@MittenstheGlove Yeah, actually you are. Liberals are the modern "Brown Shirt", burning homes and stores, breaking glass, throwing Molotov Cocktails, throwing cement filled cups, thrown feces, and otherwise using violence.
@MittenstheGlove You are trying to commit genocide of thought, which is the most heinous of all. You want to destroy anyone who does not agree with your narrative.
Cause it's what you guys enjoy doing where ever you go even places you haven't invaded or taken over just people there who can't stop you, why you think nobody likes USA
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Because money is god to them. They're so greedy to the point that they would be willing to let the US become like Africa to fill their own pockets.
Most don't want a healthcare plan, they want privatized care that's cost controlled by competition. They don't want an environmental wasteland, they want to do business without more restrictions, red tape, and high costs. Most of us aren't Religious extremists, but it faith is important to us, and those who try to take it from us aren't going to see our friendly side. As far as bigotry... Against whom?
1) Most Republicans are not religious 2) Environment is fine, better than ever. There is no Global Warming (invented crisis). 3) Gov't can't legislate morality. 4) Trump's Health policy, is lowering prems and drugs which he did. As well as a Vacc for China virus which would have taken Obama 4 years to do while he golfed.
And yet you're the ones getting triggered about mask mandates -_-
Seriously you complain about how the left wants to make the rights of others end where their feeling begins while you think the right to carry out essential tasks ends when you have to endure some discomfort and wear a mask.
@Ad_Quid_Orator Because I refuse to follow along with unscientific arbitrary rules to participate in security theater? Yeah, wearing masks is all feeling and virtue signaling.
I'm going to ask you to show me your science knowledge - and let's see if you can be honest. Explain to me how wearing a mask from a hostess stand to my table where I can take it off significantly reduces the chance of covid spread. Explain to me how covid is stopped by restaurant workers wearing gloves. Where they do such charming behaviors as carry the payment folio with their gloved hands, then carry my plate? Where they run their gloved hands through their hair then touch my glass to refill the water.
And it isn't stopped by restaurant workers wearing gloves, it's stopped by the fact that if you use sanitizer on the gloves, there are less cracks in crevices for the virus to hide versus on your hands.
And the only virtue signaling here is anti-maskers claiming that those who support mask mandates are in favor of government tyranny.
@Ad_Quid_Orator No it didn't. I want to know the following. If your "viral load" is X in any given inside setting. What is the X-y of the viral load for wearing a stupid piece of paper on your face in the 45 seconds it takes you to walk from the hostess stand to your table.
Because if you actually knew that data, I'm sure it'd be embarrassing for you. Then you'd have to admit it's a stupid, arbitrary rule. And that would violate your love of all things being a covidiot.
That depends on a lot of other factors because it's one of many variables that determines how fast a virus can spread in a community so it has to be weighed against everything else when implementing policy. And no, that's not a cop out, it's just that limiting the spread of a pandemic is more complicated than you seem to realize (or more accurately could realize).
@Ad_Quid_Orator complete cop out. Here comes the gaslighting. I bet you’re grateful the TSA makes you throw away your bottle of water before getting on a plane, too.
All for a virus with over a 99.9% survivability rate.
@Ad_Quid_Orator no moron, it’s because the virus isn’t that deadly. If you’d at least have the balls to admit that walking from a hostess stand to a table with a mask is stupid - I’d almost respect you. But you cling to the bullshit and you are nothing but a fool.
Ok, now temperature checks. Show me the science behind those. Knowing that 1) People with covid don’t always have fevers 2) people with fevers and covid don’t have them all day long and 3) nsaids will reduce a fever.
No you're just pre-emptively coping out. That's like saying you can't justify a speed limit because there's no cutoff point where you can prevent car accidents. DUH.
@Ad_Quid_Orator lol. No, I can show scientific evidence that a X reduction in speed can tie to a reduction in deaths on a particular road.
You can’t show that masks from a hostess stand to a table or temperature checks, Or gloves prevent the spread of covid. But you have the government’s dick down your throat too much to even say what everyone knows is the truth.
This is security theater and you are being played as a fool.
Key phrase: ON A PARTICULAR ROAD but there's no universal speed limit that would work everywhere just like we can say that if people wear a mask in X situation, it will reduce the viral transmission by Y amount:
That's like saying you should be able to say exactly how many accidents are prevented on this road by having a speed limit of 40 vs 45 mph. We can't know for sure, we can only infer it from other observations/experiments.
@Ad_Quid_Orator lol. And here I am thinking science is all about running experiments to find out the truth. Now you're telling me we just infer. oh fuck you're a dope.
Untreated (which most cases would be if there wasn't a lockdown because the hospital system wouldn't be overwhelmed) it would be 3.4%. It has only gone down because we've gotten better at treating it.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
36Opinion
Why do Democrats want to elect a Hitler, begin sending people to concentration camps, return to slavery, and destroy basic family structure?
See how that works sparky?
Except we aren’t. Lol.
@MittenstheGlove Yeah, actually you are. Liberals are the modern "Brown Shirt", burning homes and stores, breaking glass, throwing Molotov Cocktails, throwing cement filled cups, thrown feces, and otherwise using violence.
What minority group are we trying commit genocide on?
@MittenstheGlove You are trying to commit genocide of thought, which is the most heinous of all. You want to destroy anyone who does not agree with your narrative.
Pfft. What thoughts are we eliminating? Freedom of choice?
You are a wacko.
Seriously. You are an utter moron.
Cause it's what you guys enjoy doing where ever you go even places you haven't invaded or taken over just people there who can't stop you, why you think nobody likes USA
Because money is god to them. They're so greedy to the point that they would be willing to let the US become like Africa to fill their own pockets.
Anon. You are talking about the Clinton's, right?
Republicans value being able to enslave people simply for greed.
@not329446 Well... you have to start somewhere.
Really? Its the stupid dems who want to shut down the country again and make us all dependent on handouts.
Don't believe everything the Democrats tell you about the Republicans.
You mean to say that Republicans have an actual healthcare plan? Or environmental policy? Or are against bigotry and religious extremism?
Most don't want a healthcare plan, they want privatized care that's cost controlled by competition. They don't want an environmental wasteland, they want to do business without more restrictions, red tape, and high costs. Most of us aren't Religious extremists, but it faith is important to us, and those who try to take it from us aren't going to see our friendly side. As far as bigotry... Against whom?
1) Most Republicans are not religious
2) Environment is fine, better than ever. There is no Global Warming (invented crisis).
3) Gov't can't legislate morality.
4) Trump's Health policy, is lowering prems and drugs which he did. As well as a Vacc for China virus which would have taken Obama 4 years to do while he golfed.
You live in a fantasy world. Both parties are ultimately terrible, but if you want to know which one spends more money, it's definitely the democrats.
Talk about a nonsequitur.
Why are liberals such hand-wringing crybabies?
And yet you're the ones getting triggered about mask mandates -_-
Seriously you complain about how the left wants to make the rights of others end where their feeling begins while you think the right to carry out essential tasks ends when you have to endure some discomfort and wear a mask.
@Ad_Quid_Orator Because I refuse to follow along with unscientific arbitrary rules to participate in security theater? Yeah, wearing masks is all feeling and virtue signaling.
I'm going to ask you to show me your science knowledge - and let's see if you can be honest. Explain to me how wearing a mask from a hostess stand to my table where I can take it off significantly reduces the chance of covid spread. Explain to me how covid is stopped by restaurant workers wearing gloves. Where they do such charming behaviors as carry the payment folio with their gloved hands, then carry my plate? Where they run their gloved hands through their hair then touch my glass to refill the water.
I'll wait.
Viral load:
medium.com/.../why-masks-protect-its-wearer-too-the-viral-load-concept-2fd1ff88ed6a
And it isn't stopped by restaurant workers wearing gloves, it's stopped by the fact that if you use sanitizer on the gloves, there are less cracks in crevices for the virus to hide versus on your hands.
And the only virtue signaling here is anti-maskers claiming that those who support mask mandates are in favor of government tyranny.
@Ad_Quid_Orator so you can't answer the question. Thanks for playing.
The source I provided did answer the question.
@Ad_Quid_Orator No it didn't. I want to know the following. If your "viral load" is X in any given inside setting. What is the X-y of the viral load for wearing a stupid piece of paper on your face in the 45 seconds it takes you to walk from the hostess stand to your table.
Because if you actually knew that data, I'm sure it'd be embarrassing for you. Then you'd have to admit it's a stupid, arbitrary rule. And that would violate your love of all things being a covidiot.
That depends on a lot of other factors because it's one of many variables that determines how fast a virus can spread in a community so it has to be weighed against everything else when implementing policy. And no, that's not a cop out, it's just that limiting the spread of a pandemic is more complicated than you seem to realize (or more accurately could realize).
@Ad_Quid_Orator complete cop out. Here comes the gaslighting. I bet you’re grateful the TSA makes you throw away your bottle of water before getting on a plane, too.
All for a virus with over a 99.9% survivability rate.
It's a 99% survivability rate but the reason it's that low (versus 3.4%) is because of the lockdown.
@Ad_Quid_Orator no moron, it’s because the virus isn’t that deadly. If you’d at least have the balls to admit that walking from a hostess stand to a table with a mask is stupid - I’d almost respect you. But you cling to the bullshit and you are nothing but a fool.
Ok, now temperature checks. Show me the science behind those. Knowing that 1) People with covid don’t always have fevers 2) people with fevers and covid don’t have them all day long and 3) nsaids will reduce a fever.
Now you're copping out by breaking it down to absolutes when it is a question of the probability of being sick.
@Ad_Quid_Orator That’s two you can’t answer. You’re doing very well.
No you're just pre-emptively coping out. That's like saying you can't justify a speed limit because there's no cutoff point where you can prevent car accidents. DUH.
@Ad_Quid_Orator lol. No, I can show scientific evidence that a X reduction in speed can tie to a reduction in deaths on a particular road.
You can’t show that masks from a hostess stand to a table or temperature checks, Or gloves prevent the spread of covid. But you have the government’s dick down your throat too much to even say what everyone knows is the truth.
This is security theater and you are being played as a fool.
Key phrase: ON A PARTICULAR ROAD but there's no universal speed limit that would work everywhere just like we can say that if people wear a mask in X situation, it will reduce the viral transmission by Y amount:
medium.com/.../why-masks-protect-its-wearer-too-the-viral-load-concept-2fd1ff88ed6a
@Ad_Quid_Orator then you should be able to tell me what percentage of infections are prevented on a walk from a hostess stand.
That's like saying you should be able to say exactly how many accidents are prevented on this road by having a speed limit of 40 vs 45 mph. We can't know for sure, we can only infer it from other observations/experiments.
@Ad_Quid_Orator lol. And here I am thinking science is all about running experiments to find out the truth. Now you're telling me we just infer. oh fuck you're a dope.
You infer based on previous experiments. Duh.
@Ad_Quid_Orator So infer for me, smart guy. I mean I know why you're hedging. You know deep down what a sham this all is.
Yeah, because the virus has so far killed 200,000 instead of the projected 3+ million.
@Ad_Quid_Orator Age Group Probability of Survival
0-19: 99.997%
20-49: 99.98%
50-69: 99.5%
70+: 94.6%
Untreated (which most cases would be if there wasn't a lockdown because the hospital system wouldn't be overwhelmed) it would be 3.4%. It has only gone down because we've gotten better at treating it.
@Ad_Quid_Orator More BS
Age Group Probability of Survival
0-19: 99.997%
20-49: 99.98%
50-69: 99.5%
70+: 94.6%
Is that based on the BS co morbidity stats?
Ciz war weapons make them big bucks
Both parties sold out to foreign powers long ago.
Because the income inequality is in their favour.
Found your typo *do* --> don't.
Ditto 888theGreat .
You're 45 😵
$$$$$$
Fake news