Trumptards, will you ever stop kissing his ass?

[Anonymous]

Trumptards: Putin would never, ever try to invade Ukraine if Trump was still in office. Trump's too tough. He'd never let Putin get away with it and Putin knows this.

Trump: Putin's a genius. It's a savvy move. And the "peacekeeping" excuse? Great idea. Love it.

Trumptards: Well, Trump is right again. It's a savvy move and Putin's a genius. We should support Russia as they try to invade an independent, sovereign country and overrun it by force.

You guys just crack me up.

[ragooo8]

Well, Trump is right again. It's a savvy move and Putin's a genius. Yes Putin waited until Biden was in office because trump is unpredictable and Biden is a pussy.
As for Russia invading an independent, sovereign country and overthrowing it by force. Where have you been in the last 20 years? We've in that time invaded Afghanistan & Iraq. We've sponsored civil war and regime change wars in Syria, Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Sudan, eithopia and employ huge armies of mercenaries. We've bombed over 20 countries in 20 years. We have an assassination programme that has a 90% civilian collateral death rate, a programme that murders anyone we suspect of being a terrorist without trial based on minimal evidence and murders anyone near by. We've bombed weddings, hospitals and places of worship. We've interfered in the elections of sovereign nations since ww2 ended. Obama and Biden armed, trained and funded isis. To condemn Russia while we are doing the same thing right now at this moment in multiple countries is hypocrisy.

[Asker]

"Yes Putin waited until Biden was in office because trump is unpredictable and Biden is a pussy."

To Putin, Trump was nothing more than a useful idiot. If you believe Putin waited until Trump was out of office cause he was afraid of what Trump might do, I have several bridges you might be interested in. And Biden, the pussy, has unified NATO more than it's been in years while Trump did everything he could to destroy the unity among NATO which of course was Putin's master plan, to weaken Western European resolve and unity. Why would Putin have needed to bother with Ukraine when Trump was already trying to destroy NATO from within which was Putin''s wet dream and much, much more valuable to Putin than distracting from that by bothering with Ukraine.

And there's just a bit of difference in responding to terrorist attacks and countries that sponsor those terrorist attacks than invading a country that has done nothing to you but be a peaceful neighbor for the past 30 years with some bullshit story about ancient land rights. But great job with the whataboutism. You guys are masters of that.

Thanks for weighing in.

[ragooo8]

Trump tried to strengthen NATO by getting other countries to contribute more to it and it largely worked except for Germany.
Iraq did not attack the US, Sadam was installed by the US government. The US has been so bad in the last 20 years that a bill was brought to Congress called the "stop arming terrorist bill" with some calling for an end to America's perpetual wars of regime change and intervention.
Way to throw out whataboutism when hypocrisy has a light on it.

[Asker]

"Trump tried to strengthen NATO" I'm sorry. I started laughing so hard after reading that, I couldn't get through the rest of it.

You don't strengthen an organization by constantly threatening to leave it or by broadcasting to the world you might not support your fellow NATO members if they were attacked. Just FYI.

[ragooo8]

Trump was completely right. The rest of NATO needs to contribute more resources for their own defence. Look at Germany, richest nation in Europe, massive manufacturing capacity, bombing arms industry that mass produces stuff like leopard tanks, Pumas, boxers, euro fighter typhoon, hk416, g36, mp5s, mp7s, MG4s, MG3s, Panzerfaust 3. The US military has more German military equipment than the German military.
Usually fellow nato members attack each other

[Asker]

Of course. Trump is always right. Drink that Kool-Aid down. Drink every drop.

[ragooo8]

Just don't buy the propaganda here in the US. Seen too much of it

[blissinanarchy1]

Asker, whoever you are, I wish I could have drinks on me. Be proud that you're intelligent enough not to fall into Trump's bullshit.

[Asker]

Thank you but to me at least, it is so screamingly obvious that Trump is a serial liar, a cheat, a swindler, someone who would so anything to serve and enrich himself even if it means putting others at risk and destroying our 245 year old Democracy and the trust in our election process with lies just so his ego doesn't have to accept a legitimate loss to someone he considers inferior to him, so crystal clear that's what he is, I can't even fathom how others simply can't or won't see it.

At a core level, I can understand some of it. He appeals to hate filled racists, xenophobes, misogynists, people who think anyone who doesn't look like them or talk like them or share their religion is inferior and a threat, and Trump is the first person of influence to say to these hate filled people, come out of the shadows. What you believe is OK, what you believe is a legitimate view. I can even understand someone who was fooled by him in 2016 cause they don't call him Don the Con for nothing. But after 4 years of a non stop soap opera shit show and a country he has deliberately pushed to the verge of civil war just to benefit his own lust for power and "brand", that people would still say, "Trump 2024. He's my guy" is just beyond understanding to me.

[blissinanarchy1]

That's how my whole family is. We look at the stupidity of people who support this man and are just baffled by it, honest to god. Makes matters worse, we might be white but we're from a Black neighborhood. Although we're not black ourselves, we got a closer look at the racism blacks are under than most white people get to see. Yet my sister is a trump supporter. Then again, she's like a female Alex Jones. A waste of breath.

[Anonymous]

There were obvious reasons why Putin helped get Trump elected.

[Anonymous]

There is three undisputed facts.
1) Putin invaded Ukraine under Obama's watch.
2) It took a year for him to invade Ukraine under Biden's watch.
3) Putin showed zero aggression under Trump's watch.
You may love Biden and dispise Trump but these are facts.

[Asker]

You obviously play checkers. Putin plays chess. Let me educate you on how someone like Putin thinks. Putin's highest order plan is to see NATO destroyed, it's members fighting amongst themselves and in no position to stand up to him no matter what he does. He understands a unified NATO is all that stands between him and his ability to invade countries across Eastern Europe and recreate the Soviet Union. That is his wet dream. Trump comes along, a complete and utter useful idiot if ever there was one and with Putin's encouragement sets about to destroy the unity of NATO from within, raising questions about whether the U. S. would pull out of it, whether they would come to a fellow NATO member's defense if one was attacked, picking fights with our closets allies, supporting wannabe dictators while publicly stating he believes Putin over his own intelligence agencies.

For 4 years, Putin had this blithering idiot doing his bidding, literally trying to destroy NATO from within and Putin barely had to do anything to get him to do it. Putin couldn't have dreamed a better scenario. Do you honestly think a guy playing chess like Putin is going to do anything to distract from that and give NATO members anything to unify behind as Trump tries to get them to fight amongst themselves. Gaining control over some small piece of the Ukraine could never fulfill Putin's ultimate goals better than what Trump was doing on his own in broad daylight.

[Asker]

So of course Putin didn't do anything while his useful idiot was busy at work trying to destroy NATO from within. Once his idiot was gone and Biden is reunifying NATO again, he's back to his old tricks.
If you're a checkers player, you'll sit there continuing to think Putin wouldn't dare mess with Trump and that's why this stuff is happening before and after Trump was in office. If you play chess like Putin and are smart, you can see that Putin would have ben a fool to give NATO something to pull together on while his useful idiot was busy trying to destroy it. Putin certainly understood that. Do you?

[Opinion Owner]

What destroyed NATO'S alliance were countries like Germany and Finland, among others, that made Russia rich by importing their oil and gas, while other members refused their oil. That's what Trump warned the EU about. You fucks are giving Putin billions to build a war machine and then expect us spend our billions to protect you from them. It's happening right now! Only now the US is involved in begging Russia for oil!

[Opinion Owner]

Also, it sure seems like you're kissing Putins ass.

[Asker]

I tried to explain to you in as simple terms as I could why Putin didn't do anything while Trump was president and your takeaway is I'm kissing Putin's ass. I obviously should have assumed that no matter how simple and easy to understand I made the explanation, you would not be intellectually able to grasp it. Oh well, at least I tried.

[Opinion Owner]

Brilliant come back. What you told me is opinion and conjecture. What I told you is fact. Now, put your 3 masks on, get your tenth booster shot and make your "mothers and truckers are domestic terrorists" signs and leave the intellectual conversations to others.

[Opinion Owner]

I want our conversation to continue.

[DCooper]

Haha your boy gonna lead an effective strategy to mobilize trunalimunumaprzure now? That will put his fellow commie Pootin in his place !

https://www.youtube.com/embed/BnS6qMrkmjA

[Asker]

Wow. You sound really smart. Like a genius kinda. I guess I should really give a shit what you think. I'll try. Promise.

[Anonymous]

You guys crack me up because you can’t stop talking about Trump. It’s sick.

Move the fuck on. The man isn’t even president anymore and you’re still talking about him. You’re so obsessed it’s pathetic.

[Asker]

Yeah, it's not like he's still the leader of the Republican party, getting sucked off by almost every Republican politician and constantly teasing a run in 2024. Nah, none of that is happening.

Your utter cluelessness is adorable.

[Avicenna]

Trump isn’t on office. But the failed and incompetent Biden Administraton is. Funny how Democrsts don’t want to talk about it.

[Asker]

Wow. Haven't heard that comeback from a Trump supporter before. Good one chum and hella original.

If only a presidential administration was proven to be failed and incompetent by how often the opposition's puppets keep repeating it. Right out of the Trump playbook. If you repeat a lie often enough, eventually people will believe it's true.

[Avicenna]

Only Biden Administration sycophants have to lie, and they do almost always anonymously to avoid any accountability. The Biden Administration has been uniformly a failure across the board, including spurring the worst inflation in four decades, criminally opening the southern border to illegal entrants (an impeachable offense), getting US servicemembers killed in the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, getting slapped down by the courts for anti-white discrimination and persecuting hundreds of political prisoners. The Biden Administration is corrupt, criminal, racist and a rights violator. No wonder you're too ashamed to post this without showing who you are.

But I can see why you're anonymous and desperately trying to deflect attention from the corrupt and criminal Biden Administration's war on the American people.

[Asker]

Wow. That's a wonderful job of repeating every made up bullshit right wing talking point. You have learned how to spread propaganda well, my son. Corrupt, ctiminal, racist blah blah blah. All the things Trump was you actually you actually think you can convince anyone that Biden is? LMAO.. I am worried as you and other major intellects who worship him seem more obsessed with Biden than we ever were with Trump. BDS - Biden Derangement Syndrome perhaps?

[Avicenna]

If this criminal gang's performance in office had anything to be proud of, you'd be touting it. It speaks volumes that you're not- it's a tacit admission that I am completely correct. And given the damage wrought by the Biden Administration and the reasonable expectation that they will do even more damage, why should we ignore what it's doing? It is in power, after all.

And criticizing such abject failure is in no way comparable with the derangement shown by Democrats since 2015.

[Asker]

Oh please. The "you're not responding to all the complete and utter bullshit I'm trying to spread so it must mean I'm right" tactic is sad, weak and pathetic. "Criminal gang, corrupt, racist"... man, your Biden Derangement Syndrome is really bad. And people like you were saying all these things about Biden on his first day in office so good luck trying to convince anyone you've just now arrived at these conclusions. Obama handed Trump a country that was running on all 8 cylinders and doing great. Trump handed Biden the biggest bag of shit any incoming American president has had to deal with in the last 50 years. Meanwhile, Biden has brought unemployment back down, corporate earnings are still at all time highs which means the market will recover after Russia is settled. He's managed us through an unprecedented worldwide pandemic, he's reasserted U. S. leadership in the world undoing all the damage Trump did by antagonizing our allies and emboldening our enemies. According to you guys, if Biden's not aggressive with Putin, he's a pussy who's scared of him. If he is aggressive, he's trying to get us into a war to distract from "his record." Meanwhile, Trump just outrageously praised and supported an authoritarian dictator who's in the process of invading an independent country and starting an utterly needless war that will cost many people their lives, basically just for ego and not one of you has the guts or decency to even say so much as "yeah, that probably wasn't a good thing to say." No morals, no ethics, no decency , no willingness to ever criticize Dear Leader, no matter what he does.

Beyond that, you seem like an extremely angry guy. Listen, I'm sorry your life hasn't turned out the way you hoped it would but that's not the fault of Joe Biden or the people who support him. Maybe you should consider talking to someone about your anger issues. It might make you feel better.

[Avicenna]

LOL, the anger in your posts and in the question itself is palpable. And you're delusional, especially about Biden's feckless foreign policy. Trump didn't antagonize allies- he pointed out that we have some dependencies, not allies (cough, most NATO countries other than the UK, Poland, and the Baltic states) and that we're being taken advantage of on trade. Being used by parasites doesn't mean you're respected by them, and it's impossible to antagonize dependencies who need you when you don't need them. Trump didn't "support" Putin- he wanted to prevent the Nordstream pipeline that Biden refused to sanction last year. And we're not supposed to notice that Putin takes aggressive action when Democrats are in office but not Trump? I think that qualifies as emboldening enemies, much as China and Iran have been emboldened by the Biden Administration as well.

Comsumer confidence is down and inflation is way up. That's not great economic news. And markets were overvalued and trending down before Ukraine popped back up on the news.

So no facts support your angry and delusional claims. The Biden Administration is a failure for ordinary Americans.

But, surprise, surprise, you haven't had a word of criticism for your deities Barack Obama and Joen Biden.

[Asker]

"Trump didn't antagonize allies"

I just had to stop reading your reply there. I was laughing too hard and the tears in my eyes made it hard to read. I've wasted enough time with you. Have a good one, champ.

[Avicenna]

Well, if you're dumb enough to consider dependencies "allies" whom we have to please, there's nothing I can do about that. Germany is basically a neutral country and European Union dependencies are economic competitors who need our military protection. They should be worried about antagonizing us, not us worry about antagonizing them.

But when you look elsewhere, Japan and South Korea didn't have a problem with Trump. Neither did Israel, and Trump was able to help Israel and several Arab countries make peace.

But don't let facts get in the way of your puerile rants.

[Avicenna]

And Canada is also a dependency that was happy to help the CCP take advantage of us on trade. That's not the behavior of an ally.

[Asker]

You should never, ever call anyone else dumb or talk about anyone else's rants. You don't even understand the definition of allies or their importance on the world stage. After 9/11, they stood with us because they were... say it with me Einstein... our allies and you support your allies when they are attacked, not because they were themselves attacked.

And yeah, I'm sure Japan and South Korea had no problem with Trump when he called off the preparedness exercises they had always engaged in with them cause he was busy sucking Kim's dick and reading his love letters. I'm just going to assume you're a very bad propagandist and aren't so utterly clueless to believe Japan and South Korea had no problems with his idol worship of Kim and public comments about how great a guy he was while Kim stepped up short and medium range missile tests in their backyard. On second thought, I think you appear to be exactly that clueless.

As far as Israel is concerned, Netanyahu understood what the whole world knew. Praise Trump and compliment him publicly and Trump will do whatever you want. Of course, Israel had no problem with Trump. Trump did everything they wanted after Bibi kissed his ass.

I really hope you are not as clueless as these comments make you sound. And please stop accusing others of doing and being the very things you do and are.

Now run along. Your lesson is over.

[Avicenna]

You have some very strange ways of looking at things, but that's to be expected of a Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferer.

Around 80% of South Koreans and Japanese approved of Trump's diplomacy with North Korea:

www.pewresearch.org/.../

And it made sense to attempt to pull North Korea out of China's orbit. Doing so did not endanger the security of Japan or South Korea.

Your infantile remarks about Netanyahu and your complete unwillingness to acknowledge Trump's success in helping to bring about some peace agreements in the Middle East show you aren't a serious person.

As for "standing with us after 9/11", that was largely symbolic on the part of most NATO countries other than the UK. And 9/11 was almost 20 1/2 years ago. Look at the actions of Germany and other European Union nations since then- almost all of them refuse to spend the money on their militaries that they themselves pledged to spend. And most of them are all too eager to do business with the CCP.

And Israelis, unsurprisingly, preferred Trump to Biden;

www.jpost.com/.../majority-of-israelis-prefer-donald-trump-over-joe-biden-poll-645493

You seem like an immature hothead who can't process information and synthesize it to draw reasoned conclusions. It's not a good combination. Facts don't support your biased, Trump Derangement Syndrome-induced claims. And you're so ashamed of your views that you went anonymous.

[Asker]

You post a Pew Research article to back up your claim that "80% of South Koreans and Japanese approved of Trump's diplomacy with North Korea:" and the headline of the article YOU POST is "People in Asia-Pacific regard the U. S. more favorably than China, but Trump gets negative marks". And continues "However, these positive views do not extend to President Donald Trump, who receives significantly lower ratings than his predecessor in all six Asia-Pacific nations in the survey." That's from the article YOU POSTED, you arrogant clown. Even in the brief snippet you cherrypicked, you conveniently left out the part right after that says "Conversely, fewer than one-in-three in the Philippines, Indonesia and India approve of these dealings with Kim. (Trump’s approach to North Korea was the only one of his major foreign policy positions tested among 33 nations around the world that was viewed favorably on balance, with a median of 41% approving and 36% disapproving.)" So on balance, the Pew article confirms, they think Trump was terrible and approve of almost nothing he did. And that's the best article you can come up with to back your claim. Just pathetic

And great job by Trump in the Middle East signing a few documents that were little more than glorified trade agreement bringing "peace" to countries that were never at war while failing miserably to deal with the real issues of Iran's threat and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Your pathetic putdowns of me would actually seem to describe you perfectly cause rarely have I seen anyone whiff so badly and make themselves look so foolish as you are doing right now.

Like most Trump supporters, you are overly aggressive, nasty, insulting and incredibly poorly informed. You think this will disguise the fact that the article YOU PICKED make you look like a fool. Well guess again. If you really want to talk about bad combinations, a high level of aggression mixed with a high level of ignorance would definitely be one.

[joeldalton]

I agree. Man it was ridiculous when Trump said "Vladimir Putin doesn't want me to be president. He doesn't want me to be the nominee. If you're wondering why it's because I'm the only person in this field who's ever gone toe-to-toe with him"

[Asker]

Yeah toe to toe with him. "Well if Putin said he didn't do it I believe him. Why would he lie about it? I believe him more than I believe my own intelligence agencies." Toe to toe like that? LMAO. Unless you meant, Trump needs to get that close to Putin in order to continue to fellate him.

Thanks for weighing in.

[joeldalton]

womp womp

[img]https://cdn. cnsnews. com/styles/article_big/s3/2022-02/ToeToToeJoeTweet. JPG[/img]

[ragooo8]

Putin definitely wouldn't have done it while Trump was president. No telling what Trump would do.

[Asker]

@ragooo8 yeah, the whole world just quaked in it's boots scared of what Trump might do.

U. S. assassinated Iranian General in Iraq.

Trump to Iran. If you respond, there will be consequences the likes of which you can't imagine.

Iran fires dozens of missiles at Iraqi airbase fully populated with U. S. troops in response.

Trump: Alright, we're even. Now don't do it again.

Trump is the world's biggest pussy. The world's biggest talk big but do nothing guy. The whole world knows that. It's comical you guys think he's some sort of tough guy the world was afraid of.

I realize, trying to get you to see reality is pointless, but it's fun at least pointing out how ridiculous your view of him is.

[ragooo8]

The Iraqis wanted no response to iran's aggression. Iraq is a sovereign nation, trump was right to respect that. The Iraqis want us out of Iraq, we are after all the invaders

[Asker]

@ragooo8 If that's true, then why did Trump make the threats about an Iranian response in the first place? Why wasn't he aware of what the Iraqis wanted and why didn't he defer to them by not making threats in the first place he was never going to follow up on. Isn't that a bad strategy? Doesn't that make him and the U. S. look very weak?

[ragooo8]

You can't just go acting unilaterally in somebody else's backyard

[Asker]

@ragooo8 Then Trump shouldn't have ordered the assassination in the first place. But that doesn't answer the question I asked you. You can't prove Trump isn't a pussy who everyone knows talks tough but makes empty threats cause that's exactly what he is.

[ragooo8]

... yet Putin waited for Biden.

[Asker]

@ragooo8 You've really convinced yourself Putin consciously waited until Trump left office? That's adorable.

[Avicenna]

So what's your explanation for the fact Putin has made moves on Ukraine only when Obama and Biden have been in office?

[Citizenkirk]

We can try too defend Taiwan from China, or try discouraging invasion of Ukraine. Personally, I think the two countries will strike in a coordinated attack to keep their adversity too a minimum.

[demonics]

Do you know what a non-sequitur is? (doubt)

[Twalli]

Can you invade an area that declares independence and invites you in?

[Asker]

So you do a soft invasion of an area in 2014, plant all your partisans in there, spend 7 years having them essentially take over the region and then have them declare independence and "invite you in". Did I get that right? Pretty cool strategy.

Not sure you've ever taken a civics class but you can't just declare independence and have it become fact. It has to be granted or won in battle and recognized by the world community. You're obviously a bright guy. What do you think would happen if a small region somewhere in Russia declared independence from Russia? You think Putin would just say "oh well, they declared independence. What can I do?".

And all of that aside, you think Putin is moving 100,000 troops into the regions he already controls as "peacekeepers" because he's going to stop there? Tell me you're not that naive.

[Twalli]

I'm not. The thing is Putin and Russia said they recgonize the rebelling province's independence and then moved in to aid them. Thus they can claim that they were invited by sovereign nations to defend them against an outside aggressor. In the southern US, The Civil War is sometimes called The War or Northern Agression.

[Asker]

Putin can claim that God himself invited them in to protect these rebelling provinces. His actions still don't pass the test of international law. Besides, why all of a sudden did these provinces need aid and protecting and peacekeepers? Had Ukraine after 7 years of just leaving them alone suddenly launched an all out offensive against them no one is aware of? Putin is just constructing a bogus rationale. We all see it, We all know what he's doing and why and what his intent is. The international community is not buying it. You shouldn't either.

[Twalli]

I'm not. I just am trying to argue both sides, ssf o people don't only hold to one opinion while ignoring the other side. Putin can claim this and might get away with it if he goes no further. From what I understand those provinces weren't in open rebellion until recently.

[Asker]

Putin will likely get away with it if he goes no further because Ukraine recognizes their military power is dwarfed by Russia so they will likely lose much more than these territories if they go to war over it and the rest of the world is unwilling to fight a war over it on their behalf, not because Putin had any actual legal justification to do it.

[Twalli]

Ukraine won't try to take th egg m back unless the west acts. It like how Austria-Hungary didn't invade Serbia until they got carte blanche from Germany. One counry that knows it cannot win won't fight without backup to give them a chance.

[888theGreat]

Trump had his number , Biden can't even remember his own number

[Asker]

Yeah Trump had his number. And Putin had the pee pee tapes. LMAO.

Thanks for the laugh, buddy.

[Chthou95]

Libtards ask these questions just to start ar argument

[Asker]

There wouldn't need to be an argument if you guys just owned up to your pathetic idol worship of a corrupt, evil, wannabe dictator who continues to actively try to destroy American democracy with bullshit claims of a "stolen" election..

[Chthou95]

Didn't libs do the same thing in 2016 when they claimed the Russians rigged the election for trump? Both sides are full of shit. Conservitards and libtards.

[Asker]

Liberals never claimed Russians rigged the election. They claimed Russians meddled and interfered, whether it's bot farms posting pro Trump things or anti-Hillary disinformation on social media or a hundred other ways. There is overwhelming proof to support that. Trump literally claimed votes were illegally switched or forged or fraudulent ballots were counted despite audit after audit proving that wasn't true. His claims undermined confidence in the security of our elections and whether someone's vote would actually be counted for the person they voted for or illegally switched.

Big fucking difference between saying Russia was meddling in our election and claiming outright fraud in the counting of ballots despite absolutely no evidence to support that.

[Chthou95]

a lot of them did though. I mean late night show host couldn't stop talking about it & called it rigged. And Hilary is one of the big names as secretary. She is responsible for the Benghazi attacks but of course she's Hilary so it went under the radar. People forget that during the George floyd riots, Hilary was secretly in trial but it was never mentioned or talked about

[Asker]

"People forget that during the George floyd riots, Hilary was secretly in trial but it was never mentioned or talked about"

ROTFLMAO. Really? Oh man, I just can't... LOL

[Chthou95]

Look it up it's no secret. Hilary should be in jail right now

[Asker]

If she was "secretly" on trial, how exactly would I "look it up", genius?

[Chthou95]

The media didn't cover it. But that doesn't mean you can't find articles and sources online dipshit

[Asker]

Do you honestly believe if Hillary Clinton was actually on trial, the media wouldn't cover it? What court was she on trial in, what was she charged with and what was the verdict? Honestly, this is the biggest load of bullshit I've heard in a long time.

[Anonymous]

Red-MAGA's will never stop kissing trumps ass just like Blue-MAGA's will never stop kissing Bidens ass.

[Anonymous]

stop kissing biden’s ass

[Asker]

Sweetie, I think you have a severe case of BDS (Biden Derangement Syndrome). I recommend you contact a health care professional.

[Crucis84]

The meme that "the left can't meme" is true, and you're proof of that Mr. Asker. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a very real and serious malady; there is no such thing as BDS.

[Asker]

@Crucis84 You can stop trying to show how dumb you are. You've already convinced me. Good job but I suspect it comes to you naturally.

[Infinitely_Myself]

Posts like this create them

[Asker]

Is that so?