(Agree or Disagree) "Be attractive to many women but only choose one"?

[KnightCross]

Is Jordan Peterson's philosophy about girls and sex right?

Yes

No

[Mexicoman101]

I generally agree but I think that there's a time & a place for both the amorous and a disciplined mindset. Most women understand this, there are a lot of girls who tell me about the 'slut phase', so sexuality can be experimented with. The question is do you equate how well or often you're getting off through other people with virtue? I don't think people should. Society got used to marriage and monogamy being propped up as this big virtuous thing because God, & I think now that we're becoming so much more secular we've got people appropriating darwinian ideas of natural selection to make it sound like they'reliving well because they're sowing seeds in so many wombs & all that contrived jazz. Ultimately, I think these kinds of people come & go with every generation of celebrity. A lot of them turn out like Charlie Sheen or Madonna & they're basically punchlines people like to hate or at least mock. Still, I think most of us can agree that if thrusted into the limelight of richness & fame, we'd be at least tempted by the prospect of having whoever we wanted & had available to us. I'd definitely try to keep it out of monogamous times of my life but if I got rich and famous you bet I'd be using a wide variety of asses for pillows & I wouldn't lose any sleep over it, but I don't believe that I would want that to be my forever plan. Anybody whose goals are just that & that alone I would say is superficial enough to be dismissed in terms of credibility

[OlderAndWiser]

If you are a player and you think the ultimate goal in life is to have sex with 1,000 women, you would absolutely disagree with his philosophy. If your goal is to find a satisfying long term relationship (ad that is my goal,) he is absolutely correct.

[btbc92]

I overall agree with this. But at the same time, I don't. Because 1. Yes, you do want to make's yourself eligible for a mate. BUT, once you found somebody who meets your interest, make sure you're compatible with everything and nearly everything they value.

An example:

1. A virgin girl = eligible for marriage by many men who desires a virgin girl and likes her. A non-virgin girl who adds up sex partners tends to lower her eligibility until god forbid nobody wants to marry her. Because she's less likely to be faithful.

2. A guy who is looking for marriage = eligible by many women. Because many [regardless if they hate it or love it], wants to marry a guy who also wants to marry. Especially if SHE's attracted to him. A guy who isn't = loses girls emotionally until she no longer wants to be with him, or leads the girl on until she gives up asking him. Making the relationship straining.

Like @OlderAndWiser said. If you're not looking for long term then it's useless. But if you are, it will work. That is very much true. I've seen it happen before. Those who don't want it will lose out on something great.

[Wollu]

This deal is against men's nature. Not all men are lucky enough to find a Unicorn as J. Peterson did.

[Anonymous]

I agree, I am just trying to figure out how to be attractive to many women lol

[Tomblebee]

The last words were pretty strong.

[MyAtlantis]

Yes.

[omgjassy]

I agree

[1derfulguy]

I just like his Canadian accent <3

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Yes i agree.

[Secretgardenblood]

I have no idea