Men *used* to provide for women, when women *used* to be grateful, ladylike, and feminine. Nowadays, most women under 35 act like entitled cunts who want "The Best of all Worlds:" They wanna be multi-millionaires with popularity and adulation, but don't want to actually put in the work, accept 'no' for an answer, and be willing to fail over and over again, which almost every successful man has to go through to be successful ALL while still expecting men to make more money than them because heaven forbid a woman be super-successful and "downgrade" to a man who makes less money for her or expects her to pay for her own dinner dates!
I could go on and on with how so many women have become undateable entitled cunts in the 21st century, but it's not just women's fault. It's men's fault, too. I'm a romantic at heart, but I'm also not a pushover or willing to get stepped on by a cruel woman. Meaning, I'm not a cuckold or simp. I have my own demons I am working through, but at the end of the day, I still maintain some sense of dignity and self-respect. So many men nowadays didn't have strong male role models growing up (me included) who were raised in hyper-feminized societies, and became weaklings, sissies, Momma's Boys, cucks, simps, male feminists, and soy boys. All of these are basically the same thing: spineless, weak men.
Society has lost balance between the genders. We have undertalented, undereducated, underintelligent females with inflated egos, thinking they are *entitled* to the entire world and propped up to be pseudo, female versions of "Alpha Males," without any of the skills or work to deserve such a title; the "girl-boss" BS. And we have the total opposite with men, who are STILL as of the minute you're reading this, being torn down, destroyed, blamed for everything in society by useless wastes of sperm known as feminists, and become these weak, soyboy pussies and manchildren who never mentally grew up and take out their own father issues on Donald Trump, "white males," conservatives, or what have you.
However, the thing is, you can't escape your true nature. All these lame, pathetic, loser women who try to mind-trick themselves into thinking they're "queen diva goddesses" or some crap, still always want a powerful dominant man to put them in their place, or else, they wouldn't make BS videos like this and countless others on YouTube. So these women are really rejecting their femininity, while also deep-down inside, wanting to hold onto it. Thinking they can all be Beyoncé or some crap (despite Beyoncé actually being the submissive wife to Jay-Z in their household).
The same with soyboys, which is why despite them being these weak betas no one takes seriously, they still believe they are demanded respect like real men and that when they spew out their social justice garbage, people are expected to not only listen to them, but to believe them and do what they say despite them usually being the "white males" they claim are so toxic and misogynistic. It's ironic that no one "mansplains" more than male feminists, especially to non-feminist females who are more assertive and strong-willed than these losers will ever be.
If women want to be taken care of, they need to start ACTING like "nurturing, caring, matronly" ladies who don't open their legs on fuckin' OnlyFans and still think they're wife material after that. Once they learn what being a true lady is (hopefully before they hit the wall in their mid 30s), they'll find their gentleman to treat them like a "queen" without them needing to call themselves such narcissitic terms.
OR if a chick wants to be a "girlboss," she needs to stop expecting a man to pay for her dinners, "spoil her," and to continue to live life on Easy Mode like most Western women do.
Either put up or shut the fuck up. Be a lady or be a "girlboss," but you don't get to have both, ladies. Learn what "equality" is and how it comes with negatives too.
Most Helpful Opinions
This is a typical example of how some women want all the benefits of traditionalism with none of the responsibilities. Firstly, I will address the issue of children which she has brought up repeatedly. Women repeatedly mention how they are the ones who bring children into this world, which is true, but they conveniently forget that it is not a favor. Half of your genes are with the child. Paternity can be doubtful, but maternity cannot, so a woman has a sure shot way of ensuring that her genes are carried into the next generation while the man doesn't.
Now coming back to the femineity part and how men are supposed to be masculine and pay for everything. If you want to see an exercise of this principle, then visit any third world country and you will see clear gender roles. What she's calling as femineity is basically youth and fertility. Men are expected to compensate women for youth and fertility and being in the company of the same. But as we all know, they aren't permanent, what about when you're no longer young and beautiful, why should a man then spend his resources on you? In traditional societies what happened was that a woman committed to a man young, so he got to experience the youth and beauty for some time, secured reproductive rights by having one, two or three kids and then was he committed to her for life.
What is happening now with marriage is that over 50% end in divorce and women file over 70% of them, so it's giving the man a short taste of your end and securing the commitment in the long term by child support, alimony, and half of what he owns. And men are wising up to this scam.
Eh, society changes constantly and not sure if it's a hot take but the nuclear family is not even natural but I digress... If you as a woman want to be in a traditional relatioship and build a family you have to be ready and willing to take the role of the caregiver seriously but also choose a man that will suit your and your future children needs. It's funny how men wanting beautiful and young woman is perfectly normalized as "male nature" and not considered shallow but a woman who wants to genetically and financially secure the lives of her future children is considered shallow, gold digging and even evil at times, when female nature LITERALLY encourages them to choose the BEST mate to ensure that she passes good genes to her offsprings. I personally don't see any long term benefits to marriage and children since the stress, comprosing and tiring work is not worth my dignity and freedom but you do you.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
20Opinion
I have no interest in a woman who thinks I should provide for her. I would prefer a woman who is fully capable and willing to stand on her own two feet. Also the kind of woman that will be right beside me trying to fix a given situation when life slides sideways. It has nothing to do with gender roles. I was raised by a strong mother and my grandmother was a very strong woman as well. They both wanted nothing from anyone that they where capable of getting themselves. Even if it meant doing a lot of hard work to get it.
Yes yes yes thank for the video I have tried to Express this in so many ways on gag with answering questions I have known this since I was 5 years old I have always said that women are ten times smarter than men better than men in so many different ways and this is the exact ways that I was talking about they can take more pain they have to go to a harder part of life than men do we have one job and one job only and that branches out into little baby jobs but nothing like what a woman has to go through in life just to be with a man so I thank you very much for this this is exactly what I've been trying to say
And the fun part about this question is now we get to hear and see from all the fucking women haters and the way that they see it I want to read their questions are their answers just to see how women haters are going to take this and manipulated and run with it this is going to be goodI find it curious that no women have responded to this question. I think that tells you something.
I agree with everything this woman says. I loved it. But I don't think young women want this anymore. Most of them have feminism dripping out of the corners of their mouths and we've heard scores of them declare sonorously that they don't need men.
I think that's why as of this posting you have zero female respondents. They don't share this lady's vision anymore. So realistically she ought to be speaking directly to her gender. If women aren't on board with it, than you can't expect men to be either.This video is B. S. She encouraged women not to be manipulated by society regarding a man not providing her them but she has no problem manipulating men into providing for women. Lol
Listen, I believe a man primarily role is provide food, shelter and protection to his wife and kids but to act like most men don't need help in providing to a household is delusional at best, and insane at worse.
Unless you as a woman in some desperate poverty stricken nation desire to live in a mudd hut and only eat rice and beans til you die then you are going to have help out the household with provision.
In the 21th century unlike the ancient world we live in very comfortable times with A/C, cars, phones, computers, mortgages, healthcare, vacations, education etc so unless your man is rich she's going to have to help out financially or struggle to death to get by.If you want to live that traditional lifestyle, sure, why the heck not. it's proven itself over and over, and seems to hold up pretty well. But if you want to differently, that is also perfectly fine. I personally don't think there should be gender specific roles. There are things that need to be done, and whoever can do it should do it. Take my girlfriend and I for example. I have a job, but it's only part time as I'm still studying in college. My girlfriend makes most of the money for us. She goes to work everyday (I drive her because she can't drive), and usually I come back home, study, clean the house and such. I do that majority of the shopping and groceries, and we use a combination of both of ours' money. We both cook, however. I find it to be a very fun bonding time for the two of us. Often we will spend entire evenings just cooking with each other.
While what she says is general applicable, men or women shouldn't be forced into those roles. Those roles are generally what I prefer for myself and my romantic relationships, but if a man wants to divert from that then he shouldn't be shamed for it. Same goes for women. People should be what they want to be, not pressured into being what others think they should be.
This society no longer supports the role of men being providers and women being caregivers. And folks like to break this down along the political narratives given to them without realizing there isn't a such thing as a family that can get by on a single parent's income.
There was a time when a man could go out, get a job, and provide for his entire family.Ya know when I was 12 and I wanted to go outside and light a dead hawk I found by a creek on fire to see if itâll taste like chicken my Pa stopped me and said â Lemme tell yâall sum bout wimin Dey a dime a dozen now gon to da liquor sto n gimme sum crownâ (that was my grandpa I don't know why he was talking like that he is from panama) but it blows my mind that what he said then so accurately describes women today Why would any man want a woman who treats their relationship like a transaction and sex is all she has to offer and some women actually believe that theyâre so attractive that any she can get any man she wants sex is all she needs to offer 🤣🤣🤣 let me just say if youâre a woman and you think that for every pretty girl there 500 more who look way better than you
So wait let me get this straight...
Woman expect men to provide for them, when they made it clear that they don't want to be treated as a "weaker sex"? I thought the whole woman lib was about gaining equality between men and women? If that's the case shouldn't guys try to get the women to provide for them instead, to keep everything fair?There are many people for whom traditional gender roles just aren't a very attractive option. Why should I look after a woman financially when these days most of them have careers of their own? Has she taken into account the fact that we've moved on since 50 plus years ago? (It's called progress, but she obviously hasn't heard of it). Why should we even care that "gender roles" apparently exist in the animal kingdom? We're not animals.
This is nonsense, she's stuck in the past.She's not got much in debating skills and she's confusing gender roles, culture, societal norms and the social contract.
2 words plain and simple:
Gold Diggery
If money makes the man attractive, then that's what we call are gold diggers. There is absolutely no love in it. Only a transactional fake relationship based only on superficial things (money for love, sex and beauty). A literal service for rent.
Her diatribe was ironic since she's not remotely feminine (or even attractive, in my opinion).
Lol who is this Comedian 😂.
She negates her own saying like no one else is required to debate get she debates herself 😂Western society has poisoned women;s minds such that they want the benefits of traditional marriage but not the responsibilities. I'll take a pass on that
if women want to go back to the time when "Men made all the decisions, made all the rules, and women were subservient"... then sure
Seems reasonable. A bit whiny but otherwise not too far off. She's a looker!
I'm not really sure what this video is needed for. There's a reason why the term "simp" exists.
In other news sky is blue, water is wet.
Don't see any problems here.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!