For any strong society to exist you need to have masculine men and feminine women. Masculinity brings out the best in men while femininity brings out the best in women. Not letting people grow into their complete selves is curbing a lot of potential in both genders.
Things like binary, intersex or whatnot are not observed on any significant scale and should not be promoted. All you are doing is harming the solid foundations of society. Which always were and always have been the family unit, with a straight female as the mother, a straight male as the father, and their children.
I just saw this video of children raised in "genderless" schools in sweden and just realized not just how ridiculous this movement has become, but also how dangerous. A boy has to be taught that he is a boy and a girl that she is a girl. Anything other than that is too complex and simply confuses kids. Its gonna mess them up.
When a kid grows into teenage and adulthood, it slowly figures out if its gay or transgender.
I can't believe all these so-called "progressive" people are leagues behind in common sense and basic intelligence, compared to their ancestors, who by the way never went to school.
I know most of you are gonna hate me but I don't care I'm gonna say it anyway. Let's see if you're open-minded about an opinion you find outrageous I explain well why I think that. Oh and I'm open to discussion/precision as long as you keep calm and well-manered.
So here's my point : no they children shouldn't be raised depending to their biological sexual organ. Yes they have to know if they're boy or girl for medical and practical reason but that's all.
Why is masculinity the best thing in men? They can handle tough choices better then? So can women. (Don't you know any strong women leader around the world?) Oh and those perfect men who are so full of themselves that they don't have any respect for women (reason why rape is still a huge issue). Feminine women are the best one, why? Because they can better satisfy men in a society oversexualyzing them? Or because they must have what men haven't (connecting with feeling rather than fighting) ?
Are you sure it's the best for them when we still have no data on an other kind of society? Or maybe we always used to do so so there's no reason to change (I could speak about pollution and animal species disapearing but that's a bit of off topic even if you can imagine a bit what I mean)
In my view everyone need to have a bit of everything (being sensitive and strong for example) even if due to hormones there would be inequalities.
I do understand what you mean about the fear of transgender but hey if the only reason to change gender is because they feel more masculine/feminine then now it would mean nothing at all ! About gays you're right there will be more. But noone tell them to love a gender but a person with who they have great bonds.
Finally if you wanna know I'm a straight white guy in engineering studies, I don't have any benefit in what I'm saying except I find it moral.
Your "open mindedness" as lead you to a completely wrong thinking pattern. I will tell you why.
1) masculinity is the best in men. Masculinity is what brings out the best strengths in men. There is nothing bad about masculinity, it is entirely positive. The bad behaviours that some men do (some men, mind you, not the majority, cannot simply be explained as "masculinity) Let me make a few things clear. Men are stronger than women ( average men are stronger than average, women, strong men are stronger than strong women, the strongest man is stronger than the strongest woman) Men are faster than women (same as above) Men are better decision makers than women (average men make better decisions than average women, and most great leaders were men). You are right that there were some female leaders in history. But the amount of female leaders in history is not even 1% when comoared with all the male leaders we had in history. What does that tell us? It tells us that men are better leaders
I could go on about how male leadershio will induce patrairchy and female leadershio induces matriarchy, and why patriarchy is not only better than matriarchy, but matriarchybis inherently self destructive and unsustainable, but i will leave it for now unless you want to discuss that.
On to the next point perfect men aren't full of themselves and resoect women. Men that dont resoect women, do so because of other issues. As for rapists, that is unacceptable. Such a person is not manly at all. How can you call a man complete/masculine or perfect when he cannot even control his sexual urges. That is a very weak minded man. And all the more reason we need to raise boys to be strong minded men, so that they won't become weak degenerates that end up committing acts of deoravity such as rape.
Feminine women aren't oversexual. It seems as if you have been drinking way too much feminist bs kool aid. Feminine women embrace their femaleness and have nurturing, caring natures , that are the best
In terms of caring for and raising children. A feminine woman is much more suitable to be a wife and a mother than a non feminine woman. Thats just a fact. Also, its a lot better to have feminine women in society in general. People give women too little credit when it comes to social interactions. Women do hold a lot of power regarding social group mechanisms. And having feminine women, who are caring, nurturing, etc is gonna be a lot better for the stability of a society than women that are aggressive, or conflict seeking. We have data on mainly two types of societies : patriarchial and many tyoes of matriarchial. Amd like i said, patriarchial societies are the only ones that are sustainable. Many times over history such societies got soft and changed and what happened was that they imploded or were conquered. Thats what happens..
Everything else you said isn't oart of the discussion im seeking, so i will leave it at this
1) To begin I'd like to know your definition of masculinity as I think you've got an interesting way to see it. This way I will be able to give a proper answer about loads of things.
When you claim men are better decision maker than women I don't agree at all on your reasons. The part of women making huge things is way bigger than only 1%. I can give you more example later if you want. Moreover don't you think it's pretty obvious there are more men known for being better leaders because women weren't even allowed to act on their own since recently in history? (vote and work right for example).
Now about patriarchy and matriarchy stuff I'm interested because I don't know much about it.
I do appreciate your opinion on rapists and that's why your way to see what is masculinity interest me so much.
About women sexualysation I can't agree. When I'm in a conversation with guys and someone bring girl subject it's rarely a smart conversation. It's only about how to fuck them and who's hot, not your definition of a good man I guess. I may have only encountered stupid guys but even on this app I can see at least 25% of this kind of stuff in every topic about man behavior. Something else : women are asked to hide their bra straps. Why? Because men would get horny knowing they've got bra? Or when girls (here I refer to under 18) have to change clothes because they're showing too much, why are they sexualyzed in the first place? Or why such clothes are so easily found?
(sorry if I take a lot of time I'm french so I have to think about how to translate my ideas in the most appropriate way. In addition my corrector is constantly changing my words...).
Finally of course caring mothers are the best but as caring fathers don't you think? Can't men show to their children other values than strengh? Taste for adventure ok but I mean being there and supportive when you lost something precious (pet or breakup too). If you do agree then I wonder what's left that only women can handle thanks to their feminity.
(Thanks for waiting, I'm waiting for your answers)
Masculinity basically is a symbol of the strengths of general male behaviour. I say general, because every person is a bit different, but men tend to have common characteristics which are different from common characteristics of women.
For example men are stronger than women. Thus strength is a masculine quality. Men are said to be less emotional than women. Thus, being stoic or sturdy , is a masculine quality. (Going further on this, control of one's emotions, desires, and finally actions is also masculine, because being stoic and sturdy is a good attribute, while giving into your emotions and desires is not. Hence why i believe rapists are very far from being masculine. They have no level of control)
I would say leadershio/decision making is as well, but thats where your next question starts, so for now masculinity would mainky mean physical, mental and emotional strength and sturdyness, as well as leadership and ability to make decisions.
Is it higher than 1%? How many male leaders have we had troughout history? How many female leaders have we had troughout history? I will assure you the ratio is even greater than 99:1. And no, the reason is not sexism (see , this is the part where i accuse you of drinking the feminist cool aid, because according to them everything is sexist) Back then when times were hard and survival was the main incentive, the best person for the job , was chosen to do the job. Its that simple. And the best person, most of the time, happened to be a man. People back then werent just being stupid misogynists. A lot of them were far more intelligent than you or i could ever be.
And they decided that a man was the best option to be a leader. Ofcourse, sometimes there were women who were more talented leaders than the men, or the men werent good leaders, and in those cases the women became the leaders. As for royal inheritance, you could argue tradition of male inheritance, but there are many cases
Where the queen would rule after the kindmgs death, or the female would be given the throne, instead of the man. Again, just the "best man for the job" mentality.
However the truth is that most men are better keaders than women. Its undeniabke from the evidence we have in numbers. Women simply dont take enough risks or are afraid to do so. They always take the safest option and many times that simply means the least bad out of all options.
Also, empires with a female head often fell apart after one or two generations of female leadershio, simply because they were conquered by an outsider male lead force. Thats what happens under female leadership. Too weak to fight, too weak to resist.
Dont worry, about taking your time, i take mine as well, and i may reply late as well, since i have a few other works, but i will log on gag in my freetime. I will write about the patriarchy vs matriarchy , its a big one, it will take some time.
As for the male qualities, strength isn't the only one, but it is an important one. Men can be caring and nurturing as well, but in my opinion, women do it better. Thats not to say men shouldn't do it. The point is that women do it as well. The masculine qualities a child needs are the ones than cannot be replicated by a mother , to the same extent as the father can. As for women, yes there is so much more than just being caring and nurturing, but i dont know how to put it into words. But i am sure that there are positive influences that my mother gave me, which my father couldnt have.
Females have their own feminine intellect and taoent which we men lack and that should be cultivated. I think that is important, because now women are promoted
Your definition of masculinity is far from what I expected when I red it on your main topic post. I almost agree with your opinion on men's and women's place if it's only about common characteristics among genres (a tendency to be stronger and more stoic for men and more caring for women). This way you don't really force anything on anyone. Almost because you don't acknowledge the fact that there are some who don't feel that way (being more emotional (man) or having a big appeal for dangereous and thrilling things (woman)) and are reprimand for not being "as everyone else" when they only want acceptation.
I thought you, as many guys, wanted girl to be weak wifes needing man's protection and fulfill their desires. (Maybe not that much but not too far)
Now about leadership. You made me realise I was more thinking about great women (their incredible but still unspoken achievements) than about in a leading position itself. But still I don't like when you assume a leader is chosen in priority for his/her capacity to handle a tough situation. Having the greatest part of the population on your side demontrates your social skills ok. But also that they accept you as their superior and between a man and a woman who do you assume has to show the more proofs? The woman. While the man is already on the next step : explain what he's gonna do once elected. (In fact it was maybe true in the past when a leader was chosen from combat skills but now it's more about scare of change than anything else).
Also you're right about not trying to compete with the other genre in fields they aren't good at. But if the average men are better than the average women in some things it means there are women who are skillful in those domains too. Everyone fight with his own tools including those unusual according to average stats.
That is true women are naturally better at men in certain domains.
As for leadership today, the truth is that we are still not safe, and probably will never be.
If its no outside threat, then its ourselves.
I dont know if you know, but the current global politics is a big chess game between a lot of powerful people. And it has a lot of stakes involved. War, poverty, people dying means nothing to them. In such a situation, to survive , or come out on top, you need to either have 1) a warrior mentality - to go up against enemies and to come out on top Or 2) a businessmans mentality - where you handle conflicts and disputes with diplomacy.
As an example, they both have their own methods and use both strategies, but at heart trump is a businessman. I dont know how sincere he is of wanting to help americans, but he was always a businessman and his style of presidency reflects on it. Vladimir putin, on the other hand, is a warrior. I can tell, that in his case, he is definitely not
A sellout. He was an ex-KGB agent for his country and puts his people above anything else. He somehow manages to rule a country as big as russia, to keep isis out of it, and to keep dighting the fight against the nwo. Pure badass. Love the guy.
Back to the point, im not saying trump or putin are better than one another, im saying they have to styles of ruling, and both styles are dominated by men generally.
"A boy has to be taught that he is a boy and a girl that she is a girl. Anything other than that is too complex and simply confuses kids. Its gonna mess them up." What do you mean by this, and how is it going to mess them up? "All you are doing is harming the solid foundations of society. Which always were and always have been the family unit, with a straight female as the mother, a straight male as the father, and their children." What are you worried is going to happen? Also, you are aware that those are not the foundations that have always existed right? Polygamy, for example, was the norm among many societies and still is among some societies. Also we've compared the efficacy of same sex vs. different sex parents and there's no difference in their ability to raise children. So this part is just factually wrong.
Anyways those are just my initial questions. I don't care if a parent allows their boy to play with dolls, and allows their daughter to watch power rangers or something. Most all of these things simply seem socially contrived and I don't see any harm either way.
A young boy or girl has a very limited understanding of gender or sexuality. What it needs at that point in time is an assurance in its identitit. If it has a oenis, its a boy, if not its a girl. Simple enough. Telling a child to be whatever it wants is stupid and ridiculous at that age. They aren't old enough to make that choice, as parents you can't just entrust them with that. What you need to do is to raise them as the norm. And yes boys being raised as straight males and girls as straight females, is the norm. If you give a child too many choices, it will be overwhelmed and will be likely to have identity issues growing up.
As for the family unit, degenracy is what will happen. A society full of confused, weak pathetic degenerates.
Polygamy was not the norm in majority societies. Societies in which polygamy was practised, was mostly reserved ro elite men, who could afford to take care of multiple women. Mostly kings or nobles. For the vast majority of people, people who have had
to struggle, this was not an option. Even before, modern civilization, before modern societies, before agriculture, when humans lived in band societies, coupoes would more often than not pair up. You had not many social rules of conduct and it was mostly a "best man for the job does whatever he does best for the band to survive" time and even then, humans seemed to pair bond with one person most of the time.
Polygamy is mostly a result of luxury. Any lifestyle that is a result of luxury is unsustainable and will fold in the face of adversity. There is a reason why the man-woman-children family unit was promoted as the leading role model for most of the world by most societies. Its the strongest and most dominant one.
" Also we've compared the efficacy of same sex vs. different sex parents and there's no difference in their ability to raise children." - thus is comoletely biased and stupid. I do not believe that study for one second.
"If you give a child too many choices, it will be overwhelmed and will be likely to have identity issues growing up." Any evidence for this?
What are you defining as degeneracy? Why should I care what you define as degeneracy? Most of the gays I know aren't that confused.
I misspoke, I meant that it was allowed, ie the old school jews, arabs, and romans. If a person couldn't afford them then obviously they wouldn't have them.
kids? The first same sex couples may have adult children by now. Its not even a fair comparison. We will have to wait one or two generations to make a proper study on this, but by then it will already be too late. The damage has been done. We already know how the absence of a father can affect a child, from all these single mother households ehich have been around ever since divorces becane so easy and commonplace. Do we really need to know what will be the problem of not having a mother?
Because in every same sex couple there will be a lack of one gender. And a man or woman can never replace one another. Never. Men and women are not the same.
People are so damn stupid these days. You need to stop filling your heads up with all the cancer you learn in schools and colleges and spend some time in the woods
Yeah, well you can talk to young children and figure out what is overwhelming to them.
I dont need evidence to know that a child who cannot compute anything more than basic addition and sunbstraction and maybe, just maybe some multiplication, cannot understand something as complex as gender and sexuality. There is a reason that sex and reoroduction is even tought at 8th grade or somewhere along that age, rather than to young kids.
Degeneracy isn't individual, i meant degeneracy of society as a whole. Going with the whole lgbt movement as far as sweden has done has obviously resulted in such degeneracy. And im not the onky one with this opinion either.
As for the evidence, i think you are cherry picking when you say that study is evidence enough for you, comoared woth the our discussion regarding god. Obviously the sample size and survey in this survey is nowhere near anything to claim any real evidence
If you don't care about the research on the subject, and prefer to keep your own intuitions it seems to me that there's no point in having a conversation on the subject. Alas, all is well.
"A boy has to be taught that he is a boy and a girl that she is a girl. Anything other than that is too complex and simply confuses kids." Sounds like you just accepted that gender is a social construct, which kind of destroys the entirety of your post.
"Not letting people grow into their complete selves is curbing a lot of potential in both genders." All the less reason not to control other peoples behaviour. An awful lot of this post is totally self-defeating.
None of your video links work. One of the links shows the search terms you used, and if I type that in myself, the first video result is a response video by No Bullshit.
"A boy has to be taught that he is a boy and a girl that she is a girl. Anything other than that is too complex and simply confuses kids." Sounds like you just accepted that gender is a social construct, which kind of destroys the entirety of your post. - no, its not that simple. Gender is not a social construct. My point is that children are too simple minded to understans what masculinity , femininity, gender, sexual orientation etc truly mean. The best we can come up with is a boy and a girl. One has a penis, the other doesn't. A kid can understand that. As a kid, you tend to mirror your same sex parents behaviour naturally, as you grow up, in most cases. So , you need to tell your kids what they are in order to reinforce their own image of themselves. I giess my point is, since most people are staright, normal gendered, its negative to confuse them as children, creating self doubt of their identity.
Teaching them that they are their actual gender is just additional benefit
All the less reason not to control other peoples behaviour. An awful lot of this post is totally self-defeating.
Again, you dont see the complete picture. Most people, are and will always be straight, non trangender people. This is like 99% of people, its a non contest. And guess what both gendeds are fonna like different things. What you are doing is not controlling their behaviour. You are playing to their strengths. No one forces their son to play with cars or their daughter to play with dolls. You buy one each because thats what the majority of children like. If they dont play with it, then you dont make them. Forcing boys to play with dolls, and girls to play with cars, would be called controlling.
You seem to have a coercive view of normal family activities. Straight parents raising their children up in a normal way, is by no means controlling or social engineering. They are only playing to their strengths. Its like someone who is naturally a good archer, that was never a bow
And an arrow, vs a good archer that was given one, to practice his skill.
Sorry about the links i realizes they didn't work, but in my second uodate it seems to has the search result and you can click the first one that shows up.
Or just type in "Sweden's Feminizing boys with genderless schools"
Yeah. Women are less capable and I think staying home to raise children is a beautiful thing and shouldn’t be seen as derogatory. Women should be beautiful for their men and they have the duty to please him and obey him like the Bible and Koran say.
I’m a woman and I think virginity is a sacred thing for a woman. A man also prefers virgins to marry because it’s a signal of purity and chastity.
A woman shouldn’t be lifting weights and fixing cars. What the hell they look horrendous. A woman shouldn’t be in corporate jobs; they shouldn’t be leading nations - God says that’s the man’s job. The woman’s job is to follow and obey. And that is NOT derogatory, it’s simply what God says.
1
2 Reply
Opinion Owner
+1 y
Women are also naturally emotional and have an innate need to procreate. Women should take advantage of the beautiful gift of pregnancy. They are there to give a child love, support, and care.
Men are there to be strong providers and leaders. They’re the heads of the households and should be obeyed at all costs. I also hate divorce because it’s against the Bible.
Men are naturally born to seek multiple women. But women were naturally born to only seek love from one man. And that’s how society is supposed to be. I think that’s the correct way.
Wow, its very rare to see a woman with such an attitude anywhere, let alone, here.
I disagree with a few things, a man seeks multiple women because the woman has to accept or reject a man, and a man may take a few rejections before finding his mate.
I agree. For a healthy family unit and well formed society, we are in need of the powers and qualities of both genders. Without this, there will be a lack of peace and happiness within families and society will eventually crumble (I think this crumbling process has started already). Saying this does not mean either gender is more, or less impressive and needed than the other, both genders compliment each other, this provides and nice balance in all areas of life.
I usually hear weak men say this. I don't give my kids false hope of being "anything they want to be", because that is purely biologically speaking, not always possible (a person with the body of a ballerino will have a hard time getting into the NFL, i. e.). But if my boys decide they wanted to live as a woman, that's fine with me. The same if my girls decided they wanted to live and present as a man.
Yeah, but they will figure that out when they reach that age. No 4 year old really cares about what gender he or she is. Making them have to take that choice and more than that, raising them up in a genderless, pc cult is pure brainwashing. There is nothing good about it.
Right. I think kids will settle on a definite gender as their grow older more than when they are young. But that's why I think it's important not to shoehorn them early. I didn't go out of my way to buy my kids gendered stuff, I let them chose what they wanted to play with/ wear, so in a sense, we were gender neutral. I think what's problematic with the gender neutral movement itself is that it actively tries to reverse gender stereotypical stuff, which, then, isn't really gender neutral at all. But I don't believe in telling my kids "You are a boy, you have to play with trucks and can't play with dolls" or vice versa. I just let them be and they turned out great.
I wouldn't tell my kids what they would have to play with either. Most kids play with toys that are usually in their "gender " section because that is what caters to their likes. But occasionally you will find kids who like the opposite. Or something else alltogether.
I was into cars and my dad hated having to buy me that sh*t. My sister was into dolls and he hated having to buy her that 😂😂😂.. No one really told us to like anything
I agree. People want women and men to be equal, and they are, but that doesn't mean they have to be the same in all respects. They're not, and they never will be, and that's not a bad thing.
Its gonna be hard to be all that when you aren't even sure if you are a boy or a girl.
When you aren't teaching kids the most basic things in life and tell them they can be "whatever they want to be" you are doing a ton more harm than good. Kids dont know what they want to or should be. Its the parents job to help them grow into themselves.
I disagree. Also, the links won't work on my computer. You really should try to back up what you're saying with links to backup what you're saying. Right now it's just one opinion and another.
If people could be raised into strong, resilient and capable people by simply raising them in whatever bs method you think is okay because some bs liberals controlled by elites bent on destroying the world said so, then how come for the entirety of human history all civilizations, every single one, valued masculinity and femininity?
Why is that every civilization always trained boys to be masculine while training girls to be feminine?
Men cannot be strong, resilient warriors when you are a weak emotional pathetic mess.
You need to learn not to cry to control your emotions to be a strong man. Thats how you hone your masculinity. If you you are in the middle of the battlefield and you see your friends dying, what good is breaking down emotionally gonna do? You have to learn to suppress them for such situations.
And guess what, if our male ancestors werent strong like that, and werent raised to be strong men, a lot of us would not be alive today
by the way, i realize the links dont work, see the video "Sweden's feminizing boys with genderless schools" If you watch it and dont see whats wrong with it, then there is no hope for you. You habe become part of the problem, part of the people that the elite want you to be, ignorant, weak and letting all and any dumbass idiocy take root in society without fighting against it.
I think children of both genders should have parental figures of both genders. But that can be an uncle or aunt or a family friend, it doesn't have to be a parent.
It matters more that they get those positive adult influences somehow. It doesn't need to come from their own parents. Lots of biological parents do a horrible job of raising their children.
Thats not an excuse. Just because some parents are bad doesn't mean that all and any reppacement is alright.
The mother and father have a vital role in raising kids.
Did you know that a biological fathers presence or absence can determine the sexual maturation of his daughter? Just goes to show how strong and important family is. its beyond human understanding.
And thats why the degenerate left is trying to destroy it.
I agree, just because some parents are bad does not mean that a replacement that is also bad for the children is okay. But I disagree that children must have two parents of opposite genders in order to become well adjusted, fully functioning, happy people with good values. The important thing is for them to have parent (s) who love them and have positive adult examples from both genders. There are so many children that need families, and denying them loving parents and comfortable homes just because of the gender of the potential parents is ridiculous and cruel.
I think every child deserves two parents of the opposite sex. Thats what is natural and it is how humans are supposed to be raised.
However, there are many children without parents, and yes they do need parents and a place to call home. As for same sex parents raising kids, im undecided on how i feel about it
I draw the line when you say your both or nothing. If you say your nothing, then whenever you go to a doctor and they're prescribing drugs that can affect each sex differently, they're gonna have to look at your genitals. Then when they say your a boy or girl on the medical record, the patient is gonna throw a fit. I don't know if they can sue but if they can they will.
That genderless thing is just some people being morons. They just act as if the boy-girl would somehow cherry pick one sort of sexual behaviour and should be prepared for both.
I just think people overthink and over consider children.
As if they are some sort of a long-term deposit.
You be mascular, you be feminine attitudattitude is what got us to this point in the dirst place.
Yeah, except gender roles have lost their use in the modern day. People should choose who they are. Look, I'm not the stereotypical guy who tries to get the girl. I'm the smart person that honestly couldn't care less about it.
I'm not masculine by what most people define by. But should you sacrifice who you are to appeal to people. I don't think so.
Gender roles will never lose their meaning, they can change and we adapt, but we can't lose them.
A society without gender roles will fall to degeneracy and either implode or be conquered by another society with strong gender roles. Thats how it went down troughout history at all times and thats what will haooend again if you allow it to. If you dont want to be like most regular guys, thats fine, but im sure you have a lot more common with the regular guy than the regular girl.
They might be, since technology have became so advance, woman gaining equal rights, and technology making gender a thing that lacks barrier. And the thing is that gender is actually a social construct.
I might say it's maybe. I don't know. I mean is it even measurable? I'd say I do a lot of stuff many guys would not do. Shaving legs, I have a ton of friends that are girls, and I'm not exactly "chasing". I don't know. I would say I'm masculine. I'm just me.
Gender is not a social construct man. You leave a bunch of young boys and girls to fend for themselves on an island or in a forest and leave them to their own devices with no one telling them to be anything.
I guarantee you if they survive, the males will all be masculine and the females feminine? Why? You have to be strong to survive in this situation, and you will have to embrace your nature to be truly strong in the face of such adversity.
And when this has happened? You really wanna go there? Okay
I guarantee if they survive, they don't care if men are the one opening the doors and stuff like that. If they survive, I'm sure they focus on personal difference, not something like gender.
The way men typically are nowadays makes me not wanna have my son raised by them. I'm trying to raise my son to be DIFFERENT than these typical douchebags. Not just like them. I don't need my son growing up to be a typical moron. He needs better examples on how a respectable human being should be. And there is no specific gender to teach someone how to act like a proper human being. Not all men are typical shit ags, but MOST are.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
I agree, although I think boys are harmed more by not having a father than girls are by not having a mother.
The best way to guarantee a boy will end up a fucked up adult "man" is to be raised by a single mother.
I think both genders are harned more by not having a father. A father is the pillar of the family. Thats why the degenerates have been attacking masculinity frok the beginning and shasing men out of the family. Once the man is gone, its easy to conquer the family.
Agree 100%. True affirmation of identity is not to let facebook define five hundred 'genders', but to stimulate your child to become a healthy and accomplished member of their sex when they grow up.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions