What We Learned form Day 6 of the January 6th Hearing

Anonymous

One of the closest aides to the White House testified under oath on Tuesday what she saw and heard directly from the people involved in a surprise hearing by the January 6th Committee on the Attack of the U.S. Capital building.

What We Learned form Day 6 of the January 6th Hearing

Here's what we learned from Cassidy Huchinson:
- Trump sent people he knew were armed to attack the Capital
- Trump knew the election was not stolen
- The attack was planned months before
- Trump knew his pre-planned actions to attack the Capital were illegal
- Trump knew his actions could get people killed
- Trump ignored requests to stop the attack
- Trump intimidates witnesses who testify to Congress
- Trump Chief of Staff expected violence
- Trump Chief of Staff refused to intervene
- Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani asked for Presidential pardons
- Trump has many temper tantrums and throws food and knocks over tables
- Trump attacked his limo driver when he refused to drive him to the Capital
- Trump was ok with the Vice President getting killed

Here's what Trump tweeted on Truth Social in response:
- I did not know Cassidy (the attractive 25 year old working for his Chief of Staff)
- I never throw food
- I never choked the driver
- I never complained about crowd size

What We Learned form Day 6 of the January 6th Hearing
What We Learned form Day 6 of the January 6th Hearing
11
3
Add Opinion
3Girl Opinion
11Guy Opinion

Most Helpful Guys

  • monorprise

    We knew it wasn't a "mostly peaceful protest" because nothing got set on fire.

    it's very Sad that so many citizens who were literally seeking a redress of grevences in and around what was until then "the people's house" ended up getting killed by an incompetent capital police force.

    You would think a police force dedicated to securing the capital and seeing protests would have some more experience with crowd control. As not to shoot unarmed little girls, or induce a panic stampede in a enclosed space leading to many people to get trampled to death.

    Like 1 Person
    Is this still revelant?
    • goaded

      Who are we going to believe, you or our lying eyes?

    • monorprise

      @goaded Obviously your lying eyes since you were there personally, witnessing the Capital building being burned to the ground by a heavy armed mob and congress being held hostage.

      The fact that the building still stands and nobody was found to have anything than a walking Cain as a weapon does make me question your story.

      Hopefully congress will be made to answer for taking u. s. citizens as really political prisoners.

      Lets be honest they are political prisoners they never treated thousands of leftist who committed real crimes like this. The fact that congress is holding them hostage for being in what was until then "the people's" house is a shameful act by people claiming to preside over a "democracy". Let alone one with a 1st amendment.

    • goaded

      It's not my eyes that are lying. Five people were caught with pistols, one who also had a load of Molotov cocktails in his vehicle, witnesses saw AR-15s, and the Oath Keepers had a cache of firearms ready to be used. The fact that more firearms weren't discovered has more to do with the police having to defend the Capitol from a violent mob than anything else. Or did all 147 of them who were injured just trip on the stairs?

      You wouldn't know honesty if it came up and introduced itself to you by name.

      www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1

    • Show All
  • SlightlyEccentric

    That's what you got from it? All I got from it was Democrats are unapologetic liars who only care about the "sanctity of democracy" when its convinient and will call for its destruction when they don't get their way. A party of entitled politicians for entitled people. This whole hearing, just like the democrats, is a sham.

    Helpful 1 Person
    Is this still revelant?
    • Anonymous

      Except all the witness and two of the committee leaders are Republicans.

    • goaded

      And McCarthy refused to sit five Republicans because two of his original nominees were people of interest in the investigation.

Most Helpful Girls

  • Anonymous

    Smart people have always known how corrupt Trump is. Now we have further proof. The saddest part of this is he should have been in jail years ago.

    LikeFunny 3 People
    Is this still revelant?
    • monorprise

      What have you learned from this political circus making baseless claims outside of any kind of review or question? Nothing beyond how crazy the people running that circus are.

      That's why they can say crazy things like Trump attacking his presidential limo driver.

  • Bratsondanielle

    Can't learn nothing from that. It's a circus sideshow.

    Like 3 People
    Is this still revelant?

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

19
  • OlderAndWiser

    Political Theatre of the Terminally Absurd

    Reply
  • Chazmatazz269

    None of this has been proven. It’s all hearsay. Other potential witnesses are not being permitted because their testimony will refute the existing narrative. This is literally a witch hunt.

    LikeDisagree 2 People
    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Proven how? Like in a public hearing with eye witnesses directly involved with the incidents? Just wonder what the definition of "proof" is in your flat earth.

    • JohnK123

      Ya who also took the oath

    • ElgarRoux7

      You're not very bright, are you?

    • Show All
  • exitseven

    It turns out that this woman's "testimony" was all stuff she heard second and third hand. A real courtroom would never have allowed any of it. Since this is a fake trial that is being held just to try and keep President Trump from running in 2024 they can say anything they want whether it is true or not. The Secret Service agents have gone on record saying they will testify under oath what really happened in the limo that day. It is interesting that nobody wants to hear what they have to say,.

    Reply
    • RACSKC0B

      What's interesting is that there's no amount of evidence that would convince you that you're wrong about Trump.
      Is also interesting that you're not talking about any of the other facts, that are now well established. Namely that he knew he lost, he knew he was breaking the law, he knew that the crowd was violent, he knew who they were a threat to, etc... and he did it all anyways.
      It's interesting that you seem to have no problem with anything he did, or with him not being charged or impeached fully.

    • exitseven

      @RACSKC0B I watched the march on Jan6th. All I saw was President Trump addressing the crown and telling them to march peacefully and patriotically to the Capitol and let your voices be heard. He was not breaking the law unless it is against the law in this country to protest.
      He did not lose the election, it was stolen. and there was a half million people in Washington that came in support of the President. He requested the have National Guard troops brought in 4 days before and Pelosi refused.
      This so called hearing is nothing but a veiled attempt to prevent President Trump from running again in 2024. It is an embarrassment and will be remembered as such.

    • RACSKC0B

      Case and point.

    • Show All
  • Whatever2929292

    Whatever... Whatever you say. that woman committed perjury

    LikeDisagree 2 People
    Reply
    • goaded

      Why do you think that? Because Trump says so?

    • @goaded no. I am not in the Trump cult where Trump pushes the vaccine and wearing a mask so I have to...

      Other reasons. Some I can't get into!

    • RACSKC0B

      Just to be clear, if you know something that supports your claims, but for whatever reason can't or won't share it, it's exactly the same as not having that information.

    • Show All
  • StevieNix

    I can see why you posted this garbage anonymously.

    Reply
  • Jamesshinobi

    you are the reason woman shouldn't be allowed to vote. if you can't tell that this whole thing is a sham, then you aren't smart enough to vote.

    Helpful 1 Person
    Reply
  • 888theGreat

    We learned more lies by Democrats.

    We learned they won't let anyone testify that will say all the above are lies.

    Reply
    • We also know you are a chicken shit that uses anon to post questions

  • peedy

    That its all a bunch of made up BS

    Like 1 Person
    Reply
    • goaded

      Is what Republicans would like you to believe.

    • peedy

      Its not about democrat & Republicans its patriots and traitors
      Jan 6th was staged the people didn't do that the government did it themselves

    • goaded

      Yes, patriots and traitors, but the patriots are the ones investigating the crimes against the country.

    • Show All
  • monkeynutts

    It seems a little to crazy to me.

    Helpful 1 Person
    Reply
  • Anonymous

    We learned that the January 6th committee is a bunch of hog wash.

    Like 2 People
    Reply
    • JohnK123

      Lmao ya but she can’t tell lies in court

    • goaded

      @JohnK123 She was under oath when she testified. Trump was on his own private site.

    • Anonymous

      People lie under oath all the time.

    • Show All
Loading...