Search Results: Is he still into me

I say refined because I asked a similar question before but this is refined.

I believe that all races are equal in intelligence, but I also believe that once someone of a race reaches pioneer level intelligence, the intelligence in expressed in different ways.

For example, I believe black people, when they reach a pioneer level of intelligence, tend to live a less materialistic life compared to other races. Think of the very smart tribe leaders in Africa who have knowledge of cells and science, but still choose to live that life.

I believe Asians (particularly from oriental regions) have a bit of a balance

And Europeans are most likely to use materialism like technology to satisfy their happiness, when they are that smart, (unlike other groups)

Just to be clear it isn’t that I don’t believe they are intelligent in those fields at that stage? But with Africans for example the information on how to make technologically mostly exists as knowing the concept, and maybe imagining the technology without actually coming down to needing to build it.

I also believe that the reason why European and Asians tend to be more technologically than blacks at pioneer level intelligence is because their native lands are colder. So they have materialism (like shelter, and material conveniences to compensate to survive.)

I also believe that’s why Europeans look the way that they do, it’s because they are expressing survival in a more primitive way, like more tangible to people, because of their colder land. And primitive survival ties to reproduction in the primitive part of the brain.
While blacks and Asians (and those in between the scale) tend to have a look that is more like they are holding ancient knowledge of the rhythms of the earth.

Also non white races do contribute to society even in their tribal states, it’s just that most people are blind to how to help’s because it taps into natural rhythms rippling through collective humanity.

I believe we are on the verge of an extremely dangerous totalitarian big-tech oligarchy.

By the end of this year, AI advancements are projected to be so good they will replace mid-level software engineers. Whatever can be automated will be automated.

Here are some concerns:

1. Societal value as an individual for most will likely level out or decrease, and opportunities to gain higher or unique statusus among peers will fade.
2. Many who thrive on possessing a distinguishable hard skillset will be impacted
3. Societal value as an individual will grow based upon soft skills, socioemotional skills, and roles that rely on such. Those with deficits in these may struggle to find their niche and footing among those who possess these traits.
4. Human resources may still be needed, but may be more valued collectively than individually
5. The gap will widen between the elite and everyone else, paving the way towards oligarchy
6. Negotiating power as an individual will decrease, and individual employees will be much more disposable.

AI entrepreneurs have spoken about universal income, but these are handouts that we will be reliant on, thus giving more power to the hands that feed us. Imagine if we strayed from their rules? Could this income be reduced or eliminated? Is there a likelihood we will have some social credit system?

If you thought this was bad, it gets nightmarishly WORSE! We also have nanotechnology advancements. Coupled with AI, this becomes much more dangerous. Imagine AI controlled nanobots being released into our water supply and we consume them. Could this open doors for technological terrorism? If we were to displease our rulers, could they decide to end our lives with a click of a button?