I already know some of you folks will claim that it’s just feminazi man-hating propaganda but like... WHY
explain please And if you disagree with the message, would you want your daughters to be searching for a knight? Will you be teaching your sons to be that knight? “knight” meaning a man that protects his female partner from everything emotionally and physically to the point where she has no responsibility or worries.
Updates
+1 y
“I think it's just pointing out that what we expect from women is changing. We dont expect damsels in distress anymore and I kinda like this mindset because honestly the damsel in distress turns me off. I dont want a partner who needs my support around every corner. Dont get me wrong I like providing and being helpful in a relationship but I would rather teach a girl to change her care oil than to do it every single time.
Kinda like the whole give a man a fish vs teach a man to fish.“ —this
Updates
+1 y
“Feminazis like to self-victumize, they weaken themselves and each other so they don't have to own up to their failures and what pathetic waste of oxygen they are. This is beautiful and empowering. My daughter will "use her own sword" and this doesn't mean she won't find a knight. She'll be independent, self loving and self respecting, she'll honour only those who earn it, she'll never claim what she didn't earn and she will work hard. THAT is empowerment and that is TRUE feminism” —THISS
What does this post say about women today and is this a positive message to send to kids in general?
I don’t agree with the delivery because there’s an us vs them undertone. Putting girls against boys. This message can be delivered without even mentioning guys. Self reliance isn’t gender specific. It shouldn’t be taught while putting it in a girl’s mind “Don’t rely on a man for anything.” She’ll have issues with codependency and accepting help from men down the road.
We should teach our children how to be emotionally and mentally strong and independent from an early age. There is nothing wrong with a girl wanting a knight, a man that would defend her from the bad and do right by her, just like there’s nothing wrong with a man wanting a woman worth defending.
What’s wrong is not teaching a child how to seek those things without using them to validate themselves and find self approval. Their self worth shouldn’t be in the eyes of someone else. We need to teach our kids to define themselves through their own eyes and not the thoughts and words of others.
So. When I have daughters, I would hope her standards are high enough for her to only accept a “knight’s” hand. But, desire is to raise girls who don’t need that knight’s or any other guy’s approval to feel a sense of self worth.
I think that’s the biggest problem girls struggle with today. They care about everyone else’s approval, even a complete stranger’s over their own approval. I see dozens of different girls on a daily on this site alone, asking random dudes if they look pretty this way or that way. That’s my worst nightmare. Raising a daughter with low self esteem
The message isn't malicious in itself no, but there are underlying implications worthy to address here. I do believe in the traditional roles of men and women, not simply for tradition's sake, but because I believe traditions like these haven't just sprung from nowhere without reason. Mostly because our biology, which translates in behaviours, speaks for itself. Men are the strong and also the more aggressive sex, there is a component of our gender that is inclined towards leadership and domination embedded in our testosterone. Women have been found to have greater propensity towards compassion, empathy and kindness, and these distinctions aren't good or bad, they are simply facts.
How we treat these distinctions is what determines morality, as in teaching men to be the responsible and protective gentleman, ergo embracing masculinity and not being pigs, and women to be supportive, compassionate and kind towards men, not being embittered assholes, embracing their femininty. Does this mean I'm saying that women are destined to be dependent on men, no. What I am saying is that we have a need, and deep down a want, to accept our natures that go back since the dawn of days. Women need no swords if men act like proper men. The symbiosis of men and women, acknowledging each others strength and weaknesses, is harmony.
Well explained. I just wonder about the times when men aren’t around and women also need to have some traditionally masculine qualities in order to survive well. I even have a husband but you know, he works 3rd shift. That means I must be prepared to defend myself and our home during the wee hours of the night. I have no problem with this. I willingly accept it.
Then again when I’m at work, I’ve had to learn certain traditionally masculine traits in order to perform well. Again, I’m happy doing it and I’ve become a better person for it.
But I don’t believer I’ve lost my femininity just because I’ve had to lead with masculine traits at certain times in life.
But I know I’d be shit out of luck if I didn’t learn to carry my own sword, so to speak.
@MzAsh Definitely, I'm not saying women do not benifit from knowing how to use the sword, so to speak, but only to a certain extent, there comes a point where the brute strength and endurance, being able to take a lot of damage that is, of a man simply nullifies any skill a woman can aquire if we aren't talking lethal means such as firearms which carry other risks in normalizing. But I believe this goes together with what I'm saying that if men are taught traditional roles of protectiveness and responsibility, the need for women to know the sword diminishes drastically. And women embracing their femininity and acting in more traditional ways towards men, minus the socially subjegated norms of history, this also contributes to the makings of more proper men.
And by that I by no means excuse any crime by either sex, such as rape, but we still both affect each other by how we portray our nature and intentions. And that could do with a call back to tradition nowadays.
It would likely be challenging to expect men to act traditionally towards women without treating them like children. That’s what happened before and we still have a residual feminist hatred of men because of the way they used to wield their power over women. We can’t go back to that in that same way. But if we found a way to teach men responsibility and protectiveness without being domineering then I think that would be ideal.
It is common sense in my opinion, because if she always looks for a knight- then what happens when the knight isn't there to protect her?
I guess it's saying to teach girls to stand up for themselves rather than relying on somebody, and that doesn't mean just physically. In verbal situations, when she knows something isn't right she should speak up etc- use her voice as her sword if that makes sense.
If she can, physically too, but for some people both men and women that can be quite hard say if they have disabilities etc.
its A really shitty metaphor that a Child isn’t going to understand Last time I saw a grubby sword wielding woman she was being arrested by police for threatening someone at the exit of a chick fil a if they didn’t give her cash instead of a an order of waffle fries.
you teach children values and discipline. You teach them self responsibility. No one needs knights or swords. So I guess that meme is so self proclaimed feminists can pat themselves on the back for being woke.
It’s not aimed for kids to understand. It’s for parents to teach their daughters to learn how to defend themselves when life calls for it. it’s just a metaphor that everyone is aware of. Who in their right mind would literally teach their kids to pick up swords to be knights? That’s not a feminist thing. It’s a crazy person thing. And the situation you described is not a standard that happens today.
As I pointed out it’s a shorty metaphor used for woke people to pay the selves on the back. It isn’t instructive or beneficial in anyway.
Any reasonable person knows that you teach a child values and self responsibility. No one needs a dirty child with a sword to misrepresent responsibility and relationships.
I accept and agree with traditional gender roles. There is nothing in our current society that prevents girls from being assertive and independent, if that is their choice. However, since most people ultimately find a partner to complement them, there are some advantages to gender roles.
@KrakenAttackin Who cares? We’d rather be less comfortable and more stressed breaking our backs to survive than to have to be forced back into the alternative reality of total traditionalism.
"We’d rather be less comfortable and more stressed breaking our backs to survive than to have to be forced back into the alternative reality of total traditionalism."
1. Are you really breaking your back to survive?
2. Who is trying to force you into a traditional gender role?
3. Are women too weak to resist this mythical beast who is trying to make you wear a dress and curtsy?
Me personally, I’m not breaking my back. I’m actually doing very well and I live comfortably. But I got to where I’m at with a lot of hard work that was beyond stressful and gut wrenching at times... and I’d choose this same path all over again than to go off be and the homemaker that women were influenced to be.
"We’d rather be less comfortable and more stressed breaking our backs to survive than to have to be forced back into the alternative reality of total traditionalism." Is it women who are trying to force you to be traditional?
I don't think any parent wants their child to not be self sufficient, or aka "not being able to survive without a man". Any one who wants their child to be self insufficient is unfit to be a parent.
Housewiving isn't really what its all cracked up to be. Nowadays, most households require both spouses working just to survive. Think about the financial consequences: your child missing all the summer camps, tutoring, borrowing 80k in loans for college tuition. Prices have been rising over the past few decades while wages stayed the same.
A woman without job skills or an education or if she's been out of the workforce for 10+ years would find it extremely difficult to divorce her husband, if needed. Financial abuse also takes place within many single provider families. A husband who is unhappy with his wife can refuse her a personal allowance. Therefore, she cannot have her own voice or stand up for herself, if needed. She will face the consequences with not complying with her husband's every request.
Very few women are genuinely interested in becoming housewives nowadays. And a large majority of those who end up doing so are either hate their careers or are simply lazy. Women with high intellect and career potential tend to not become housewives.
@nella965 Yes, all of that is what women tell themselves if they do not want to follow the past, but traditional gender roles do not necessarily mean that a woman is supposed to be barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen.
I think that housewiving is simply unrealistic and more of a tradition of the past that is not sustainable today. We really need to assess what is the best choice for our children and families. We also need to listen to what women want. Nobody has the right to dictate what womens lives should be like. Its no longer the 1950s where everyone was forced to live according to what society expects them to do. Its your life, you can do what makes you happy. Happiness is the overall goal because you only live once.
I'm just pointing it out that because you seem to be touting that housewiving is all rainbows and roses. You seem to enjoy the idea of a housewife but you're really not factoring in the circumstances and the situations within each family to figure out the best choices for them. You also don't seem to be concerned about the potential problems of housewiving. Not every woman is married to a nice kind husband. Women should really have the right to pick what makes them happy.
You need to put away your own selfish ideals insisting your preferences. But rather really take a look for what is best for the children, women, and particular family situation. Its not an "I want" situation. We really need to look out for the welfare of ALL, not only just for your preferences.
Maybe you weren't imposing traditional gender roles onto women. But I find that this is what many men do, especially on this website. And I just have to get this message out there.
@nella965 “I'm just pointing it out that because you seem to be touting that housewiving is all rainbows and roses.” What did I say that leads to that conclusion?
“You seem to enjoy the idea of a housewife but you're really not factoring in the circumstances and the situations within each family to figure out the best choices for them.” What did I say that leads to that conclusion?
“You also don't seem to be concerned about the potential problems of housewiving.” You really shouldn’t engage in such prevarications.
“Not every woman is married to a nice kind husband.” Are you kidding me? For 65 years, I have believed that every woman is married to a nice kind husband. Wow! Thanks for getting me straight on that point.
“Women should really have the right to pick what makes them happy.” Did I ever suggest otherwise? No.
“You need to put away your own selfish ideals insisting your preferences.” 1. Calling me selfish? What have I said to justify your name calling? 2. Insisting? Show me what I said that constitutes “insisting.”
“But rather really take a look for what is best for the children, women, and particular family situation.” Thank God you are here to shine light on the path I should follow. I’ve been SO selfish for 65 years! But not anymore!
“Its not an ‘I want’ situation. We really need to look out for the welfare of ALL, not only just for your preferences.” I am SO sorry that I’ve been a selfish bastard!
You really should apologize for what you have done.
@OlderAndWiser, I have acknowledged that you might not be imposing traditional gender roles. But given how irked and argumentative you seem right now, I think you're simply angry that your perspective sounds less reasonable. I just got the impression that you didn't agree with what I've said because you simply did not acknowledge or show any sort of consideration to anything I've written. Maybe if you acknowledged what I've said, we wouldn't have come to this stage.
@OlderAndWiser, Regardless of whatever your perspective is, a man's personal preference should not take any precedence over his children's or wife's welfare or happiness. Its not longer the patriarchal era of the 1950s. Sorry to say this but it is what it is.
@nella965 In 65 years, I have learned nothing, as you have discerned by a few simple assumptions about my character. Now you have arrived - at the wise old age of 25 - to set me straight. You are being EXTREMELY presumptuous and condescending.
Goodbye (that means that I don't want to read anything else from you.) I have heard enough of your lectures.
@nella965 If you had a child you would know what you are saying is SJW gibberish. Kids need a mother in the home for at least a couple of years. "Mothers" who abandon their children to day care when they are six-weeks old end up with kids are have serious attachment issues later in life.
@KrakenAttackin haha I was raised by both working parents. I ended up being kinder, fairer and definitely less of a troll than you. I recognize you as a huge troll online and yet you were raised with a mother at home.
@OlderAndWiser, I didn't mean to say that you didn't know anything or that you're a misogynist like all the other assholes on here. Its just that the negative attitude surrounding working mothers is unbelievably overwhelming on here so I just had to address it.
@nella965 Yeah, but that's not me. I'm not stuck in a time warp. While I believe in traditional gender roles, I also believe that following those roles is a voluntary choice. I believe in chivalry but I don't do anything that is demeaning to women. I am far from the person you think I might be.
@KrakenAttackin haha do you realize that almost all working mothers have a problem being away from their kids after birthing them? It natural instinct where mothers feel the need to wonder where their kids are every few hours especially right after birthing. But they work because we know its what we want long term. You quit your high paying career for 5 years, you never know if you can secure the same position again after your skills become outdated after 5 years. This is the reason why I would work until my stomach until 7 months pregnant until the point where I can't work to walk to work so I can have more maternity leave time to nurse my newborn baby. I, along with so many other kids during my childhood was raised this way. At one point, my grandparents took over caring for me for a period.
@KrakenAttackin Most working parents do really miss our kids and prefer to stay home with them. Almost all parents have pictures of their children along with their cute drawings plastered on their desks. Some women even have huge photos plastered next to their desks. But they have to work to support our families to make sure our kids have everything they need to grow up. Just because a mother works, it doesn't mean she doesn't miss her children. Thinking with such a mentality shows you have absolutely no experience in life.
@COMMODOREII Definitely. I had a wonderful father growing up. He took care of me so well and sacrificed so much for me that I want to pass on this same parenting skill onto my future children. The sexist assholes who say that fathers can't ever be amazing parents because men are not designed to take care of children, are just a load of bullcrap. I had a narcissistic mother who hated me since birth. I never viewed her as an actual parent. My father was who I relied on for everything.
For me, it is more about dependency. Teaching her to be independent, even in small everyday tasks is something that we see missing.
Changing her car tires on her own, filling oil, fixing bulb, water leakage etc. We dont even have to teach them all. Its just building the confidence that she CAN do it on her own.
So by going the definition above, I think it is very positive message. This not only teaches them to be independent, it is also a great way to improve their standards when it comes to men. And from what I have seen, such women also make really great wives.
Totally agree with that. We have way to many incomplete humans. A human soul, a human spirit, a human mind should be adrogynous combining all the strong and positive features of both genders, however without loss of no-doubt-useful special abilities (such as mother's love for her children).
I would teach my children to be new people in the new world, so to be everything they can embrace in their nature for the best of their lifes. Definitely they will be their own knights in any respect.
(But I won't forget to consider, what they themselves want and are. If f. e. the personality of my potential daughter says clearly, her destiny is to be a woman like in old times, then it should be taken in account. To overlook what the children, the personalities who are yet in children's age, ARE or are meant to be themselves by their nature is one of the biggest mistakes one could ever make by raising them. (and makes repeatedly over and over and over in all times))
If we’re taking the meme literally women wouldn’t be able to fight and protect her self even if she is massively trained she will still get destroyed by 90% of guys That’s not the message They’re trying to get out there.
the reality is that women should be looking for the knight, they don’t need the thieves or beggars then need a man who will defend them with there life provide and take care of there women. Women should be at home taking care of the kids in the household and making dinner men are the breadwinners women are the bread makers
The point wasn’t that women can’t protect them selves, If a train woman fought an untrained guy, the trained would easily destroyed the untrained guy. But say you had Ronda Rousey vs John Cena, Cena would win every time. I’m not trying to women are incapable of defending themselves I’m saying average guy vs average girl who isn’t train guys would win
Personally I find gender roles fucking stupid: if I lived like my conservative grandparents wanted me to I probably wouldn't be able to cook actual food for myself, take care of my house on my own, and would probably be in an arranged marriage with one of my cousins.
Especially today, it's a lot harder to make ends meet and you can't expect to piggyback off other people; if women were still expected to be subservient to men, they still probably wouldn't have the right to own any property.
So for a bright bubbly summary: Women don't need to depend on Men to do everything!!! Yay!!!
I don't care if my future children are boys or girls; they will be self-sufficient. Personally, I don't see this as "feminazi" propaganda, because this is actually encouraging strong women. The real complaint, if there's one to be had, is that they are trying to use a child in this poster, at which point "looking for a knight" shouldn't even be on her radar anyway.
The biggest problem with the modern feminist movement, is that has nothing to do with equality; it's about giving arbitrary special treatment to women while also (and more importantly according to some) bringing down men, and usually indiscriminately. From a legality standpoint, there's very little ground to stand on I these arguments because the only way to "fix" the problems they identify is to give exceptionally preferential treatment to women, which for many reasons will not, and should not happen.
This is the exact opposite of feminazism. Feminazis like to self-victumize, they weaken themselves and each other so they don't have to own up to their failures and what pathetic waste of oxygen they are. This? This is beautiful and empowering. My daughter will indeed "use her own sword" and this doesn't mean she won't find a knight. She'll be independent, self loving and self respecting, she'll honour only those who earn it, she'll never claim what she didn't earn and she will work hard and long to achieve her aspirations. THAT is strength, that is empowerment and that is TRUE feminism, my mother (senior partner in the biggest law firm in the country) taught me that.
The problem here is that women have been stron in certain cultures like the ones i showed here. They even had rights. So the concept of a damsel in distress is actually quite new in concepts of history.
that poster Says to me, women have the strength and courage to face lifes challenges with out some man coming to their rescue, do for you, but depend on you, you can do it it's encouraging just as martin Luther Kings i have a dream speech stirred people to change find the strength within themselves, to bring about change , James brown came out with a song, called, say it loud I'm black and I'm proud, listen to it some time, it uplifted blacks encouraged them to strive to better them selves be proud of who you are always hold your head high have self esteem confidence, that poster is no different, I taught my kids to be better than me all while they were growing up I told them this, and to raise their kids to be better than them and so on change for the better has to start somewhere in our hearts and at home
I do not, as such, disagree with the message. I have a daughter and four Granddaughters, and want them to be empowered and free to be what they want. However (you knew that was coming, right?), I have a sense that, in the search for "equality", women are being pressured to emulate male patterns of success. The genders have different requirements, fulfilled in different ways. Males cannot be mothers, but can be loving fathers. Women do not make the best swordsmen, and will lose in most cases to a male of matched ability. (Testosterone boosts muscle and speed.) My point is not that girls shouldn't learn to fence, in fact it develops grace, agility, and confidence. (I fenced with many capable women in my youth.) What is important is that much fulfillment in life comes from partnership, and the partnership is stronger when both bring complementary skills to it. So teach her archery, so the strong brutes don't get close enough to overpower her.
This is like asking should I raise my child to have the ability to make her own money and raise her own success or should she just become a gold digger and leech off a man for a better living.
Who the hell wants their child to not be self sufficient?
It is funny how so many guys feelings got hurt by the ad. Kind of telling. But it is the way GaG is.
No, I would not care about the ad one way or another. My problem isn't that some women see me as an adversary. If someone thinks they are better at my craft than I am. . . or a better provider than I am, believe me I have nothing more to prove.
I agree that everyone should be made to take responsibility for themselves. But it’s not just that. They need to be taught to take care of others.
It’s also important to make sure the expectations she has will adapt too. Don’t be surprised if she still demands men be more capable than her and then becomes the resentful feminist type when she looks around and blames men for being to weak to date.
What seems to be neglected is that there may be another role that is important and it is complimented by the knight role being filled by a companion. I think we’ve seen this with many women more and more in recent years: they get so caught up in being the “knight” then complain when the there isn’t a guy who wants to be their knight or is “good enough” for them.
In the end you’ve got no stable social structure and it’s all fucked. Basically, be careful with what you wish for.
Do whatever you want but there are some biological truths that come into play between men and women. I remember watching a television show where a decent looking women who owned her own business and had her own monies couldn't find the type of guy that she was attracted to. One of the hosts of the show had to explain to her that strong take charge guys like she wants are simply not attracted to women like her. I totally agreed with this assessment. As an alpha, I am not attracted to women like her.
I am not scared, or frightened of them, I am not intimidated by them. I just dont find them attractive. I want someone who will make a nest for our children and be good mother to them.
The problem is that such propaganda is aimed at making men superfluous. In the 6000 years of human history, there were clear gender roles until 60 years ago. These roles have proven their worth. In this scenario it was also part of being a man to protect his wife or women in general. The man knew that he was important. When the man has the impression that he no longer matters, he starts to go crazy or do nonsense like drinking alcohol or beating his wife. Then a vicious cycle began in which the man was no longer presented as a solution to the problems but as the actual problem and the woman became more and more powerful over the man, which exacerbated his misconduct and / or his loss of meaning in life. This poster of a girl who acts not like a squaw (woman) but like a warrior (man) is a confusion of gender identity and could lead to homosexuality or promote it.
I agree with it. I teach my girls to fend for themselves physically, psychologically, and emotionally. Relying on someone else for anything opens the door for abuse, and I'd rather them be self- sufficient in all aspects so they can walk away when needed.
Women are more independent these days which are great bt im still going to tell my daughter about her Prince Charming and show her the disney princess/prince movies i loved. I’ll tell her that she doesn't need a man but that she should want one and that it makes life feel complete when feeling loved and giving it in return. She’ll get love from her parents, siblings, and extended fam... but i want her to know that love between a man and woman are great as well and all apart of life
I think it's just pointing out that what we expect from women is changing. We dont expect damsels in distress anymore and I kinda like this mindset because honestly the damsel in distress turns me off. I dont want a partner who needs my support around every corner. Dont get me wrong I like providing and being helpful in a relationship but I would rather teach a girl to change her care oil than to do it every single time.
Kinda like the whole give a man a fish vs teach a man to fish.
I hate it when stuff like this becomes politicised - Right if I had a daughter I would say "You are a warrior princess, you can slay the dragon on your own if you want but if you do want a (male/female - modern world) to be by your side make sure (depending on your girls personality) you get treated right whether like a fairy princess or an equal in battle or even you do the treating and treat them like a prince or princess"
The actual message of this poster is very positive. But it is very divisive and creates an ‘us vs them’ mentality even though it’s not explicit. There’s no reason to mention males to tell girls to look after themselves. Also, I prefer it when everyone is included
I'd say it's sound advice she might not come across any knights and if she does, the two of them will be even stronger. The thing about the Marxists is that when they say stuff like that , they don't actually mean it or have women's interests at heart. It's all for show, a way to get you to believe them so they can get you to do their dirty work.
I don't think there's anything wrong with THIS message at all and in fact would push this sort of thing with my own daughter.
But the truth is I was expecting it to be period blood on her face and some snooty comment about men... then I clicked and it was something a lot more normal.
Sad that I've come to expect period blood face painting and man hate. Empowerment doesn't require ridicule of a 'other.' This didn't do that so I say you do you. Golden rule is cool like that.
I like the message but leta take it all the way and cutoff all the female centric welfare and eliminate alimony. Let's make women sign up for the draft if they want to vote. Go for it ladies pick up that sword and accept all the privileges and more importantly the responsibilities that come with it
True words, girls/women aren't weak or fragil and they should be teached how to live their life on their own. Strong, beautiful and independent. It's so overrated that girls need a male partner to protect them from everything. That doesn't mean they don't want a man in their live, it just means they don't need one because they can handle things on their own.
I think you should let a girl develop the way she naturally would. If that's to use a sword, great. If it's to look for a knight, also great. Some people aren't built to use a sword, and to say "all women should use the sword" can make those who can't feel bad about themselves.
Raised both my kids to stand on there own two feet no matter how others are. Not hate just common sense. Why does a man have to be the knight? Why can't the women be the knight also if she wants anyway
Even as a submissive in a BDSM relationship, I wholeheartedly endorse this message. It is always better to teach others to support themselves and to not always rely on others. There will be times when you are your only savior.
11.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
It’s not even close to feminazis. I support this. Girls need to learn how to fight and survive independently. Once they do, life becomes much sweeter as they start getting treated more equally.
@KrakenAttackin oh contraire... I think we need a few battalions of these kinds of women, trained by Paul Kersey with Rambo type rapid response SWAT team powers to implement. Shut down human trafficking rings fast. I respect a woman who can plaster an SOB with lead, and fry the bacon in the pan later that evening. Unfortunately, there is too much corruption in our society and the often delicate souls pay the price... not to mention certain cultures where they would have to fight for their rights to even exist.
Ah... I've heard some tales that women don't really like the knight as much as they want us to believe. My plan for my kids is raise the boy to be a man and raise the girl to use her head. I'll judge whomever they bring home regardless.
I dont think it's a good idea to say this to little girls. Men have a natural instinct to want to protect women. And women seek protectors. Like it's cool for women to be independent and all but I think it's kind of going against nature
@mrhappy69 I dont think those things are going against natural instincts for attracting a mate. Like maybe slightly since everyone is busy on their computers to go out and acutally date
@mrhappy69 I give my kids vaccines so they can go to school but overall I think they are full of chemicals and I just can't see how that is safe. I acutally got delayed vaccines for my oldest cuz he had heart issues as a baby and it was too dangerous for him to get them at the normal ages they give them. So they must be some type of dangerous If my doctor was making me do that for him
Unfortunately I see this photo and then I see the amount of gold diggers and sugar babies in the world and I am like meh. We have a trophy wife for a First Lady of a the most powerful country in our world the USA
I'm not sure your definition of knight is the same as the writer. You might reflect that this is one of many reasons why many children are raised in single parent environments.
I disagree because she will never get a knight acting like that. And of course i will raise my daughters and sons in traditional ways. From what I've seen people who aren't traditional turn out really really bad so i dont want that for them.
To all the ladies who gave me a "thumbs down", how well do you really think you would fare against a man in combat? If you can't be honest here at least be honest to yourself.
I didn’t give you a thumbs down but this is the truth— I (and many other women) know good and well we’d probably never have a chance against a man in combat... and I have no desire to ever put myself in that position. But there are some women who genuinely want to take that chance anyway, and they should have every right and free opportunity to do so. Also, I think you might have taken it too literally. It was referring to different aspects of independence and responsibility.
It's great to raise capable children but beside that i think women are fucking crazy these days and with all the feminists propaganda, women today are weaker than they were 50 years ago
That's just ridiculously meaningless bullshit. Who the fuck tell their daughters to "wait for a knight"? We are no longer in the middle ages, if your parents tell you this than you are fucked anyways.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions