Oh, it isn't politically incorrect. It is what happens when politics matters more than objective facts, data, etc. So in that sense it is absolutely political. And pretty popular politics at that.
By the way your link shows migration data. It isn't "White" replacement theory. It is weird you would post this link when Tucker Carlson can tell you all you need to know about "White" replacement theory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_genocide_conspiracy_theory '
White genocide anxiety", "white displacement anxiety", and, the most commonly referred to, "white extinction anxiety" or panic, is said to be one of the key driving forces behind the conspiracy theory and its supporters' adherence to it. The thesis, often cited as an explanation for some sections of white society's resistance to racial diversity, is reported as virtually inseparable from the conspiracy theory itself.
It's real but it's roots are not racially motivated. Rather it's a motivation to displace bad impoverish the native population to allow for the higher ups to gain more power and cheaper labor and to introduce more agreeable groups with no incentive for patriotism or loyalty and an incentive due to public assistance programs to vote in favor of more control and the best interest of the native born population.
Opinion
16Opinion
The term “politically incorrect” originated in the Soviet Union. Of course it is politically correct to bring it up if one disapproves. It is okay if you’re at the World Economic Forum talking about how the original European culture needs to be destroyed and mass migration is one of the tools to accomplish this. There is a double standard here.
The conspiracy theory stems from a maliciously misinterpreted section of Kalergi's book Praktischer Idealismus, in which he predicted that a mixed race of the future would arise: "The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."
Modern far-right individuals seek to draw relationships between contemporary European policy-making and this quote.
Austrian neo-Nazi writer Gerd Honsik wrote about the subject in his book Kalergi Plan (2005). The independent Italian newspaper Linkiesta investigated the conspiracy theory and described it as a hoax which is comparable to the fabricated anti-semitic document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I guess it would be safest to say that it is a strong theory which is gaining more and more factual support each month/year.
Rapid engineered cultural displacement is soft genocide. This has been known since the Germanics used it to rot the Roman Empire.
1) a theory is a set of facts that point to a conclusion. So technically you could be off to a better start than you think.
2) what’s so wrong with Replacement? If you’re pro capitalism you should be for “best man for the job.” Be they illegal immigrants or not. If you can’t compete with illegals, maybe you should be replaced.
I am sure it is not PC but like it is with a lot of stuff the democrats are trying to do , it will not be covered in the fake news.
yea you're right this time. replacement theory is simply fact. immigrants lower our wages and replace us economically and politically
well it's clearly happening. Really awkward how people on the left are trying to call it a conspiracy theory as it happens in front of our eyes while they support it.
White Western Europeans supplanted Native North and South Americans. That may be the answer.
I don’t really care about people moving to another place and living there
To some extent there is proof of the "theory"
But there is so much fear surrounding it as well.
People today are just generally ignorant.
Normally it's called genocide when a demographic is removed, displaced or otherwise rendered obsolete within a country. Considering this phenomena is only happening in White majority countries, it's hard to ignore or simply pass it off as a theory.
I found this interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/UYK_9gH7d7U
Why not call it ethnic cleansing?
What is replacement theory?
you sound like an Antis emic
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
You can also add your opinion below!
next time you want to spout your bullshit just be ready to deal with a history major