Many people until today disagree on Roe v. s Wade 1973 Supreme Court decision to allow abortion. Many states in U. S still don't support this law. I am religious man and with morals and values and I don't support the fact tax payer money goes into supporting women bad sexual behavior. 2ndly humans lived on earth for thousands years without any law that told them to kill their kids in the bells because outcome that comes after. So what if a woman has the pregnancy at least she will learn no one will rescue you for your bad behavior. Only acceptable reason to abort should be life n death. Aside from that their should not be billions dollars wasted to support illicit sexual activity on tax payers.
If u ran for office would you outlaw this law? Please choose n explain why you are pro choice v. s pro life.
Pro life? Why
Pro choice? Why
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Updates
+1 y
Oh a child is so inconvenient because I got raped was it childs fault why u punishing him..
The British statesman and political philosopher Edmund Burke wrote, "The effect of liberty to individuals is that they may do as they please. We ought see what it will please them to do before we risk congratulations." Therein lay the problem with laws that permit abortion on demand.
A society that premises its law as "Choice"- to use the locution of abortion rights advocates - effectively leaves open the question of the value of human life. It becomes not a standing principle, but a subjective judgment to each individual. In such a society, human life becomes not an end in itself, but mere instrument. Life becomes not an object whose preservation is the highest standard, but rather a convenience to be maintained or not according to the satisfaction of another's will.
We shape our laws and then our laws shape us - see also the civil rights laws of the 1960s which have effected a revolution in race relations. (The idea that a black man and a white man cannot sit together at the same lunch counter is as alien to this generation as Neptune. Yet in 1965 it was pretty much the norm.)
Inherent then in the pro-choice argument is the idea that life has no value save that which each person chooses to attach to it. It denies society any authority to make a collective judgment on such questions. Therefore, in this view, the law may not afford protection to life except at some arbitrarily defined (and inherently subjective) point.
This then conduces to an assertion of power over rights. Life is maintained not as its own end, but according to the will of the person who, effectively, controls it because they can. An ethic of convenience is established and it is a slippery slope on which to build a culture and a legal edifice.
Such a society will not value life that sees life as not an end, but as a means to some other end. Indeed, that is why at about the same time as the culture began to shift on the abortion question we also saw a rise in child abuse, spousal abuse, divorce, out of wedlock births and other social pathologies. These were not unrelated phenomena.
Aristotle said that the first questions of politics are, "How ought we to live? What kind of a people do we wish to be?" The implicit answer of those who support abortion on demand is, in effect, that it is nobody's business. Predictable results follow. One cannot expect the society to absent itself from collective moral judgments on the value of life and then expect an ethical social order to result.
I wrote this Bodily Rights and Abortion specifically on this subject and while it’s not my best work it still serves as a decent introduction to my position.
I’m pro-choice because of the bodily rights argument, but there are some caveats I have to add due to the leftward lurch of American Democrats. No, I am not a proponent of late stage or partial birth abortions if they intentionally kill the fetus/ baby. Late stage abortions utilize either IDX or D&E which both intentionally end the life of a viable fetus. This is different from the post viable abortion in which the fetus just dies as a consequence of its insufficient development. If a woman desires to have a late stage abortion I think she should have the right to remove the fetus for self autonomy reasons, but not at the cost of intentionally killing it. This means she could have a Cesarian or early induction to remove the fetus, but then the baby would have to be kept alive like any other person.
Besides that though you make some claims I disagree with. Firstly women throughout antiquity frequently performed abortions and actual infanticide after the baby left the womb. This was such a commonplace thing that old peace officers used to report dead babies in the streets as no different a dead dog. Secondly, I’m not sure which religion you ascribe to, but the Bible itself expressly describes how to perform an abortion in numbers 5, as well as describing an unborn baby as not being equal to a living human in Exodus 21. Yevamot 69b:10 states that a baby is just fluid until the 40th day, and the Hadiths state that ensoulment doesn’t occur until the 120th day, so that covers the big 3 at least.
“This is different from the post viable abortion in which the fetus just dies as a consequence of its insufficient development.” This was supposed to say “pre-viable abortion”.
I believe you can be both. Most of my problems are with American policies on two levels. First with special needs children languishing (warehoused) in the foster care system. Secondly, policies that may encourage children being born, but once the cord is cut, your completely on your own. This is in contrast to many European countries with strong family leave policies, child care, job protections, education and other elements that are more holistic to actually raising a productive member of society. Combining the two, where you have a special needs kid and the lack of support systems, would result in much consternation for any mother.
So I'm pro-life once they are out of the womb, but America does not make it easy to raise a child once its born. Its a horrible choice to have to make, be it economical or if the fetus has conditions that would be inconsistent with sustaining life. there's much research saying that many abortions in the US are due to economic issues for the mother/family. Look at child support enforcement here, its a joke. Your bringing up a kid in poverty and squalor. Other female mammals have the capability of embryonic diapause, I wish we had that as humans.
Pro choice because it makes more sense to let the woman choose what to do with her body in cases of promiscuity or rape or even in instances where say the man abandons her. Not every woman wants to be or feels capable of being a single mom.
Abortion is also a good thing if the woman knows that her baby won't have a good life, say if she's a prostitute, a drug addict or if she's just a busy person.
Plus the foetus is just a foetus. It's a little human in process of being formed but not a fully formed being. I don't think that people are as attached to a foetus as they are to a baby. I'm not saying that there is no attachment at all but it's certainly not the same as loving a baby who had already been delivered. If the level of attachement would've been the same people would've said "We have 2 kids" instead of saying "We have one kid and one on the way"
I think about it as 'engaged to be married'... They're not married yet and still have time to change their mind.
Overall, I believe that it's best to not have kids at all rather than having them and not giving them a good upbringing and all the happiness on earth.
I am pro choice. No one is required to like that women choose to abort but their opinion should never get to override the woman’s authority over her pregnancy.
No man is claiming he has the accual authority to override a womans disposition in that matter. But , wether you like it or not or wether you believe it or not , men have Gods commanded commandment to lead women spiritually concerning life or death and its consequences. Your body belongs to God and so does a biological creation inside of it. Between female and male who created biologically a new creation together the shared conception belongs to God regardless. You or the father have NO absolute humanly right to choose the eternal destiny of any human by your constituent decision solely to end any humans life for any reason.
I’m also pro brain there are 17 different birth controls to abortion pills and usually using a condom plus lubrication plus! If a Girl is rap3d she can’t take before after pill the next day pill next week pill abortion pill there’s also other people precautions that are new into the technology that the girl could go and get his self checked out plus needles and other stuff..
@Mjghost FYI many of contraceptive methods currently available are not 100% effective. The morning after pill also only works well enough if you take it a day or so after having had sex. I really doubt someone who was just raped would be in a mental place where they can even begin contemplating things like taking the morning after pill on time. And oh what if the girl was raped on Friday eve/Saturday morning, most pharmacies are closed after those hours, so I suppose she is just gonna have to have that baby? And don’t even get me started on the side effects of different contraceptives. :S
Except she chose to get pregnant? Why does every one ignore that part of her authority? She literally made that happened, she went out of her way to get knocked up, she refused to use contraceptives which are insanely common and cheap and then she got pregnant. Why is it that women like yourself always argue about a woman's "right to choose" but ignore the original choice she had the right to make? Also what about the childs right not to die? I mean why does it exist? Oh yeah, the child exists because their parents where idiots and didn't use proper protection because they where lazy or "it didn't feel as good". Suck it up and own it, your free to choose and always have been no one is questioning that, what is in question is your "right" to kill your offspring that you created because you couldn't be bothered to do things the responsible way and your belief that you have the right not to be responsible for your actions. Those are two very different things (which is why you conflate the two because one is understandable (and absolutely a right) and the other is just you acting like a child who doesn't want to suck it up an take responsibility which isn't understandable nor acceptable.
@hellionthesagereborn I understand you have questions about this, but these really aren't your concerns. Everyone should be making decisions based on what they think is right for them. You don't get to tell anyone what is the right decision based on their circumstances, many of those circumstances you might be completely unaware of. If you don't like it, that's fine. Then don't like it.
So ignore the whole she chose to get knocked up thing because its inconvient got yah. Of course you would because well look at you, your entire ideological belief structure hinges on you not having to be a responsible human being. Rather sad and pathetic really. People like you really aught not be reproducing to begin with, your basically a child yourself, to immature and incapable of self reflection or taking responsibility. I just don't think you should have the right to murder a baby because you couldn't be bothered to take the thirty second of using a contraceptive. Seems really screwed up and clearly has nothing to do with what is right (I mean really who the fuck would use that as a justification for killing their own baby that only existes because they the adult decided to act like a fucking idiot? Well people with no moral values like yourself obviously but its still really screwed up).
You can feel however which way you want to feel about this matter but at the end of the day, the decision isn’t yours to make unless you’re the one in it.
This quite literally has nothing to do with "decisions" it has to do with whether or not what you are condoning is murder or not (and it is legally and morally speaking). That's like saying its okay for me to kill my wife if she becomes inconvient to me and its my decision to make because it doesn't affect you. Sure it doesn't affect you, but it affects the person being murdered so its a moot point. Its a stupid argument and of course you know that because for you its not about logic its about avoiding responsibility as much as humanely possible. Yeah abortion affects me because I can have kids but don't get a say in whether or not they get murdered, yes it affects me because you are advocating for legal murder which I find to be morally objectionable. So yeah, I do get a say in this no different then any one else.
Abortions aren't free. Family planning programs support so much more than abortions.
Being men, we rrally should just shut the fuck up about what women should or should not do with their bodies. Nobody is perfect. I would allow everybody one. One oops. I dont support abortion being used as steady birth control. If a woman has to have a kid dug out every 30 days, then i think she should have her uterus welded shut.
That life or death stance is a bunch of bullshit too. There are a million detectable birth defects that won't KILL a child. But they will spend every second of their short ass, miserable life in constant pain wishing they were dead. You can thank your precious savior for that one.
God and his plan conceive a billion children a day who have no reason being born. Now thats a hard fact of life. We, as humans, try to excuse and/or understand the devine plan all the time. Our way is not his way. Thats a bitch. But thats a fact too.
The long and the short of it is this. Until we each are either dealing with an unwanted pregnancy, or face to face with god asking him exactly what he meant when he outlined the devine plan, then we need to just shut the fuck up.
This is one of the most controversial, brain dead topics I have ever seen anywhere. People actually acting like everyone has a good life or that the parent (s) could ever offer a good life. "Just give the child up for adoption", oh and let them go through that system? Sure. They may never find a home. Let's not even get into how close minded all these individuals actually are and remember how small their world is. They only see what is in front of them but the world as a whole. The world is a lot larger than your city, state, country, or even continent. People live their own lives, and people make mistakes. You have people that are born that don't want to live, and you have those that want their life. People will argue both sides, but it is best to leave it on the fence where it belongs, mind your business and go about your day. You know damn well you aren't about to adopt a child right now, nor are you going to get a child from a parent (s) that doesn't want their potential child. Quit acting like you are a hero, and a daycare. You aren't. Remember that. Only when you actively step in and do something for these "would be" children that will potentially not exist, can you have a legitimate opinion on this matter.
Mighty assumptious aren't you? You don't know one thing about me. I would love to adopt if I were allowed to. Queers can adopt, women can adopt, it's always men are the targets of the unwritten policy IE this case non adoption policy. That and the damn government has to get their hands in each and everything they can manage to put them in. You got any idea what it cost to adopt do you? You don't speak for me I can tell you that.
The word is presumptuous. I'm not speaking specifically. I'm speaking generally. Also, as large as the world is, you couldn't know where I live, nor could I know where you live, hence why I mentioned the city, state country and continent. I'm sure we don't live near one another. I'm also sure the policy differs because of where we live. I'm not saying you can't adopt, and I'm not saying that you wouldn't adopt, however the general person isn't going to do so. You are merely 1 individual (possibly partnered, so 2 individuals) of approximately 7.7 billion humans.
Relax. Everything isn't about you. This opinion isn't about you. It's for the vast majority that are so pro life that they cannot see reason. For those that do not choose to adopt but believe that all lives have merit even if many lives end short. Etc. This topic is a literal shit show. You come looking for a clown, but you literally get the fucking circus instead.
You would be amazed how many of us out here would love to adopt and we could if it weren't for 3rd party forces that stand in our way that make it impossible. It's just like when you hear the words "dead beat dad", you automatically think that's true because the dad's were labeled that, when in fact false allegations were brought against them in order to steal full custody of their children and things like that. Lot's of people want to adopt but can't and it's not because they wouldn't.
And you wonder why I say "They may never find a home". I already know this. The system as a whole is terrible world wide. There are plenty of people on the planet as is. It isn't like the few that choose to do away with would be lives are cutting the population by a modicum. The world keeps turnin'.
I’m not sure tax payer money goes to abortion, unless the abortion is prefaced by incest, rape, or the life of the mother is at risk. I believe this is called the Hyde Amendment.” I’m pro-life because it’s not right to abort a human life just because one has the ability to and because of convenience. If you let the processes that be take over then you’ll get a human being baby. You can say this about isolated sperm or eggs. The majority of abortions are not done out of reasons due to rape, but mostly lack of convenience to my knowledge. I believe poor decision-making and bad judgment led to the decision to contemplate abortion. I don’t like the immorality of abortion nor do I like the lack of judgment and decision-making around it. There are other alternatives for one to take if they perceive themselves of being not able to take care of the child because they say “I’m too busy” or “This world is too cruel.” I can debunk these statements but I lack the patience to write a further lengthy piece.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Did you know that there are over 400,000 children in the foster care system right now? These are kids who came from bad homes or were given to the adoption agency. If you take away a woman’s right for abortion away, there would probably be millions in the foster care system which WE are paying for through our taxes. Which is cheaper? Birth control or one child in foster care? Hmmm? Not to mention the low chance that kid has to succeed in life.
Also, where the flying fuck are the fathers of these unwanted kids? Yes, people make mistakes but keeping the woman 100% accountable to this is the very reason women get abortions because they know the can’t count on the loser guy who knocked them up.
ALSO thousands of years ago, having an abortion meant death to the woman but you were likely to die from child birth. No one wants to have an abortion but there should still be the option. Even if it’s morally wrong, if you are going to force a woman to not abort, you better be the one offering to adopt the kid. The reason behind abortion is usually because the woman knows she can’t give the child the life it deserves.
Everyone has problems in life, and we still want to be alive. By your comment, we can infere that poor people should not be alive, because they pass through financial issues, for example. If they are poor today, they can battle and they can have a better life tomorrow. Everything can change, as long as you are alive. You are determining the future of the person based on the conditions of borning. How many successful histories we see every day of people thad had everything to lose hope but keep going and became succesful. Bill Gates and Einstein passed through hard times. If you are sad today, you can be happy tomorrow. In other words, besides saying that poor people should not be alive, you are saying that disabled people should not live as well. That is eugenics, the base of the idea of legalizing abortion. Search for Margaret Sanger on google and you will see how abortion is an evil idea, that evolves feminism and brainwashing on population in every aspects, especially sexual behavior.
pulation control. Search on the internet and you will see how we are manipulated every day by the media and the rich people on foundations to think that children are a problem, and procriating should not be stimulated.
correcting my last reply: Also, there are lots of maipulation on statics regarding abortion. You are wrong, most of the abortions don't come from people who are poor. Poor people usually raise the kids working hard and doing what tehy can. Most of the abortions come from promiscuity, women and men that think that a child will be a problem for their studies or carrier, for example. Using poor people to defend abortion is really something hypocritical to do. Abortion come from selfishness and only think about the pleasure o the moment without consequences. Also, you mentioned "birth control". People spread the idea that killing other innocent and defenseless person is birth control to bring people closer to the theme abortion and keep them guessing If It is really right or wrong. Birth controls are contraceptives. If you don't want or If you can't provide a child financially or emotionally , you are not ready to have sex. But If you have sex, you can use comtraceptives. They are cheap, universal and they have a very low percentage of failure when used correctly. ( I will have to make more comments because there is not enough space here)
Other thing you mention is that " even If It is morally wrong...". By this statement, you are relativizing moral and values. If you are alive now, It is because there is a law that say that killing is a crime, for example. So, we should not relativize moral and values, as they are the solid base of our relationships on society. Otherwise, we would be irrational animals that act only based on our insticts, but we are not. We have a heart to use ethics on our routine. Funny thing is that the same people that agree with abortion try to defend social minories ( poor people), stating that they "die during unsafe abortions" ( manipulated statistics, as I referred), but they are doing exactly the opposite: they are indirectly saying that poor people should not have children because their children will have awful lives. Only rich people should have children? that is the base of the program for population control. Search on the internet and you will see how we are manipulated every day by the media, the labels and the rich people on foundations ( Rockfeller, for example, google It), to think that children are a problem, and procriating should not be stimulated based on their manipulation.
Because a fetus is neither concious nor feels pain (up to a certain age) so there is absolutely no downside for it if it "dies". Killing a fetus is about as bad as killing a plant. Sure, technically it's sort of alive but that is it. Why force people to ruin their lives for no reason? Yes, an abortion ends a potential life, but if that is bad then every single time a man ejaculates outside of a vagina is half a murder, and every time a woman has her period is half a murder too. Cause if they had worked together they could have given a human a life. But they didn't. Are they murderers because of that? No, cause that is stupid. Either we treat a fetus like a plant that doesn't suffer any loss from an abortion, or we have to treat a fetus like a potential future human being that loses its potential future, which means that not ensuring that every woman is pregnant at all times in order to make as much babies as possible - cause what could become a human but doesn't counts as murder?
I'm so glad this brave anonymous added that update because he obviously has no idea the psychological damage being raped or being forced to carry your rapist's remind around for almost a year would do to most victims. He doesn't care about incest babies or children born who will be born with obvious mental or physical disabilities. Doesn't care about the 600k sitting in foster care, what's one more? What a lucky guy to never be forced to make such a difficult decision in his life, but think he has the right to judge others for their choices. I'm pro choice all day. A woman's body is their own business 🖕🏿
This is up for debate, as women still mourn the potential for this clump of cells to have been a child. People think abortions are easy choices, made lightly, simple as taking Plan B, but there's much more at stake.
The abortion happens before 12 weeks if I'm not mistaken. Before that time it is not a human so not a murder. You might be killing something but not a human, it's not human before 4 month.
To reiterate, some women still have an emotional response to conceiving, the potential to have a child, whatever stage of mitosis is going on. It still can be an emotional and traumatic experience to deal with
Pro-choice. The women getting abortions are often poor or would-be single moms so they can’t give children the proper resources. Kids raised in unfavorable conditions don’t usually turn out well and having thousands or millions of people with that kind of upbringing is harmful to the general population. Adoption is an option too, but unfortunately most women who shouldn’t be raising kids don’t put their babies up for adoption because it’s too painful and goes completely against motherly instinct. If they aren’t going to use resources like adoption in most cases and usually don’t produce well-adjusted members of society, abortion should still be on the table.
That is absurd you talk about abortion should be ok but ten you say adoption is too painful for the mother. Do you see the absurdity of that statement?
And you also said adoption doesn’t produce well-adjusted children so abortion should be on the table You are stuck in your own words you don’t know what the hell you’re even talking about do you
It’s ridiculous how many women prefer to take a life so they can avoid taking responsibility for their whoredom. If you don’t want a kid, well... 🤔 don’t do what causes it. DUH.
After reading some the posts on this... I am bewildered at how many people simply don’t know how to keep their legs closed. 😂 That by itself solves the problem.
Worse. Once you start abortion you get addicted to it. Thinking it's normal behavior. By time a teenage begins upto around 25 she probably been through at least 5 abortions. Some never get another chance to get pregnant.
Pro-life because life is sacred and murder is wrong. Most abortion don't happen due to rape they happen because women have unprotected sex without contraception and pregnancy is a natural consequence of that. A girl in college tried to get me removed from class because she felt threatened because she knew I was Pro-life even though I kept my opinions to myself, she went on a massive rant at me in class. Obviously she feels guilty and is mourning the death of the child she had killed so I didn't engage.
It's not a murder, you're not killing anyone. You prevent a fucked up life from happening. I can't even accept your opinion when you state something so wrong and horrible "murder" omg
I'll even go further, if it's a murder can they explain how the allow can tolerate murder? I don't believe God is saying life is a punishment for having sex or being raped.
I’m 100% pro choice. Every woman should be able to choose what she wants to do with her body. Imagine if someone was making you abort if you wanted a child. Why should it be any different if it’s the opposite? Also, how can you be pro life if that life means life without both parents/financial support/love and appreciation? I get that abortion is against some peoples beliefs but pro choice doesn’t make you abort a child, it just gives you and other people a right to choose what is best for yourself and for the child. I personally wouldn’t want to be born just because my mother knew she’d end up in prison for aborting me. It makes a serious scars for the child to know that it wasn’t wanted.
Pro life. Not only do I think its wrong to kill a fetus, I think that if you where just not stupid about it you could have avoided the issue all together as contraceptives are incredibly common and incredibly cheap. Their is simply no rational reason to require an abortion baring rape and the incredibly rare cases of defective birth control (in almost every case its simply used improperly i. e. she doesn't take the pill regularly like she is suppose to so that's why it fails i. e. human error (lazyiness or forgetfulness)).
The one you are now arguing with is just a murderer. She has a choice to choose her eternal destiny as all of us do. GOD will definitly judge her accordingly as all of us.
@Djaay I know what kind of person she is, I just don't tolerate liars. She isn't about choice, she is about avoiding responsibility at any cost and its disgusting. Bringing life into the world only to snuff it out because you can't be bothered to care is despicable on every level.
No... She advocates that she's got a murderous heart. That's her choice for her destiny eternally. Like I said , let GOD judge her for her immorality and murderous thoughts.
I am pro-life. I knew a woman at church about 15 years ago who kept her child after being raped. The Child was a wonderful, beautiful young woman at the time, and it would be a shame if she never existed.
Abortion is murder. Snow and I are opposed to Abortion under any circumstances. She isn't religious, well she believes in "a God", but I don't know what yet, but anyway she can see that abortion is morally wrong too.
The Golden Rule says, "Do unto Others as you would have them do unto you." The Silver Rule says, "Don't do to others what you don't want done to you." Abortion violates both the Golden Rule and the Silver Rule.
the Declaration of Independence states that we are endowed with a right to life from our Creator. If the right to life comes from the Creator, then it stands to reason that right is imparted at the moment of creation, which would be conception. Thus abortion violates the fundamental God-given rights of the unborn child.
My fundamental belief is from sexual education and birth control is the best way to lower the abortion rates.
The thing that brings my piss to a boil is abstinence only education and birth control is a sin. I get it, the catholic church wants more followers by not pulling out, that is a long term power move. Not everyone is a Christian. they shouldn't follow the same baby making policy.
You can't have abstinence only education and birth control as a sin without abortions. If you care more about abortion, you should leave the abstinence and birth control beliefs at the door that don't follow your sect. Are you going to pass out condoms at an anti abortion picket line? Every counter of planned parenthood has free ones.
Dogmatic pressure is not a way for people to make right decisions. I wish there was none but forcing that wish is going to create more.
I'm pro-choice. The whole point of making the US, where I live, was to make a country free from religious laws. If you don't like abortions or it's against your religion, then don't get one. It's that easy. It isn't your choice to decide what other women can do and not do to their body.
4
9 Reply
Asker
+1 y
If it isn't paid by my tax payers do as u wish. I don't support paying for your illicit sexual activity. Men don't get to go sleep with prostitutes and send the bill to white house.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment this is what your tax dollars pay for - exactly what you think is okay. Prostitution isn't even legal in the US save for a few select locations so that isn't a valid point.
It is insane to try and tell a woman what to do with her situation I do not support feminism but are you gonna take care of all these kids that poor women would have if abortion was banned? Worry about your own life.
I don't mind if legal immigrants come here just I do not want illegals to come here. Either way abortions control the population in a way that if it gets banned will fuck everyone when it comes to food and resources at some point the middle class is dying also so you will have even more homeless people.
That's liberal b. s food scarcity is way to tell middle class control your spending. Real problem is wealthy like Amazon not paying their damn taxes. 11 billion in profits and $0 dollars in taxes. While I pay 26% of my share of $50,000 a year salary. That's b. s read it. www.businessinsider.com/amazon-not-paying-taxes-trump-bezos-2018-4
I am not disagreeing with that but think about it a true conservative is pro-abortion because we believe the government should not be up in your business.
I'm pro life in the sense that I think in most cases abortion is wrong, but I do think there is some grey areas like rape for example. I also don't support laws outlawing it because I don't think that would do any good, but I am against government funding it.
Let's say she gets raped and he knocks her up. Why would she want a kid from that union to be a CONSTANT life-long reminder of what happened to her? BEING raped would be a bad enough reminder!! Or, in the case of my ex-fiancé; she got pregnant from her first hubby and WANTED to have the baby, but it was a stillborn because of some physical thing to do with her that she didn't know she had and she had to carry around a dead baby in her for 2 or 3 months which REALLY freaked her out and turned her into a zombie!!! A few years later, she meets me and I get her pregnant twice. The first time, we just couldn't afford to have a kid. The second time, we decided to keep it but her Dr. told her she has some kind of condition where she might end up with another stillborn and she wanted NO part of THAT, again!!
Pro choice, no one should be forced to have a child they dont want. Most women that have abortions are druggies or dont have the money to raise a baby. And by the way you know women have been having abortions for a really really long time. This is nothing new and only recently has became a hot topic issue
4
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Ok everyone is pro life no one likes abortions but I think there necessary.
Out of all the people who are pro life how many of them have adopted kids? How many of them volunteer time to help children that weren't wanted.
Just BC a parents gives birth to them doesn't mean they have the resources to take care of them or that they want to.
Also if a women is raped and gets pregnant should she have to carry the child of the monster? I don't think so
What if an abortion is necessary for saving the mothers life?
Most Helpful Opinions