Apart from children, elderly, seriously sick or handicap, do you believe if a person is young and able to work but refuses to work should they eat?

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Why, why not?

They should not be fed and able to eat.

They should still be fed and able to eat.

Other.

[letuswaltzforthedead]

If a few people decide to help them, they can eat but the amount of people who will seriously help them won't be many. We don't need to incentivize laziness, we need to eliminate it before all the country has are people who choose not to work and people who cannot work.

[NerdInDenial]

In a black and white perspective, they should not eat if they cannot work because hunting, for example, would require work. However, this would only lead to a huge population of squalor. Instead of EBT or rent reduction or subsidies, the government should establish camps where they feed and house people.

[AviatorTom]

They should eat, but without help from anyone else, government included. They should fend for themselves.

[RealMarek]

As long as they could find work that pays enough to cover basic expenses, this applies. This is not a given in the US today.

[LimitedBenefits101]

They should not be fed and able to eat.

Laziness is not accepted in my book✍️

[Anonymous]

So, are you saying lazy people should starve to death?

How Christian of you. 🤦‍♂️

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Yes they should. Refusing to work when able is wrong before the eyes of the lord.