
Do you think tattoos should affect someone's job opportunities?


I don't like that it does.
But it does. End of story.
Do I wish the world was more understood? Yes. I'm also not gonna reject the world as it is. I'll accept the world as it is and make my decisions based on that.
In my mind, if you get your neck and/or face tatted up you are committing to a lifestyle and burning the boats so to speak. And someone who does that knows that to be true aswell.
There's a rebel nature to getting a tattoo to begin with and the more visible the more weight that gets. You know when you get those tattoos what comes with it before you do it.
You can't then after the fact object to what happens when you knew it would.
Additionally. From a moralistic standpoint I'm not going to judge a particular business for not wanting that person to be the face of their business depending on the job, the business/industry.
Certain fields having a tat makes sense and if anything confers some clout. You better fit the role. In other fields it's put of place. I may think the higher ups in charge are incorrect in their judgment of those who get tattoos or their views of tattoos in general. But that is their right and who am I to tell them they're wrong for it.
It's not like they're judging someone based on characteristics they can't control. They're judging based on choices made by the individual and/or how they choose to carry themselves.
So I can't hate on them for that either. No one is really "wrong" per se. I just disagree with their final conclusion.
Depends on the job. Clandestine work would definitely be out in the above’s example.
It depends. If they are covered in tattoos with gang affiliations, hate groups, etc. then I would not want to employ them for fear that they are still associated with those people and their ideologies. However, if they just have a normal sleeve of tattoos and can do the work, it would bother me.
Yes, I think they should in jobs where interacting with the general public is required. I’ll admit, I have a strong bias against tattoos.
Opinion
53Opinion
Yes. Many, many people see tattoos - especially tattoos on the face - as being repulsive, and I would not want any employee interacting with the public if they have tattoos. I also question the intelligence of anyone who gets facial tattoos. Or sleeves, etc.
If the entirety of your face is covered then yes. It's only reasonable that any establishment/ company would want it's workers to look presentable because it reflects on the company as a whole.
Yes they should.
I am very okay with Tattoo and find them really lovely on girls ( okay hot).
however as with all things there are limits.
Employing someone as a salesman for a car dealership is not a good idea if the person had full face tattoos, he can be the nicest person on earth, however customers will judge in seconds.
then there are things like, an employing having a swastika or Fuck you Cnut on his forehead
Those are fairly much extremes the rest, become less of a problem, and I have literally zero problem employing someone with other tattoos on arms, legs, body. And by chance I do have a number like that.….
Yes. Tats tell a lot about a person - their attitudes, lifestyles, affiliations, judgement. You can't advertise your attachment to a bizarre subculture and expect the rest of the world to accept you.
As far as I'm concerned certain body modifications show immaturity, extremely bad judgement in the least, mental illness at worst, and indicate antisocial behavior and a desire to self harm.
If a person has a right to mutilate their body then others have a right to laugh at or reject them.
I'm reminded of dumb ass kids who got rainbow-colored mohawks in order to be cool, but then slumped around wondering why everyone was looking at them. The thing is, though, a kid can grow up and fix their hair, but they can't repair their choice to get ugly tattoos or piercings when they were young and stupid.
In terms of law, no. But businesses and organizations should be free to set their own standards for who they want representing them in the public eye, with the understanding that they could potentially be missing out on an otherwise stellar asset.
I can say without a doubt that if I was the god-emperor of a professional workplace, there would absolutely be standards set in stone especially for anyone who deals with clients outside of the organization, and it would exclude people with face tattoos or any other wild alterations to visible body parts. Especially when dealing with international business and trade, you have to be even more careful with your Public image if you want to get anywhere.
I think employers should have that right yes. It's not personal. It's a personal choice. I've worked at the same place for 23 years. And when I started there the founder of the company still ruled. I didn't agree with all his rules but I respected them because he's built a successful company. And some of his rules really hampered his ability to make money. You have to respect a business owner that doesn't always put the almighty dollar over everything all the time.
To go back to your question. He felt visible tattoos were unprofessional. I do feel we lost out on some talented people due to a silly tat but probably missed out on some really bad people for the same reason.
It depends specifically on what job (s), what clientele the said person would be associating with and what tat’s we’re talking about.
Personally if I’m going to the dentist I’d feel more comfortable if the dentist didn’t have fuck you tatted on his forehead.
With that being said people should all be treated equally regardless of tattooing but the reality of the issue is that society will dictate what is and what isn’t acceptable.
Then again, if the same dude was building me a fence… I probably wouldn’t give a shit as long as he was cool.
So generally speaking…
No. I don't particularly like tattoos, especially when they're on the face, but I don't think such a thing would mean the person isn't intelligent or competent enough for the job. I personally know several people who love tattoos and they are proficient and ethical people. In this case "don't judge a book by its cover" is very appropriate.
Yeah, I have never hired anyone with visible tattoos and I never will.
If one person is given all the freedom to cover him-/her-/itself in pictures,
then any other person ( or institution) must have all the freedom to not want it around.
Tattoo's are individual decorations. And they are voluntary ones.
Each ''thing'' has a place where it matches - and other places where it doesn't.
When I first started going to football matches I remember standing close to two people with tattoos, one had the name of the football team tattooed on his lip (Yes his lip!!) and the other had a spiders web tattooed across his face... now I'm usually a liberal kinda guy and don't judge people on appearance but I'm kinda guessing these guys had some awkward job interviews.
Yeah, tattoos are a choice.. And if they are like the guy in the image, I'd not hire them, my company deals with hundreds of businesses, hiring someone like that sets the wrong tone.
If they had them, they were covered... I personally have 4 but you'd never see them without seeing me in a way that would piss my wife off.
I would say no, especially since they are becoming more common in this era. Unfortunately, there is a line of too many tattoos, for example, the example given getting your entire face tattooed. I wouldn't say it is right to judge them but that behavior is also very telling of the person if they are willing to reach that point.
My work makes employees cover them up with a band-aid or liquid makeup. A few had to wear long sleeves year round to cover their arms. I'm not sure what my work would do for someone with face tattoos - like in the picture
Depends on the tattoos and their placement in my opinion, as well as the job. Certain tattoos have certain meanings, for example gang related tattoos, and somebody who could potentially be gang related would not be somebody you would want to represent your business. Same could go for offensive tattoos with vulgar language or inappropriate images. As long as the tattoos are not offensive and are not highly visible, I would hire you as long as you seem fit for the job.
As someone with piercings and tattoos I generally say no however I do know some people that really gave no thought to their future and have crap scribbled all over. Anything offensive etc should def disqualify you for certain employment.
Theoretically no, but there are certain places and types of people that just won’t hire a heavily tatted person. I have a co-worker who was once asked to remove her small innocuous facial piercing so she quit lol.
In theory, no. In practice, it’s gonna affect job opportunities. If they can be covered, I don’t think it should. Tattoos on someone’s face makes me seriously question their judgment, and good judgment is a factor in a lot of careers.
It depends on what and where they are.
My business model means I don't employ anyone with visible tattoos. Note the key word: VISIBLE
If someone has a tattoo on their face and they aren't Maori then if they are otherwise a good fit I'd ask them to wear foundation to cover up during work hours. It's no different than the makeup a girl wears. Outside of the office, do what you like. At work you are an extension of me and the service I offer. Tattoos are (usually) not appropriate.
Nope, one should not be judged cause they have Tattoos
In a corporate world, Yes. If they are visible outside clothing, then yes. Of course it opens up the argument about the nature and size of the tattoos but I am keeping my answer simple. And people who are seeking job opportunities in the "corporate world" should know better.
It depends on the job. Appearance is often important for jobs.
Yes, because tattoos are an outward display of what is inside.
Tattoos scream criminal underclass, low IQ and big psychological problems.
When a female has tattoos, she becomes a walking red flag.
@MysteriousDarkness He obviously meant that is what they bring to mind for him. There is nothing to prove. For me, someone who looked like that looks like someone with very poor judgment and possible psychological issues.
he probably can't work some jobs because of his face tattoos
like Teachers, Bankers, law enforcement officers, front office administrators, healthcare professionals and many more that require some formality
Yes. Most employers have dress codes and some have uniforms. They don't want (and shouldn't be required) to be represented by their employees' "individuality".
If they are face tats I never understood why people got those I used to only think rappers got face tattoos but I’ve been seeing random everyday people with them and chances are they work at like a tattoo parlor or hot topic 😂
I knew a girl who had a dragonfly on her neck. She worked in my building and we became friends. She was a sweet kid and maybe the last person you would think would get a neck tattoo. One day I asked her what the hell was she thinking when she got that thing.
She told me her boyfriend got one and thought it wuold be cool if she did too. Then he broke up with her soon after.
@exitseven there you go.
Technically no, but very few law firms are gonna hire a guy (or girl) with tattoos all over their face
Yes, just like obesity should. Its The employers right to hire whoever maintains the companies image.
I mean you can’t apply for a police job with “fuck the police” tattoo.
Well yeah.. kinda, I wouldn't fancy going under the surgeon's knife knowing the very last thing I could see is a tattoo of a skull!
I had been a hiring manger for many years and a neck tattoo would tell me that the person is not serious. I know it is more mainstream than it was but I usually go with my gut.
No but clearly it wouldn't be appropriate for certain establishments and if its affiliated with dangerous organizations or groups
Yeah, if the tattoos are in a place like that guy's. Face, neck, anything that your clothes can't cover. Those tattoos become a reflection of that company's image.
Yes it should. That scares the shit out of some people. Including kids if you wanted to be a grade school teacher. Also I don't want my boss looking like that.
They will if you get them on your face or neck, no high paying company will hire you, you effectively limit your income potential.
Depends on the job. I think if I went to the bank and the person handling the money had face tattoos like the guy in the photo I might leave.
It shouldn't, but certain professions and companies have their policy regarding exposed tattoo.
Yes. No face tattoos or neck tattoos. You shouldn’t have it if you can’t cover it up while you’re at work!
It is an even bigger no no in Japan than it is in America.
Depends on the job, the tattoo and its placement. Call me old fashioned but I'd rather not see the bloke in the picture as a policeman.
@rcljr Yeah. It's not exactly like one thinks "that fellow would make a fine secretary of state for home affairs"...
Anything above the collar yes.
If you work for a church yes.
Otherwise no
People judge on appearance so yeah I’m sure that plays a factor
Fuck yeah what do you think. no one will give anyone a job that looks like a freak. I love tattoos I have several but not all over my face..
Yes, people their appearance is important in some jobs.
When I send salespeople out to clients visible tattoos like that could negatively affect my business.
Some jobs. I don’t mind them but they can be shocking to customers. Could cause issues with sales.
If it looks like the one in the picture, it will affect job opportunities.
It will in the public eye type of jobs but not warehouse work
If my financial advisers walked in all tatted up including full face mask, I'd say NEXT. LMFAO
A tattoo should tell the story you want to tell... no one should dictate any opinions... EVER...
Yes. I think so and it does.
They're indicators of judgement...
Not at all it's just a style
No unless its stupid and unprofessional
Nothing wrong with him
That should be totally the choice of the employer.
it depends on the tatoo
How a person presents himself speaks volumes.
Depending on the tattoo, yeah.
But most? no.
They should not, but they certainly DO.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions