
What's your opinion of the manosphere online community?


Men and women will always have a problem with each other.
The reason being is that people don't focus on the food of the other sex.
I met a man tall dark and incredibly handsome. Well groomed, well kept.
Yet he said to me "I wish I was pretty like Brad pitt or whoevers hot atm, since it allows you into places and introduces you to people ugly people cannot meet!"
He by all accounts is successful in his own right.
I valued that, but he didn't understand why.
(he wasn't where or who he needed to be to feel worthy of my admiration)
Me a nobody...
And to compensate for his insecurity referred to me as a peasant...
And cast me aside because I had now serviced him and he no longer needed me.
Am I bothered, a little but I knew what was going to happen I just had some hope it wouldn't be that way.
I met a man who had a birth defect that causes issues with his leg, he has a slight limp.
I didn't care. I thought at 35 out here dating doing his thing with a great social group he must be confident and a go getter.
Wrong.
He saw me and deemed me his carer.
He falsely represented himself.
He is spoilt.
And he expected to be able to manipulate me into doing everything for him.
And if that included me earning more and being the breadwinner too great.
He made suggestions as to what we could do together but didn't go through with them.
It was bait.
His family and parents did him a great disservice.
I don't want to claim men are the problem I can only write here what my experience is.
And my observations are that there are far too many people that are incompatible but more able to present themselves in such a way that appeals to a particular person...
I'm not always the best at explaining.
I am far from perfect. I suffer imposter syndrome and lack support.
Unfortunately I pour into others because its easier to help others shine then try and fail, because there's usually noone there to catch me when I fall.
My last breakdown so severe I don't know if I will recover again.
So I'm looking for my other half, not the perfect half just the right half.
But the fear and complaining and the games, unfortunately that makes it all the more harder!
It's easier to pretend than to be real!
*The reason being is that people don't focus on the good of the other sex!!!
“Unfortunately I pour into others because its easier to help others shine then try and fail, because there's usually noone there to catch me when I fall.”
That’s a good quote. It’s money, for the most part. The natural polar attraction of men and women are being killed as they feminize/masculinize themselves, hence the not “focusing” on the good. I think it’s fair to point out that people know what they should do, but they it just doesn’t feel right. And again, it’s mostly money. We all probably would have been happier had we been born 60 years ago, or at the beginning of an economic growth cycle, those generations are the lucky ones.
I have absolutely no idea...
I'll just put it out there like this. If your a man incapable of being the breadwinner, expecting your woman to do everything you shouldn't try to use tactics to still control the relationship.
Because when the shoes on the other foot they expect women to adhere to knowing her place.
I'll put it out there like this. There are a lot of misogynists...
That's what I'm seeing.
I do not hate men, I love what a man is always have, I just don't respect a man who doesn't conduct himself with respect and dignity.
I always say this "when you see a weakness in someone, self control is necessary. Just because you can exploit doesn't mean you should"
I find today men do it anyway..!
Yes, what you’re describing are narcissists. It knows no gender. It can afflict both. And it usually happens to people who are lazy and/or scared of vulnerability.
If a woman provides, she can’t do everything at home too. It doesn’t make sense. It’s single parenting. It does make you reluctant to procreate, does it no? But, it still sucks for the woman, pretty raw deal. The guy in that instance has to assume the feminine role, in my opinion. AND he has to work doing something to at least cover his spending money unless his wife makes a fuck ton of money. He’s not assuming his proper role. And the real question is, would you still be attracted to a guy mowing the lawn, making the bed, cooking shitty but edible meals, keeping the house up, while working some shitty part time job at a store? I think you reeeeeeaaaaalllly have to be honest with yourself, because this is the traditional role between men and women for years. You can’t see him as a lesser man because you have to take care of him. And he can’t see you as a lesser woman because you make more. He has to respect, you have to cherish. I think a lot of women lie to themselves when they say they’re okay with their spouse making less.
I'm not okay with my spouse making less.
But I'm also not okay with my spouse displaying the traits I've mentioned above.
What I find there are many men that view women as a service provider.
Nothing more.
Then you’re stuck. And you’ll have to close up your shop until you find one who does. Your lady network will have to do the same. You dumb bitches need to stop opening your legs and stop doing porn. Shit, if I had a bored wife sitting at home flicking her bean all day, I’d probably child lock her phone and the TV and the computer until I got home. And if she became a lard ass, I’d be telling her it’s disrespectful to undermine my efforts in trying to take care of her by maintaining an unhealthy BMI. I don’t care how insensitive that is.
While I do think most of them are tactless in the way they talk, I do appreciate that they understand female nature a lot better than a lot of guys do. Of course, there's some people who are just bitter and immature in the community but there's others that seem to really want to help guys improve.
I feel bad for them. I think it's a basically a well intentioned community of lost men who need better guidance that are getting taken advantage of by grifters who mostly want to sell them on a dream. It's sad, because those creators could make a big difference in those men's lives, but they don't because they would rather make a quick buck.
You know, it was a lousy movie. Charmingly bad enough to be a cult classic? Sure. But not SO bad as to warrant a whole community (which kind of defeats the point of being a "cult classic").
Some people...
Opinion
10Opinion
I like the intention of it. The way it is applied is actually damaging. The same goes for the feminist movement. I like the intention of it, the way it is applied is damaging. Reality is you can make fun of anything. I always say, if i go out with a man and offer to pay for my meal (out of the intention of not wanting to make him feel "use" if things don't work out between us), a man with a broken lens from the manosphere will consider me a modern independent bitch who doesn't need him. If i go out with a man and don't offer to pay for my meal (because i am trying to make him feel like the man and masculine), a man with a broken lens from the manosphere will consider me a gold digger looking for a free meal. The concept here is that if a man is wounded and broken and harboring a lot of anger towards women, any behavior will be interpreted and seen through that broken lens, a 23 year old who is trying to get married will be hypergamous gold digger... and a 33 year old with a career and financial ability who is trying to get married will be a desperate independent bitch and a cat mom looking for a beta bucks simp. A wounded woman can do the same... I am all for male empowerment, we need it, but you don't empower one group by tearing down the other group or abusing the other group. You empower one group by teaching them HOW it is done. Unfortunately the great majority of men that watch this content do so because they never had a father or a male figure to teach them or show them how to be men. They grow up with single mothers. So they are already broken and you add more harm by teaching them lies about the opposite gender. I personally would RUN AWAY from any man who feeds off of this content. At the end of the day, a man who has been raised in a balanced house with a healthy father, masculine figure that modeled what it is like to co-partner with a woman and raise a family is the best source of education for the man i look forward to.
They're mostly dweebs and neckbeards... Some of them are even edgelords lol... They're so cringe and weird... They envy women so much it's like they wanna be women lol...
It's their constant whining and moaning that is extremely irritating. And their bs hypocrisy that's annoying as hell.
Men aren't supposed to act like that.
Exactly!
I typically stay away from there. These days, I don't need them to tell me what to avoid. If a woman seems fishy immediately, I avoid on instinct.
The few times I have seen it they seem to have some valid points, especially when it comes to sexism against men in the legal system.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/ko5F8pw_6WoThey speak many inconvenient truths that make others very uncomfortable. I have read much of it and just about all of the basic points of red pill ideology are true.
Nearly all movements make a few and truthful solid points but that doesn't negate 90% of what that movement is saying is BS.
And what is that basic ideology?
1. Men and women are different. The basic differences in behavior are influenced by genetics and not mere social constructs ( nature vs nurture )
2. Women need men for resources and for protection.
3. Women will chose a long term partner based primarily on his capacity to provide resources for her ( food , shelter , also protection). This man is called the beta male.
4. Women will be sexually attracted to alpha men ; guys who are leaders and do not obsess over what others think and are not chasing them around. These are the men that turn them on.
5. A women's sexual prime if from her mid teen age years to about 25 or so. Then she hits what is called "the wall" and her sexual value for men starts to decline after that.
6. Women will often fool around with the bad boy types but at the same time have several "orbiters" , that is , men whom she keeps around because they are useful to her ; she may need money , a ride , help moving into a new apartment / house , etc and she knows that these men want her so she manipulates them for her advantage. These guys are usually beta /nice guys that have become friend zoned by her but she messes with their heads giving them false hope ie., some light flirting , a vague promise of sex.
7. Women are attracted to men who have options - men who have several other women chasing / pining after him. Ever wonder why married men get so much attention from women?
8. A women's ego is stroked by how much male attention she gets ( Instagram anyone?) A man's more by how successful he becomes ( work , money etc).
9. Women are turned off by desperate , needy guys and turned on by indifferent men.
10 Women are attracted to good looking, in shape guys and so a man's looks do matter (despite what the media and Hollywood tells us).
11. Women communicate disinterest by arguing with you , being unavailable. Interest is the opposite.
This is the gist of it more or less. It is not a complete or very through list but it is what I can recall inso much as a working knowledge of red pilled ideology is concerned. There are people who delve deep into this and provide very complex analysis of the psychological differences between women's behavior.
Anyways , there it is. Now I am off to get some ZZZZ.
Out of those only 4 are right. The rest is BS.
they have some excesses but a few good points also. like laws on divorce.
Wtf is the manosphere?
Online community of men who complain about women non stop, relationships, feminism, divorce laws etc.
Oh, so men on GaG?
😂😂
Lots of good info to wake naïve men up. Some garbage but over all good material.
GaG is my manosphere, and anyone who doesn't agree with me can suck it.
Mostly confused assholes.
Scary and creepy in my opinion.
Sounds kinda gay.
I don't know what it is
What on earth is that?
You can also add your opinion below!