Studies show woman end relationships nearly 80% of the time. Why are men so much more loyal?

[Vegasrunner]

[WonderingManII]

I googled it, and here is what google says.

Yes, multiple studies do indicate that women are more likely to initiate the end of a relationship, including divorces, compared to men, with some studies suggesting this happens in a significant majority of cases, potentially as high as 70-80%. However, it's important to note that while this trend is observed, the exact percentages can vary depending on the specific study and the type of relationship (marital, cohabiting, dating) being examined.

I think some Men are more mature and don't listen to his feelings as much.

[Anonymous]

Men are much more realistic about what they can expect from a relationship. Men are generally about maintaining the status quo. When they find something that works (like a relationship) they don't want to f*** with success. While are always looking to trade up so to speak. That either means replacing aspects of the relationship or replacing the partner completely if need be to her.

And let me be clear this doesn't mean that women grow and change and men do not. I'm simply saying Men do not want to f*** with a relationship too much that works. Women simply do not have that gene. Women are NEVER fully satisfied.

[Anonymous]

Not a question of loyalty, a lot of men cheat in relationships but stay because its just sex for them but when a woman cheats it means she's planning to move on.

[Vegasrunner]

@Anonymous Interesting take so you're saying that a woman having sex outside the relationship is so much then a man. Yhat actually makes sense.

[Opinion Owner]

I'm saying men are opportunistic, he f*cked her because she was reasonably attractive, maybe less attractive than his current wife/girlfriend.
With women we are ending the relationship but will stay in it until we've a new guy we perceive as better and any sign of commitment from him and we are gone.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner Makes sense this is why having sex outside of a relationship is seen as bad for women.

[Opinion Owner]

Bad for a man too especially when he's explaining how he got another woman pregnant or brought home an std.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opiniom Owner Not really, as you pointed out men don't have an emotional attachment, and have to be lucky to even to find an additional woman to have sex w/ and would still have to close the deal. As long as he can financial support the other women, then it shouldn't be that big if a deal. STD's can basically be prevented by wearing condoms

[Opinion Owner]

While he's financially supporting the other woman that's money they as a couple don't have and money being taken away from their children. STDs such as herpes and hepatitis can be contracted regardless of a condom. Think about the girl going down on the guy and vice versa, how many people wear condoms for that and of course how many guys are reckless enough not to wear a condom.
A cheating man is also not performing his duties in the bedroom with his wife/partner

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner only if you believe resources are finite, but a HV man can easily provide for multiple families, TBH we wouldn't have multiple women if we hadn't shown the ability to do so. The chances of those STD's when wearing a condom are slim, you're more likely to get struck by lightning, so it's not a realistic concern. A HV man doesn't have "bedroom" duties, that's the duty of the woman

[Opinion Owner]

Doesn't matter if resources are infinite. Doesn't matter if he's a king, fact is that other woman and child are taking from my children.
You need to go back to sex ed if you think you can't get an std while wearing a condom. Remember a condom only covers the shaft. Is she going to wear a condom on her mouth while giving oral? Are you?




A HV man does have bedroom duties he must perform, if he can't for whatever reason then he's not a HV man is he?

Remember 20% of people in the US have STDs. Just think about that b4 you decide to cheat and bring and STD into a relationship.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner Of they were actually taking away from our main girls kids then I would agree, but as long as both all the kids can get the basic resources it's fine. That typically why rich men have a lot of children. It's possible to get an STD while wearing a condom, it's just a small percentage. Also the other person would have to have one, that's why I don't allow my women to have sex w/ anyone except me one they have been tested. No we have a million important things to take care of, providing, protecting etc. The women needs to be the one performing bed room duties, if she doesn't we will just replace her for one that does.

[Opinion Owner]

But they are taking away from the main girl's kids. They are taking time and inheritance and giving the basic resources to your main girl's kids is unacceptable. Rich men tend to have an heir and a spare not a lot of kids.

It's not a small percentage. 17% of Americans have genital Herpes. That's on the genitals, that part around the genitals, in the mouth and around the mouth. You don't allow your women to have sex with anyone but you? Now your just being delusional. If she's willing to be your 2nd woman then she's with some other guy while your not there and has been with other guys before you. She's giving you a bj and making out with you spreading that Herpes on to your penis and into your mouth and then you bring it home to your main girl. Maybe you kiss your child goodnight and your child catches it.
If you aren't performing your martial duties then you aren't a high value man and she will find another to do so. In the old times it was grounds for divorce.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner Time is relative, if you're a HV main you're not going to have a lot of time to spend w/ kids anyway, that's your women's job. Inheritance and resources shouldn't change. Also remember you brought kids into this conversation, if you're a HV man you probably shouldn't be having kids anyway because it only causes problems, and opens up up to women having leverage.
No I don't allow mine to have sex, w/ anyone but me. There's no point if she did, I would just replace her, tbh most women aren't trying to have sex w/ random men, they would much rather have sex w/ one HV man so if they're lucky enough to get one they'll do whatever than can to keep him. Marriage us for females and doesn't hold any real value for men, so that's another flaw in your theory.

[Opinion Owner]

Time is not relative, its finite. If you are a HV you find time for your wife and kids. If you are a HV with no time for your wife then she's sleeping with the gardener, personal trainer or jujitsu instructor. Did you not learn from Tom Brady.
If you are a HV and you can't give your wife kids then you are not a HV man, she will leave you for a man that can give her kids.
You don't allow your side piece to have sex with anyone but you but she's f*cking whoever she wants while you are paying for her lifestyle.
A high value man when he finds a woman he seems as marraige material will do whatever he has to to get her down the isle and produce his babies. There's a reason a lot of HV men get married. There's the girls a HV man can get and the women they want, often the women they want aren't so easy to get and there are other HV after them.
Also STDs are no joke, not something you should be risking bringing into a relationship from your side chick

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner It's absolutely relative, 5 minutes w/ someone you love feels way different than 5 minutes w/ your hand on a stove. Brady replaced a super model in hours, so yes I learned that it's easy to replace even the world's hottest women if you're HV. Kids are a women's value, if she doest have my kids and leaves, that just means I'm not tied to her, that's a win for the man. Side chicks are actually pretty loyal, as long as they understand their role. Actually most HV men are single, look at entertainers, athletes and celebrities. No reason for HV to limit ourselves to one woman.

[Opinion Owner]

Brady couldn't keep a HV man, probably in the top top percentage of HV men, an athlete who won superbowls, on the cover of fashion magazines, more money than God, handsome and charming got dumped for a jujitsu instructor and you think a sidechick would be loyal. Sidechicks are loyal as long as their rent is paid and they haven't found better yet, sidechicks always have multiple men on the go
Single HV men that are celebrities, entertainers, athletes etc aren't single they are gay.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner I think I understand your confusion now. Men are not judged as HV by the woman the "keep" we are judged by how many we can get. Brady literally replaced a super model w/ a younger hotter woman in a matter of hours. You're attempting to apply female metrics to male dating, it's not relevant if the sidechick is "loyal" is relevant the man is able to easily replace her if she doesn't.

[Opinion Owner]

HV women can get a lot of hoes but few they want, basically the difference between a hoe and a housewife.
Brady got cheated on while he was away not performing his husbandly duties, and the guy was definitely not a HV man. The model he replaced Gisele with doesn't view him as a HV male, just a meal check to up her profile b4 she runs off with her yoga instructor.
The sidechick is not loyal because she's looking for a HV man, she's willing to be a sidechick until she finds better and probably is a sidechick for multiple HV men.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinon Owner in my opinion there's only such thing as a HV woman as woman are valued on the quality if man they can keep. Brady absolutely performed his husbandly uties as he financially provided for his family. There's no way you can speak to how someone u'ver never met feels, what we do know is that he was able to replace one model w/ another and will be able to do so for the rest of his life. Meanwhile his wife, as you accurately mentioned s now forced to settle for a LV man and will have to do so for the rest of her life. It's an easy w for him.

[Opinion Owner]

A woman's value is determined by the high value men who want them as their wives rather than the usual pump n dump one night stands, sidechicks and FWBs
If Brady was performing his husbandly duties her jujitsu instructor would have been teaching her jujitsu. Gisele could have gone back and pulled any NFL or NBA player instead she choose the jujitsu guy and even had his kid.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner Exactly, a woman's "value" is determined by her man. He performed his duties, by providing her a lifestyle, her decision to get banged by an instructor. This is something that you don't grasp. Women make decisions based on how they are feeling "at the time" . At 40+ maybe she can get ran through by some professional athletes, but a 20 something muliti millionaire man isn't going to take an old woman seriously. Why would they when they can just have a younger version of her?

[Opinion Owner]

The fact that the jujitsu instructor was banging her shows he wasn't stepping up to the plate. It's a common thing with HV men. While he's out on buisness she's cheating with the gardener, yoga instructor, driver and so on. The woman Brady is not a younger version of Gisselle, Gisele isn't in her prime and is still hotter than Idrina
upload.wikimedia.org/.../..._1_%2859793898%29.jpeg
I do believe that any NFL star would happily date Gisele. We've seen it b4 with athletes dating older women.
Also Gisele is worth more than Brady always was.

[AI Opinion]

Here to sprinkle some insight! 🌟 Women often end relationships more due to factors like emotional disconnect or unmet needs. Men can sometimes hang on to relationships longer due to fear of change or comfort zones. It's not always about loyalty—sometimes it's about avoiding the hassle of change or not noticing the red flags waving like it's a parade! 🚩 Relationships are a dance, and not everyone's in sync all the time. 💃🕺

[Jeff51]

Where did you see that from? I don't think it's correct