Should Mariah Carey be legally allowed to trademark herself, for profit, as the "Queen of Christmas"? (Page 2)

[PainusNdeeAnus]

More like Queen Of Thanksgiving Good lord!

Her chair turned around so slow on the voice

[Msputiton]

At first i was like seems fine. But when it covers almost everything that sells during Christmas, it seems pretty wrong.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Sure. She thought of it first and this is what a capitalist society is about.

[bayoubomber]

I'll tell you this much. The Vikings should be bitching. 7-1. Our record is not representative. We are the Queens of everything. The Vikings should have first rights for Queens of Christmas. Period.

[exitseven]

Queen of Soul, Queen of Christmas, Whats the difference.

[TroyDT2]

Aretha was proclaimed that by a famous DJ and even though I prefer Mavis Staples personally, I have never heard anyone really dispute it. Mariah is "self-proclaiming" a title that was bestowed upon Darlene Love three decades ago and which the New Yorker bestowed upon Elizabeth Chan in 2018.

[AdithyaR]

I honestly could not care less. It's not even a common topic in my area so it doesn't matter to me.

[AngryCarl]

It's a meaningless title, so I say let her have it. If she's not Queen of Christmas, who is?

[DermalPunch]

It really makes sense.

[AmandaYVR]

lol. How so?

[DermalPunch]

Baby all I want for Christmas is practically a hymn at this point.

[Bellona]

This is disrespectful to me as a Catholic

[Andres77]

Still a selfish diva

[legalboxers]

well she is technically

[AmandaYVR]

Technically? Uh, no.

[dustybiker]

Wow. Ego.

[AmandaYVR]

Indeed. It's blowing the roof off.

[Anonymous]

Sure. She's a narcissist anyway.

[panamared1]

I really dislike this, but it is legal