👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
"In the case of the 3 percent
of Washington, DC., infants who die from cocaine addiction while no
mothers go to prison, the right to choose means the right to kill - not a fetus but a child.
If we hold a drunk driver responsible for injury, why shouldn’t we hold a
crack-addicted mother responsible for injury? In reality, the drunk driver
injures a human being only occasionally; the crack-addicted mother injures a human being almost 100 percent of the time. Should the mother who addicts her child to crack have any more rights than another child abuser or drug dealer? How can we give a normal drug dealer a life sentence but claim that a mother who deals drugs to her own child should not so much as stand trial?"