCLJT]

Hell no, I’m a single male and I won’t get the vaccine. It was rushed through production, it was rushed through testing, and I do not trust the government as far as I can throw it. Look online for the list of experiments the US has clandestinely conducted on its own citizens.

[Gravit1]

I'm personally waiting for the deactivated virus model, because that has been used for decades, even then I won't get one until after a blood test to confirm I had Covid. However, the battery of test Pfizer weren't insufficient. The platform is pretty simple, but I wouldn't exactly take it. It had sufficient testing for short term results, but decades later are the question. The mRNA model acts like a virus in your body. It is pretty straightforward, but long term repetitive use will likely cause issue. One or two won't be a huge concern, but decades of use isn't as guaranteed.

They got this technology approved so they could use it in other ways, those other ways are intriguing, but also nightmarish. We are talking about altering human genes to make animal proteins, Island of Dr. Moreau style.

[Belgie]

You do know Trump and the US Government had nothing to do with this vaccines development, right? Your paranoia and complaints about Americas actions in the past are like blaming Winston Churchill for why Amazon lost your package. They are completely unrelated.

What am I saying, of course you don't. You know nothing.

[RCLJT]

@Belgie , I’m a Trump voter hun, it goes way beyond any Presidency to the CIA, FBI, OSI, the military…

[Belgie]

Ooh of course it does you unmedicated fruit bat.

[katiesmuff]

It isn't so much about how I feel, but what does the medical community say about it. Since I am not pregnant and not getting pregnant I didn't spend time listening about this subject however it seems it is OK for pregnant women to get the shot.

[ZackBan]

Usually when a pregeant woman smokes or does some kind of drugs she is labled a monster for putting an unborn child at risk.

But getting an untested drug shot into your arm because everyone is doing it is and shouldn't have any risks

[HannaIsInnocent]

And people thought having kids with your siblings was bad... the kid coming out of that woman is gonna look a bit funny I’d assume. Or have a name like Elon musks kid. Dunno but I don’t think it’s a good idea, as the vaccine is underdeveloped.

[DaisyM23]

As long as the vaccine is safe for pregnancy it doesn’t really matter. I’m sure a few of them aren’t good but I don’t know the ins and outs of each different one

[Jennifer-M]

Our babies are too important to risk just because of what some scientists say.

[Anonymous]

To each his own. That’s how I feel about it. If someone want themelves (and their baby) to be guinea pigs then let them. That’s how I feel about it. Nobody is forcing pregnant (or non pregnant) people to get the vaccine, that’s entirely their own choice and so if they or their baby suffer consequences because of the vaccine, now or in the future, that’s on them.

[RCLJT]

Be careful what you say, Giselle will turn you in if you don’t bow down and lick Biden’s shoes like she does.

[KloexJayne]

i dont even want to take it, why should a pregnant woman have to.

[Smashingdoozy]

From what I've read there has been no issues and it's infact recommend for some.

[Massageman]

They shouldn't- very simple.

[Calgarydirty69]

yeah, good call stay in this pandemic, you know it's cause of dumbasses like you that were even in a pandemic I hope everyone reads your illogical way of thinking

[Z1pTD]

@Calgarydirty69 no wonder you’re single.

[Giselle333]

@Calgarydirty69 You’re so dumb AND ugly. Great mix.

[RCLJT]

@Giselle333 , you do know that Hexane causes nerve damage and Polyethylene Glycol causes Anaphylaxis right? Or are you just dumb and ugly? by the way those 2 chemicals are in the petroleum based bubbles the mRNA are encapsulated in, enjoy ! I’ll be prepping for when y’all turn into flesh eating zombies…

[Giselle333]

@RCLJT Grow up too 50 year old fuckwit

[Giselle333]

@RCLJT You**

[Giselle333]

Dumbass. Imagine being that immature at 50 lol

[RCLJT]

@Giselle333 , another liberal sheep that thinks everyone should blindly obey, without choice, you would’ve loved East Germany during the Cold War, you are the type that would turn in their own mother for watering plants on a no watering day.

[Smashingdoozy]

@RCLJT did you just say something in the vaccine causes anaphylaxis 💀... No shit Sherlock. People are going to have adverse reactions to vaccines that is normal and we have known this will happen for decades. People get anaphylaxis from antibiotics does that mean they shouldn't take them? No it means they should find one that doesn't cause a reaction for them 🤦🏻‍♀️

[Smashingdoozy]

But also for the vaccine they TELL people if you have had a reaction to Polyethylene Glycol in the past don't get it.

[Giselle333]

@Calgarydirty69 Yes I do love Germany because I am German HAHAHA. You are SO DUMB.

[RCLJT]

@Smashingdoozy , go ahead, get the vaccine, fkn mindless sheep

[Smashingdoozy]

I've already had it 💀

[Anonymous]

Would this be a twofer? Is there enough immunity for both Mom and baby in one (or two for the two dose ones) shot? I’d be curious of that 🧐

[ebbyeb]

That’s a really interesting idea i wonder if they’re studying that rn!

[genericname85]

i mean nothing is better than conducting medical experiments on humans than conducting medical experiments on pregnant women right? i mean what's the number on pregnant women losing their baby or dying cause of corona? i bet it's a 3 figure number at max globally.

[Astarlessnightsky]

I have not looked into it, but if the doctor says its fine, i would trust the doctors opinion on it.

[CindyRuns]

If I was pregnant, I'd get it... I want to live to see my baby !!!

[PinkHamster]

Horrible Idea and I won’t take it now nor after I give birth 💕✨

[Jesus_is_the_guey]

Me and my wife both agree it’s not in her best interest especially considering that her pregnancy is already high risk

[Shamalien]

The fact that it’s being recommended to pregnant women is beyond sickening. Modern medicine can save you but just as likely it will hurt or even kill you

[COMMODOREII]

CDC recommends it but it is best up to the health care provider.
https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210426/cdc-recommends-covid-19-vaccine-during-pregnancy

[pokerbot]

I wouldn't recommend it. But hey, I'm not a doctor.

[etexbearkat]

My sister ended up getting it when she was pregnant with my niece, and from what I heard, she had no side effects, and gave birth to a happy, healthy baby girl.

[Sumdude1]

Mutant

[Anonymous]

I wouldn't recommend it; until there is more data on the vaccine and pregnancies.

[Aahana391]

I think a doctor should be consulted before taking vaccine, afterall, vaccine reacts differently on different people. It should be under doctor's supervision.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

I've heard on my News that It's good for pregnant Women to get the Covid Vaccine but be careful of the Johnson & Johnson one

[Wiredone]

It's the woman's choice but I don't think it's a good idea. They don't know what effect it would have on the unborn child.

[Wise4myage]

I don't know, I think it might be wise for them to wait till the baby is born and just be really careful.

[Pogi-Paddy-2]

So I have read in the Lancet and JAMA (British and American medical journals) have concluded that their research has found benefits for pregnant women to get the COVID-19 vaccination with no major complications.⚕️☯️

[RoxyFoxx]

This is a question for doctors, not for an anonymous online forum.

[just_a_potato]

And with that, you could always just ignore my question.

[cth96190]

Sure, if you want the woman to misscarry and die of an autoimmune disesase between two and 19 years after she is injected.
Enjoy the MS.

[vald9inches]

I think it can definitely be a very dangerous and risky time to do it

[JDavid25]

I don't think anybody should get this vaccine, especially Pregnant women..

[exitseven]

I don't think it is a good idea. There is not enough data about it.

[TacosRAwesome]

If the medical community says they can take it and it is safe then it's up to the pregnant person to decide.

[In_Trance]

Bad idea

[JamieLoves]

Are you insane!!!
It was rushed out too quickly!
You’re child is a gift from God!
You’re supplying protect your newborn!

Exemption,
All Liberals should get it and give it to their children. Every year !

[worldscolide]

I dont really have an opinion on this. I know the vaccine may cause worse side effects in pregnant women than someone who is not pregnant, but its their risk to take.

[joeldalton]

There's no way I'd get the vaccine if I was pregnant or would I want my wife to get it if she was pregnant.

[NoManTwo]

If I was a pregnant woman I would not get the vaccine

[EmotionOfFear]

They absolutely should not. Simple as that.

Honestly, people should try to avoid having babies in this climate, anyway.

[SamtheDnDgirl]

I'd have to see the notes done in research about this.

[Drumlin2001]

My OH is 7 months pregnant, she had hers. We waited till the guidance had changed to say it was safe.

[ThisAndThat]

NO! https://www.bitchute.com/video/Rd91ya04arvm/?list=subscriptions

[Joshua0213]

Take it but when y'all die I told you so. People have died after getting it already, most notably India's health ambassador died 1 day after getting the vaccine

[cat1313]

if i was going to have a baby no i won't get the vaccine.
why knot dot no what going to hapin to the baby

[ayomanwya]

Are you going to tell pregnant women not to get the vaccine “doctor?” If they want to get the vaccine then they will

[just_a_potato]

This felt like it was targeted towards me

[ayomanwya]

Well not exactly

[just_a_potato]

Not exactly? Mhm alright so this was in some way directed towards me, yes? If so I haven't even made an opinion on the question I asked, I was merely curious. If it wasn't then pretend I never wrote this.

[Philyouup]

not my business. if the medical community says it’s ok. i have no issues.

[Anonymous]

The advice given was for people who have food allergies or are pregnant shouldn’t risk getting it.

[Surely]

From the rumors going around, I would avoid getting it when pregnant and if you ever intended on having children also.