Search Results: only calls when he wants something

"Now, that message of free trade is one I conveyed to Canada's leaders a few weeks ago, and it was warmly received there. Indeed, throughout the world there's a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition... And today many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period, called the Smoot-Hawley tariff, greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery.

You see, at first, when someone says, ``Let's impose tariffs on foreign imports,'' it looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while it works -- but only for a short time. What eventually occurs is:

First, homegrown industries start relying on government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes they need to succeed in world markets.

And then, while all this is going on, something even worse occurs. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars.

The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, and less and less competition. So, soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying.

Then the worst happens: Markets shrink and collapse; businesses and industries shut down; and millions of people lose their jobs.

There are those in this Congress, just as there were back in the thirties, who want to go for the quick political advantage, who will risk America's prosperity for the sake of a short-term appeal to some special interest group, who forget that millions of American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export business and additional millions are tied to imports. Well, I've never forgotten those jobs."

Even before I took the red pill, I noticed something: women seem drawn to chaos. They ridicule men who value peace by calling them:

• Boring
• Selfish
• Lame
• And more...

It’s not hard to figure out — if you value your peace, then finding a partner who feels the same should be a win. But instead, we’ve got the vast majority of women acting like peace is something shameful. Like calm is a disease. If you mock people for wanting peace, then let’s call it what it is: you don’t value peace. You thrive in chaos.

This isn’t new for me. Middle school was when I first noticed how manipulative girls could be. High school only proved the point. Most of the fights I saw? Girls. And I’d skip lunch some days just to avoid sitting near girls who spent the whole time gossiping, scheming, and planning drama like it was a group project.

That’s when I accepted it: peace doesn’t exist in a woman’s world. If she’s not starting chaos, she’s stuck in the middle of it. And the kicker? She’ll act like it just “happened” to her — like she’s the victim, not the one lighting the fuse.

It’s not about avoiding conflict — it’s about needing it. Needing the attention, the validation, the spotlight. That’s the real addiction.