Too much Wealth inequality the whole table gets flipped over. The first will be last and the last will be first. A world leader getting a knife up the anus.
In Amarica, alimony was used to keep the table steady when other tables are flipping. It's a compromise to keep the status quo. I agree with alimonys
Sprite of a spouse being trapped in a life situation without there own means and having a way to combat that.
I don't like the capitalist neoliberal bastardized version of alimony. Get the stuck spouse without financial means a lawyer that gets a decent cut to devour the other spouse alive. This is a product of wealth inequality at its finest.
Most Helpful Opinions
Alimony should have never existed. There should be no such thing as child support. Kids aren’t property to grant to one parent or the other. Joint custody and responsibility should be the standard. Kids should spend half of their time with each parent after a divorce and during the time the parent houses their child they should be responsible for their expenses. If one parent is jailed, sent to war, or dies then the remaining parent has to carry the load during that period.
I don't know if it should be abolished, but I think it's a silly thing. A divorce should mean separation of everything, including financially. Unless the money was made equally and agreed upon to split it as earned, it would make sense. I feel like it's just a really stupid legal obligation.
If the man produced most of the income and it was not a joint account, there should be no reason to give basically free money to your ex-spouse. There are definitely certain circumstances where I'd be willing to look past, like was he the one who insisted on being the provider? Either way, as a whole - it's stupid.
If one spouse commands the other to sacrifice their career to be a stay at home parent and then they divorce, I think the spouse with an income should be required to at least help the other one get back in their own feet, for a limited period of time. Say, 6 months or so. This why I’d rather have my own income regardless of my other life choices.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
16Opinion
@MzAsh I'm totally with you but i feel we can extend it a bit more. Look i kinda get the logic of alimony but this life time stuff is BS. How about you get alimony long enough for you to get retrained in something...2-3 years? How has being a stay at home mom ruined you from ever returning to work for the rest of your life? In CA 10+ years of marriage might mean eternal alimony, how is that fair?
I assume you mean "wealth inequality".
In which case, dear lord, please travel more. You are horribly sheltered. And if you can't afford travel, oops. Wealth inequality isn't bad, right? 🤷It should be limited, but not completely abolished. For example, a woman who gave up college and a career to raise kids for 20 years should not be left high and dry by her M. D. husband who divorces her.
Absolutely. its indentured servitude or slavery. It basically incentivizes women to not get off of their asses and work. If women truly are equal to men than it is unnecessary. Alas feminism will never choose to get rid of it because it steals from men and gives to women...
No definitely not. There are many cases that are completely unfair like if a women stays home to raise the kids while the husband is able to work. If they spilt the women gets stuck with kids and no job. That really isn't fair and with things like child support it totally makes sense when you see the amount of fathers that walk away from their children. I think women especially have all the right to make the man pay her.
Alimony should have never existed in the first place, and now that there really isn't any legitimate reason for it other than female vindictiveness and greed, it should definitely be abolished.
I think it should exist, but be severely adjusted. There are definite cases that alimony is justified. I do think they should be short term 1-3 year assistance plans
A monetary compensation in lieu of doing a parent's job is sort of cheap.
I'd prefer to see a system that secures proper emotional care for a child than just the financial 'deal' about it.Yes it screwed my dad short term but since he has large income he got over it
I am ok with it if the time frame was limited to 1.5 years and if it was based on what is neccessary to survive rather than a % of the guy's income.
Strong legal prenup could work or best is no marriage.
Yes what entitles a woman or man to a paycheck from their exes if no kids are involved. Ridiculous
Yes, absolutely. However, the entire family court system and divorce law needs a complete overhaul as well.
I don't agree with it either. Blame the British.
Yes but it would save me a lot of money
It makes people think twice on divorce..
Yes it should be banned
Forgiveness is easier
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions